Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP  (Read 2971195 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| Hello Shithead.
« Reply #56880 on: March 04, 2020, 12:30:42 AM »
From here I think Sanders just gets on a roll. I don't think there's nearly as much resistance to him within the party as pundits or social media addicts would imagine, and if people are seeing you throw a victory party every week they're liable to just jump on board.

hahaha look at this dumb motherfucker

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56881 on: March 04, 2020, 12:34:14 AM »
Hm, with these Sanders losses honestly a lot of his arguments have gone out of the window. Things like curating new voters. That definitely didn't happen.

Will have to see how it impacts the races on March 10.
weed

Cauliflower Of Love

  • Section 552
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56882 on: March 04, 2020, 12:37:27 AM »
Bloomber at 18.8

Sanders 28.7

Biden 17

In cali.

RIP Revolution.
titor

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56883 on: March 04, 2020, 12:40:07 AM »
Bloomber at 18.8

Sanders 28.7

Biden 17

In cali.

RIP Revolution.

I've been reading crazy stats of the voters in that race and...Latinos really, really want them some Sanders. I knew this from anecdotal in real life evidence. But seeing something like 90 percent of young latino voters going Sanders is a massive wow moment. Makes you wonder if any will turn out for Biden in Nov.
weed

bdoughty

  • Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56884 on: March 04, 2020, 12:40:31 AM »
Reuters went Biden on Biden yesterday.



There are three mistakes in the caption/photo. See if you can catch them all.


Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56885 on: March 04, 2020, 12:42:28 AM »
Hm, with these Sanders losses honestly a lot of his arguments have gone out of the window. Things like curating new voters. That definitely didn't happen.

Will have to see how it impacts the races on March 10.

There are a whole bunch of arguments towards Sanders being 1) uniquely electable and/or 2) able to pass his agenda that are not aging well.

Note those aren't arguments about his actual platform being superior to eg Biden's, but being right doesn't get you any prizes.

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56886 on: March 04, 2020, 12:43:50 AM »
Bloomber at 18.8
God I hope Bloomberg stays viable in Texas too.

 :joker You're trapped in here with us now Mike. :society

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56887 on: March 04, 2020, 12:43:57 AM »
Hm, with these Sanders losses honestly a lot of his arguments have gone out of the window. Things like curating new voters. That definitely didn't happen.

Will have to see how it impacts the races on March 10.

There are a whole bunch of arguments towards Sanders being 1) uniquely electable and/or 2) able to pass his agenda that are not aging well.

Note those aren't arguments about his actual platform being superior to eg Biden's, but being right doesn't get you any prizes.

Americans don't care about platform.

Another thing to learn from this is the turn out. Before today I thought conclusively that Biden can't beat Trump. But the turn out for him is massive. I think he can.

The problem is there is one obstacle for Biden going forward: his weakness - debates. Bernie will try to pound him on the 15th. And if Biden clenches the nom, I think Biden will lose to Trump's bullying. But given this turnout I wonder if they'll come out to ride for Biden anyways.

I mean, if his platform is shit and they're voting for him, maybe they don't even care if he bombs debates. Trump bombed debates and still won. If they rally that much behind Biden then he may still eke out a W.
weed

Cauliflower Of Love

  • Section 552
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56888 on: March 04, 2020, 12:45:50 AM »
Kornacki just basially said Sanders loses the night even with a landslide in Cali.

They're no longer talking demographics though.

:thinking:
titor

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56889 on: March 04, 2020, 12:46:18 AM »
Another thing to learn from this is the turn out. Before today I thought conclusively that Biden can't beat Trump. But the turn out for him is massive. I think he can.
Slow your roll there, just to pick a state that's larger and near 100% results, Biden currently is sitting at 36% of what Trump got in Massachusetts. Trump lost MA 60-33.

edit: he's also sitting far below both Hillary and Bernie last time, with a total D turnout that looks about the same

bdoughty

  • Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56890 on: March 04, 2020, 12:46:29 AM »
Biden Harris 2020 baby yeahhhhhhh!!!!!! Can you fuckin feel it

I feel an L for the D with that lineup.

ShutUp

  • Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56891 on: March 04, 2020, 12:48:29 AM »
I go out for a couple hours and come back to this. A lot of you are fucking pathetic. Especially james. I'm sorry your guy lost some races tonight. Get the fuck over it. The kind of shit you're saying about Warren supporters in particular is garbage. No one was owed their votes.

