Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP  (Read 2965612 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

shosta

  • death to one's self
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12600 on: December 31, 2017, 09:04:26 PM »
Oscar Wilde quote: "If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh or they will kill you." Reminded me of benji. Cheers everyone, happy new year. Especially to Nola, who I feel bad about ignoring every time he makes a good counterpoint. I always mean to respond but end up forgetting about the conversation entirely.
每天生气

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12601 on: December 31, 2017, 11:32:41 PM »
Oscar Wilde quote: "If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh or they will kill you." Reminded me of benji. Cheers everyone, happy new year. Especially to Nola, who I feel bad about ignoring every time he makes a good counterpoint. I always mean to respond but end up forgetting about the conversation entirely.

Yeah, I’ve seen benji kill several people before, you do not wanna cross that guy.
©@©™

Assimilate

  • Now bringing you *Zen*
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12602 on: December 31, 2017, 11:51:34 PM »
where is benjiiiiiiiiii   :stahp

never underestimate someone that can make you laugh and cry at the same time.

one more brazilian fruit drink down the hole  :yuck

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12603 on: January 01, 2018, 05:34:50 PM »
where is benjiiiiiiiiii   :stahp

Mueller team got to him.
ὕβρις

shosta

  • death to one's self
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12604 on: January 01, 2018, 05:35:33 PM »
His activity always drops when a new quarter begins because he has to prepare and teach. Or maybe submitting grades.
每天生气

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12605 on: January 01, 2018, 05:38:02 PM »
Oh fuck, we're being GRADED?
rub

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12606 on: January 01, 2018, 05:55:39 PM »
Oh fuck, we're being GRADED?

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Wel all failed except Kara
[close]
ὕβρις

Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12607 on: January 01, 2018, 08:39:22 PM »
His activity always drops when a new quarter begins because he has to prepare and teach. Or maybe submitting grades.

OH YES.

An army of Benji's will soon be upon us.

 :cody :preach :mouf :rejoice

jorma

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12608 on: January 02, 2018, 08:27:45 AM »
I do love that people bring up Sweden when that country locked itself into isolation for years, making it a white ethno state of sorts, and then has war profiteering to thank for its financial basis. Progressive policy success right there.

I'm not sure how to wrap my head around this one. First, we never isolated ourselves. We've been roving all over the world in private enterprise since the viking era. It's just that no one was ever particularly interested in visiting us. Mostly because the "white ethno state" of Sweden was a peasant shithole with no economy, nothing interesting to see and the most distinguished mentally-challenged climate in the free world (besides maybe finland).

Staying of ww2 helped for sure, but we owe our current success almost entirely to a social democrat reign that combined promoting private enterprise with a good social safety net and perhaps most important of all - an actual and honest attempt to create a country with equality of opportunity. A gigantic project called "folkhemmet" that started in the 1930's or so and peaked when Olof Palme was assassinated in 1986.

So now you can post about Swedish financial successes in the future without sounding completely distinguished mentally-challenged.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12609 on: January 02, 2018, 11:15:17 AM »
Nailed it!
©@©™

Broseidon

  • Estado Homo
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12610 on: January 02, 2018, 11:53:50 AM »
The man would take credit for the Sun rising in the morning.
bent

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12611 on: January 02, 2018, 02:02:48 PM »
I do love that people bring up Sweden when that country locked itself into isolation for years, making it a white ethno state of sorts, and then has war profiteering to thank for its financial basis. Progressive policy success right there.

I'm not sure how to wrap my head around this one. First, we never isolated ourselves. We've been roving all over the world in private enterprise since the viking era. It's just that no one was ever particularly interested in visiting us. Mostly because the "white ethno state" of Sweden was a peasant shithole with no economy, nothing interesting to see and the most distinguished mentally-challenged climate in the free world (besides maybe finland).

Staying of ww2 helped for sure, but we owe our current success almost entirely to a social democrat reign that combined promoting private enterprise with a good social safety net and perhaps most important of all - an actual and honest attempt to create a country with equality of opportunity. A gigantic project called "folkhemmet" that started in the 1930's or so and peaked when Olof Palme was assassinated in 1986.

