Other Forums |OT| ♀ C O R E V A L U E S ♀ Sponsored By THQNordic

[Straight Edge]

I feel like this page would be improved with alternating posts between race realism discussion and Yakub

(Image removed from quote.)

So he’s The Leader from Incredible Hulk.

[Bore Expert]

Colorism

colorism

I prefer chartreuse over olive green.

I prefer every shade from cafe au lait to deep mocha.
 

[Cauliflower Of Love]

A fraud who’s been compromised by Russia. Anyone who still defends him is totally suspect.

SUS

[Propagandhim]

Talk about IQ is obviously an uncomfortable one. As a number of people may know, Sam Harris not that long back interviewed Charles Murray which he got a lot of flack for. In another podcast he mentioned that a lot of the people criticising him for interviewing Charles Murray would stop at the notion that intelligence is highly heritable. Here's the thing, this is the least contested part. Most scientists within the fields that study intelligence do not deny intelligence is highly heritable. What's more, we all kind of know this deep down. We know that not everyone can be a physicist, right? We all know deep down that some people are just naturally smart.

The heritability of IQ for adults is between 58% and 77%[5] (with some more-recent estimates as high as 80%[6] and 86%.[7]) Genome-wide association studies have identified inherited genome sequence differences that account for 20% of the 50% of the genetic variation that contributes to heritability.[8] IQ goes from being weakly correlated with genetics, for children, to being strongly correlated with genetics for late teens and adults. The heritability of IQ increases with age and reaches an asymptote at 18–20 years of age and continues at that level well into adulthood. This phenomenon is known as the Wilson Effect.[9] Recent studies suggest that family and parenting characteristics are not significant contributors to variation in IQ scores;[10] however, poor prenatal environment, malnutrition and disease can have deleterious effects.[11][12]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ

It is a politically sensitive subject for obvious reasons. Something that should be noted is that variation within groups is far greater than between groups. In other words just because average IQ within a group may be lower, it doesn't mean there aren't really smart people in that group. What this means is that it is always best to judge people as individuals because the average IQ of a group does not tell you anything about any given individual within that group.

I do worry about the way the Left is dealing with it actually: The view that any disparities within statistical data is mostly down to structural racism or sexism, and the constant push for parity, is inevitably going to lead to some people overstating the genetic element, and in very ugly ways. If the Left just focused their efforts on removing the barriers to entry and potential biases, and not so much on achieving parity, you could avoid the discussion altogether, which is what they want to do anyway. And it is perfectly understandable why they don't want the discussion to begin with. The problem is, the type of politics used by the left doesn't really allow for that; it's too confrontational. When your rhetoric implies everything is the fault of 'white people' and ignores any other factors, it is inevitable that some people are going to say, "hold on a minute, maybe IQ has something to do with it?" or "maybe there are biological differences between the sexes?".

Wait a second, wait a second.  Jewish people, who are .2% of the world's population but 22.5% of the population of those awarded the Nobel Prize are not just raising their kids approximately 2423 times better than the general population?   I knew they were colluding with each other!   

[Transhuman]

Kiwifarm wasn't enough for you? How many stalking community do you need?

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a bit of cross-community good will and synergy.

Imagine spending your life stalking people online and signing up to more sites to stalk them more.

Call it silly, but seeing people enjoy something you made has been oddly rewarding.

The site is cool and all... but I see Kiwifarms and I just see a hate site. From what little i've seen, the people with a conscience over there are few and far between. Whereas on thebore, Resetera is just like a trashy tv show we can't help but watch. Here we're only a hate site in the sense that we hate ourselves.

[PogiJones]

Olive green is the worst color.

Why would you choose this?




Dark yellow is pretty bad too.

[Rufus]

Wait a second, wait a second.  Jewish people, who are .2% of the world's population but 22.5% of the population of those awarded the Nobel Prize are not just raising their kids approximately 2423 times better than the general population?   I knew they were colluding with each other!   

however, poor prenatal environment, malnutrition and disease can have deleterious effects.[11][12]

:B

[Propagandhim]

Wait a second, wait a second.  Jewish people, who are .2% of the world's population but 22.5% of the population of those awarded the Nobel Prize are not just raising their kids approximately 2423 times better than the general population?   I knew they were colluding with each other!   

however, poor prenatal environment, malnutrition and disease can have deleterious effects.[11][12]

:B

I wasn't talking about poor, disease-ridden malnutritioned people.  I was talking about the general population, which includes the cross-section of non-Jewish white people that are much less likely to attend Ivy Leagues or win the Nobel Prize as a representation of their population size than Jewish people.   What accounts for that?

