Author Topic: star trek  (Read 184452 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2580 on: March 01, 2020, 11:06:43 PM »
In every single combat scenario Picard has had his gun set to stun. He has chided two crew members (Seven and Elnor) about murder. This is a completely nonsensical criticism and Picard has very much been in line with prior Federation principles of past shows.
weed

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2581 on: March 01, 2020, 11:09:19 PM »
Yet he gave Seven two phaser assault rifles with little to no hesitation.

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2582 on: March 02, 2020, 01:16:27 AM »
Anyways, let's actually discuss the show.

Episode 6 was fantastic.

The reunion with Hugh, the Borg reclamation project scenes were the most positive Trek in DECADES, the tension and build up to Soji's dream. I like all of the characters and how it's a show about the struggle to find good in a harsh universe. I love this show and I'm excited as FUCK for the next episode.

It also looked like Soji's father looked sort of like Bashir. I'll be giddy if that's the case.

"These aren't monsters, they're victims."

:bow

RLM complainers: WHEN IS IT GOING TO BE POSITIVE TREK AGAIN reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Also reusing the old Hugh actor :hyper

And this week we get to see Riker and Troi :hyper
weed

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2583 on: March 02, 2020, 01:17:50 AM »
https://screenrant.com/star-trek-picard-tng-ds9-morality-idealism-better-explained

Quote
Picard Is About The Good In Flawed People In An Imperfect World

Quote
The Perfect Is The Enemy Of The Good

As per the article.

They've truly taken what was great about DS9 and are just exploring more of it :bow
weed

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2584 on: March 02, 2020, 01:26:33 AM »
Yeah this show is complete nonsense as a Trek show, but I'm going to finish it because I'm essentially a hostage to trek.

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2585 on: March 02, 2020, 06:43:38 PM »
https://screenrant.com/star-trek-picard-tng-ds9-morality-idealism-better-explained

Quote
Picard Is About The Good In Flawed People In An Imperfect World

Quote
The Perfect Is The Enemy Of The Good

As per the article.

They've truly taken what was great about DS9 and are just exploring more of it :bow

No.

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2586 on: March 02, 2020, 06:48:11 PM »

TEEEPO

  • hi, i suck
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2587 on: March 02, 2020, 06:51:14 PM »
why do you guys care what other people think?

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2588 on: March 02, 2020, 07:37:14 PM »
NtGay

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2589 on: March 02, 2020, 07:38:38 PM »


:dead
NtGay

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2590 on: March 02, 2020, 07:42:10 PM »
why do you guys care what other people think?

they encapsulate what I think I just dont want to type it out

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2591 on: March 02, 2020, 07:56:44 PM »
why do you guys care what other people think?

So I can tell them they are wrong an their taste is shit.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2020, 06:41:57 AM by D3RANG3D »

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2592 on: March 02, 2020, 10:16:04 PM »
It's just their network of transwarp shit being blowed up right?



« Last Edit: March 02, 2020, 10:31:38 PM by Leadbelly »

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2593 on: March 02, 2020, 10:32:37 PM »
None of us should really care if someone dislikes/likes this stuff yet here we are. Can't get mad at people for liking it because I don't, I'm happy for you all.

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2594 on: March 02, 2020, 10:42:52 PM »

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2595 on: March 02, 2020, 10:46:43 PM »
why do you guys care what other people think?
None of us should really care if someone dislikes/likes this stuff yet here we are. Can't get mad at people for liking it because I don't, I'm happy for you all.
FUUUUCCCCCKKKK OOOOOOOOoooofffOOOFFFFFF

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2596 on: March 02, 2020, 10:50:46 PM »
FACT CHECK: I can't fuck ooooof without first being fucked ooooon

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2597 on: March 04, 2020, 04:30:53 PM »
NtGay

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2598 on: March 05, 2020, 05:02:33 AM »
What's the point in bringing back
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Hugh
[close]
if you're just gonna have the character be totally pointless and then die a pointless death?

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2599 on: March 05, 2020, 07:30:01 AM »
I just started watching the new ep and what little I saw it looks like the rumor is true about tying it with the dumpster fire that is STD.

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2600 on: March 05, 2020, 07:47:59 AM »
Already watched the episode, how so?

And yes the episode is garbage again

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2601 on: March 05, 2020, 07:50:45 AM »
Already watched the episode, how so?

And yes the episode is garbage again

spoiler (click to show/hide)
I'm pretty sure they are tying it to the whole "Control" AI thing from STD.
[close]

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2602 on: March 05, 2020, 07:53:42 AM »
Oh, I don't know anything about that. I didn't watch S2 of Discovery.

I would imagine they would steer this show as clear from Discovery as possible, the trainwreck that it is.

Not that this is much better tbh. The entire episode was boring as fuck.

