River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible

[bork]

https://twitter.com/adrianhon/status/1167016682356912128

[bork]

Any coward can make millions shitting on trans people while getting cheered on by a sold out crowd, while playing the victim.

(Image removed from quote.)

Millions you say? Where do I sign up?

It's true, nobody ever fucks up doing comedy.  Easiest job ever! 

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

[Momo]

 

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

[Raist]

https://twitter.com/adrianhon/status/1167016682356912128

I'm sure that would be his stance if he was on the receiving end, too.

[Propagandhim]

Any coward can make millions shitting on trans people while getting cheered on by a sold out crowd, while playing the victim.

(Image removed from quote.)

Millions you say? Where do I sign up?

It's true, nobody ever fucks up doing comedy.  Easiest job ever! 

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

A classic

[VomKriege]

 
I could make millions by doing comedy, I just choose not to out of moral fiber.

[Joe Molotov]

I could make millions by doing comedy, I just choose not to out of moral fiber.

And don't forget crippling social anxiety.

[GreatSageEqualOfHeaven]

[VomKriege]

I feel like if metoo ever hits japan they're going to have to close down the entire country

Pictured : Real Life and Power Dynamics in Japan

[Spieler1]

Making successful jokes is alt-right, amirite???
Come on, reee-types, just say it already. You've been too long stuck on "reading is alt-right" and "science is alt-right" - time to move forward. 

[VomKriege]

The worst thing about all of these accusations is that I'm now aware of people like this Alexis nobody and I really don't fucking care. Let me know when someone accuses Derek Smart of trying to pink sock her.

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

[Raist]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/government-is-to-suspend-parliament-u-k-update-queen-approves-the-move.137704/page-25#post-24033846

Sorry but the idea of being "born better" is just nuts in my book and should not be supported by any means in a modern democratic society

Where do any of them say they are "born better"? If anything they have to bare more burden than a lot of us do. It's not just about money.

Poor British royals.

[Spieler1]

dumb as shit. the good thing about reee is the same that gamersgate had compared to real nazis - they are ultimately worthless nerds whose lunatic shit talk will never affect anything in the real world.

[HaughtyFrank]

They may have sniped down a thread earlier, but boogie called his haters "worse than Nazis and rapists...because at least they do something they believe in"
https://twitter.com/LegacyKillaHD/status/1166930770310705152
 

Hold up, what believes are rapists supposed to stand for 

[james]

Is fat Boogie still larger than Mars or has he slimmed down to the size of a respectable moon?

[Spieler1]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/john-carmack-interview-on-joe-rogan-experience.137973/

alt right gaming side never learns

[BIONIC]

They may have sniped down a thread earlier, but boogie called his haters "worse than Nazis and rapists...because at least they do something they believe in"
https://twitter.com/LegacyKillaHD/status/1166930770310705152
 

Hold up, what believes are rapists supposed to stand for 

   I believe I can fly

[GreatSageEqualOfHeaven]

Hold up, what believes are rapists supposed to stand for 

sex by any means necessary I guess

[daemon]

So what's your stance on this Alec Holowka and Zoe Quinn thing? The devs from Night in the Woods have already ceased to work with Alec saying they believe Quinn's tale. Because right now it's all a one-sided story that obviously paints him in a bad light, but we've seen factual information about the lack of morality when it comes to... certain stuff from Zoe (which doesn't mean we should enable the GG narrative, but we shouldn't sweep it under the rug as if it didn't exist).

 Now the thing is, a guy is actively being demonized by someone in a position of a magnitude of 10 times the social media outreach, and is weaponizing it to tell her story in hopes of, possibly, being in the spotlight again. A spotlight that surely creates haters, but generates way more net income and benefits. I like the established narrative of calling him "a legend", like if he was the Weinstein of fucking gaming. All that while she has 123k followers in comparison to the 10k Alec has.

I just hope that in this case if the whole story (or at least the relevant parts) is not true, Alec puts Zoe on trial for a huge lump sum which stops this free of consequences target drawing she's so good at. And I'm talking suing for 6 figures. Well she and any other person that does it. A recent example is the proJared case.

