Author Topic: What book(s) are you reading?  (Read 452621 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2580 on: August 10, 2016, 07:15:45 PM »
http://io9.gizmodo.com/ask-sci-fi-legend-william-gibson-where-the-heck-he-thin-1784987666

io9 hosted a Q&A session for William Gibson. A sadly very brief read, but some good insight to his process.

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2581 on: August 15, 2016, 12:22:43 PM »
halfway though reaper's gale.  Damn good.
NtGay

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2582 on: August 15, 2016, 12:38:06 PM »
I'm in the habit now where I alternate between reading five or six books instead of reading and finishing them one at a time.
🍆🍆

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2583 on: August 17, 2016, 08:53:51 PM »
Finished Reaper's Gale.  :(

Going to do return of the crimson guard next.
NtGay

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2584 on: August 23, 2016, 10:40:34 AM »
Just finished The Quantum Thief, which I'd heard a good deal about and had been looking forward to for ages.

I have almost no idea of what happened, except the very end involving entirely new characters, and was a setup for the second book in the series.

The book was rich with good ideas, but some syntactic conceits used in text didn't translate to the audiobook and left me at a loss.

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2585 on: August 31, 2016, 03:14:14 AM »


very quite good, it's not a Teddy lovefest like normal, which is great because he's a more interesting figure (and gasp...actual politician) than the worshipped apolitical all-principled demigod McCain and others write of him as

couldn't help but find some parallels to the recent primaries with Sanders (running against the Party he wanted to control) and Trump (all sorts of stops trying to be pulled out to derail a candidate who kept winning over the electorate) also stuff like the media hyping a hopefully contested conventions, campaign staff shuffles leading to cries of selling out, a movement (womens suffrage in this case) heckling the "progressive" candidate for their lack of interest in the issue*, a single issue becoming a strange litmus test (in this case referendums overturning judicial decisions), etc.

really goes into a lot of detail about BEFORE TR split off to run his own party which is where a lot of history of this campaign has always seemed to START (or well, start at the GOP convention which led to the split) and i find the pregame jockeying of the pre-1972 era to be one of the more interesting aspects of it, yet it's rarely covered in campaign histories

also love all the old fun bullshit from back in the day, Teddy's team bends over backwards to manufacture a "draft" for himself after La Follette starts getting traction as a challenger to Taft (much like Eugene McCarthy against LBJ...which let Robert Kennedy jump in) since you couldn't be seen as wanting it back then (FDR later did something similar for his third term attempt) and then later they claim that his phone and telegraph are being tapped by Taft which is why he has to head to Chicago for the Convention (back then candidates, who were not delegates at least, didn't head to the convention in person...something FDR also broke tradition on) with the goal of basically trying to get the delegates to switch to him by his merely appearing

and in even more parallels with today, all sorts of people who were basically just taking money from TR's bankrollers and not actually accomplishing anything for the campaign or even being detrimental to the efforts, all the while everyone refused to tell TR anything he wouldn't want to hear and he stuck to his own friendly media bubble

*TR felt that women shouldn't be forced to vote as it was beneath their gender to get involved in politics and suffrage would force them to vote for some reason...Taft apparently didn't think it needed a constitutional amendment

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2586 on: August 31, 2016, 09:30:47 AM »
Reading Providence has got me stoked for the Alan Moore's new book.



Quote
Fierce in its imagining and stupefying in its scope, Jerusalem is the tale of everything, told from a vanished gutter.

In the epic novel Jerusalem, Alan Moore channels both the ecstatic visions of William Blake and the theoretical physics of Albert Einstein through the hardscrabble streets and alleys of his hometown of Northampton, UK. In the half a square mile of decay and demolition that was England’s Saxon capital, eternity is loitering between the firetrap housing projects. Embedded in the grubby amber of the district’s narrative among its saints, kings, prostitutes, and derelicts, a different kind of human time is happening, a soiled simultaneity that does not differentiate between the petrol-colored puddles and the fractured dreams of those who navigate them.

Employing, a kaleidoscope of literary forms and styles that ranges from brutal social realism to extravagant children’s fantasy, from the modern stage drama to the extremes of science fiction, Jerusalem’s dizzyingly rich cast of characters includes the living, the dead, the celestial, and the infernal in an intricately woven tapestry that presents a vision of an absolute and timeless human reality in all of its exquisite, comical, and heartbreaking splendor.

