Uhhhh lol Africans also do well themselves. Arguably better than most inmigrants. They are among the best educated and many are doing very, very well for themselves. Still doesn't take away from the argument of white supremacy and they'll still be considered "ni.ggers." Times are better to be sure but at the end of the day, if the cops were called on an Asian or that Nigerian immigrant's son they'll likely use deadly force. When applying for a job they'll still be discriminated against. Hence, inferior. Never mind that Asian men are considered effemininate and weak and that it's better for an Asian girl to marry white. That argument is so bad. Lmao What a dumbass, who doesn't understand the basics of the concept he's talking about.
Maldito idiota.
You're right. The whole argument pretty much falls flat on its face by saying that no economic success would be the only symptom of white supremacy. The follow up question would be what exactly Colin believes white surpemacy is.
It is a dumb opinion but it's surprising that this earned him the Voldemort treatment while so many other people who say stupid shit aren't declared unmentionable
Well, it at least shows 'white supremacy' as a theory is inadequate. I think cindi misses the point a little on this. It is not simply that 'Asians' are successful, they
outperform whites in terms of academic achievement and job salary. And since people on the Left seem to take statisitics like this as evidence of an advantage, then using that same logic, Asians have advantages over whites in terms of academic achievement and ultimately job prospects. If we are to define 'White Supremacy' as a system of structural racism that privileges white people over all others, well not universally in all aspects of life. And not where it is most important either. Asians have an advantage in one of the places where it really counts.
One thing I find really annoying as well is the way it is dismissed as simply the 'token minority' as if like white people got together and conspired to make Asians the token minority or something. What's more, Asians as a category comprises people of many different countries. When Americans think of Asians, they tend to think of Koreans, Chinese, or Japanese, etc, but it also comprises Indians. And while Koreans, Chinese and Japanese you can say have similar characteristics, Indians are not only culturally different but significantly phenotypically different. There are no similarities. As if simply explaining it away by calling them the 'token minority' has any merit.
