Author Topic: YANG GANG 2024  (Read 42731 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #300 on: June 20, 2019, 12:37:38 PM »
So this website is totally a libertarian front group, right?

Will post results in the U.S. politics thread I think.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #301 on: June 20, 2019, 12:41:47 PM »
how heavily do they weigh the "which candidate are you planning to vote for in 2020" question?  :doge

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #302 on: June 20, 2019, 12:45:00 PM »
WTF why is Gary Johnson in the results. :lol
Hi

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #303 on: June 20, 2019, 12:55:19 PM »
So this website is totally a libertarian front group, right?
yeah, it was at one time, not sure how much it's worked that out of its system as they added requested stuff

it seems like the only one of these silly quizzes to really be updated so far

this one is even worse: http://www.selectsmart.com/president/

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #304 on: June 20, 2019, 01:10:41 PM »
It asks "Should gay marriage be legal?" even though a conservative Supreme Court said it was (probably because you can answer that question with all sorts of impractical but "nuanced" lolbertarian responses like "the government shouldn't marry anyone at all :hmph") but it doesn't ask about Medicare for All.

Then there's the political compass where Donald Trump isn't "authoritarian" but Gary Johnson is an economic centrist. :doge

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #305 on: June 20, 2019, 01:22:40 PM »
yeah it needs to be updated more since 2016, there's a question that asks if we should declare war on ISIS and stuff about Syria and Yemen where you know what the answers "mean" but need to be reworded at the very least

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #306 on: June 22, 2019, 09:28:49 PM »

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #307 on: June 22, 2019, 10:22:50 PM »
 :jawalrus
Hi

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #308 on: June 27, 2019, 11:49:44 PM »
We are sorry to inform our viewers that due to a death on the cast, "YANG GANG 2020" cannot finish out the rest of its season. "The Black Power Mixtape 1967-1975 with Marianne Williamson" has been moved to its 11PM timeslot.
每天生气

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #309 on: June 28, 2019, 09:18:36 AM »
The $1000 per month for every American has been replaced with a Steam sale.
dog

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #310 on: August 10, 2019, 05:25:09 PM »
RISE FROM YOUR GRAVE
dog

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #311 on: August 10, 2019, 05:28:51 PM »
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1160253482424684544

this thread's got at least three months left in it :lol
每天生气

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #312 on: August 10, 2019, 05:29:01 PM »
yaaaaaaangdemonium

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #313 on: August 10, 2019, 05:29:17 PM »
Yang Gang stronger than ever.

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #314 on: August 10, 2019, 05:33:38 PM »
:lol Honestly my raging hate on for a psudeo-Dem candidate is for Delaney nowadays. :-[
Hi

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #315 on: August 10, 2019, 05:36:47 PM »
每天生气

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #316 on: August 10, 2019, 05:40:23 PM »
Shonda brazenly stealing my reposts

Raist

  • Winner of the Baited Award 2018
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #317 on: August 11, 2019, 03:53:13 AM »

EightBitNate

  • I don’t wanna be horny anymore, I wanna be happy
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #318 on: August 11, 2019, 11:00:08 AM »
Yang went up 30000 followers after that Elon Musk tweet :o

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #319 on: August 11, 2019, 01:54:23 PM »
Instead of Clinton conspiracies this possible occupant of the White House would tweet animu waifu's and #grabthebag memes all day.  :bowsette

My guess is that he hasn't considered what a $1000 each month will do for the illegal drug trade.  :lol
🤴

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #320 on: August 11, 2019, 02:29:47 PM »
Can't wait to see what the Biden campaign think is "a popular, hip podcast in touch with the zeitgeist" when they'll want in on that train.
ὕβρις

BisMarckie

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #321 on: August 11, 2019, 02:30:33 PM »
Can't wait to see what the Biden campaign think is "a popular, hip podcast in touch with the zeitgeist" when they'll want in on that train.

Does seniorforums.com have a podcast?

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #322 on: August 11, 2019, 02:33:48 PM »
Can't wait to see what the Biden campaign think is "a popular, hip podcast in touch with the zeitgeist" when they'll want in on that train.