[Momo]

They may have sniped down a thread earlier, but boogie called his haters "worse than Nazis and rapists...because at least they do something they believe in"
https://twitter.com/LegacyKillaHD/status/1166930770310705152
 

Hold up, what believes are rapists supposed to stand for 

have you ever seen that old hentai with rapeman? A rape superhentaivillain takes pride in their correct application of rape.

[GreatSageEqualOfHeaven]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/john-carmack-interview-on-joe-rogan-experience.137973/

alt right gaming side never learns

Gosh, there sure is a lot of thread whining, backseat modding, lazy drivebys and intentional thread derailing going on in that topic, I wonder which members will get Actioned

[Momo]

Boogie's an idiot in the middle of a mental breakdown lmao, where's our boogie, I miss him

[GreatSageEqualOfHeaven]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/john-carmack-interview-on-joe-rogan-experience.137973/

alt right gaming side never learns

Gosh, there sure is a lot of thread whining, backseat modding, lazy drivebys and intentional thread derailing going on in that topic, I wonder which members will get Actioned

...and locked, by yet another mod I've never fucking heard of

Its not that Joe Rogan is a banned topic, its just moderators believe any topic about his show won't go well, so better pre-emptively lock them rather than clean up people ruining topics.

[Momo]

Is fat Boogie still larger than Mars or has he slimmed down to the size of a respectable moon?

your fat racism is disgusting and ill have you know some moons are larger than planets

[Cauliflower Of Love]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/infowars-returns-to-youtube-after-ceo-said-it-will-allow-%E2%80%98offensive%E2%80%99-content-update-youtube-deleted-infowars-war-room-channel.137961/


The first thing they thing off is uploading porn to youtube.

[marrec]

So what's your stance on this Alec Holowka and Zoe Quinn thing? The devs from Night in the Woods have already ceased to work with Alec saying they believe Quinn's tale. Because right now it's all a one-sided story that obviously paints him in a bad light, but we've seen factual information about the lack of morality when it comes to... certain stuff from Zoe (which doesn't mean we should enable the GG narrative, but we shouldn't sweep it under the rug as if it didn't exist).

 Now the thing is, a guy is actively being demonized by someone in a position of a magnitude of 10 times the social media outreach, and is weaponizing it to tell her story in hopes of, possibly, being in the spotlight again. A spotlight that surely creates haters, but generates way more net income and benefits. I like the established narrative of calling him "a legend", like if he was the Weinstein of fucking gaming. All that while she has 123k followers in comparison to the 10k Alec has.

I just hope that in this case if the whole story (or at least the relevant parts) is not true, Alec puts Zoe on trial for a huge lump sum which stops this free of consequences target drawing she's so good at. And I'm talking suing for 6 figures. Well she and any other person that does it. A recent example is the proJared case.

Corroboration by others who were communicating with Zoe at the time and accusations of misconduct against Alec by others before Zoe seem to indicate that she's likely telling the truth about her experiences, also the timeline matches up and she'd have little reason to lie at this point.

[daemon]

So what's your stance on this Alec Holowka and Zoe Quinn thing? The devs from Night in the Woods have already ceased to work with Alec saying they believe Quinn's tale. Because right now it's all a one-sided story that obviously paints him in a bad light, but we've seen factual information about the lack of morality when it comes to... certain stuff from Zoe (which doesn't mean we should enable the GG narrative, but we shouldn't sweep it under the rug as if it didn't exist).

 Now the thing is, a guy is actively being demonized by someone in a position of a magnitude of 10 times the social media outreach, and is weaponizing it to tell her story in hopes of, possibly, being in the spotlight again. A spotlight that surely creates haters, but generates way more net income and benefits. I like the established narrative of calling him "a legend", like if he was the Weinstein of fucking gaming. All that while she has 123k followers in comparison to the 10k Alec has.

I just hope that in this case if the whole story (or at least the relevant parts) is not true, Alec puts Zoe on trial for a huge lump sum which stops this free of consequences target drawing she's so good at. And I'm talking suing for 6 figures. Well she and any other person that does it. A recent example is the proJared case.

Corroboration by others who were communicating with Zoe at the time and accusations of misconduct against Alec by others before Zoe seem to indicate that she's likely telling the truth about her experiences, also the timeline matches up and she'd have little reason to lie at this point.

This is information I was missing, could I get any links?