In these pages lurk demons from the second-century Book of Tobit and angels with golden blood who reduce fate to a snooker tournament. Vagrants, prostitutes, and ghosts rub shoulders with Oliver Cromwell, Samuel Beckett, James Joyce’s tragic daughter Lucia, and Buffalo Bill, among many others. There is a conversation in the thunderstruck dome of St. Paul’s Cathedral, childbirth on the cobblestones of Lambeth Walk, an estranged couple sitting all night on the cold steps of a Gothic church front, and an infant choking on a cough drop for eleven chapters. An art exhibition is in preparation, and above the world a naked old man and a beautiful dead baby race along the Attics of the Breath toward the heat death of the universe.

An opulent mythology for those without a pot to piss in, through the labyrinthine streets and pages of Jerusalem tread ghosts that sing of wealth, poverty, and our threadbare millennium. They discuss English as a visionary language from John Bunyan to James Joyce, hold forth on the illusion of mortality post-Einstein, and insist upon the meanest slum as Blake’s eternal holy city.

:doge

Quote
Hardcover: 1280 pages

:doge :doge :doge



:noah
©@©™

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2587 on: September 03, 2016, 11:40:24 PM »
Finshed return of the crimson guard.  Disappointing ending.  The middle was pretty good.  He really could have cut down on like half the story lines though. 

Gonna start Toll the Hounds tonight.  Really excited for it going back to Genabackis. 
NtGay

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2588 on: October 12, 2016, 02:05:09 PM »


Just finished this.  It's a fictionalized but incredibly well researched portrait of the rise of the Mexican Cartels in the early 2000s.  I had just finished watching Narcos and these guys make Escobar look like some anachronistic gentlemen from a bygone era.  Definitely takes a strong stomach to get through.
vin

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2589 on: October 13, 2016, 07:14:13 AM »

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2590 on: November 05, 2016, 11:31:36 PM »
Finally finished reading Mistborn Book 2 by Brandon Sanderson after a couple of months.  It's entertaining enough, but really is a C+ grade Game of Thrones politicking fantasy and suffers from middle book in a trilogy issue where the last 200 pages are essentially just setting up the story for the 3rd book.  Will read some other stuff and then finish out the 3rd book and see how the plot is overall.  First book was better for sure even if it was a bit Star Wars a New Hope x Fantasy.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2591 on: November 06, 2016, 12:23:44 AM »
Finally finished reading Mistborn Book 2 by Brandon Sanderson after a couple of months.  It's entertaining enough, but really is a C+ grade Game of Thrones politicking fantasy and suffers from middle book in a trilogy issue where the last 200 pages are essentially just setting up the story for the 3rd book.  Will read some other stuff and then finish out the 3rd book and see how the plot is overall.  First book was better for sure even if it was a bit Star Wars a New Hope x Fantasy.

Try The Lies of Locke Lamora if you want some unusual, fun, and humorous fantasy that is still grounded.

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2592 on: November 06, 2016, 06:41:00 AM »


i would have titled it Pants On Fire

seagrams hotsauce

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2593 on: November 06, 2016, 07:13:17 AM »
Any good?

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2594 on: November 06, 2016, 12:37:16 PM »
Yeah, it's alright. It's kinda weird for an academic press book though and the guy trips up on his critiques a lot. A lot of his examples I have to look up because he explains events poorly and they're from like 2012. The most interesting probably is the interviews with so-called "real" fact checkers like PolitiFact who turn down their noses at Media Matters and such partisan fact checkers. He argues, and I agree, that the partisan fact checkers play a valuable role since sometimes they're the only ones who even dare criticize certain topics, let alone media figures which the others won't touch.

I had no clue PolitiFact franchised itself out and pursued litigation against people for using "pants on fire" and other "trademarks" of their brand. That and other stuff about how the places work and stuff is the other most interesting stuff probably. He worked a few months with them on stuff.



As an aside, just to comment on the Supreme Court book above. It's supposed to be like how the Burger Court was the first steps of the horrible slide to the hellscape that is the Roberts Court. But the book utterly fails at this except for a couple examples. Most of the book is about how the Burger Court expanded free speech protections, abortion rights, womens rights, civil rights, etc. and then the authors complain that they didn't go outside the cases to do something like make quotas for women in every industry and have them paid more.