So now you can post about Swedish financial successes in the future without sounding completely distinguished mentally-challenged.

I said war profiteering, which you retranslated as staying out of wars. Nah, I'm talking about selling to the warring countries and allowing their troop movements.

Quote
In the Swiss wake, Portugal and Sweden have also arrived in the historical dock. Their governments' apparent lack of interest in the source of the Nazi gold they received in exchange for sales to Germany of tungsten, wood, sardines and iron ore has been widely criticized. As in Switzerland, the suspicion has emerged that they profited from the Nazi conquest, and genocide, and that their neutrality was simply a cloak for connivance.

''Sweden was not neutral, Sweden was weak,'' said Arne Ruth, a Swedish journalist who has written a book on the Third Reich. ''Its sales of iron ore made an important contribution to the German effort. It allowed German troops and weaponry through its territory to Norway. In 1943, its government told the central bank to ignore suspicions that German gold Sweden received was looted. What is interesting is that all these facts, more or less known for some time, are commanding such attention now.''

Your Folkhemmet is based on money made in the wars. That's how you began your welfare state. You had a low population and war profit. The seed of your social democracy comes from there.

Honestly, your "we've been exploring since the Vikings" sounds like some goofy school propaganda. Your country isolated itself from what was going on in the world but still lent out its mining and lumber industry to the war machines to make money in order to afford its welfare state.

You kind of agree, but you don't seem to get it. Your social democrat period is the isolation from world events in any way but profiteering. Your private industry is the profiteering.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12612 on: January 02, 2018, 02:23:03 PM »
Isolationism and war profiteering, what does it remind me of ? :thinking
At least they got a welfare state out of it.
ὕβρις

shosta

  • death to one's self
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12613 on: January 02, 2018, 05:13:59 PM »
Ok but the US got nukes and Vegas out of it. Money well spent.
每天生气

sinxtanx

  • Junior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12614 on: January 02, 2018, 05:28:42 PM »
as if Sweden wouldn't have sold that "tungsten, wood, sardines and iron ore" for profits in the hypothetical scenario where there was no war

get money -> tax that shit -> get welfare

I'm so bummed we don't have several generations of homeless veterans stalking the shadows ever watchful and protecting our homeland

shosta

  • death to one's self
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12615 on: January 02, 2018, 05:39:21 PM »
Sweden has a higher homelessness rate than the United States (about twice as much).
每天生气

sinxtanx

  • Junior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12616 on: January 02, 2018, 06:00:54 PM »
and they're not pulling their weight, I tell you

too busy receiving aid

edit: I got curious and looked up the most recent report on homelessness in Sweden and damn we have a generous definition
like "renting apartment second hand" generous
so the rate of "acute homelessness" aka "does not have home and lives in car/tent" was less than half
for the US I looked on wikipedia, and the US includes "home instability from hardship and/or domestic violence" in their definition which is similarly generous

anyway I was looking for numbers and the numbers I got was 34,000 / 10,000,000 = 0.34% homeless Sweden as of 2017(most generous available definition), 1,593,150 / 323,000,000 = 0.49% homeless USA as of 2010(most generous available definition)

granted, Obama could have fixed all that in the intervening time
« Last Edit: January 02, 2018, 06:31:01 PM by sinxtanx »

jorma

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12617 on: January 02, 2018, 07:07:30 PM »
I do love that people bring up Sweden when that country locked itself into isolation for years, making it a white ethno state of sorts, and then has war profiteering to thank for its financial basis. Progressive policy success right there.

I'm not sure how to wrap my head around this one. First, we never isolated ourselves. We've been roving all over the world in private enterprise since the viking era. It's just that no one was ever particularly interested in visiting us. Mostly because the "white ethno state" of Sweden was a peasant shithole with no economy, nothing interesting to see and the most distinguished mentally-challenged climate in the free world (besides maybe finland).