Also why would Rios not suspect Agnes when she says "It's not Raffi"  and why would he even suspect Raffi in the first place?
Doesnt he already know her for a long time?

And why are Rios and Agnes hooking up again? I totally missed that really.

Potato

  • Kipfler
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2603 on: March 05, 2020, 08:43:52 AM »
Just finished episode 5 of Picard. It's very slow moving, but I think I like it.
Spud

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2604 on: March 05, 2020, 10:23:19 AM »
I liked the Riker and Picard interactions...

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2605 on: March 05, 2020, 11:00:55 AM »
Imo the only good parts of the episode. Good to see them together

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2606 on: March 06, 2020, 04:00:23 AM »
I LOVED this episode. Troi!!
weed

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2607 on: March 06, 2020, 07:05:37 AM »
« Last Edit: March 08, 2020, 09:24:39 AM by D3RANG3D »

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2608 on: March 08, 2020, 03:39:53 PM »
NtGay

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2609 on: March 12, 2020, 08:36:30 AM »
Picard EP 08 The first episode that I can even call good, felt almost like  a Star Trek episode if not for the cursing, and drunks/druggies.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2020, 09:23:34 AM by D3RANG3D »

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2610 on: March 12, 2020, 03:30:48 PM »


Might watch picard tonight

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2611 on: March 13, 2020, 07:06:09 PM »

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2612 on: March 13, 2020, 07:12:14 PM »

"Out of context?" No, I'm pretty sure I saw this episode.

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2613 on: March 13, 2020, 07:14:09 PM »
NtGay

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2614 on: March 14, 2020, 03:22:52 AM »
This is beautiful.

weed

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2615 on: March 14, 2020, 04:45:36 AM »
Steve Shives  :ufup :trash

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2616 on: March 14, 2020, 11:32:54 AM »
That's like, your opinion, dude.
weed

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2617 on: March 14, 2020, 12:06:59 PM »
He is watchmojo/whatculture tier.
« Last Edit: March 14, 2020, 02:52:22 PM by D3RANG3D »

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2618 on: March 14, 2020, 03:53:27 PM »
Ok
weed

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2619 on: March 14, 2020, 03:55:28 PM »
This is beautiful.



Keep American politics outta this thread please

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2620 on: March 15, 2020, 02:07:43 AM »
Are people still using Red Letter Media as a barometer of what is good?

 :heh

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2621 on: March 15, 2020, 07:21:15 AM »
No RLM is the barometer for what makes an entertaining youtube channel and nothing more.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
They are not wrong on STD/Picard though.  :ryker
[close]

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2622 on: March 15, 2020, 08:38:00 AM »
Are people still using Red Letter Media as a barometer of what is good?

 :heh

No, but they are right in that this show is written by someone who hasnt watched much tng at all.

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2623 on: March 15, 2020, 09:25:14 AM »
Have only watched 3 episodes of Picard and liked what I saw so I won't comment but I know I disagree with RLM generally speaking as a source of authority (or people who can never seem to stop bringing them up) when it comes to this stuff so I doubt they have suddenly got better when it comes to what determines good from bad.

The idea that Picard also needs to be roughly the same show as TNG is also something I don't agree with at all. But I'll digress until I have time to watch the full season.

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2624 on: March 15, 2020, 09:59:08 AM »
Notice I said an entertaining channel and not whats good and right with the world. I don't agree with them on a lot of their opinions on film and TV shows but I whole heatedly agree with them on STD/Picard.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
See stuff like NuTrek (STD/Picard aka Star Drek) wouldn't be as lambasted if they had any likable characters and weren't written like dog shit.
[close]

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2625 on: March 15, 2020, 10:01:12 AM »
To each his own but I have no problem in general with "NuTrek". TNG was just as flawed as anything else once nostalgia goggles are removed. Which is not to say I don't generally speaking like TNG. I just don't put it on some pedestal as the only way to do Trek or even the best way to do Trek.

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2626 on: March 15, 2020, 10:05:40 AM »
To each his own but I have no problem in general with "NuTrek". TNG was just as flawed as anything else once nostalgia goggles are removed. Which is not to say I don't generally speaking like TNG. I just don't put it on some pedestal as the only way to do Trek or even the best way to do Trek.


I don't think TNG is the best Trek, to me it's TOS then DS9.

Ah the it's not as good as you remember fallacy...

I'll just leave this here.

« Last Edit: March 15, 2020, 10:22:46 AM by D3RANG3D »

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2627 on: March 15, 2020, 10:32:36 AM »
NtGay

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2628 on: March 15, 2020, 11:43:39 AM »
To each his own but I have no problem in general with "NuTrek". TNG was just as flawed as anything else once nostalgia goggles are removed. Which is not to say I don't generally speaking like TNG. I just don't put it on some pedestal as the only way to do Trek or even the best way to do Trek.


I don't think TNG is the best Trek, to me it's TOS then DS9.