The funny part is that part of the book praises Ruth Bader Ginsburg for her incremental approach to bringing Supreme Court cases to get small wins that add up, when the book basically paints the Burger Court as doing exactly this.

The worst example was basically complaining that sure the Burger Court may have decided Roe v. Wade and a whole bunch of other birth control cases that freed these up for women from state laws. But the real horrid legacy is that the evil white men on the court (the book seriously reminds you that they're mostly white men over and over) refused to understand the real troubles of women and mandate that all forms of birth control be free forever. Also, by improving womens rights they undermined the ERA which might have passed if they had refused to improve them!

The good part is all the internal hubbub from the private papers and stuff since they're all dead. Like Roe v. Wade, that was like the Tuesday case, nobody even cared about it. Some other case everyone has forgotten was the important one that term but only one anyone remembers. Also arguments back and forth and then angry dissents. Stuff getting personal like Burger and Blackmun being friends for decades and then after five years on the Court together no longer speaking for the rest of their lives. I should read the one Bob Woodward book, it apparently has more of this kind of stuff, and is regarding the same Court.

The one Oliver Wendall Holmes circlejerk book was good for that kind of stuff and gossip and little spats, even if all of it was being twisted to make him seem like a demigod in a room full of morons who couldn't grasp his genius.

tiesto

  • ルカルカ★ナイトフィーバー
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2595 on: November 06, 2016, 05:36:26 PM »
^_^

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2596 on: November 06, 2016, 06:16:54 PM »
Let me know if Midway's PS2 Joust reboot is in there. That was my last project before jumping ship to Japan.

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2597 on: November 06, 2016, 06:40:53 PM »
I got that too!  Skimmed a little but haven't read yet.  Book is massive!

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2598 on: November 06, 2016, 06:58:12 PM »
Reading these two. American Gods I'm reading through for the second time, but I've never read the 10th anniversary edition. Which I am reading now.



*****

tiesto

  • ルカルカ★ナイトフィーバー
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2599 on: November 06, 2016, 08:38:29 PM »
Let me know if Midway's PS2 Joust reboot is in there. That was my last project before jumping ship to Japan.

Will do! It's a pretty big book (480 pages!) and I'm only on the SNES section now. Some interesting things were in development that I didn't know about... Fallout 3 was originally gonna be a completely different game codenamed "Van Buuren". Overhead and more like the first 2. Also there was another game based on The Witcher in development years before CD Projekt's, it was gonna be a linear 3rd person action adventure. And a Myst game called "The Adventures Beyond The D'ni Ultraworld". Sounds like there are some fellow Orb fanboys in the dev team!
^_^

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2600 on: November 06, 2016, 10:22:45 PM »
Reading these two. American Gods I'm reading through for the second time, but I've never read the 10th anniversary edition. Which I am reading now.

(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)

Nice!  I'm going on vacation tomorrow and bringing Anansi Boys to read for the first time.  Really looking forward to the TV adaptation of American Gods in January.

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2601 on: November 16, 2016, 08:29:47 PM »
Finished Anansi Boys, good read.  What surprised me was that the book was a very british comedy adventure considering American Gods is played pretty straight.  Anansi Boys had some really funny stuff like the lime scene.  But yeah, I just enjoyed how British humor it was.  The oddball stuff reminded me of a Douglas Adams novel.

No idea how they can incorporate any of this into American Gods TV, but if the more they can, the better.  The African animal mythology stories were great.

tiesto

  • ルカルカ★ナイトフィーバー
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2602 on: November 16, 2016, 09:39:36 PM »
Chrono - no PS2 Joust reboot but there's an article on a Joust reboot for the N64...
^_^

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2603 on: November 16, 2016, 10:13:40 PM »
read Norm MacDonald's book

it's funny

it's fiction, and if you take it as a real autobiography, he will be upset

Syph

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2604 on: November 27, 2016, 06:41:38 PM »


pretty good so far
not something i'd usually read and the jacket really turned me off, but I've plugged through and it's been very interesting
definitely thought-provoking
XO

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2605 on: December 12, 2016, 12:40:03 PM »

jakefromstatefarm

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2606 on: December 12, 2016, 09:00:04 PM »
About the author: ZACHARY AUBURN is a writer and artist whose 'zines include an analysis of every outfit worn by the Golden Girls in the first season, a Choose Your Own Adventure about a tortured relationship (which Slate called a "small masterpiece"), and a field guide to the aliens on Star Trek.