Staying of ww2 helped for sure, but we owe our current success almost entirely to a social democrat reign that combined promoting private enterprise with a good social safety net and perhaps most important of all - an actual and honest attempt to create a country with equality of opportunity. A gigantic project called "folkhemmet" that started in the 1930's or so and peaked when Olof Palme was assassinated in 1986.

So now you can post about Swedish financial successes in the future without sounding completely distinguished mentally-challenged.

I said war profiteering, which you retranslated as staying out of wars. Nah, I'm talking about selling to the warring countries and allowing their troop movements.

Quote
In the Swiss wake, Portugal and Sweden have also arrived in the historical dock. Their governments' apparent lack of interest in the source of the Nazi gold they received in exchange for sales to Germany of tungsten, wood, sardines and iron ore has been widely criticized. As in Switzerland, the suspicion has emerged that they profited from the Nazi conquest, and genocide, and that their neutrality was simply a cloak for connivance.

''Sweden was not neutral, Sweden was weak,'' said Arne Ruth, a Swedish journalist who has written a book on the Third Reich. ''Its sales of iron ore made an important contribution to the German effort. It allowed German troops and weaponry through its territory to Norway. In 1943, its government told the central bank to ignore suspicions that German gold Sweden received was looted. What is interesting is that all these facts, more or less known for some time, are commanding such attention now.''

Your Folkhemmet is based on money made in the wars. That's how you began your welfare state. You had a low population and war profit. The seed of your social democracy comes from there.

Honestly, your "we've been exploring since the Vikings" sounds like some goofy school propaganda. Your country isolated itself from what was going on in the world but still lent out its mining and lumber industry to the war machines to make money in order to afford its welfare state.

You kind of agree, but you don't seem to get it. Your social democrat period is the isolation from world events in any way but profiteering. Your private industry is the profiteering.

Quote
Your Folkhemmet is based on money made in the wars. That's how you began your welfare state. You had a low population and war profit. The seed of your social democracy comes from there.

But i just told you the basics of how, when and why the welfare state began. Why would you double down like this?

Yes, as i said we profited after the war because much unlike the rest of Europe we weren't bombed back to the stoneage. Our infrastructure was intact. So we got a head start. But folkhemmet had already been a work in progress for 20 years. It didn't begin or end with the war. You seem to want to reduce a multi-generational project to just 5 years during the war? It seems a bit dense to be honest.

Quote
So now you can post about Swedish financial successes in the future without sounding completely distinguished mentally-challenged.

I admit i was wrong here though. My bad and i take it back.

And your homeschooling tutor needs to explain the isolationist part a bit better, because i'm all wtf??? here.

Nintex

  • Boy's Club President
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12618 on: January 02, 2018, 07:33:44 PM »
http://twitter.com/thehill/status/948342664856068097

This is the best presidency ever  :usacry

"As I said in December, we won't forget the Jerusalem vote," Haley said at a news conference. "To that end, tomorrow night, we are having a reception for the countries who chose not to oppose the U.S. position [on Jerusalem]."
:trumps


Americans still prefer The Handmaid's Tale over Socialism

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/948347944562053121
🤴

shosta

  • death to one's self
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12619 on: January 02, 2018, 09:18:47 PM »
and they're not pulling their weight, I tell you

too busy receiving aid

edit: I got curious and looked up the most recent report on homelessness in Sweden and damn we have a generous definition
like "renting apartment second hand" generous
so the rate of "acute homelessness" aka "does not have home and lives in car/tent" was less than half
for the US I looked on wikipedia, and the US includes "home instability from hardship and/or domestic violence" in their definition which is similarly generous

anyway I was looking for numbers and the numbers I got was 34,000 / 10,000,000 = 0.34% homeless Sweden as of 2017(most generous available definition), 1,593,150 / 323,000,000 = 0.49% homeless USA as of 2010(most generous available definition)

granted, Obama could have fixed all that in the intervening time
You could just use the OCED numbers. http://www.oecd.org/els/family/HC3-1-Homeless-population.pdf
Quote
There  is  no  internationally  agreed definition of homelessness. Therefore, this  indicator presents a collection of available statistics on homelessness in OECD and EU countries in line with definitions used in national surveys (comparability issues on the data are discussed below). Some countries have different official definitions of homeless: they may use a definition for the purpose of data collection but use another one or several definitions for policy purposes, i.e. in the framework of policy measures aimed at tackling homelessness. In this indicator we refer only to the statistical definition used for data collection purposes.
If you look at the actual criteria later in the paper you'll see the definitions used for homeless in the United States and for Sweden are almost identical (shelters and transitional housing).
每天生气


Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12621 on: January 02, 2018, 09:30:41 PM »
Jfc


I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12623 on: January 02, 2018, 10:41:56 PM »
So supposedly with Hatch resigning there's a rumor that Mitt Romney might run as his replacement and Steve Bannon has said he'll campaign against Romney. I think Steve Bannon overthinks his power/influence. If Romney should run in Utah, him a favorite son of a strong mormon dynasty? It would take a miracle for him to lose.
que

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12624 on: January 03, 2018, 01:01:47 AM »
Agreed Romney will likely win. The Mormons love him.

Also... if there was a mole in the trump campaign feeding the FBI information, it’s likely this thing is not even close to being done.

Shrew

  • Junior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12625 on: January 03, 2018, 02:19:24 AM »
Yo! Yeah, you. Chronovore. You can say "Gay." It's cool. Gay people don't care.

I saw you say "Fuck this Fae Earth" instead of "Fuck this gay earth" earlier, and it was the gayest thing I've ever seen, like gay people would get mad if you said "gay". Fuck me, do you dorks ever hang out with real life people, do understand what real life people go through. We got bills to pay, mouths to feed. Rent to pay. Fuckin online shit. Yo you dudes need to get out on the streets, get in touch. It's good for you I swear, they aren'r\t just symbols you talk about they're people and they're cool.

Hung with a Japanese dude. Didn't give a fuck about anime, he just wanted weed and pussy. Go figure. THE INTERNET LIED TO ME


Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12626 on: January 03, 2018, 02:29:05 AM »
Quote from: jorma
You seem to want to reduce a multi-generational project to just 5 years during the war? It seems a bit dense to be honest.

Welcome to the world of etoilet...Expect to take many “L’s” along the way.

seagrams hotsauce

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12627 on: January 03, 2018, 02:46:09 AM »
Yo! Yeah, you. Chronovore. You can say "Gay." It's cool. Gay people don't care.

I saw you say "Fuck this Fae Earth" instead of "Fuck this gay earth" earlier, and it was the gayest thing I've ever seen, like gay people would get mad if you said "gay". Fuck me, do you dorks ever hang out with real life people, do understand what real life people go through. We got bills to pay, mouths to feed. Rent to pay. Fuckin online shit. Yo you dudes need to get out on the streets, get in touch. It's good for you I swear, they aren'r\t just symbols you talk about they're people and they're cool.

Hung with a Japanese dude. Didn't give a fuck about anime, he just wanted weed and pussy. Go figure. THE INTERNET LIED TO ME



What's goin on here buddy

Shrew

  • Junior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12628 on: January 03, 2018, 03:04:32 AM »
Quote
What's goin on here buddy

It's ok to be gay. And the censorship of that on this forum is childish

"taco"

Just say taco, you fuckin feggits. It's fine. It's not an alt right thing, nobody cares, own it. Where have you been for the past 20 years?




Shrew

  • Junior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12629 on: January 03, 2018, 03:06:05 AM »
I mean, really


Shrew

  • Junior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12630 on: January 03, 2018, 03:09:43 AM »
Man. Posting on NeoGaf really did a number on you guys


VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12631 on: January 03, 2018, 03:11:26 AM »
Shrew has the BIGGER Button and it WORKS !
ὕβρις

Shrew

  • Junior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12632 on: January 03, 2018, 03:14:57 AM »
Shrew has the BIGGER Button and it WORKS !

It's true!

I see a bunch of links on this page and I'm like, "Who gives a fuck?"