[agrajag]

Olive green is the worst color.

Why would you choose this?

(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)


Dark yellow is pretty bad too.

(Image removed from quote.)

I wasn't's when was the right moment to post this, until now. I find the Gucci brand colors ugly as fuck.



What a horrible color combination! Come at me nudemac.

[Rufus]

I wasn't talking about poor, disease-ridden malnutritioned people.  I was talking about the general population, which includes the cross-section of non-Jewish white people that are much less likely to attend Ivy Leagues or win the Nobel Prize as a representation of their population size than Jewish people.   What accounts for that?

I suppose I should have bolded parental environment.

[PogiJones]

Looks like desaturated Christmas

[agrajag]

According to these IQ hirarchy people, races are like RPG classes

Like, Asians are the smartest, but they are scrawny and weak, and have small penises. I guess they would be mages.

Blacks are athletic and well endowed, but lacking in wits, they are warriors.

White people are not particularly great at anything, but they are well rounded and can appropriate from other cultures. I guess they should be the paladin class.

[Switters]

I had to google careposting because I'm old. God help you if you carepost.

[marrec]

According to these IQ hirarchy people, races are like RPG classes

Like, Asians are the smartest, but they are scrawny and weak, and have small penises. I guess they would be mages.

Blacks are athletic and well endowed, but lacking in wits, they are warriors.

White people are not particularly great at anything, but they are well rounded and can appropriate from other cultures. I guess they should be the paladin class.

Finally I am a white knight

 

[Propagandhim]

According to these IQ hirarchy people, races are like RPG classes

Like, Asians are the smartest, but they are scrawny and weak, and have small penises. I guess they would be mages.

Blacks are athletic and well endowed, but lacking in wits, they are warriors.

White people are not particularly great at anything, but they are well rounded and can appropriate from other cultures. I guess they should be the paladin class.

https://twitter.com/gamespite/status/1023419903578136577

[Jansen]

Add Leadbelly to the list

[Cauliflower Of Love]

damn pogi

nsfw those pictures

[Propagandhim]

I wasn't talking about poor, disease-ridden malnutritioned people.  I was talking about the general population, which includes the cross-section of non-Jewish white people that are much less likely to attend Ivy Leagues or win the Nobel Prize as a representation of their population size than Jewish people.   What accounts for that?

I suppose I should have bolded parental environment.

Why do white people have an exponentially worse pre-natal environment than Jews?  Kosher food improves placenta quality?

[Transhuman]

Olive green is the worst color.

Why would you choose this?

Dark yellow is pretty bad too

Olive green

 

Dark yellow

 

Pretending you can afford to be picky

 

[PogiJones]

A couple good green colors for comparison



Compared to



If you want earthy, go brown



Don't go olive green.

[agrajag]

What the fuck is that second one, is she some fucking forest elf nymth?

[Momo]

[marrec]

Add Leadbelly to the list

I think Leadbelly is just legitimately intellectually curious but has not done enough research to understand what heritability would mean in this context compared to environmental factors.

I swear this is my last post on the subject

[HardcoreRetro]

The olive green looks the best out of that bunch.

[Rufus]

Why do white people have an exponentially worse pre-natal environment than Jews?  Kosher food improves placenta quality?

I read prenatal as parental and assumed to have found a contradiction in the quote. That's all. And if I had bolded it, I would have spotted it.

I'm gonna go sit in front of a fan now...

[PogiJones]

I think the dress style of the olive green is the best, but the color is absolutely the worst

[Transhuman]

I think the dress style of the olive green is the best, but the color is absolutely the worst

https://gfycat.com/InsistentVariableKillifish

Olive green 4 lyfe

[agrajag]

I'll take the brown one. Wait, we're talking about dresses?

[Propagandhim]

Why do white people have an exponentially worse pre-natal environment than Jews?  Kosher food improves placenta quality?

I read prenatal as parental and assumed to have found a contradiction in the quote. That's all. And if I had bolded it, I would have spotted it.

I'm gonna go sit in front of a fan now...

 

[Cauliflower Of Love]

is pogi trolling me so I will read his posts?

[Transhuman]

What the fuck is that second one, is she some fucking forest elf nymth?

Nah she's about to terrorise Gotham for not being eco-friendly.

[Joe Molotov]

Olive Garden > *

[PogiJones]

Honestly I think the model is making the olive green look way better than it actually does


Here:

[Raist]

I think the dress style of the olive green is the best, but the color is absolutely the worst

https://gfycat.com/InsistentVariableKillifish

Olive green 4 lyfe

[agrajag]

Olive Garden > *

User banned (duration pending): shilling for non-Yum! Brands restaurant chains.