Where'd you go? a Biden rally?

:yikes

You 86 IQ clown, you're a pretentious Nintex knockoff without the goofball appeal of the original. Fuck off and stop crowding out posts from people who have something useful to offer. I'd rather read James' misogyny-drenched rants than whatever you try to pass off as contributions.

You never have anything insightful to offer and yet keep puking all over the site. No matter how many times you change names to hide it.

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56892 on: March 04, 2020, 12:49:00 AM »
Another thing to learn from this is the turn out. Before today I thought conclusively that Biden can't beat Trump. But the turn out for him is massive. I think he can.
Slow your roll there, just to pick a state that's larger and near 100% results, Biden currently is sitting at 36% of what Trump got in Massachusetts. Trump lost MA 60-33.

Hm, thanks for the caution. I was too Texas biased in that post. Can you compare turnout metrics for us state by state race and year by year?

*bats eyes*
weed

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56893 on: March 04, 2020, 12:52:25 AM »
Of course Biden can beat Trump. Could lose to him too. It'll come down to the same five or so states as last time. Turnout looks to be up but not quite to 2008 levels, which is encouraging but not determinative.

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56894 on: March 04, 2020, 12:57:00 AM »
Well, even though Texas obviously isn't in more than 71% in we can look at it and see just how far the gap is versus a general election, not even a Presidential one.

2020 D Primary:
Biden - 460,807   
Sanders - 436,928   
Bloomberg - 241,585   
Warren - 177,626   
Buttigieg - 78,954   
Klobuchar - 40,968

2016 D Primary
Clinton - 936,004
Sanders - 476,547

2016 Presidential Election
Trump - 4,685,047
Clinton - 3,877,868
Johnson - 283,492

2018 Senate Election
Cruz - 4,260,553
O'Rourke - 4,045,632

2016 R Primary
Cruz - 1,241,118
Trump - 758,762
Rubio - 503,055
Kasich - 120,473
Carson - 117,969
Jeb! - 35,420 (Declared Winner)

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56896 on: March 04, 2020, 12:58:58 AM »
If Joe's lead doesn't get too much bigger in Texas, and Bloomberg stays just viable, he and Benard are basically walking away with nearly the same amount of delegates. Even though Joe "won" with this "massive turnout" supposedly.

This was the argument a week ago for why Bernie wasn't going to end it all on Super Tuesday so nobody should concede anything to him. Nothing's changed except they get to mark a bunch of states in Joe's color because he came in first, often barely* from looking at a lot of these states.

*because of the way the D's allocate delegates, a ten point win in Minnesota with a third candidate viable is way less huge than say, NC where he won by 18 and only him and Bernard are viable.

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56897 on: March 04, 2020, 01:02:31 AM »
Well, even though Texas obviously isn't in more than 71% in we can look at it and see just how far the gap is versus a general election, not even a Presidential one.

2020 D Primary:
Biden - 460,807   
Sanders - 436,928   
Bloomberg - 241,585   
Warren - 177,626   
Buttigieg - 78,954   
Klobuchar - 40,968

...

2016 D Primary
Clinton - 936,004
Sanders - 476,547

Well, it's not lower turnout. If you combine the non Biden and Sanders votes there's still a total of additional 539,133 votes‬ without all the votes in. Which, when combined with Biden's votes is more than Hillary's 2016 total.

The real story here is that Sanders has a less votes in 2020 than in 2016 (although still counting).
weed

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56898 on: March 04, 2020, 01:05:03 AM »
Interesting to me is how much Amy dropped in Minnesota. She was polling at 30% last week. She dropped out YESTERDAY and is only getting 5%. (Pete was at 7% he's getting 1% there.)

I'm way used to the old days when I grew up where you had to send a letter with a guy to the convention so he could drop you out because even a telegraph message would be too slow.

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56899 on: March 04, 2020, 01:05:46 AM »
Interesting to me is how much Amy dropped in Minnesota. She was polling at 30% last week. She dropped out YESTERDAY and is only getting 5%.

I'm way used to the old days when I grew up where you had to send a letter with a guy to the convention so he could drop you out because even a telegraph message would be too slow.

