Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP  (Read 2965703 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

FStop7

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4260 on: March 12, 2017, 08:15:11 PM »
https://twitter.com/SteveKingIA/status/840980755236999169

Well then.
I'm getting tired of these endless variations on "the sky is falling, the sky is falling" from that part of the spectrum. You'd think Genghis Khan had returned. This time with laser weapons.


Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4261 on: March 13, 2017, 02:58:54 AM »
somebody needs to build a damn crib around this country to get those people's babies outta here
The fuck you think all this MAGA shit is son?
Hi

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4262 on: March 13, 2017, 11:38:33 AM »
My staff sergeant is a "militant atheist".   Regularly mocks religion out of the blue, says shit about how it's not rational, not based in science, etc.

And then thirty minutes later will turn around and rant about how climate change is a hoax/fraud/conspiracy, etc.

 :goty2

I never understood the kind of people who think that creationism and evolution denial are absurd things, but have no problem with thinking climate change is a hoax.

So you definitely don't trust conservatives on matters of geology and biology, but think their climatology division is legit?  :doge

I think my example is also a bit of a wrinkle of my circumstances.

Canada does have lots of very religious people (hell, I grew up as one, and on my better days, still like to call myself a Christian), but on a macro level is much less evangelical than America.

Nonetheless, policing in general is a very "conservative" profession.  I'm centrist as far as the general Canadian populace, and The Bore, is concerned, but in my office, I'm practically the left-wing pinko Commie.  :cancry

So it doesn't really surprise me in that context that you get an example of someone without religious attachment, who otherwise has an "orthodox Conservative" outlook, and obsessively consumes conservative talk radio shit, etc. but somehow filters out the Christian content.

Doesn't make it any less maddening though.

If your staff sergeant self-identifies as a militant atheist, you might want to blow their mind sometime and show them where that phrase originated from.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
©@©™

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4264 on: March 13, 2017, 03:36:42 PM »
https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/841249846120075265
A coworker was basically telling me this last Friday.  "My kid's school was able to identify people who stole laptops by accessing the camera on them.  Imagine what the CIA can do to try to get Trump!"   :doge



ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4267 on: March 13, 2017, 04:46:27 PM »
People still trust CBO projections?  That's a sweet job to have. Make 10 year projections and influence law, but never have culpability for being wrong.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2017/01/02/learning-from-cbos-history-of-incorrect-obamacare-projections/#5be78b0c46a7

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4268 on: March 13, 2017, 04:49:01 PM »
Ya but only 24 million poors
NtGay

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4269 on: March 13, 2017, 05:07:50 PM »
People still trust CBO projections?  That's a sweet job to have. Make 10 year projections and influence law, but never have culpability for being wrong.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2017/01/02/learning-from-cbos-history-of-incorrect-obamacare-projections/#5be78b0c46a7

Kaiser did a review of all projections of the ACA and the CBO was consistently the best forecaster. So yes.

They tend to overestimate costs though. So Republicans may be able to make the case of budget deficits.

At best right now the most positive projection is from Standard and Poors and they estimate at least 6 million will lose insurance. And if you look at the leaner subsidies, the change in age rating, the block granting of Medicaid, it is impossible for millions not to lose insurance under this. The question was always how many millions.


EDIT: Since I am home and can add to what I was saying, this is a copy of one of the studies Kaiser did:
http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2015/dec/cbo-crystal-ball-forecast-aca

« Last Edit: March 13, 2017, 06:26:39 PM by Nola »

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4270 on: March 13, 2017, 06:13:36 PM »
Oh hey guess who used to love CBO projections?
https://twitter.com/RyanLizza/status/840002387398012929
Hi

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4271 on: March 13, 2017, 07:45:13 PM »
https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/841249846120075265
A coworker was basically telling me this last Friday.  "My kid's school was able to identify people who stole laptops by accessing the camera on them.  Imagine what the CIA can do to try to get Trump!"   :doge

And you answered: "The problem is not that they can or not, but that if it does they require a order from a judge, specially if the order  comes from Obama. And Microwaves dont have cameras."

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4272 on: March 13, 2017, 09:45:49 PM »
People still trust CBO projections?  That's a sweet job to have. Make 10 year projections and influence law, but never have culpability for being wrong.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2017/01/02/learning-from-cbos-history-of-incorrect-obamacare-projections/#5be78b0c46a7
first subhead "Exchange Enrollment Much Less Than CBO Projected"

ctrl+f "employ"

no results

thinking emoji

Philip Cardgage

  • #1 Creeper Lagoon Fan
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4273 on: March 14, 2017, 08:50:19 AM »
So, I'm a little confused by something. Wikileaks releases a document written by the Cia, detailing methods of spying on people using products many U. S. Residents own.