Shrew

  • Junior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12633 on: January 03, 2018, 03:17:37 AM »
and they're not pulling their weight, I tell you

too busy receiving aid

edit: I got curious and looked up the most recent report on homelessness in Sweden and damn we have a generous definition
like "renting apartment second hand" generous
so the rate of "acute homelessness" aka "does not have home and lives in car/tent" was less than half
for the US I looked on wikipedia, and the US includes "home instability from hardship and/or domestic violence" in their definition which is similarly generous

anyway I was looking for numbers and the numbers I got was 34,000 / 10,000,000 = 0.34% homeless Sweden as of 2017(most generous available definition), 1,593,150 / 323,000,000 = 0.49% homeless USA as of 2010(most generous available definition)

granted, Obama could have fixed all that in the intervening time
You could just use the OCED numbers. http://www.oecd.org/els/family/HC3-1-Homeless-population.pdf
Quote
There  is  no  internationally  agreed definition of homelessness. Therefore, this  indicator presents a collection of available statistics on homelessness in OECD and EU countries in line with definitions used in national surveys (comparability issues on the data are discussed below). Some countries have different official definitions of homeless: they may use a definition for the purpose of data collection but use another one or several definitions for policy purposes, i.e. in the framework of policy measures aimed at tackling homelessness. In this indicator we refer only to the statistical definition used for data collection purposes.
If you look at the actual criteria later in the paper you'll see the definitions used for homeless in the United States and for Sweden are almost identical (shelters and transitional housing).

who gives a shit outside of people who hate trump





Shrew

  • Junior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12635 on: January 03, 2018, 03:29:51 AM »
For real, have you guys spent the whole year mad about nothing?

Shrew

  • Junior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12636 on: January 03, 2018, 03:55:08 AM »
I concur, you guys raise some valid points



team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12637 on: January 03, 2018, 04:37:35 AM »
 :trumps
*****

shosta

  • death to one's self
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12638 on: January 03, 2018, 05:01:19 AM »
make this thread great again
ban Shrew
每天生气

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12639 on: January 03, 2018, 07:54:45 AM »
Yo! Yeah, you. Chronovore. You can say "Gay." It's cool. Gay people don't care.

I saw you say "Fuck this Fae Earth" instead of "Fuck this gay earth" earlier, and it was the gayest thing I've ever seen, like gay people would get mad if you said "gay". Fuck me, do you dorks ever hang out with real life people, do understand what real life people go through. We got bills to pay, mouths to feed. Rent to pay. Fuckin online shit. Yo you dudes need to get out on the streets, get in touch. It's good for you I swear, they aren'r\t just symbols you talk about they're people and they're cool.

Hung with a Japanese dude. Didn't give a fuck about anime, he just wanted weed and pussy. Go figure. THE INTERNET LIED TO ME



Easy, son.

seagrams hotsauce

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12640 on: January 03, 2018, 08:05:35 AM »
The decline in quality of lunatics from Creepy Stalker to novid to this guy is really disappointing tbh

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12641 on: January 03, 2018, 08:34:50 AM »
Quality of lunatics has been down since Neil Armstrong.
ὕβρις

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12642 on: January 03, 2018, 09:01:31 AM »
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/948195478428102657

WHAT THE FUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCK

With this logic, he's responsible for the thousands of gun related deaths.
©ZH

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12643 on: January 03, 2018, 12:26:15 PM »
Quote
Donald Trump’s former chief strategist Steve Bannon has described the Trump Tower meeting between the president’s son and a group of Russians during the 2016 election campaign as “treasonous” and “unpatriotic”, according to an explosive new book seen by the Guardian.

Bannon, speaking to author Michael Wolff, warned that the investigation into alleged collusion with the Kremlin will focus on money laundering and predicted: “They’re going to crack Don Junior like an egg on national TV.”



Quote
He is particularly scathing about a June 2016 meeting involving Trump’s son Donald Jr, son-in-law Jared Kushner, then campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya at Trump Tower in New York.

Quote
“Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad shit, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately.”