She was way, way less viable than we were led to believe even in her home state :lol
weed

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56900 on: March 04, 2020, 01:07:59 AM »
Bernie having around the same amount of voters, and actually less than 2016, isn't good for him. It shows he hasn't truly grown his base in Texas. All this despite all the canvassing and base expansion arguments.
weed

bdoughty

  • Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56901 on: March 04, 2020, 01:09:10 AM »
Guy who old people like... lady who identity politicians like.... it's a wrap. Stick a fork in Drumpf, he done :rejoice

Trump replaces Pence with James Woods. Blowout!

https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1234686446474186752

Cauliflower Of Love

  • Section 552
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56902 on: March 04, 2020, 01:09:12 AM »
Chris Hayes is getting jacked up, fuck. You can see his biceps through his suite. That's like cuomo level.
titor

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56903 on: March 04, 2020, 01:09:20 AM »
Biden was only polling at 8% in Minnesota last week, he's got 39% of the vote! That's like almost perfect Amy-Pete handover.

Last Week: Amy+Biden+Pete = 45%
Super Tuesday: Amy+Biden+Pete = 45.2%

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56904 on: March 04, 2020, 01:14:01 AM »
PROJECTED JOEMENTIUM

(Image removed from quote.)
damn, I totally underprojected:

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56905 on: March 04, 2020, 01:14:38 AM »

bluemax

  • Senior Member
NO

Cauliflower Of Love

  • Section 552
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56907 on: March 04, 2020, 01:16:28 AM »
PROJECTED JOEMENTIUM

(Image removed from quote.)
damn, I totally underprojected:
(Image removed from quote.)

Congrats Joe, you're back to where you started.

Biden 2020!

It took the entire Democratic class to make up one bernie.

The reaction is so lopsided.
titor

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56908 on: March 04, 2020, 01:17:11 AM »
https://twitter.com/cmclymer/status/1235060426599092224

She still hasn't won a state.

Why the fuck are Warren supporters jacking themselves off with sexism arguments? It's the same shit that happened with Hillary. I cannot fucking GODDAMN wait for a woman to become president for people to finally fucking stop blaming sexism for that candidates failures. God DAMN.
weed

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| Hello Shithead.
« Reply #56909 on: March 04, 2020, 01:17:38 AM »
From here I think Sanders just gets on a roll. I don't think there's nearly as much resistance to him within the party as pundits or social media addicts would imagine, and if people are seeing you throw a victory party every week they're liable to just jump on board.
edit: quoting a Mandark post and just repeating everything he said. will meditate on this
:karen
*****

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56910 on: March 04, 2020, 01:18:00 AM »

Cauliflower Of Love

  • Section 552
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56911 on: March 04, 2020, 01:18:54 AM »
Biden is viable in Cali!
titor

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56912 on: March 04, 2020, 01:19:30 AM »
Bernie having around the same amount of voters, and actually less than 2016, isn't good for him. It shows he hasn't truly grown his base in Texas. All this despite all the canvassing and base expansion arguments.

He polled lower than he did in 2016 and got fewer votes in the early states too.

Of course the argument was there were more candidates, but if he'd really been electorally strong then there wouldn't have been that many candidates pulling away so many voters. They would have been winnowed out early or stuck in the 1-2% range.

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56913 on: March 04, 2020, 01:19:38 AM »
Quote
Democratic presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg will reassess on Wednesday whether he should stay in the race after getting disappointing results in Super Tuesday primaries despite spending more than a half billion dollars on his three-month campaign.

A person close to the Bloomberg campaign confirmed the deliberations. The person wasn’t authorized to discuss the matter by name and requested anonymity. Bloomberg flew back to New York after campaigning Tuesday in Florida, a state that votes March 17 and where he’s already spent millions.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BUT MY EPIC TWEET

Cauliflower Of Love

  • Section 552
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56914 on: March 04, 2020, 01:20:33 AM »
You know, I think Biden really wanted to run a Sanders-esque campaign where he doesn't have to rely on friends and favors from outside money, and finally realized it wasn't going to happen and just reverted to old school politics.
titor

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56915 on: March 04, 2020, 01:21:10 AM »
https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1235083828927979520

I just wanted to post these Amy emotes.  :karen :klob

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56916 on: March 04, 2020, 01:21:18 AM »
It's tough to say but my candidate may not be viable. We will have to see how he performs against Biden in the rust belt. If he loses those I see him bowing out graciously.

Not hard is it, Warren stans?
weed

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56917 on: March 04, 2020, 01:21:21 AM »
The Movie Blob and PoliEraElites are epic Warren fans. So I just assume anyone who supports her has similar views.

