Author Topic: Woah..wait Die Hard is getting GOOD reviews? (Read 1206 times)

Cheebs · « **on:** June 26, 2007, 03:53:27 PM »

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/live_free_or_die_hard/
83% with every cream of the crop so far being fresh.

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #1 on:** June 26, 2007, 03:55:07 PM »

Quote

Rated PG-13

does not compute.

bud · « **Reply #2 on:** June 26, 2007, 03:55:19 PM »

hell yeah. if it's better than dh2 i'll be a happy man

border · « **Reply #3 on:** June 26, 2007, 03:59:46 PM »

I never felt like explicit language and graphic violence were what made these films good. Though annoyed by the PG-13, I never understood why people thought it would cause the films to suck ass.

bluemax · « **Reply #4 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:06:19 PM »

Quote from: border on June 26, 2007, 03:59:46 PM

I never felt like explicit language and graphic violence were what made these films good. Though annoyed by the PG-13, I never understood why people thought it would cause the films to suck ass.

What? Half of what made Die Hard so popular in the first place was that you had a regular Joe cop, overcoming the odds, a lack of crazy special effects, and lots of violence and profanity.

I watched that 10 minute preview and it didn't feel like Die Hard. Every review I've read hasn't made me think Die Hard.

Is it possibly a decent high budget action flick? Maybe, but its not Die Hard.

Error Macro · « **Reply #5 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:08:53 PM »

I don't rely on RT's tomatometer at all. That shit is seriously off base far too often.

Mupepe · « **Reply #6 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:10:56 PM »

Quote from: bluemax on June 26, 2007, 04:06:19 PM

Quote from: border on June 26, 2007, 03:59:46 PM
I never felt like explicit language and graphic violence were what made these films good. Though annoyed by the PG-13, I never understood why people thought it would cause the films to suck ass.

What? Half of what made Die Hard so popular in the first place was that you had a regular Joe cop, overcoming the odds, a lack of crazy special effects, and lots of violence and profanity.

I watched that 10 minute preview and it didn't feel like Die Hard. Every review I've read hasn't made me think Die Hard.

Is it possibly a decent high budget action flick? Maybe, but its not Die Hard.

pretty much. the trailers look nothing like a die hard flick

border · « **Reply #7 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:11:51 PM »

Quote

Half of what made Die Hard so popular in the first place was that you had a regular Joe cop, overcoming the odds, a lack of crazy special effects,

What does any of that have to do with the ratings? All of it can be done within the boundaries of PG-13.

Quote

lots of violence and profanity.

Aside from the first film, I never felt that graphic R-rated violence or profanity was really the signature of the series. Aside from some "fucks" and "distinguished black fellows", Die Hard With A Vengeance probably wasn't that far from a PG-13.

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #8 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:14:16 PM »

Quote from: Error Macro on June 26, 2007, 04:08:53 PM

I don't rely on RT's tomatometer at all. That shit is seriously off base far too often.

It's at 73 over at metacritic

BlueTsunami · « **Reply #9 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:32:09 PM »

I'll watch it purely for the ACTION PACKED GOODTIMES. Its Summa baby, take your Cannes Film festival winners and shove it. Right now, its all bout the truck into helicopter impact. Who gives a fug

Mupepe · « **Reply #10 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:38:13 PM »

Quote from: border on June 26, 2007, 04:11:51 PM

Quote
Half of what made Die Hard so popular in the first place was that you had a regular Joe cop, overcoming the odds, a lack of crazy special effects,
What does any of that have to do with the ratings? All of it can be done within the boundaries of PG-13.

Quote
lots of violence and profanity.

Aside from the first film, I never felt that graphic R-rated violence or profanity was really the signature of the series. Aside from some "fucks" and "distinguished black fellows", Die Hard With A Vengeance probably wasn't that far from a PG-13.

I don't think that's what he's complaining about. The trailers just don't seem like the old die hard movies

Tauntaun · « **Reply #11 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:50:38 PM »

Quote from: Rob Thomas on June 26, 2007, 04:38:13 PM

Quote from: border on June 26, 2007, 04:11:51 PM
Quote
Half of what made Die Hard so popular in the first place was that you had a regular Joe cop, overcoming the odds, a lack of crazy special effects,
What does any of that have to do with the ratings? All of it can be done within the boundaries of PG-13.

