Author Topic: Doxxing Files |OT| Do not use a pandemic to make a platform wars thread  (Read 1469303 times)

Averon, Mostima, Straight Edge, Jansen and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Switters

  • Member
The viddy titty thread... They're just going in circles... They're still talking about Quiet 6 years later...

 :notlikethis

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]
troll

SmokyDave

  • Member
50s? the yts were sending a black man to do their dirty work at the 1936 Olympics in front of Hitler* :doge

*to get this reference, try to imagine a less murderous Trump who is Austrian that takes over Germany and never once posts on Twitter
Heinz-Christian Strache jokes! Nice.

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
The viddy titty thread... They're just going in circles... They're still talking about Quiet 6 years later...

 :notlikethis

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

They feed on being mad. They keep digging up old stuff or super obscure games to keep the ball rolling.

Pissy F Benny

  • Ooh, girl I say ooh Whatever happened my friend
  • Senior Member
The viddy titty thread... They're just going in circles... They're still talking about Quiet 6 years later...

 :notlikethis

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

WORDS THAT KILL IMAGES THAT BURN

why are we here?
just to suffer?

Pissy F Benny

  • Ooh, girl I say ooh Whatever happened my friend
  • Senior Member
MGS5 should have been the greatest game of all time, fuck you konami cheapskates :stahp

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
MGSV still has VA-VA-VA-VA-VA-VA-VA-VAGINA BOMB! tho

Pissy F Benny

  • Ooh, girl I say ooh Whatever happened my friend
  • Senior Member
that was ground zeroes m8 :snob

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Just because Konami realised they could sucker thirsty kojima fan boys into paying £20 for a demo / prologue chapter doesn't mean I'm going to concede that's a seperate game

BisMarckie

  • Senior Member
The viddy titty thread... They're just going in circles... They're still talking about Quiet 6 years later...

 :notlikethis

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

DSP looking a lot better, living his best life

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-her-ass-is-part-of-her-character.275780/page-160#post-68684806
Quote from: Transistor
Quote from: shiba5
Quiet was so embarrassing that I was afraid my husband would walk in on one of her helicopter scenes.

I warned my wife ahead of time and she still gave me shit about it (and I don't blame her one bit)

:ryker
ど助平

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-her-ass-is-part-of-her-character.275780/page-160#post-68684806
Quote from: Transistor
Quote from: shiba5
Quiet was so embarrassing that I was afraid my husband would walk in on one of her helicopter scenes.

I warned my wife ahead of time and she still gave me shit about it (and I don't blame her one bit)

:ryker



(funny that posting "My wife has no issue with Quiet and actually likes her" would get you banned)

HardcoreRetro

  • Punk Mushi no Onna
  • Senior Member
Should've modded the scene to this superior version.


BIONIC

  • Live Laugh Love. Wanderlust. The Office. Pizza. Dog mom. #Blessed
  • Senior Member
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-her-ass-is-part-of-her-character.275780/page-160#post-68684806
Quote from: Transistor
Quote from: shiba5
Quiet was so embarrassing that I was afraid my husband would walk in on one of her helicopter scenes.

I warned my wife ahead of time and she still gave me shit about it (and I don't blame her one bit)

:ryker

(Image removed from quote.)

(funny that posting "My wife has no issue with Quiet and actually likes her" would get you banned)

“Your wife should make an account and speak for herself you patriarchal scum.”

*Wife makes account and speaks for herself*

User Banned (Permanent): For being a bitch with internalized misogyny; account in junior phase
Wine

Uncle

  • Have You Ever
  • Senior Member
https://www.resetera.com/threads/each-passing-year-shows-more-and-more-that-ps-home-was-way-ahead-of-its-time.451282/
Quote
With more and more gaming leaning into cross promotion and guest spots. Plus with streaming being popular, just shows PS Home was already doing what the industry was progressing to.
quality thread would read again

The only reason I remember Home is that it came out in that period when the PS3 was really struggling and the Sony fans on GAF were particularly keen to defend the hive and hail anything as mind-blowing innovation that was going to change the world.

Uncle

Potato

  • Kipfler
  • Senior Member
So Morrigan was Varg all along.

(Image removed from quote.)
Varg is a much hotter chick than Morrigan will ever be
Spud

BadAss2961

  • Junior Member
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-her-ass-is-part-of-her-character.275780/post-68670613
Quote
We should start the discussion by talking about why is sexualization bad. Is it?
In my opinion, that sexualization is something bad is a social construction, just as the idea of sex itself being bad. We have fought during decades for sexual liberalization and bow it seems we are walking backwards.
Summarizing: I dont see sexualization as something bad. I just see it has been forced to be considered like something bad. Think about it.

Quote
This discussion has been running for 3.5 years, you aren’t starting anything. Perhaps try reading the OP and re-reading the thread title as you’ve missed the entire context by a country mile.

Yeah. Had he been following the discussion for the last 3.5 years, he'd probably know not to interrupt since half the users in that thread have their dick in their hand.

Quote
Okay, it’s page one hundred and sixty…finally time to start the discussion
Close to realizing that no one in the thread actually discusses anything? It's a huge circle jerk

Quote
Imagine not posting for over a year and then dropping this lukewarm take lol
Correctly identifies the take as lukewarm, doesn't realize how absurd it is to ban someone for a lukewarm take

Just realized they actually gave him a perm for that post. lol



HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Also why doesn't Samus have the physique of Conan or He-Man??? :cat

https://www.resetera.com/threads/metroid-dread-announced-for-nintendo-switch-coming-october-8th-2021-gameplay-at-threadmarks.442639/page-118

Why are they even so eager to turn Samus into a meathead when the whole point of the suit she's wearing is that you wouldn't need to be super buff?