Bannon went on, Wolff writes, to say that if any such meeting had to take place, it should have been set up “in a Holiday Inn in Manchester, New Hampshire, with your lawyers who meet with these people”. Any information, he said, could then be “dump[ed] … down to Breitbart or something like that, or maybe some other more legitimate publication”.

Bannon added: “You never see it, you never know it, because you don’t need to … But that’s the brain trust that they had.”

Quote
“You realise where this is going,” he is quoted as saying. “This is all about money laundering. Mueller chose [senior prosecutor Andrew] Weissmann first and he is a money-laundering guy. Their path to fucking Trump goes right through Paul Manafort, Don Jr and Jared Kushner … It’s as plain as a hair on your face.”

Last month it was reported that federal prosecutors had subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank, the German financial institution that has lent hundreds of millions of dollars to the Kushner property empire. Bannon continues: “It goes through Deutsche Bank and all the Kushner shit. The Kushner shit is greasy. They’re going to go right through that. They’re going to roll those two guys up and say play me or trade me.”

Scorning apparent White House insouciance, Bannon reaches for a hurricane metaphor: “They’re sitting on a beach trying to stop a Category Five.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/03/donald-trump-russia-steve-bannon-michael-wolff?CMP=share

Fusion GPS also has a story to tell it would seem.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/02/opinion/republicans-investigation-fusion-gps.html




Rats on a sinking ship? A moment of honesty from America’s greatest political strategist? Quotes soon to be labeled  fake news by the purveyors of honest journalism? The last gasp from the libs overcompensating for Hillary’s loss before the real story of Seth Rich and Uranium One breaks through?
« Last Edit: January 03, 2018, 12:32:38 PM by Nola »

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12644 on: January 03, 2018, 01:03:15 PM »
Shrew, we've been trolled worse by far better.
que

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12645 on: January 03, 2018, 01:22:04 PM »
Leper this filth

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
dog

Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12647 on: January 03, 2018, 01:41:40 PM »
Agy I'm serious your avatar legit triggers me.

 :trigger

Go pack to the pussy one. That one was pure win.

Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12648 on: January 03, 2018, 01:44:38 PM »
And now Trump and Bannon turn against one another.


The Sith always destroy themselves.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12649 on: January 03, 2018, 01:46:44 PM »
Is it too late for Breitbart to make the 2017 Fake News Awards (to be announced Monday) or could there be a last minute addition to the ballot?
©@©™

Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12650 on: January 03, 2018, 01:51:17 PM »

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12651 on: January 03, 2018, 01:57:31 PM »
Agy I'm serious your avatar legit triggers me.

 :trigger

Go pack to the pussy one. That one was pure win.

I am not defined by my avatars!!

Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12652 on: January 03, 2018, 02:10:51 PM »

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12653 on: January 03, 2018, 02:18:28 PM »
letthemfight.gif

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12654 on: January 03, 2018, 03:23:05 PM »
"... the most talented field ever assembled by the republican party." :neogaf

That's talent? :neogaf
©ZH

Skullfuckers Anonymous

  • Will hunt bullies for fruit baskets. PM for details.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12655 on: January 03, 2018, 03:35:17 PM »
"... the most talented field ever assembled by the republican party." :neogaf

That's talent? :neogaf

I mean they did have a Serial Killer, Guac Master, Waterboy, Baby Hitler savior and Jim Gilmore.

Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12656 on: January 03, 2018, 03:41:23 PM »
Dear god 2018 is off to a bombastic start. :heh :rejoice

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12657 on: January 03, 2018, 03:43:23 PM »
Deep State Steve Bannon  :nope
©@©™

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12658 on: January 03, 2018, 03:59:28 PM »
So, uh... what's the end goal here? Bannon wouldn't just say this crap without a benefit to himself.
rub

Skullfuckers Anonymous

  • Will hunt bullies for fruit baskets. PM for details.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| 2016 renewed for a 3rd season
« Reply #12659 on: January 03, 2018, 04:13:08 PM »
So, uh... what's the end goal here? Bannon wouldn't just say this crap without a benefit to himself.

I'm pretty sure all the recent Bannon quotes are stuff he said while working at the White House. Shit's about to get a lot more raw.