[Cauliflower Of Love]

Honestly I think the model is making the olive green look way better than it actually does


Here:

(Image removed from quote.)

[stufte]

Honestly I think the model is making the olive green look way better than it actually does


Here:

(Image removed from quote.)

No carpet to match the drapes. niiiicccceee. 

[Nintex]

But what about Eva Green

[Joe Molotov]

Olive Garden > *

User banned (duration pending): shilling for non-Yum! Brands restaurant chains.

I feel like Olive Garden, along with it's former sister restaurant Red Lobster, are spiritually Yum! Brands.

[PogiJones]

I mean, come on. It's the worst.

[stufte]

But what about Eva Green
(Image removed from quote.)

 

[thetylerrob]

Is pogo joking or does he not understand how skin tone matters in fashion? Maybe he’s color blind?

[Jenkem]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/apple-beats-estimates-races-towards-1-trillion-market-value.59091/#post-10976528

You think Apple has only done a little for society?

Apple creating the modern smart phone did massive stuff for society.

Massive stuff.

ruined the internet by giving every fat slob with a phone access to it?

[stufte]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/apple-beats-estimates-races-towards-1-trillion-market-value.59091/#post-10976528

You think Apple has only done a little for society?

Apple creating the modern smart phone did massive stuff for society.

Massive stuff.

ruined the internet by giving every fat slob with a phone access to it?

Massive stuff like leveling up slacktivism with the ability to tweet your disgust of capitalism from the comfort of your papasan.

[Propagandhim]

It's insane how you guys are still posting green shit.   Contrast this dump to NeoGAF - A veritable Lyceum, where members of savoir faire are holding court in lectures on philosophy, politics, mathematics, and race realism.   Dipshits.

[PogiJones]

I never joke about clothing articles irrelevant to me

[PogiJones]

I rest my case

[agrajag]

Remember all those gaf threads about how nazis had the best fashion? 

[Cauliflower Of Love]

(Image removed from quote.)


I rest my case

That guy in the middle is like "fuck, they got me on film.

[Atramental]

I had to google careposting because I'm old. God help you if you carepost.

(Image removed from quote.)

"the african word is banned here, you know what it is."

Hmm.

[VomKriege]

I wasn't talking about poor, disease-ridden malnutritioned people.  I was talking about the general population, which includes the cross-section of non-Jewish white people that are much less likely to attend Ivy Leagues or win the Nobel Prize as a representation of their population size than Jewish people.   What accounts for that?

I suppose I should have bolded parental environment.

Why do white people have an exponentially worse pre-natal environment than Jews?  Kosher food improves placenta quality?

Israel is a white nationalist state, so that should mean Jews are white, right?

Only when convenient.

[VomKriege]

Apple deserves every dollar and every ounce of it's success. It's detractors are proven wrong time and time again, literally every single second of every day, for the past few decades.

Their continued success isn't the result of some massive conspiracy, a fluke, or fanboyism. They make a shitload of money, because a shitload of people buy their products, regardless of the mockery and outrage of a tiny minority (often monetized) on the internet who have never really understood Apple to begin with, and never will. People confidently proclaim that every single product it releases is it's "worst ever" (which goes on to get fantastic reviews and becomes the industry standard, with design and functionality aped by everyone) and that the company is just inches away from downfall, this time. Rinse and repeat.

Meanwhile, Apple smashes records each quarter, and people like to pretend this comes easily and is no big deal. There's a reason people keep choosing Apple products while its pricing is on the upper end of the spectrum, and while it competes against the biggest companies on the planet in the most competitive industry. It's because even though their software/hardware isn't perfect, it's consistently leagues better than pretty much everything else out there. People here can mock and deny this statement all their want, but they have yet to come up with a more rational and plausible scenario for Apple's continued record-breaking success. Obviously, they're doing A LOT right, and their most controversial decisions are pretty much always geared towards the long term.

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

[BIONIC]

I had to google careposting because I'm old. God help you if you carepost.

(Image removed from quote.)

"the african word is banned here, you know what it is."

Hmm.

[jorma]

i would mate with all of those colours

[stufte]

i would mate with all of those colours

racist much?

wow.

[Broseidon]

(Image removed from quote.)

I mean, come on. It's the worst.

I don't remember this Mirrors Edge level

[Broseidon]

Apple deserves every dollar and every ounce of it's success. It's detractors are proven wrong time and time again, literally every single second of every day, for the past few decades.