Jon Oliver spends five minutes saying how everything is kosher because it's theoretical and the CIA is barred from spying on its own people.

Yet, last year, he interviewed Edward Snowden who is an enemy of the state because he said that the Government was spying on its own people.

So, what gives?

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4274 on: March 14, 2017, 09:07:16 AM »
Is it just that CIA jurisdiction is different than NSA with regards to spying on citizens? Of course I'm sure all the intelligence agencies share those same tools.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4275 on: March 14, 2017, 12:30:02 PM »
Looks like I'll have to stop saying Lane Kiffin is the king of "falling up" and replace him with Paul Ryan. At least Kiffin has accomplished some things (championships, banging coeds).
010

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4276 on: March 14, 2017, 01:15:56 PM »
Looks like I'll have to stop saying Lane Kiffin is the king of "falling up" and replace him with Paul Ryan. At least Kiffin has accomplished some things (championships, banging coeds).
Totally worth reading the replies in this tweet thread:
https://twitter.com/david_j_roth/status/841479686165274625

seagrams hotsauce

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4277 on: March 14, 2017, 05:01:09 PM »
Is it just that CIA jurisdiction is different than NSA with regards to spying on citizens? Of course I'm sure all the intelligence agencies share those same tools.

I'm not sure what the relationship is between the NSA and the other two but the CIA and FBI have been pretty uncooperative with one another since day one

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4278 on: March 14, 2017, 05:28:27 PM »
Is it just that CIA jurisdiction is different than NSA with regards to spying on citizens? Of course I'm sure all the intelligence agencies share those same tools.

They don't share the same tools as shown by all the software from the recent wikileaks, which was written by the CIA for the CIA
NtGay

Dennis

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4279 on: March 14, 2017, 05:28:49 PM »

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4280 on: March 14, 2017, 05:57:34 PM »
So...Breitbart just released a pre-election tape of Paul Ryan saying he would no longer support Trump on anything [this was after that Pussy-gate tape] and nearly at the same time a White House report leaked that said the fallout from Ryan's health plan would be even worse than what the CBO estimated:

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/03/i-have-theory-about-steve-bannon-and-ahca
dog

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4281 on: March 14, 2017, 06:13:41 PM »
Looks like I'll have to stop saying Lane Kiffin is the king of "falling up" and replace him with Paul Ryan. At least Kiffin has accomplished some things (championships, banging coeds).

Lane Kiffin : Al Davis :: Paul Ryan : Donald Trump

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
010

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4283 on: March 14, 2017, 07:55:36 PM »
Looks like I'll have to stop saying Lane Kiffin is the king of "falling up" and replace him with Paul Ryan. At least Kiffin has accomplished some things (championships, banging coeds).

Lane Kiffin : Al Davis :: Paul Ryan : Donald Trump

Is Reince Priebus the JaMarcus Russell of the Trump Administration?
©@©™


benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4285 on: March 14, 2017, 08:08:14 PM »
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/323792-former-nc-gov-says-backlash-over-bathroom-law-has-made-it-hard
Quote
Former North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R) says the state's controversial "bathroom law" has made it difficult for him to land a job after leaving office.

McCrory said in an interview with a World Radio podcast, according to the News & Observer, that the backlash following the law “has impacted me to this day, even after I left office. People are reluctant to hire me, because ‘oh my gosh, he’s a bigot’ — which is the last thing I am.”

He blamed liberal advocates who opposed the law, which requires that transgender people use the bathroom corresponding to their biological sex as identified on their birth certificate, for damaging his reputation.

“If you disagree with the politically correct thought police on this new definition of gender, you’re a bigot, you’re the worst of evil,” McCrory said. “It’s almost as if I broke a law.”
:usacry R.I.P. IN PEACE AMERICA 1776-2017 :usacry

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4286 on: March 14, 2017, 08:19:37 PM »
backlash-over-bathroom-law-has-made-it-hard

go on...  :phil
©@©™

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4287 on: March 14, 2017, 08:43:33 PM »
Tax returns from 2005.