[marrec]

So what's your stance on this Alec Holowka and Zoe Quinn thing? The devs from Night in the Woods have already ceased to work with Alec saying they believe Quinn's tale. Because right now it's all a one-sided story that obviously paints him in a bad light, but we've seen factual information about the lack of morality when it comes to... certain stuff from Zoe (which doesn't mean we should enable the GG narrative, but we shouldn't sweep it under the rug as if it didn't exist).

 Now the thing is, a guy is actively being demonized by someone in a position of a magnitude of 10 times the social media outreach, and is weaponizing it to tell her story in hopes of, possibly, being in the spotlight again. A spotlight that surely creates haters, but generates way more net income and benefits. I like the established narrative of calling him "a legend", like if he was the Weinstein of fucking gaming. All that while she has 123k followers in comparison to the 10k Alec has.

I just hope that in this case if the whole story (or at least the relevant parts) is not true, Alec puts Zoe on trial for a huge lump sum which stops this free of consequences target drawing she's so good at. And I'm talking suing for 6 figures. Well she and any other person that does it. A recent example is the proJared case.

Corroboration by others who were communicating with Zoe at the time and accusations of misconduct against Alec by others before Zoe seem to indicate that she's likely telling the truth about her experiences, also the timeline matches up and she'd have little reason to lie at this point.

This is information I was missing, could I get any links?

Let me dig some up, it was all tweets that are long gone but I'm sure someone's collected them all.

[GreatSageEqualOfHeaven]

she'd have little reason to lie at this point.

Grand Opening: https://www.polygon.com/comics/2018/6/7/17435908/dc-vertigo-relaunch-zoe-quinn-comic

Grand Closing: https://www.polygon.com/2019/6/21/18700918/dc-comics-vertigo-shutting-down-black-label

there's certainly a bit of a whiff that some of the #gamergate 'faces' would absolutely love a gaming #metoo to set up shop in

[headwalk]

So what's your stance on this Alec Holowka and Zoe Quinn thing? The devs from Night in the Woods have already ceased to work with Alec saying they believe Quinn's tale. Because right now it's all a one-sided story that obviously paints him in a bad light, but we've seen factual information about the lack of morality when it comes to... certain stuff from Zoe (which doesn't mean we should enable the GG narrative, but we shouldn't sweep it under the rug as if it didn't exist).

 Now the thing is, a guy is actively being demonized by someone in a position of a magnitude of 10 times the social media outreach, and is weaponizing it to tell her story in hopes of, possibly, being in the spotlight again. A spotlight that surely creates haters, but generates way more net income and benefits. I like the established narrative of calling him "a legend", like if he was the Weinstein of fucking gaming. All that while she has 123k followers in comparison to the 10k Alec has.

I just hope that in this case if the whole story (or at least the relevant parts) is not true, Alec puts Zoe on trial for a huge lump sum which stops this free of consequences target drawing she's so good at. And I'm talking suing for 6 figures. Well she and any other person that does it. A recent example is the proJared case.

Corroboration by others who were communicating with Zoe at the time and accusations of misconduct against Alec by others before Zoe seem to indicate that she's likely telling the truth about her experiences, also the timeline matches up and she'd have little reason to lie at this point.

This is information I was missing, could I get any links?

https://store.steampowered.com/app/481510/Night_in_the_Woods/

[Momo]

I don't think anyone should be cancelled via just accusations, if its a workplace dispute at least their HR should step in and investigate, if its between random unaffiliated people and its a procecutable crime I'd like the police to get involved if it's an other idk, throw dice or whatever, it's become increasingly unfair on everyone and there doesn't seem to be a way to settle these things fairly for everyone, I do see civil litigation becoming more popular though, well at least for those with money.

[stufte]

So what's your stance on this Alec Holowka and Zoe Quinn thing? The devs from Night in the Woods have already ceased to work with Alec saying they believe Quinn's tale. Because right now it's all a one-sided story that obviously paints him in a bad light, but we've seen factual information about the lack of morality when it comes to... certain stuff from Zoe (which doesn't mean we should enable the GG narrative, but we shouldn't sweep it under the rug as if it didn't exist).