Wait, what are Occam's views on Elizabeth Warren? :hmm

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56918 on: March 04, 2020, 01:22:26 AM »
I could live with Diamond Joe.
serge

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56919 on: March 04, 2020, 01:22:32 AM »
It's tough to say but my candidate may not be viable. We will have to see how he performs against Biden in the rust belt. If he loses those I see him bowing out graciously.

Not hard is it, Warren stans?

good point no bernie stans will be making any excuses

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56920 on: March 04, 2020, 01:23:23 AM »

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56921 on: March 04, 2020, 01:23:56 AM »
https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1235083828927979520

I just wanted to post these Amy emotes.  :karen :klob

wow this is such a shocking statistic

/s
weed

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56922 on: March 04, 2020, 01:25:18 AM »
Epic accounts like the Horsewhisperer have also been going overtime on Twitter, don't even follow that trash account but the Twitter algorithm has been pushing him onto my feed.

You gotta keep that shit on Latest Tweets, man.

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56923 on: March 04, 2020, 01:26:10 AM »
Those Warren articles were written after she tanked hard in both Iowa and New Hampshire. I could almost excuse Iowa because you never really know what those guys want other than be wined and dined and pretend they're special. New Hampshire? She's from a neighboring state and she should know the retail politics to get people to vote for her.

Sometimes people aren't into you. If you think it's sexism, that's fine I guess. It could also be that progressives understand on a whole that they're still a small part of the party (when they even want to participate) and quickly picked around their preferred candidate in Bernie Sanders instead of deciding late.

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56924 on: March 04, 2020, 01:26:43 AM »
It's tough to say but my candidate may not be viable. We will have to see how he performs against Biden in the rust belt. If he loses those I see him bowing out graciously.

Not hard is it, Warren stans?

good point no bernie stans will be making any excuses

Oh, I'm sure many will.
weed

Cauliflower Of Love

  • Section 552
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56925 on: March 04, 2020, 01:27:20 AM »
You know, I think Biden really wanted to run a Sanders-esque campaign where he doesn't have to rely on friends and favors from outside money, and finally realized it wasn't going to happen and just reverted to old school politics.

Was Biden getting some key endorsements worse than when Sanders got the entire Squad to endorse him right after the heart attack? If so, why?

Huh? How are they comparable? 


A few freshman reps vs political industry
« Last Edit: March 04, 2020, 01:37:17 AM by Cauliflower Of Love »
titor

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56926 on: March 04, 2020, 01:37:38 AM »
New Hampshire? She's from a neighboring state and she should know the retail politics to get people to vote for her.
They also don't like it being assumed that they'll vote for Massachusetts politicians just because it's nearby and all reporters know about from the area. Sometimes they'll vote for neighbors (John Kerry, Howard Dean, Paul Tsongas) and sometimes they won't (Scott Brown, Mitt Romney, Elizabeth Warren) depending on other factors.

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56927 on: March 04, 2020, 01:40:11 AM »
The % of precincts reporting from Texas went backwards from 73% to 69%, what is this some kind of sexist joke Texas? How dare you!

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56928 on: March 04, 2020, 01:40:12 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)

Imagine being this hurt, you mentally deficient cornball. Please kill yourself and stop being so tied to your forum identity as an absolute bottom feeding clown.

You went to jail? What happened dude? You okay man?
weed

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56929 on: March 04, 2020, 01:43:15 AM »
Soon after Pete Buttigieg endorsed Joe Biden for president on Monday night, top Biden advisers Greg Schultz and Sheila Nix were on the phone with about 40 Buttigieg bundlers asking them to join the team, too.

The call, arranged within hours of Buttigieg’s departure of the race, was aimed at recruiting Buttigieg’s most passionate fundraisers looking for their next act in the presidential race. And it’s part of a bigger behind-the-scenes push, running in parallel to the string of prominent public endorsements flowing Biden’s way, urging Democrats that now is the time to unite behind the former vice president.

In addition to further coalescing supporters of the other moderate candidates in the 2020 race, the Biden campaign needs the donors’ cash to air more ads, hire more staff and compete with Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Mike Bloomberg in upcoming primary states. Biden reaped an explosion of cash after winning the South Carolina primary on Saturday, but before that, neither Biden nor his super PAC booked any advertising in Super Tuesday states until late last week, while some of his rivals had been airing ads for over a month.