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4288 on: March 14, 2017, 08:51:22 PM »
Tax returns from 2005.
doesn't matter when the crime was committed for him to be automatically impeached

/GAF legal hot take

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4289 on: March 14, 2017, 08:52:20 PM »
lol it's only two pages of the tax returns :dead

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4290 on: March 14, 2017, 08:52:45 PM »
What's the statute of limitations on taking bribes from Russia to commit treason?
©@©™

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4291 on: March 14, 2017, 08:53:34 PM »
Asking for a friend.
©@©™

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4292 on: March 14, 2017, 09:15:50 PM »
lmao at maddow's ten hours of "just asking questions" and then going to a break

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4293 on: March 14, 2017, 09:20:18 PM »
lmao at maddow's ten hours of "just asking questions" and then going to a break

breh she's got an hour of air time to fill

daemon

  • Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4294 on: March 14, 2017, 09:21:44 PM »
at this rate, the wall will be built and we still won't see any tax returns.

I'm now picturing the voice of the narrator for AMC shows.


"Previously, on season 6 of Tax Returns"

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4295 on: March 14, 2017, 09:21:53 PM »
I'm not watching, but both my regular twitter feed and the little politics list I made a while ago are 100% people tweeting about how long Maddow's taking with this.

https://twitter.com/kevinarnovitz/status/841818876673445888
https://twitter.com/dcsportsbog/status/841817309165559809
https://twitter.com/rembert/status/841818065096572929
https://twitter.com/netw3rk/status/841818843219648512
https://twitter.com/theshrillest/status/841820799728246786
https://twitter.com/jbouie/status/841818928615723008


Kevin Arnovitz deleted his tweet, but it was "It feels like the hand-check rule was reinstated for breaking news."

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4296 on: March 14, 2017, 09:23:50 PM »
itsnothing.gif

?

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4297 on: March 14, 2017, 09:31:25 PM »
he paid 25% :holeup

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4298 on: March 14, 2017, 09:40:05 PM »
Mainstream cable news is fucking trash(few individual shows aside).




benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4299 on: March 14, 2017, 09:45:41 PM »
Quote
BREAKING NEWS: Trump made $150 million in 2005 and paid $38 million in federal taxes

POLITICO
to: me
9:44 pm

The White House said on Tuesday that President Donald Trump earned more than $150 million in 2005 - and paid some $38 million in federal taxes.

The administration offered those details in a statement as journalist David Cay Johnston published two pages of tax information about the president, apparently from Trump's 2005 return. The revelations were simultaneously broadcast on MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show," which included an interview with Johnston.

"Before being elected President, Mr. Trump was one ofå the most successful businessmen in the world with a responsibility to his company, his family and his employees to pay no more tax than legally required," The White House said in a statement. "That being said, Mr. Trump paid $38 million dollars even after taking into account large scale depreciation for construction, on an income of more than $150 million dollars, as well as paying tens of millions of dollars in other taxes such as sales and excise taxes and employment taxes and this illegally published return proves just that."


zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4301 on: March 14, 2017, 09:55:02 PM »
rub

El Babua

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4302 on: March 14, 2017, 09:55:04 PM »
Y'all got worked.

If it was a real scoop, they wouldn't have to hype it up for some cable news show.

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4303 on: March 14, 2017, 10:17:54 PM »
Lesson here: Stay in your fucking lane. lol

If you are an editorial host that primarily offers analysis or punditry, you should probably stick to the game you know how to play.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4304 on: March 14, 2017, 10:18:38 PM »
So anyways, back to the ACA repeal.

I get that FUD against any source of embarrassing information is pretty much automatic for the GOP, but even so the attacks on the ACA feel goofy.

They're repealing rules which mandate health insurance and slashing funding to subsidize that coverage. That's pretty explicitly designed to push people away from health insurance, no?

Dennis

  • Senior Member

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4306 on: March 14, 2017, 10:41:03 PM »
Maddow jumped the shark
püp

Dennis

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4307 on: March 14, 2017, 10:43:25 PM »


benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4309 on: March 14, 2017, 10:46:30 PM »
keep winning democrats:

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4310 on: March 14, 2017, 10:47:43 PM »
omg


benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4311 on: March 14, 2017, 11:09:53 PM »
18part tweet about why this is important from HuffPo columnist:
https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/841833971700899841

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4312 on: March 14, 2017, 11:17:16 PM »
oh here come the tweetsplainers

 :goty2
rub

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4313 on: March 14, 2017, 11:17:21 PM »
So anyways, back to the ACA repeal.

I get that FUD against any source of embarrassing information is pretty much automatic for the GOP, but even so the attacks on the ACA feel goofy.