 Now the thing is, a guy is actively being demonized by someone in a position of a magnitude of 10 times the social media outreach, and is weaponizing it to tell her story in hopes of, possibly, being in the spotlight again. A spotlight that surely creates haters, but generates way more net income and benefits. I like the established narrative of calling him "a legend", like if he was the Weinstein of fucking gaming. All that while she has 123k followers in comparison to the 10k Alec has.

I just hope that in this case if the whole story (or at least the relevant parts) is not true, Alec puts Zoe on trial for a huge lump sum which stops this free of consequences target drawing she's so good at. And I'm talking suing for 6 figures. Well she and any other person that does it. A recent example is the proJared case.

Corroboration by others who were communicating with Zoe at the time and accusations of misconduct against Alec by others before Zoe seem to indicate that she's likely telling the truth about her experiences, also the timeline matches up and she'd have little reason to lie at this point.

This is information I was missing, could I get any links?

https://store.steampowered.com/app/481510/Night_in_the_Woods/

Man, fuck this trend of review bombing to air your grievances... I hate this timeline.

[daemon]

So what's your stance on this Alec Holowka and Zoe Quinn thing? The devs from Night in the Woods have already ceased to work with Alec saying they believe Quinn's tale. Because right now it's all a one-sided story that obviously paints him in a bad light, but we've seen factual information about the lack of morality when it comes to... certain stuff from Zoe (which doesn't mean we should enable the GG narrative, but we shouldn't sweep it under the rug as if it didn't exist).

 Now the thing is, a guy is actively being demonized by someone in a position of a magnitude of 10 times the social media outreach, and is weaponizing it to tell her story in hopes of, possibly, being in the spotlight again. A spotlight that surely creates haters, but generates way more net income and benefits. I like the established narrative of calling him "a legend", like if he was the Weinstein of fucking gaming. All that while she has 123k followers in comparison to the 10k Alec has.

I just hope that in this case if the whole story (or at least the relevant parts) is not true, Alec puts Zoe on trial for a huge lump sum which stops this free of consequences target drawing she's so good at. And I'm talking suing for 6 figures. Well she and any other person that does it. A recent example is the proJared case.

Corroboration by others who were communicating with Zoe at the time and accusations of misconduct against Alec by others before Zoe seem to indicate that she's likely telling the truth about her experiences, also the timeline matches up and she'd have little reason to lie at this point.

This is information I was missing, could I get any links?

https://store.steampowered.com/app/481510/Night_in_the_Woods/

Man, fuck this trend of review bombing to air your grievances... I hate this timeline.

This is actually one of the few instances where I see validity to it. 3 dev team, they disassociate from one throwing him overboard based on... no tangible proof afaik. So some people don't want to support the two remaining devs that took this path to protect the IP over their colleague. Still, it's petty.

This one, however, is great:



Lays his doubts, still likes the game, thumbs up.

[Averon]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/is-joe-rogan-a-banned-content-source-on-this-forum.137979/#post-24036251

Resonable member: "Hey, can get get some clarity on what we can post and what sources are allowed"
Reee mods: "No"

A simple yes or no to the OP would have sufficed, but instead, they what him to go through hoops through private channels to get an answer that no one else can see. Why are they scared of plainly laying out what's allowed and what isn't? And why is making a thread so everyone can see and refer to it in the future the "wrong way to do this?"

[Uncle]

He needs to do a ProjaredAndySignore and shut up and wait for some months while building a defense. Doing a Vic is the worse advice he can get right now.

I will say projared having an actual screenshot of himself asking ARE YOU 18 and the other person says YES OF COURSE LOL is probably something he should've whipped out immediately when the accusations dropped

it's more compelling to present this all at once but jesus that's kind of an important detail

[stufte]

So what's your stance on this Alec Holowka and Zoe Quinn thing? The devs from Night in the Woods have already ceased to work with Alec saying they believe Quinn's tale. Because right now it's all a one-sided story that obviously paints him in a bad light, but we've seen factual information about the lack of morality when it comes to... certain stuff from Zoe (which doesn't mean we should enable the GG narrative, but we shouldn't sweep it under the rug as if it didn't exist).

