Tasty: If boycotting amazon makes someone feel like they are contributing to something, then that's fine. I don't expect people to be 100% consistent in all aspects of everything. A "vegan" who once a year eats a steak isn't erasing the 364.75 days of the year they are more ethically consuming.
What I'm making fun of in this thread is people posting on a video game forum doing things like demanding Polygon don't link to Prime Deals; they are expecting all of this 100% perfect activism when the very forum they are posting on represents all kinds of problematic capitalism.
In the end it makes it all feel like virtue signaling, and not real activism.
"B-b-but the website you are posting on is hosted on amazon" = lame BS to me.. but that's exactly what resetera users are doing right now.. on a forum hosted on AWS.
Agreed, although I will say the perspective shifts depending on whether you consider product boycotts as virtue signalling and/or slacktivism vs. "real" activism. And it's a sliding scale for every issue like this... does forcing everyone to have separate bins for recycling actually do any good?
Probably not, so I can see someone criticizing me for doing so as "virtue signaling." On the other coin of the hand, boycotts have been known to work (depending on the product, company, and goals involved.)
But I agree with you in this instance. Resetera has become a good case study on outrage culture.