:jasoncollins

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2607 on: December 13, 2016, 07:32:44 PM »
the back of the book has a list of "other books in the How To Talk To Your Cat About series" that I wish were real:
Quote
  • 9/11
  • Abortion Holocaust
  • Being Adopted
  • Biblical Literalism
  • Cats
  • Chemtrails
  • U.S. Corporate Tax Policy
  • Disabling Quantum Cryptography
  • Divorce
  • Eating Disorders
  • Fluroide and Mind Control
  • Gamergate
  • Georgia O'Keeffe
  • Global Warming
  • The Gnostic Gospels
  • Grand Unified Theory
  • Hippies
  • Hosting a Dinner Party
  • Immigration
  • ISIS
  • Jesus
  • Learning to Drive
  • Miscegenation
  • The Moon Landing Hoax
  • The Moral Majority
  • The New World Order
  • Objectivism
  • Online Dating
  • P versus NP
  • Phrenology
  • Planning for Retirement
  • Political Correctness
  • Postmodern Architecture
  • Project MKUltra
  • The Rand Corporation
  • Recursive Evaluation Functions in Neural Networks
  • The Riemann Hypothesis
  • Santa Claus
  • Scientology
  • Secret Minecraft Techniques
  • Sharia Law
  • Social Justice Warriors
  • States Rights
  • The Teapot Dome Scandal
  • The Afterlife
  • The Articles of the Confederacy
  • The Lost Tribes of Israel
  • The Tunguska Event
  • Thimerosal
  • Third Wave Feminism
  • The Zionist Menace
« Last Edit: December 13, 2016, 07:36:56 PM by benjipwns »

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2608 on: December 13, 2016, 07:53:54 PM »
Why would you talk to your cat about Tunguska, since those little shards of Bast are responsible for it?

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2609 on: December 15, 2016, 06:16:35 PM »


very much like the SNL and ESPN books (Live From New York and Those Guys Have All The Fun) where it's 95+% interview content as oral history, not paragraphs of story and/or analysis

covers the founding to about 1992

the first modern music videos were apparently devised by British bands so as to avoid having to actually show up and play on various TV programs that all wanted them to appear over and over

laziness  :rejoice

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2610 on: December 17, 2016, 10:53:09 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)

very much like the SNL and ESPN books (Live From New York and Those Guys Have All The Fun) where it's 95+% interview content as oral history, not paragraphs of story and/or analysis

covers the founding to about 1992

the first modern music videos were apparently devised by British bands so as to avoid having to actually show up and play on various TV programs that all wanted them to appear over and over

laziness  :rejoice

Maybe get a blister on their little finger. Maybe get a blister on their thumb.
©@©™

jakefromstatefarm

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2611 on: December 18, 2016, 10:26:46 PM »
snip
So I wanna come back to this post because finals just ended last week and shawty hasn't chirped back and I've spent the ensuing free time working through some of Tolkien's letters, which wound this interpretation (but not fatally, imo). The leitmotif throughout this (brief) investigation has been the reframing of the legendarium within Tolkien's own religiosity. As he himself wrote to his son in Letter 172:
Quote
The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work.
Pace the above Word of God, Middle-Earth is not entirely reducible to tolkiens catholicism, but it was undoubtedly informed by it. At any rate, here's what I've come up with.

Quote
The West is a promise after death.
This is untenable, per Letter 237:
Quote
The passage over Sea is not Death. The 'mythology' is Elf-centered. According to it there was at first an actual Earthly Paradise, home and realm of the Valar, as a physical part of the earth.
From this and the 2 articles from the literature I looked at, Aman, or the 'Undying Lands', is closer to Eden after the expulsion than Celestial Paradise as such. So, a real, physical place on Arda, not a transcendent afterlife. The emendation "there was at first" is important here, Aman/Valinor was submerged after the numenoreans tried to reach it in the Silmarillion. It still exists, and is what Frodo and Bilbo sail towards, it's just been in occultation since the Second (I think?) Age. From letter 325:

Quote
The ‘immortals’ who were permitted to leave Middle-earth and seek Aman — the undying lands of Valinor and Eressëa, an island assigned to the Eldar — set sail in ships specially made and hallowed for this voyage, and steered due West towards the ancient site of these lands. They only set out after sundown; but if any keen-eyed observer from that shore had watched one of these ships he might have seen that it never became hull-down but dwindled only by distance until it vanished in the twilight: it followed the straight road to the true West and not the bent road of the earth’s surface. As it vanished it left the physical world. There was no return. The Elves who took this road and those few ‘mortals’ who by special grace went with them, had abandoned the ‘History of the world’ and could play no further part in it.