Does seniorforums.com have a podcast?

Only on the AM band.
ὕβρις

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member

EightBitNate

  • I don’t wanna be horny anymore, I wanna be happy
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #324 on: August 11, 2019, 10:22:58 PM »
I’ve only heard of Sam Seder because someone linked him here once. I’ve been trying to give his commentary a shot but he’s so blatantly pro-Sanders I have trouble even getting into it. It’s fine to favor a candidate, but it’s so tiresome hearing them only speak positively about a single person.
« Last Edit: August 11, 2019, 10:39:14 PM by EightBitNate »

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #325 on: August 11, 2019, 10:31:44 PM »
Seder is also very pro-Warren.

EightBitNate

  • I don’t wanna be horny anymore, I wanna be happy
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #326 on: August 11, 2019, 10:40:18 PM »
Seder is also very pro-Warren.

I feel like that’s more to do with how similar Warren/Sanders are. You can’t not sound like a hypocrite by praising one and bashing the other.

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #327 on: August 11, 2019, 10:45:26 PM »
Warren and Sanders come from different perspectives on the left side. Warren's view is that you can basically reform the current system and slap down corporate interests when needed. Sanders is arguing for a more drastic government intervention. It's why Sanders is willing to go much further in arguing for systematic change, while Warren is more incremental. Just look at their plans for college tuition. Warren has an overall cap and means testing to determine if you are warranted to qualify while Sanders is just saying fuck it, everyone is covered.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #328 on: August 11, 2019, 10:48:51 PM »
Sanders wants to keep the filibuster.

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #329 on: August 11, 2019, 11:06:34 PM »

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #330 on: August 13, 2019, 02:30:33 AM »
https://www.isidewith.com/elections/2020-presidential-quiz



79% Andrew Yang
74% John Delaney
73% Tulsi Gabbard
72% John Kasich
72% Pete Buttigieg
70% Kirsten Gillibrand
70% Kamala Harris
69% Donald Trump
69% Joe Biden
68% Bernie Sanders
68% Amy Klobuchar

lol

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #331 on: August 13, 2019, 03:26:19 AM »
Conclusive proof that Trump and Biden are the same!
Hi

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #332 on: August 13, 2019, 05:32:44 AM »
Can't wait to see what the Biden campaign think is "a popular, hip podcast in touch with the zeitgeist" when they'll want in on that train.
Joe Biden on Joe Rogan  :lawd

"They're saying Trump is onto something. Like cocaine or meth or some shit. Did you see him sweat the other day. Crazy man just crazy.
So did you see ever the video of Hitler tweaking after he was injected with bull semen and cocaine? I have shown it to a lot of my guests on this podcast."

"Yeah, I saw that live on CNN and couldn't believe it"

"And that's the point Joe, some people are saying that you are not well and that you should not run for President because you can't remember correctly"

"THEY ARE WRONG JOE. Those are just smears from the right. I perfectly remember when I was Vice President 20 years ago and President Osama was my best black friend"
🤴

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #333 on: August 13, 2019, 10:51:42 AM »
Just curious, how much of your time does a post like that take?

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #334 on: August 13, 2019, 10:59:57 AM »
Just curious, how much of your time does a post like that take?
Just about as fast as I can type it. So about a minute I guess?
🤴

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #335 on: August 13, 2019, 11:00:42 AM »
Perfection

Propagandhim

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #336 on: August 13, 2019, 11:12:06 AM »
Quote
https://www.isidewith.com/elections/2020-presidential-quiz

Yang: 94
Tulsi: 92
Beto: 89
Delaney: 87
Buttigieg: 85
Booker: 84
Harris: 83
Kasich: 81
Warren: 81

EightBitNate

  • I don’t wanna be horny anymore, I wanna be happy
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #337 on: August 13, 2019, 07:56:09 PM »


:(

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #338 on: August 13, 2019, 08:11:17 PM »
每天生气

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #339 on: August 13, 2019, 11:04:10 PM »


 :tocry
*****

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #340 on: August 14, 2019, 10:26:02 AM »
🤴