Ah the it's not as good as you remember fallacy...

I'll just leave this here.



This video is terrible. It is drawn out, has no structure, and just seemingly meanders.
weed

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2629 on: March 15, 2020, 11:46:38 AM »
fake news.

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2630 on: March 15, 2020, 11:55:12 AM »
Have only watched 3 episodes of Picard and liked what I saw so I won't comment but I know I disagree with RLM generally speaking as a source of authority (or people who can never seem to stop bringing them up) when it comes to this stuff so I doubt they have suddenly got better when it comes to what determines good from bad.

The idea that Picard also needs to be roughly the same show as TNG is also something I don't agree with at all. But I'll digress until I have time to watch the full season.

It doesnt need to be the same as TNG. But the characters need to be not fucking stupid, ie Picard himself.

MMaRsu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2631 on: March 15, 2020, 11:57:05 AM »
To each his own but I have no problem in general with "NuTrek". TNG was just as flawed as anything else once nostalgia goggles are removed. Which is not to say I don't generally speaking like TNG. I just don't put it on some pedestal as the only way to do Trek or even the best way to do Trek.

Fucking nonsense 100%. I only watched TNG for the first time in the last few years. The only show I saw as a kid growing up was Voyager, and out of DS9, TNG and VOY, VOY is the worst one in hindsight. No nostalgia glasses here.

TNG still invokes a great sense of morality, discussions of what is logical and moral, what is ethical.

Picard deals with none of these issues, and instead is a horrible analogy for Trumps America.

In my opinion, most DS9 episodes are above and beyond the writing set here in Picard. Didn't bother with Discovery season 2, as season 1 was fucking garbage.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2632 on: March 15, 2020, 12:46:25 PM »
100% of every holodeck episode in every iteration of trek is shit, so don't pretend old treks are flawless :lol

i'm two episodes back on picard but so far i am still enjoying it. definitely not TNG though heh

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2633 on: March 15, 2020, 12:48:14 PM »
Who said they were flawless?

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2634 on: March 15, 2020, 12:50:44 PM »
holodeck or lwaxana troi = next episode button

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2635 on: March 15, 2020, 02:44:25 PM »
Who said they were flawless?
okay pedantic ass :lol

they aren't as good as you remember. happy now? many of the episodes of the vaunted old trek shows suck balls.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2020, 02:52:03 PM by nachobro »

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2636 on: March 15, 2020, 02:58:40 PM »
TNG is flawed as fuck and a product of its era. It's a classic but get real.

Picard is assimilated into the Borg, doesn't have PTSD at all and it's not even mentioned besides the episode where he goes back to the farm and First Contact.

The show has almost no continuity.

weed

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot™
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2637 on: March 15, 2020, 03:00:42 PM »
TNG is flawed as fuck and a product of its era. It's a classic but get real.

Picard is assimilated into the Borg, doesn't have PTSD at all and it's not even mentioned besides the episode where he goes back to the farm and First Contact.

The show has almost no continuity.



That's the whole Borg/PTSD arc that Picard forgot about specifically that he got over it in First Contact about the only thing the TNG movies did right.

Who said they were flawless?
okay pedantic ass :lol

they aren't as good as you remember. happy now? many of the episodes of the vaunted old trek shows suck balls.

TNG is still light years ahead of Nutrek garbage. :neogaf

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Imagine trying to tear down something good so you can put a literal piece of shit on a pedestal.  :sabu
[close]













« Last Edit: March 15, 2020, 08:13:34 PM by D3RANG3D »

Stro

  • #SaturnSquad
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2638 on: March 15, 2020, 09:03:12 PM »
Two points that mean nothing:


1. RLM (and really it's just Mike with Rich tagging along that drive any and all Star Trek nonsnse) are quick to point out the flaws in what they deem classic Trek stuff as well.

2. I don't know shit about Star Trek besides catching a couple of minutes of TNG here and there on USA before Raw as a kid and maybe one of the later ones on UPN at 1 in the morning on Saturdays or some shit, but everything about Discovery and Picard scream "Not Trek" even to me.

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2639 on: March 15, 2020, 10:06:24 PM »
There is no such thing as "Not Trek". It's fine if people like or don't like something. But "Not Trek" is meaningless imo. Especially when some people who've enjoyed Trek all their lives from TOS to the TNG era to the current era enjoy it. Like me.

My main point with RLM is that tossing that into the conversation generally does nothing. Especially when they are used as the arbiter of what is "Not Trek" when I disagree with at least 75% of what they say. I'm fine with people as individuals liking or not liking current Trek especially when they express their individual opinions about what they like or don't like. My argument is that

A.) Not all people will agree so let's not pretend there is one consensus opinion here that is the right one.
B.) Please don't use RLM as the appeal to authority. They are random dudes who post stuff on youtube. They have no special claim to what is or isn't trek.