The angelic immortals (incarnate only at their own will), the Valar or regents under God, and others of the same order but less power and majesty (such as Olórin = Gandalf) needed no transport, unless they for a time remained incarnate, and they could, if allowed or commanded, return.

As for Frodo or other mortals, they could only dwell in Aman for a limited time — whether brief or long. The Valar had neither the power nor the right to confer ‘immortality’ upon them. Their sojourn was a ‘purgatory’, but one of peace and healing and they would eventually pass away (die at their own desire and of free will) to destinations of which the Elves knew nothing.

So what I said here:
Quote
It's why "The West" works as arc words: you're not literally going in a cardinal direction -iirc, he explicitly laid out that if you did, you still wouldn't reach Aman- you're passing a threshold from this world to a far green country with white shores and a swift sunrise.
Is also not true. You are actually going due west, it's just that this isn't physically possible for mortals who haven't been beknighted with divine favor. Whether that's an actually meaningful distinction I'll leave for the reader to decide. You are still passing a threshold though. Once you've gone, you exit history, which makes that last paragraph interesting: if Frodos not dead yet, and still mortal, the only thing left for him to do is willingly kill himself to reach a "destination of which the Elves know nothing." Whether that undiscovered country is the same thing as Celestial Paradise? Who knows.
 
Quote
The Silmarillion feels like the Bible in that there are a bunch of alien geometries and spatial/temporal ambiguities you just can't square away if you go in with the attitude that everything on the map in the appendix is a 1 for 1 representation of the proverbial thing-in-the-world...You can do that in fantasy, you can imagine time and space differently. I think that's one of the strongest points in favor of it as a genre and it's why I feel confident in drawing a lineage between Tolkien and works like Beowulf which, for obvious reasons, don't share our modernist sympathies.
So, this is the rub and I think it's still broadly defensible. Tolkien always hedges his remarks in these letters. Lines like "The 'mythology' is Elf-centered" are symptomatic and 100% deliberate. I initially had a tough time squaring away that kind of language with this new insight on Aman/Valinor but what I think he's doing here is creating a space for competing interpretations in-universe. Whether Iluvatar sunk the undying lands in moral retribution for the numenoreans hubris or a cataclysmic physical event ocurred that profoundly changed the geography of middle earth isn't the point. The point is to imitate the texts that run these distinctions together. The legendarium is misty in the same way the Beowulf we've inherited is.


Quote
**I have never read Heidegger either :expert
The allusion to Heidegger's in-der-Welt-sein, or, being-in-the-world, doesn't work here. You could've picked literally any other writer in the continental phenomenological tradition to make this joke. But you didn't. And that's ok. We learn, we grow, we special fellow :expert.




spoiler (click to show/hide)
:confused
[close]

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2612 on: December 30, 2016, 08:16:29 PM »
Almost done with 'It'

Kinda Meh.
NtGay

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2613 on: December 30, 2016, 08:43:58 PM »
Reading/plugging my good friend's first novel, Directorate 51: Revelation, an Amazon Kindle exclusive. If you've got a buck and change to spare it'd help the guy out. :)

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2614 on: December 30, 2016, 08:44:29 PM »
Almost done with 'It'

Kinda Meh.

It picks up with the underaged gangbang at the end. :jared

Mr Gilhaney

  • RegisteredFlexOffender
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2615 on: December 30, 2016, 09:32:46 PM »
Does sonic have a penis on that cover?

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2616 on: December 30, 2016, 09:39:57 PM »
Almost done with 'It'

Kinda Meh.