Buttigieg released the names of his bundlers last December, and Biden staffers are reaching out to donors one-by-one off of that list, according to one former Buttigieg donor. And in turn, some Buttigieg donors are already actively participating in the recruitment effort: Alex Slater, a Buttigieg bundler turned Biden backer, emailed other Buttigieg donors Tuesday morning asking them to put aside the pain of Buttigieg’s dropout and join up.

“I respect that — it’s barely 24 hours since Pete conceded, and each candidate has legitimate merits. Also, who wants to be proven wrong twice? These are very legitimate positions,” Slater wrote in the email, which POLITICO obtained. “But listening to many of you I have personally come to the belief that the political moment deserves action and conviction. That’s why I’m firmly following Pete’s lead in endorsing Vice President Joe Biden, joining to support his campaign and asking you to consider doing the same.”

“Although the vice president wasn't our first choice, he represents the kind of politics that Pete represents,” said John Atkinson, a Democratic bundler who supported Buttigieg. Atkinson and Mark Ishaug, another Buttigieg donor, hosted Monday night's call between the Biden advisers and the Buttigieg bundlers, which was organized by Nix and Becky Carroll, a member of Buttigieg's policy team.

Atkinson is now backing Biden, he said. Other prominent Buttigieg fundraisers who are now supporting Biden include former ambassador to Switzerland Suzan LeVine and her husband, Eric; hedge fund manager Orin Kramer, an early supporter of Obama; and event planner Bryan Rafanelli, who planned events for the Obama White House.

"I don’t believe we can win with Bernie. So now we need to step in the ring with Joe, and go," said Rafanelli, who added he had already gotten requests for a pro-Biden event in Boston. "The burden is now on the Biden campaign to swiftly organize all of us and thank us and pull us in."
Quote
"For Pete donors, there are three levels of thinking right now,” said one Buttigieg bundler who called himself “Biden-curious.” “One, a full-throated support for Biden now, joining his national finance committee; two, supporting Biden, but not bundle for him because you're exhausted; or three, I need a minute to mourn.”

Charles Adams Jr., a fundraiser for Buttigieg’s campaign who lives in Geneva, said he was “slightly taken aback” to wake up on Monday to an email from a former Buttigieg fundraiser who had already switched her allegiance to Biden, and was sharing information on how to donate.

“I thought it would be appropriate to give it a few days” before supporting another candidate, Adams said.
:money

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56930 on: March 04, 2020, 01:45:08 AM »
Can you stop fucking derailing plz?

This isn't resetera bud.

Cauliflower Of Love

  • Section 552
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56931 on: March 04, 2020, 01:45:29 AM »
You know, I think Biden really wanted to run a Sanders-esque campaign where he doesn't have to rely on friends and favors from outside money, and finally realized it wasn't going to happen and just reverted to old school politics.

Was Biden getting some key endorsements worse than when Sanders got the entire Squad to endorse him right after the heart attack? If so, why?

Huh? How are they comparable? 


A few freshman senators vs political industry

The Squad are all members of the House, not the Senate.

Shosh keeps insisting that you're a policy wonk, and then you do shit like this.

oh no a typo. ::)
titor

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56932 on: March 04, 2020, 01:47:40 AM »
Cindi, as an example of what I was talking about regarding the delegates and how close Biden/Sanders still are in Texas, POLITICO has of the delegates so far out of it at:
Biden - 49
Sanders - 49
Bloomberg - 4

Massachusetts is 34 Biden, 26 Sanders, 17 Warren.

The Biden haul is coming from OK, AK, TN, AL, NC, and VA. Any minor Biden leads in TX and MA are cancelled out by Bernie's leads in VT and CO. The hope for Bernie is that California is such that it erases more of that Southern bulge. Minnesota is definitely a bad one though, Amy had mostly kept candidates away from it so it was her vs. Sanders and then she made it a Biden state overnight.

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56933 on: March 04, 2020, 01:47:47 AM »
https://twitter.com/cmclymer/status/1235060426599092224

She still hasn't won a state.

Why the fuck are Warren supporters jacking themselves off with sexism arguments? It's the same shit that happened with Hillary. I cannot fucking GODDAMN wait for a woman to become president for people to finally fucking stop blaming sexism for that candidates failures. God DAMN.

To some people it's all aesthetics, any criticisms about Harris's prosecution record and Buttigieg's well, lots of things, were irrelevant compared to the look.
Same crowd of people that unironically celebrate more female execs in the mili-indus complex. Or long for the nostalgia of the Obama days where everything was peachy.

