In which case, the bad faith that was sewn has reaped no emotional response whatsoever. Either way, they don't get what they want, and I am satisfied.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
https://twitter.com/jewcommie/status/1255308398507278336
https://twitter.com/ExtraSmallRobin/status/1255800047154925569Idk if we're gonna make it past May.
Quote from: toku on April 30, 2020, 05:29:07 PMhttps://twitter.com/ExtraSmallRobin/status/1255800047154925569Idk if we're gonna make it past May.the virus wasn't a real virus, but NANOMACHINES created by a megacorp with various goals including manipulation of politicians
Quote from: OnlyRegret on April 30, 2020, 11:12:06 PMQuote from: toku on April 30, 2020, 05:29:07 PMhttps://twitter.com/ExtraSmallRobin/status/1255800047154925569Idk if we're gonna make it past May.the virus wasn't a real virus, but NANOMACHINES created by a megacorp with various goals including manipulation of politicians different to corona how???
Welp, I've spent a lot of the quarantine in the idealist world while comparing and contrasting with the relevant left philosophy but: My take is that we basically don't know in the end wrt ontology and may never know but i came out with more questions (how stable are the boundaries between natural science and social science really?) than answers. ussr and prc thinkers had a lot of thoughts about this and i haven't taken a strict line but one thing i really do agree with is the idea that material circumstances shape ideology and consciousness and in that respect acknowledging this is essential for both analysis of history and political action. but TBH i'll have to check back with you in a year or something.
are you guys materialists? like wrt general ontology, do you think that everything there is is reductively physical? ive been bored and am wondering whether its necessary to be if you wanna employ something like histmat
you can still think all the facts are physical!
https://twitter.com/camilateleSUR/status/1256963936093683712didnt know where to post this one
Not all Republicans are racist
So is the takeaway that Progressives can compromise, or is that compromise is bad when it's the wrong people compromising?
By using the most popular and democratic rhetoric available to explain and justify their aristocratic system, the Federalists [viz. the supporters for the ratification of the Constitution in the late 1780s, not the supporters of the Washington and Adams administrations of the 1790s] helped to foreclose the development of an American intellectual tradition in which differing ideas of politics would be intimately and genuinely related to differing social interests. In other words, the Federalists in 1787 hastened the destruction of whatever chance there was in America for the growth of an avowedly aristocratic conception of politics and thereby contributed to the creation of that encompassing liberal tradition which has mitigated and often obscured the real social antagonisms of American politics. By attempting to confront and distinguished mentally-challenged fellow the thrust of the Revolution with the rhetoric of the Revolution the Federalists fixed the terms for the future discussion of American politics. They thus brought the ideology of the Revolution to consummation and created a distinctly American political theory but only at the cost of eventually impoverishing later American political thought.
Please post socialist/communist literature for someone that has read the Manifesto and Einstein's socialism essay. I guess Das Kapital?