Quote
lots of violence and profanity.

Aside from the first film, I never felt that graphic R-rated violence or profanity was really the signature of the series. Aside from some "fucks" and "distinguished black fellows", Die Hard With A Vengeance probably wasn't that far from a PG-13.

I don't think that's what he's complaining about. The trailers just don't seem like the old die hard movies

Yeah it's more PoTC-ish and cheesy sidekick (lolz mac age cigarillo) giving stupid questions so Bruce Willis can give stupid one liners. I don't like that mac-man in my Die Hard.

CajoleJuice · « **Reply #12 on:** June 26, 2007, 05:25:28 PM »

Quote from: border on June 26, 2007, 04:11:51 PM

Quote
Half of what made Die Hard so popular in the first place was that you had a regular Joe cop, overcoming the odds, a lack of crazy special effects,
What does any of that have to do with the ratings? All of it can be done within the boundaries of PG-13.

Quote
lots of violence and profanity.

Aside from the first film, I never felt that graphic R-rated violence or profanity was really the signature of the series. Aside from some "fucks" and "distinguished black fellows", Die Hard With A Vengeance probably wasn't that far from a PG-13.

Some? With a Vengeance has more cursing than the first two combined. And a sign that says "I HATE distinguished black fellows" And 2 has a icicle go through a guy's eye.

TVC15 · « **Reply #13 on:** June 26, 2007, 05:26:32 PM »

From what I've read it is more mediocre than good.

Nick · « **Reply #14 on:** June 26, 2007, 05:31:13 PM »

From what I've read it has Bruce Willis at the age of 100.

Junpei the Tracer! · « **Reply #15 on:** June 26, 2007, 05:47:15 PM »

All of you shut up.It's gonna be good.

bud · « **Reply #16 on:** June 27, 2007, 05:37:10 AM »

75% after 61 reviews

max_cool · « **Reply #17 on:** June 27, 2007, 05:46:45 AM »

Die Hard? more like Suck Hard!!!

spoiler (click to show/hide)

this only applies to this latest pg-13-lets-hold-hands-and-sing Die Hard that I haven't seen

[close]

abrader · « **Reply #18 on:** June 27, 2007, 06:24:41 AM »

I agree with the PG-13 sentiments.....

Otherwise I presumed this would kick ass.

EvilBoris · « **Reply #19 on:** June 27, 2007, 06:46:41 AM »

Pesky internet critics are pulling the rating down. Cream of the crop remains strong

Its good to see some redress of the blockbuster balance, with Ratatouille, as expected, cleaning up and good buzz behind Transformers.
I'm speaking on all accounts though, I haven't gone to the cinema in two years (!)

AdmiralViscen · « **Reply #20 on:** June 27, 2007, 10:46:13 AM »

Overall is dropping, cream of the crop is rising.

I'm gonna see it tomorrow.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #21 on:** June 27, 2007, 10:47:17 AM »

I BET HE SAYS FIRETRUCK INSTEAD OF FUCK

Robo · « **Reply #22 on:** June 27, 2007, 11:36:47 AM »

The trailers paint it as more of a Michael Bay film than even Transformers appears to be.

Given the praise, halfhearted or not, I'm interested in seeing how a PG-13 Die Hard turned out.

TVC15 · « **Reply #23 on:** June 27, 2007, 12:31:40 PM »

The reviews generally seem to say it starts off good, gets meh, and that there's 1 good sequence in the second half.

MyNameIsMethodis · « **Reply #24 on:** June 27, 2007, 12:33:32 PM »

I support this movie because it supports my glorious state, New Hampshire, by stealing the states motto and bastardizing it.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #25 on:** June 27, 2007, 02:10:14 PM »

The rating is mind boggling. The demographic that is going to see Die Hard is much older. Hell, my MOTHER, who is now 50-years-old, without me saying ANYTHING, said she was going to see but was unhappy that it was rated PG-13. Why FOX would alienate that demographic is crazy. The fanbase for the series is very solid as the films have aged well with time, and it attracts younger, older, male and female viewer.

bud · « **Reply #26 on:** June 27, 2007, 02:12:04 PM »

78% after 68 reviews and 71 at metacritic

i guess it's better than die harder

News:

Author Topic: Woah..wait Die Hard is getting GOOD reviews? (Read 1206 times)