look folks, real talk can we just say there is a concept called white supremacy that had ebbs and wanes.
That concept states that its a group of folks that runs certain aspects of western society and its entities, and it uses "codes of conduct" to keep said power structure in line.
This does not mean and has never meant one individual white person has more privileges then the other or as we seen with the coded racism of incel/MGTOW rights to a white women's body.
The SSW movement is deliberately confusing the two concepts. This is because all of the SSW financial backers are white folks.
The reason this kind of white supremacy is dangerous is because these groups have malignant aims to keep, gain and horde wrath to the elites of those societies.
Leadership can be malevolent (high taxes, curfews etc) without being malignant (treating people unfairly, the rule of law done unfairly) to its ethnic populations. The reverse happens as well.
The Privilege argument can be destroyed if people looked at it in a NFL context.
The owners of the league, it is alleged by Kaepernick, colluded to prevent him from even getting a backup job from the 32 NFL teams. 4 starters are black the rest white, and if you look at the stats for those QB's who had major injures - Kaepernick has a case. This is a possible perfect example of supremacy, even though some of the ownership have liberal tendencies.
But the privilege argument falls flat when you hear about Matt Stadford. He is the highest paid quarterback in the history of the league, Tom Brady (ok fair its not his contract year) is paid less with 5 rings.
The SSW dont want to fix the Supremacy problem because it screws with the money supply they need to push their mantra of Privilege