It picks up with the underaged gangbang at the end. :jared

Reading now.  WTF
NtGay

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2617 on: December 30, 2016, 09:46:56 PM »
LOL the fat kid got the biggest dick. 
NtGay

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2618 on: December 30, 2016, 10:03:57 PM »
Stephen King: Cocaine's a hell of a drug.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2619 on: December 30, 2016, 10:13:49 PM »
LOL the fat kid got the biggest dick. 

Um, spoilers! :maf
©@©™

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2620 on: December 30, 2016, 10:17:07 PM »

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2621 on: December 30, 2016, 10:18:32 PM »
Pretty sure he was off of drugs when he wrote this one. 
NtGay

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2622 on: December 30, 2016, 10:41:49 PM »
They killed like 100 people in the flood just to save like 10 kids every 30 years, lol
NtGay

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2623 on: December 30, 2016, 10:43:35 PM »
They killed like 100 people in the flood just to save like 10 kids every 30 years, lol

I'd make the same sacrifice to kill a spider tbh.

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2624 on: December 30, 2016, 10:45:05 PM »
If you consider those peoples potential children over time, I think the losers club is looking at a net loss of live from their antics.  Never trust a fucking turtle.
NtGay

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2625 on: January 02, 2017, 02:06:37 PM »
Started back up midway through Toll the Hounds after being too stressed to read for 3 months.  First chapter I get to, more Bridge Burners dying :( 
NtGay

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2626 on: January 02, 2017, 02:57:56 PM »
I'm gonna be posting in here a lot over the next year... I've decided to fail spectacularly and read a new (to me) book each week of 2017.

Up first: Neuromancer by William Gibson. Hard to believe I've never read this. About 2/3 of the way through it.
yar

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2627 on: January 02, 2017, 03:25:16 PM »
Ya I'm going to be posting so much in this thread, so prepare your post-holes. 
NtGay

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2628 on: January 02, 2017, 06:27:19 PM »
Me too. Going to increase my book reading by ∞% this year (since I read zero books this year.)

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2629 on: January 02, 2017, 07:24:44 PM »
Me too. Going to increase my book reading by ∞% this year (since I read zero books this year.)

You should read a book on math. 
NtGay

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2630 on: January 02, 2017, 07:43:15 PM »
Me too. Going to increase my book reading by ∞% this year (since I read zero books this year.)

You should read a book on math.

Gimme recs breh.

Edit- Wait isn't it infinite?

http://mathcentral.uregina.ca/qq/database/qq.09.05/joseph1.html

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2631 on: January 02, 2017, 08:25:21 PM »
No you have a divide by 0, which makes the whole thing undefined. 
NtGay

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2632 on: January 02, 2017, 08:28:16 PM »
Look, you use your math and I'll use mine.

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2633 on: January 02, 2017, 08:30:10 PM »
NtGay

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2634 on: January 02, 2017, 08:33:56 PM »
Quote
However, 0/0 is still undefined on the Riemann sphere, but defined in wheels.

BS. 0/0 is obviously 1.

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2635 on: January 02, 2017, 08:39:13 PM »
In college, I took college algebra which was the lowest non-remedial offered because I only needed the one math credit. (I had done like past AP-calculus and stuff already but didn't want to bother with any actual work for a required core credit.)

One day, like ten people in the class were arguing with the professor for like twenty minutes that 2/2 = 0 because when you divide something by itself you have nothing left.

I did beat Metroid: Zero Mission tho

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2636 on: January 02, 2017, 08:42:40 PM »
In college? :lol

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2637 on: January 03, 2017, 08:42:28 AM »
I want to laugh, but the only way I know how to explain why they were wrong would be to repeat what I learned when I was little, which is "how many times this number fits into this other number".

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2638 on: January 03, 2017, 09:57:39 AM »
In college, I took college algebra which was the lowest non-remedial offered because I only needed the one math credit. (I had done like past AP-calculus and stuff already but didn't want to bother with any actual work for a required core credit.)

One day, like ten people in the class were arguing with the professor for like twenty minutes that 2/2 = 0 because when you divide something by itself you have nothing left.

I did beat Metroid: Zero Mission tho

I beat Metroid: 2/2 Mission :smug
©@©™

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Reply #2639 on: January 03, 2017, 10:07:32 AM »
Eventually the professor was so frustrated she just said "for the purposes of this class any number divided by itself will equal 1!!!"

Thing I never understood is like...did they ignore what their TI-84+ Silver Edition Pluses were telling them?