 Now the thing is, a guy is actively being demonized by someone in a position of a magnitude of 10 times the social media outreach, and is weaponizing it to tell her story in hopes of, possibly, being in the spotlight again. A spotlight that surely creates haters, but generates way more net income and benefits. I like the established narrative of calling him "a legend", like if he was the Weinstein of fucking gaming. All that while she has 123k followers in comparison to the 10k Alec has.

I just hope that in this case if the whole story (or at least the relevant parts) is not true, Alec puts Zoe on trial for a huge lump sum which stops this free of consequences target drawing she's so good at. And I'm talking suing for 6 figures. Well she and any other person that does it. A recent example is the proJared case.

Corroboration by others who were communicating with Zoe at the time and accusations of misconduct against Alec by others before Zoe seem to indicate that she's likely telling the truth about her experiences, also the timeline matches up and she'd have little reason to lie at this point.

This is information I was missing, could I get any links?

https://store.steampowered.com/app/481510/Night_in_the_Woods/

Man, fuck this trend of review bombing to air your grievances... I hate this timeline.

This is actually one of the few instances where I see validity to it. 3 dev team, they disassociate from one throwing him overboard based on... no tangible proof afaik. So some people don't want to support the two remaining devs that took this path to protect the IP over their colleague. Still, it's petty.

Nope. Just don't buy the fucking game. Or if you have then don't buy future games. If you feel the need to review bomb with shit like this, you're a pathetic turd and should have your review rights on the platform revoked.

[daemon]

He needs to do a ProjaredAndySignore and shut up and wait for some months while building a defense. Doing a Vic is the worse advice he can get right now.

I will say projared having an actual screenshot of himself asking ARE YOU 18 and the other person says YES OF COURSE LOL is probably something he should've whipped out immediately when the accusations dropped

It sounds like it, but nothing stops a hate wave on its apex. not even proof.

Nope. Just don't buy the fucking game. Or if you have then don't buy future games. If you feel the need to review bomb with shit like this, you're a pathetic turd and should have your review rights on the platform revoked.

I mean, sure. But it's not like it's an orchestrated attack. What are there, like a handful of negatives based on this issue? But yeah, they're certainly not using it as intended and review rights should be revoked if they keep doing stuff like that. Delete the review as it's not really a game review.

[stufte]

He needs to do a ProjaredAndySignore and shut up and wait for some months while building a defense. Doing a Vic is the worse advice he can get right now.

I will say projared having an actual screenshot of himself asking ARE YOU 18 and the other person says YES OF COURSE LOL is probably something he should've whipped out immediately when the accusations dropped

It sounds like it, but nothing stops a hate wave on its apex. not even proof.

Woke twitter/reee HATE uncancelling people. They pretty much refuse to do it.

[Averon]

Anything he says now will be twisted, misconstrued, or taken in the worst possible light. They WANT to believe the accusation against him. No amount of proof he can provide to the contrary will get them off their hate train. The ProJared thread that was locked is a testament to that.

[marrec]

So what's your stance on this Alec Holowka and Zoe Quinn thing? The devs from Night in the Woods have already ceased to work with Alec saying they believe Quinn's tale. Because right now it's all a one-sided story that obviously paints him in a bad light, but we've seen factual information about the lack of morality when it comes to... certain stuff from Zoe (which doesn't mean we should enable the GG narrative, but we shouldn't sweep it under the rug as if it didn't exist).

 Now the thing is, a guy is actively being demonized by someone in a position of a magnitude of 10 times the social media outreach, and is weaponizing it to tell her story in hopes of, possibly, being in the spotlight again. A spotlight that surely creates haters, but generates way more net income and benefits. I like the established narrative of calling him "a legend", like if he was the Weinstein of fucking gaming. All that while she has 123k followers in comparison to the 10k Alec has.

I just hope that in this case if the whole story (or at least the relevant parts) is not true, Alec puts Zoe on trial for a huge lump sum which stops this free of consequences target drawing she's so good at. And I'm talking suing for 6 figures. Well she and any other person that does it. A recent example is the proJared case.

Corroboration by others who were communicating with Zoe at the time and accusations of misconduct against Alec by others before Zoe seem to indicate that she's likely telling the truth about her experiences, also the timeline matches up and she'd have little reason to lie at this point.

This is information I was missing, could I get any links?

