Author Topic: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.  (Read 219312 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.



curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1922 on: April 27, 2020, 03:16:26 PM »
Might be bored enough to try to make sense of value form theory  :thinking

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1923 on: April 28, 2020, 11:23:10 PM »
 yet to unravel the mysteries of value form theory but this article that's somewhat related is really good:

https://nplusonemag.com/issue-28/reviews/the-bleak-left/

Touches on VFT but mainly it's about the big problem in nu-Socialism, the decline of the wage-earning industrial class that was supposed to deliver the revolution


toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member


VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1927 on: April 30, 2020, 08:42:02 PM »
4 more years and Daou is becoming Maoist News Network 2.
ὕβρις


OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1929 on: April 30, 2020, 11:12:06 PM »
https://twitter.com/ExtraSmallRobin/status/1255800047154925569

Idk if we're gonna make it past May.

the virus wasn't a real virus, but NANOMACHINES created by a megacorp with various goals including manipulation of politicians
 :comeon

remy

  • my hog is small but it is mighty
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1930 on: April 30, 2020, 11:55:11 PM »
https://twitter.com/ExtraSmallRobin/status/1255800047154925569

Idk if we're gonna make it past May.

the virus wasn't a real virus, but NANOMACHINES created by a megacorp with various goals including manipulation of politicians
 :comeon
different to corona how?????????

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1931 on: April 30, 2020, 11:59:17 PM »
One wasn't spread by 5G.

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
https://twitter.com/ExtraSmallRobin/status/1255800047154925569

Idk if we're gonna make it past May.

the virus wasn't a real virus, but NANOMACHINES created by a megacorp with various goals including manipulation of politicians
 :comeon
different to corona how?????????

where is my fucking augmented vision

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
The Intercept being worth that much in the first place :existential

jakefromstatefarm

  • Senior Member
are you guys materialists? like wrt general ontology, do you think that everything there is is reductively physical? ive been bored and am wondering whether its necessary to be if you wanna employ something like histmat

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Nah, I'm a straddler who says while everything should be able to be reduced we don't (at least yet) have the capability to comprehend or understand it as such so our only recourse is theoretical.


Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Welp, I've spent a lot of the quarantine in the idealist world while comparing and contrasting with the relevant left philosophy but: My take is that we basically don't know in the end wrt ontology and may never know but i came out with more questions (how stable are the boundaries between natural science and social science really?) than answers. ussr and prc thinkers had a lot of thoughts about this and i haven't taken a strict line but one thing i really do agree with is the idea that material circumstances shape ideology and consciousness and in that respect acknowledging this is essential for both analysis of history and political action. but TBH i'll have to check back with you in a year or something.

:mjcry
I've settled on this being true regardless of any heavy reading I won't do anyway. Can't see how it wouldn't be. Can't escape the meat prison and all its needs.

Crash Dummy

  • teleiophile
  • Member
are you guys materialists? like wrt general ontology, do you think that everything there is is reductively physical? ive been bored and am wondering whether its necessary to be if you wanna employ something like histmat
I had way too religious an upbringing


shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
are you guys materialists? like wrt general ontology, do you think that everything there is is reductively physical? ive been bored and am wondering whether its necessary to be if you wanna employ something like histmat
https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1256733482501447685
每天生气

jakefromstatefarm

  • Senior Member
you can still think all the facts are physical!


shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
you can still think all the facts are physical!
currently imagining a monkey named entailment with a long ass tail that physically pushes the premises together

that's the world I want to live in
每天生气

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Look, it's all well and good but we have strong intelligence that Chavismo escaped from a Cuban lab.
ὕβρις

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
每天生气

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
©@©™

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Don't know if this got posted anywhere, figured it's most relevant to the political economy thread:

https://mobile.twitter.com/JStein_WaPo/status/1257303959229943808

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
It's rare enough that I can only say : Kudos for speaking his mind and walking the walk.
ὕβρις


jakefromstatefarm

  • Senior Member
there’s ~60 pages in the cambridge companion to the roman economy and another ~30 in the cambridge economic history of rome dedicated to production. beyond some general and comparative surveys i could give you, idk much else wrt commodities

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
每天生气

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
I know he's just another idiot on the internet but Matt Stoller scares the shit out of me.
每天生气

Mandark

  • Icon
Briahna Gray was on Twitter defending that discussion.

:spin

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
So is the takeaway that Progressives can compromise, or is that compromise is bad when it's the wrong people compromising?

Mandark

  • Icon
hell yeah I was worried nobody was going to step up and defend stoller

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Quote
Not all Republicans are racist
You could call 90% of them racist and still satisfy the catch. Meanwhile Repubs have to eat the bigger pill, the only thing trickling down is you pissing yourself.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
So is the takeaway that Progressives can compromise, or is that compromise is bad when it's the wrong people compromising?
https://twitter.com/bigbossserdar/status/1257595848659173381
每天生气

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
tfw I let down my guard and now my ass is a china vassal  :(

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
What about a Josh Hawley ticket with Matt Stoller, Briahna Joy Gray, Stephanie Kelton, and Matt Pompeo in the cabinet
每天生气

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
*****

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Trostkyite  :obama
dog

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
 :-\
*****

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
The first thing the JDPON should do when it takes power is outlaw keurig cups.
每天生气

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Is there a chart for tea drinkers? Or is that automatically like Juche or something.

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
*****

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
 :nope
dog

jakefromstatefarm

  • Senior Member
re: ted cruz’ admiration for gordon wood from a couple days back, ive been going through Creation of the American Republic and the denouement is a rare moment of lucidity from someone who usually paints a really nauseating starry-eyed narrative of america

Quote
By using the most popular and democratic rhetoric available to explain and justify their aristocratic system, the Federalists [viz. the supporters for the ratification of the Constitution in the late 1780s, not the supporters of the Washington and Adams administrations of the 1790s] helped to foreclose the development of an American intellectual tradition in which differing ideas of politics would be intimately and genuinely related to differing social interests. In other words, the Federalists in 1787 hastened the destruction of whatever chance there was in America for the growth of an avowedly aristocratic conception of politics and thereby contributed to the creation of that encompassing liberal tradition which has mitigated and often obscured the real social antagonisms of American politics. By attempting to confront and distinguished mentally-challenged fellow the thrust of the Revolution with the rhetoric of the Revolution the Federalists fixed the terms for the future discussion of American politics. They thus brought the ideology of the Revolution to consummation and created a distinctly American political theory but only at the cost of eventually impoverishing later American political thought.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
每天生气

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
dog

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
每天生气

jakefromstatefarm

  • Senior Member
reminds me of the slatestarcodex utilitarian tradcath on reddit i check in on every time i need to put myself into an aneurysm coma

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
*****


shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Please post socialist/communist literature for someone that has read the Manifesto and Einstein's socialism essay. I guess Das Kapital?
short answer is Lenin's state and revolution.

Don't read Das Kapital unless you want to be an econ dork. Even if you like economics you're better off sticking with Keynesian authors and supplementing that with Marxist analyses of trade relationships, developmental economics, and so on.
每天生气

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
czech good vibes thread
*****

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Reading Marx's writings that aren't Kapital or Manifesto is a good intermediate step (18th Brumaire, German Ideology, Gotha program, etc.)

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member


I have a copy of this in my house :yeshrug

Now, that doesn't mean it's good, but
每天生气

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
where's that kara post about the intro to commy canon...