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56934 on: March 04, 2020, 01:48:56 AM »
Can you stop fucking derailing plz?


lmfao

You’re such a fucking bitch, dude. Imagine being so triggered that you have to PM and get personal because of shit i posted in here. You’re so fucking spineless and can’t actually converse with someone. Like I said, kill yourself.

Just ignore the forum heel.

Tuckers Law

  • Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56935 on: March 04, 2020, 01:50:17 AM »
Your couples spat is worse than any Nintex post in here.



Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56938 on: March 04, 2020, 01:53:21 AM »
Warren is a snake for not dropping out and endorsing, but Pete and Amy are snakes for doing that? Endorsements from junior House reps don't matter? What's the guiding principle here?

It's almost as if 100% of your process arguments are just motivated reasoning.

You should have just said that instead of sending bitter pm's

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| SUPER SALT FACTORY
« Reply #56939 on: March 04, 2020, 01:53:38 AM »
Soon after Pete Buttigieg endorsed Joe Biden for president on Monday night, top Biden advisers Greg Schultz and Sheila Nix were on the phone with about 40 Buttigieg bundlers asking them to join the team, too.

The call, arranged within hours of Buttigieg’s departure of the race, was aimed at recruiting Buttigieg’s most passionate fundraisers looking for their next act in the presidential race. And it’s part of a bigger behind-the-scenes push, running in parallel to the string of prominent public endorsements flowing Biden’s way, urging Democrats that now is the time to unite behind the former vice president.

In addition to further coalescing supporters of the other moderate candidates in the 2020 race, the Biden campaign needs the donors’ cash to air more ads, hire more staff and compete with Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Mike Bloomberg in upcoming primary states. Biden reaped an explosion of cash after winning the South Carolina primary on Saturday, but before that, neither Biden nor his super PAC booked any advertising in Super Tuesday states until late last week, while some of his rivals had been airing ads for over a month.

Buttigieg released the names of his bundlers last December, and Biden staffers are reaching out to donors one-by-one off of that list, according to one former Buttigieg donor. And in turn, some Buttigieg donors are already actively participating in the recruitment effort: Alex Slater, a Buttigieg bundler turned Biden backer, emailed other Buttigieg donors Tuesday morning asking them to put aside the pain of Buttigieg’s dropout and join up.

“I respect that — it’s barely 24 hours since Pete conceded, and each candidate has legitimate merits. Also, who wants to be proven wrong twice? These are very legitimate positions,” Slater wrote in the email, which POLITICO obtained. “But listening to many of you I have personally come to the belief that the political moment deserves action and conviction. That’s why I’m firmly following Pete’s lead in endorsing Vice President Joe Biden, joining to support his campaign and asking you to consider doing the same.”

“Although the vice president wasn't our first choice, he represents the kind of politics that Pete represents,” said John Atkinson, a Democratic bundler who supported Buttigieg. Atkinson and Mark Ishaug, another Buttigieg donor, hosted Monday night's call between the Biden advisers and the Buttigieg bundlers, which was organized by Nix and Becky Carroll, a member of Buttigieg's policy team.

Atkinson is now backing Biden, he said. Other prominent Buttigieg fundraisers who are now supporting Biden include former ambassador to Switzerland Suzan LeVine and her husband, Eric; hedge fund manager Orin Kramer, an early supporter of Obama; and event planner Bryan Rafanelli, who planned events for the Obama White House.

"I don’t believe we can win with Bernie. So now we need to step in the ring with Joe, and go," said Rafanelli, who added he had already gotten requests for a pro-Biden event in Boston. "The burden is now on the Biden campaign to swiftly organize all of us and thank us and pull us in."
Quote
"For Pete donors, there are three levels of thinking right now,” said one Buttigieg bundler who called himself “Biden-curious.” “One, a full-throated support for Biden now, joining his national finance committee; two, supporting Biden, but not bundle for him because you're exhausted; or three, I need a minute to mourn.”

Charles Adams Jr., a fundraiser for Buttigieg’s campaign who lives in Geneva, said he was “slightly taken aback” to wake up on Monday to an email from a former Buttigieg fundraiser who had already switched her allegiance to Biden, and was sharing information on how to donate.

“I thought it would be appropriate to give it a few days” before supporting another candidate, Adams said.
:money

What Pete phase are we on right now? Phase 4, phase 5?