Let me dig some up, it was all tweets that are long gone but I'm sure someone's collected them all.

https://twitter.com/MattThorson/status/1166804301391360000

https://twitter.com/KaiClavier/status/1166832062080397313

https://twitter.com/SMBeiko/status/1166703563126398976

https://twitter.com/soft_rumpus/status/1166808228614701056

https://twitter.com/MOOMANiBE/status/1166380600057425920

https://twitter.com/dannyBstyle/status/1166516194322468864

https://twitter.com/soft_rumpus/status/1166808228614701056

Just a few minutes of searching, DannyB's testimony is important here.

[VomKriege]

Haven't there been already some corroborating remarks by other people about this specific case ? I'm honestly not sure because I blanked on the details already, too many cases and I'm not so invested I'll make an effort to remember it.

The more claims made by reputable -conceivably identifiable- people, the less reasonable it gets to be overly skeptical. It's a little unfair to single account accusations, but it is what it is.

I think armchair psychology & speculating on possible motives and rationales of what is essentially strangers is a bit of a fool's errand unless you have really solid ground for that. Why someone decided to bring some testimony up now and not X ago or what would compel them to cook up a lie is generally not entirely rational.

[stufte]

At this point you can accuse anyone you want that you've had even the remotest of contact with and ruin their lives. It apparently doesn't even need any real evidence, just a tweet with some vague facts.

[Transhuman]

They may have sniped down a thread earlier, but boogie called his haters "worse than Nazis and rapists...because at least they do something they believe in"
https://twitter.com/LegacyKillaHD/status/1166930770310705152
 

Hold up, what believes are rapists supposed to stand for 

have you ever seen that old hentai with rapeman? A rape superhentaivillain takes pride in their correct application of rape.

He's a real stickler for rape.

[marrec]

Also the "industry legend" stuff with Alec is accurate, he's been influential in indie gaming for over a decade despite not having identifiable or successful game releases attached to his name until recently.

[Cauliflower Of Love]

Speak with your fucking chest

[stufte]

Also the "industry legend" stuff with Alec is accurate, he's been influential in indie gaming for over a decade despite not having identifiable or successful game releases attached to his name until recently.

I'm sure he's a scumbag. I just don't believe Zoe Quinn.

[GreatSageEqualOfHeaven]

He's just a guy that talks.... not really a source for anything to do with news.

news stories are regularly derived from people talking in an interview

[Raist]

So what's your stance on this Alec Holowka and Zoe Quinn thing? The devs from [...]

 

[Philip Cardgage]

He's just a guy that talks.... not really a source for anything to do with news.

news stories are regularly derived from people talking in an interview

So this is another 8chan thing where their anger is derived from the jealousy that he didn't hold an interview on Ree?

[VomKriege]

Also the "industry legend" stuff with Alec is accurate, he's been influential in indie gaming for over a decade despite not having identifiable or successful game releases attached to his name until recently.

Meh. Would be slighty less peeved by it without the "he demanded other industry legends to blackmail me". But stopping at that is a bit like worrying about if the silverware has been properly polished while the Titanic is sinking.

[GreatSageEqualOfHeaven]

Haven't there been already some corroborating remarks by other people about this specific case ? I'm honestly not sure because I blanked on the details already, too many cases and I'm not so invested I'll make an effort to remember it.

The more claims made by reputable -conceivably identifiable- people, the less reasonable it gets to be overly skeptical. It's a little unfair to single account accusations, but it is what it is.

I think armchair psychology & speculating on possible motives and rationales of what is essentially strangers is a bit of a fool's errand unless you have really solid ground for that. Why someone decided to bring some testimony up now and not X ago or what would compel them to cook up a lie is generally not entirely rational.

the problem with this kind of scenario of anonymous non-specific accusations is people chiming in with "oh yea, I heard some stuff" comments; you have no way of knowing if multiple people are all citing the same accusation independently, and using other peoples second hand knowledge as corroroborative evidence.

In this specific example, I have no idea what the actual story is, and I'm not going to side with either of them until at the very least a response has been issued, or a corroborating first hand account emerges.

[stufte]

I can neither confirm nor deny Alex Whateverhisnameis touched me inappropriately in an unconfirmed location.

I mean, he was probably at your house. Drugs and alcohol were involved. Tweet about it!