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #341 on: August 14, 2019, 11:20:50 AM »
Mooch Mini

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #342 on: August 14, 2019, 11:59:53 AM »
he is approximately 1.15 Shapiros

Propagandhim

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #343 on: August 14, 2019, 03:56:26 PM »
Saw him on Real Time..he's a little taller or at the same height as Bill Maher, whatever that is.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2019, 04:01:27 PM by Propagandhim »

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #344 on: August 14, 2019, 04:07:09 PM »
Google says 174cm which is pretty average...
ὕβρις

EightBitNate

  • I don’t wanna be horny anymore, I wanna be happy
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #345 on: August 14, 2019, 04:22:08 PM »
Google says 174cm which is pretty average...

Yang is 5’7, which is less than that...

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #346 on: August 14, 2019, 04:22:32 PM »
I think Stro literally thought Yang was a tiny Asian and not a 6 foot monster
每天生气

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #347 on: August 14, 2019, 04:25:13 PM »
Google says 174cm which is pretty average...

Yang is 5’7, which is less than that...

174 cm is roughly 5'7".
Wouldn't be the first time height is misreported or inflated though...
ὕβρις

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #348 on: August 14, 2019, 04:27:28 PM »
typical shonda  :mueller
*****

Propagandhim

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #349 on: August 14, 2019, 04:27:28 PM »
Google says 174cm which is pretty average...

Yang is 5’7, which is less than that...

174 cm is roughly 5'7".
Wouldn't be the first time height is misreported or inflated though...

  :confused

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #350 on: August 14, 2019, 04:27:50 PM »
lol, if you Google Scaramucci height 5'9" is what comes up in big bold letters.

I think Shapiro lied about being 5'9" also   :lol

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #351 on: August 14, 2019, 04:29:35 PM »
Google says 174cm which is pretty average...

Yang is 5’7, which is less than that...

174 cm is roughly 5'7".
Wouldn't be the first time height is misreported or inflated though...

  :confused

Scaramucci is supposedly 5'8" (as per article) or 174cm (per Google suggestion) which translates to 5'7" according to the converter I used online.
ὕβρις

Propagandhim

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #352 on: August 14, 2019, 04:33:20 PM »
Google says 174cm which is pretty average...

Yang is 5’7, which is less than that...

174 cm is roughly 5'7".
Wouldn't be the first time height is misreported or inflated though...

  :confused

Scaramucci is supposedly 5'8" (as per article) or 174cm (per Google suggestion) which translates to 5'7" according to the converter I used online.

Did...you convert 174cm to inches, get 68.5, then divide 68.5 inches by 12, get 5.7...and then think that was 5'7....?

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #354 on: August 14, 2019, 04:37:12 PM »
I agree with OnlyRegret.
每天生气

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #355 on: August 14, 2019, 04:39:14 PM »
Google says 174cm which is pretty average...

Yang is 5’7, which is less than that...

174 cm is roughly 5'7".
Wouldn't be the first time height is misreported or inflated though...

  :confused

Scaramucci is supposedly 5'8" (as per article) or 174cm (per Google suggestion) which translates to 5'7" according to the converter I used online.

Did...you convert 174cm to inches, get 68.5, then divide 68.5 inches by 12, get 5.7...and then think that was 5'7....?

That's the value the converter gave me (5,7) but some subtlety might have escaped me. Just searching 174cm gives me 5'8" (and a half). My mistake.

I think we can all agree he looks much shorter than that.
ὕβρις

Propagandhim

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #356 on: August 14, 2019, 04:52:51 PM »



catch these vibes

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #357 on: August 14, 2019, 06:05:06 PM »
lol, if you Google Scaramucci height 5'9" is what comes up in big bold letters.

I think Shapiro lied about being 5'9" also   :lol
Shapiro is like 5ft .9" :teehee
Hi

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #358 on: August 14, 2019, 06:26:08 PM »
I'm 69 inches tall. :smug

jorma

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #359 on: August 14, 2019, 07:39:01 PM »
this confusion is the excuse i needed to post this:

https://twitter.com/Ralphium/status/1160242266902061056