They're repealing rules which mandate health insurance and slashing funding to subsidize that coverage. That's pretty explicitly designed to push people away from health insurance, no?

Or as Ryan says, if you want it you can get it  :doge

The more I look at the plan the more it looks like little more than tax cuts for the rich being sold as "health care." This seems like the entire conservative wing throwing up their hands and admitting no, they don't have any ideas on how to address healthcare. Poor, old...poor and old? Too bad, this isn't for you. And of course block granting Medicaid ensures it gets shitcanned. Public health, drug addiction help, community centers get shitcanned too. Thankfully this shit isn't going to pass.

So do democrats grow some balls and just say hey, why don't we just raise the Medicaid expansion income limit to include "middle class" people, increase hospital reimbursement rates, and change the name from Medicaid to something else in order to kill the stigma.
010

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4314 on: March 14, 2017, 11:21:38 PM »
Medicade makes it sound like a dirty and dark arcade tucked into the corner of the mall.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
he says as if there's any other kind of mall-located arcade
[close]

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4315 on: March 15, 2017, 12:08:24 AM »
how did i miss this, why didn't they poll this for a decade except when osama got "killed"?


Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4316 on: March 15, 2017, 12:31:25 AM »
38 on 150 is pretty awful, especially for someone whose schtick is how much of a savvy businessman they are. Apparently the president selects his tax preparers like he does his executive agency heads (without any review).

spoiler (click to show/hide)
hmu Mr. President
[close]

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4317 on: March 15, 2017, 01:05:00 AM »
So anyways, back to the ACA repeal.

I get that FUD against any source of embarrassing information is pretty much automatic for the GOP, but even so the attacks on the ACA feel goofy.

They're repealing rules which mandate health insurance and slashing funding to subsidize that coverage. That's pretty explicitly designed to push people away from health insurance, no?

One of my biggest annoyances right now is pretty much this very thing.

On the one hand you have Ryan/Trump/GOP claiming if they don't do anything Obamacare will collapse completely. Setting aside the CBO, Kaiser, and numerous other places disputing that, how the fuck does that square with them passing a bill that relies on the functioning of those exchanges to work????

 Since in addition to that, all the complaints they have leveled at the ACA for why it is collapsing or failing, are not actually improved by this bill. In many cases, it makes them worse.

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4318 on: March 15, 2017, 01:26:50 AM »
Is it just that CIA jurisdiction is different than NSA with regards to spying on citizens? Of course I'm sure all the intelligence agencies share those same tools.
With the NSA, the issue is that they're collecting pretty much everything from everyone. This CIA thing is just a look at their tool belt. The juicy ones being assassination methods (compromising cars that are drive by wire) and a department (?) specializing in profiling and impersonating known hackers. Hm... :doge

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4319 on: March 15, 2017, 01:52:22 AM »
I'll try to offhand piece this together in regards to the John Oliver thing, but do so poorly and inaccurately. The DIA and CIA are in theory concerned with human intelligence (legally, foreign), the NSA is concerned with information/data/signal intelligence. Again, technically legally only "foreign" intelligence.

Traditionally the "loophole" was that they had to have only one foot in the U.S., i.e. someone here talking to someone there. The NSA realized this was a waste of time and just decided to hoover up everything in sight and figure it out later. Which is why they got caught.

The DIA and CIA have goals that are outside simple data collection and spent years on building relationships and so on, the NSA has been organized and worked in a such a way that they've never got past that data collection step so their spying is considered often almost functionally useless. You go "I need to know about this thing in placename, Russia", the CIA talks to some people and comes back "they think it's bullshit", the NSA dumps fifty gigabytes of everything a search turned up "placename, Russia" in on you.

ECHELON is rumored to have accomplished essentially nothing it was set out to do but wound up doing all sorts of other shit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON

Also, like everything else, the FBI, CIA, DIA and NSA all have turf wars so there's endless redundancy and it's not difficult for an administration to get the intelligence it wants to see. Which is a funny lesson nobody seems to ever recall about the [insert fuckup here] the agencies played along until it was time to turn on the administration.

The advantage to the average American of the CIA is that they've been publicly burned before by the Congress, so they tended to be much more careful about staying within certain boundaries in the years after the Church Committee. The War on Terror started to reverse that. Protecting us.

The NSA not only got less than a slap on the wrist, but the DNI directly lied to Congress and kept his job. (Snowden claims this is why he whistleblew.)