[NekoFever]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/john-carmack-interview-on-joe-rogan-experience.137973/

alt right gaming side never learns

Crazy idea here, but maybe if the moderators would start, you know, moderating the dipshits who derail threads all the time, there wouldn’t be so much “low quality discussion” going on and people could talk about what an industry icon like John Carmack has to say.

[Raist]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/john-carmack-interview-on-joe-rogan-experience.137973/

alt right gaming side never learns

Crazy idea here, but maybe if the moderators would start, you know, moderating the dipshits who derail threads all the time, there wouldn’t be so much “low quality discussion” going on and people could talk about what an industry icon like John Carmack has to say.

But why? No one should listen to what Carmack has to say, he's obviously problematic, as demonstrated by him going on Rogan's podcast.

#cancelled

[daemon]

Also the "industry legend" stuff with Alec is accurate, he's been influential in indie gaming for over a decade despite not having identifiable or successful game releases attached to his name until recently.

He's legendary and no one is really doubtful, teams cut ties, there's secrecy involving his evil deeds (a mastermind) and people who live with him are shocked but not surprised. That makes sense. You see, I have a sociopath aunt. I know what lies she's perpetrated through the years and how much she's been able to convince people with zero proof. Some people are just like that. Remember she became what she is now due to a couple posts of a wizard imageboard. Wow, two people said mean things-> "this is what the male fantasy looks like meme"


But let me ask you then: Why are you believing tweets that offer barely anything but "impressions" and hearsay? Did you believe zoe's bf chat logs (actual tangible information unless doctored). I believe the words used by certain forum board back in the day were "vengeful" and "misogynistic" referring to them. Aiming the downspout of your hysterical fanbase towards one person because you saw how effective it was when someone else did it... eh.


Can we all agree that some people do not have any judgement and just move with the current, like jellyfish? I just hope you're never resetera'd in real life.

[Cauliflower Of Love]

I can neither confirm nor deny Alex Whateverhisnameis touched me inappropriately in an unconfirmed location.

[EightBitNate]

Edit nvm

[VomKriege]

I guess I should have said "The more separate claims made by reputable -conceivably identifiable- people" because that's implicitly what I meant. It goes without saying that first hand is stronger than second hand, named than anonymous and so on and so forth.

It's an hugely flawed method rife with potential for mob justice and all the attached problems, no disagreement here... But it exists, warts and all, for a reason. Internal policing (by companies, institutions...) and private arbitration have its set of issues and even setting aside many of the endemic issues encountered in courts around the world, it's a practical reality that not everyone can just lawyer up at all times.

TLDR : Justice-by-Twitter is very suboptimal, but expect it to be a mainstay in everyone's lives for the foreseeable future.

[marrec]

Also the "industry legend" stuff with Alec is accurate, he's been influential in indie gaming for over a decade despite not having identifiable or successful game releases attached to his name until recently.

He's legendary and no one is really doubtful, teams cut ties, there's secrecy involving his evil deeds (a mastermind) and people who live with him are shocked but not surprised. That makes sense. You see, I have a sociopath aunt. I know what lies she's perpetrated through the years and how much she's been able to convince people with zero proof. Some people are just like that. Remember she became what she is now due to a couple posts of a wizard imageboard. Wow, two people said mean things-> "this is what the male fantasy looks like meme"


But let me ask you then: Why are you believing tweets that offer barely anything but "impressions" and hearsay? Did you believe zoe's bf chat logs (actual tangible information unless doctored). I believe the words used by certain forum board back in the day were "vengeful" and "misogynistic" referring to them. Aiming the downspout of your hysterical fanbase towards one person because you saw how effective it was when someone else did it... eh.


Can we all agree that some people do not have any judgement and just move with the current, like jellyfish? I just hope you're never resetera'd in real life.

I honestly don't think I have to dredge of memories of "zoe's bf" (it's hilarious that this is his legacy), her accusation seems credible and has been backed up by DannyB and others. Also, abusers tend to gravitate toward each other, something to do with recognizing vulnerability and codependency in each other. I'm sure Zoe's got a whole book full of bad relationships she's been abusive in and been abused in.

Alec should of course get his change to respond, but is it REALLY so hard to believe that some posing industry fuckboi abused a young Zoe Quinn?

[nachobro]

who tf are any of those people