Their continued success isn't the result of some massive conspiracy, a fluke, or fanboyism. They make a shitload of money, because a shitload of people buy their products, regardless of the mockery and outrage of a tiny minority (often monetized) on the internet who have never really understood Apple to begin with, and never will. People confidently proclaim that every single product it releases is it's "worst ever" (which goes on to get fantastic reviews and becomes the industry standard, with design and functionality aped by everyone) and that the company is just inches away from downfall, this time. Rinse and repeat.

Meanwhile, Apple smashes records each quarter, and people like to pretend this comes easily and is no big deal. There's a reason people keep choosing Apple products while its pricing is on the upper end of the spectrum, and while it competes against the biggest companies on the planet in the most competitive industry. It's because even though their software/hardware isn't perfect, it's consistently leagues better than pretty much everything else out there. People here can mock and deny this statement all their want, but they have yet to come up with a more rational and plausible scenario for Apple's continued record-breaking success. Obviously, they're doing A LOT right, and their most controversial decisions are pretty much always geared towards the long term.

Look at this Marxist-Leninist screed typical of anti-RevisionEra

[Raist]

The funny part is how they’re so convinced how the ~30,000 indictments will come for Hillary Clinton and the liberal / Hollywood establishment any week now. They’ve been keeping up that fantasy since last year, and it’s always just around the corner.

https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/sealed-indictments-qanon-conspiracy/

Somehow this sounds amusingly familiar

[agrajag]

Yes, I remember when I was 12 and shilled for my favorite corporations too.

[Optimus]

Talk about IQ is obviously an uncomfortable one. As a number of people may know, Sam Harris not that long back interviewed Charles Murray which he got a lot of flack for. In another podcast he mentioned that a lot of the people criticising him for interviewing Charles Murray would stop at the notion that intelligence is highly heritable. Here's the thing, this is the least contested part. Most scientists within the fields that study intelligence do not deny intelligence is highly heritable. What's more, we all kind of know this deep down. We know that not everyone can be a physicist, right? We all know deep down that some people are just naturally smart.

The heritability of IQ for adults is between 58% and 77%[5] (with some more-recent estimates as high as 80%[6] and 86%.[7]) Genome-wide association studies have identified inherited genome sequence differences that account for 20% of the 50% of the genetic variation that contributes to heritability.[8] IQ goes from being weakly correlated with genetics, for children, to being strongly correlated with genetics for late teens and adults. The heritability of IQ increases with age and reaches an asymptote at 18–20 years of age and continues at that level well into adulthood. This phenomenon is known as the Wilson Effect.[9] Recent studies suggest that family and parenting characteristics are not significant contributors to variation in IQ scores;[10] however, poor prenatal environment, malnutrition and disease can have deleterious effects.[11][12]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ

It is a politically sensitive subject for obvious reasons. Something that should be noted is that variation within groups is far greater than between groups. In other words just because average IQ within a group may be lower, it doesn't mean there aren't really smart people in that group. What this means is that it is always best to judge people as individuals because the average IQ of a group does not tell you anything about any given individual within that group.

I do worry about the way the Left is dealing with it actually: The view that any disparities within statistical data is mostly down to structural racism or sexism, and the constant push for parity, is inevitably going to lead to some people overstating the genetic element, and in very ugly ways. If the Left just focused their efforts on removing the barriers to entry and potential biases, and not so much on achieving parity, you could avoid the discussion altogether, which is what they want to do anyway. And it is perfectly understandable why they don't want the discussion to begin with. The problem is, the type of politics used by the left doesn't really allow for that; it's too confrontational. When your rhetoric implies everything is the fault of 'white people' and ignores any other factors, it is inevitable that some people are going to say, "hold on a minute, maybe IQ has something to do with it?" or "maybe there are biological differences between the sexes?".

Exactly and this is what separates idiot racists from the people who just accept certain inconvenient results. The problem is that even though the difference is pretty huge it's also nuanced and, like you said, the more identity politics loons push their ideology the more the right will be forced to respond and the more stuff like this will come to the surface. And let's face it, the right or in fact the average Joe aren't very good at making important distinctions or processing stuff like this rationally or critically so this could turn really ugly.

As per usual SJWs are often causing the opposite outcomes of what they're trying to achieve with their idiotic tactics and narrative which again confirms my theory that they and the far-right are feeding off each other pushing more and more people to the edges of the political spectrum.


Also, olive green is a godless color only the colorblind would defend.