It's like casting The Rock as Iron Man

Hap Shaughnessy

  • Junior Member
https://www.resetera.com/threads/two-namibian-sprinters-banned-from-olympics-400-meter-event-due-to-the-same-testosterone-rule-that-blocked-caster-semenya.451372/

Am I not understanding this? Aren't these bans the result of the same studies on trans athletes that Era trots out and are considered absolute, unquestionable truth in other threads? 
QOFM

Straight Edge

  • Boots & Braces
  • Senior Member
Quote
read an article about this topic a few days ago:

By conflating gender and sex, I would argue we fudge the very reason we have sex categories in sport: the male performance advantage. Without a separate category for females, there would be no women in Olympic finals. Even in the 100m, one of the events with the smallest performance gap, approximately 10,000 men worldwide have personal bests faster than the current Olympic female champion, Elaine Thompson-Herah (10.70sec). And it’s not just track and field. While the smallest attainment gap between the sexes comes in running, rowing and swimming events (11-13%), this moves up to 16%-22% in track cycling, and between 29% and 34% when it comes to bowling cricket balls and weightlifting. The difference in punch power between men and women is a whopping 162%. Not, then, to be sniffed at. But the International Olympic Committee tweaked its guidelines in 2015 to allow athletes such as Hubbard to compete in the women’s category, provided their total testosterone level in serum is kept below 10 nanomoles per litre for at least 12 months. Transgender men face no restrictions in the male category for obvious reasons.
Increasingly, however, research is showing that these testosterone guidelines do not guarantee the “fair competition” the IOC was hoping for. Ross Tucker, a sports scientist and expert on testosterone advantage in sport, succinctly sums it up: “Lowering of testosterone is almost completely ineffective in taking away the biological differences between males and females.” There is just no proof that reducing testosterone takes away the advantage of muscle mass, strength, lean body mass, muscle size or bone density. Despite this new evidence from Drs Emma Hilton and Tommy Lundberg, the IOC has put off any further decisions making until after Tokyo and left it up to individual sports federations to decide their own transgender policies.
The most common argument used in favour of inclusion is that sport is all about natural advantage and that being a trans woman is just another factor to add to the list alongside Michael Phelps’s size 14 feet and double-jointed ankles. The problem with this argument is that we don’t compete according to foot-size, but we do protect the integrity of women’s sport because the advantage gained from male puberty is so comprehensive in terms of speed, power, strength and so much else. Phelps’s feet gave him an advantage as a swimmer; male puberty gave him a much bigger advantage across the board. At the Beijing Olympics, he won the 200m freestyle in 1.42.96, breaking the world record. Federica Pellegrini broke the women’s world record at the same distance, finishing in 1.54.82 – a time that wouldn’t have got her into the men’s semi-finals. It wasn’t internalised misogyny slowing her down.
But above all, there needs to be a realisation that you can’t always have it all. Just as women and trans men can’t dominate in men’s sports; and men can’t enter women’s sport; trans women shouldn’t be able to push open a door that was locked for a reason. It isn’t fair.

 :salute
Oi Oi

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Quote
read an article about this topic a few days ago:

By conflating gender and sex, I would argue we fudge the very reason we have sex categories in sport: the male performance advantage. Without a separate category for females, there would be no women in Olympic finals. Even in the 100m, one of the events with the smallest performance gap, approximately 10,000 men worldwide have personal bests faster than the current Olympic female champion, Elaine Thompson-Herah (10.70sec). And it’s not just track and field. While the smallest attainment gap between the sexes comes in running, rowing and swimming events (11-13%), this moves up to 16%-22% in track cycling, and between 29% and 34% when it comes to bowling cricket balls and weightlifting. The difference in punch power between men and women is a whopping 162%. Not, then, to be sniffed at. But the International Olympic Committee tweaked its guidelines in 2015 to allow athletes such as Hubbard to compete in the women’s category, provided their total testosterone level in serum is kept below 10 nanomoles per litre for at least 12 months. Transgender men face no restrictions in the male category for obvious reasons.
Increasingly, however, research is showing that these testosterone guidelines do not guarantee the “fair competition” the IOC was hoping for. Ross Tucker, a sports scientist and expert on testosterone advantage in sport, succinctly sums it up: “Lowering of testosterone is almost completely ineffective in taking away the biological differences between males and females.” There is just no proof that reducing testosterone takes away the advantage of muscle mass, strength, lean body mass, muscle size or bone density. Despite this new evidence from Drs Emma Hilton and Tommy Lundberg, the IOC has put off any further decisions making until after Tokyo and left it up to individual sports federations to decide their own transgender policies.
The most common argument used in favour of inclusion is that sport is all about natural advantage and that being a trans woman is just another factor to add to the list alongside Michael Phelps’s size 14 feet and double-jointed ankles. The problem with this argument is that we don’t compete according to foot-size, but we do protect the integrity of women’s sport because the advantage gained from male puberty is so comprehensive in terms of speed, power, strength and so much else. Phelps’s feet gave him an advantage as a swimmer; male puberty gave him a much bigger advantage across the board. At the Beijing Olympics, he won the 200m freestyle in 1.42.96, breaking the world record. Federica Pellegrini broke the women’s world record at the same distance, finishing in 1.54.82 – a time that wouldn’t have got her into the men’s semi-finals. It wasn’t internalised misogyny slowing her down.
But above all, there needs to be a realisation that you can’t always have it all. Just as women and trans men can’t dominate in men’s sports; and men can’t enter women’s sport; trans women shouldn’t be able to push open a door that was locked for a reason. It isn’t fair.

 :salute

Trying to be slick quoting an "article" written by "journalists" from the well known tabloid "the guardian"

benjipwns

  • Senior Member
The Guardian is a well known alt-right rag associated with anti-trans regular Tucker Carlson guest Glenn Greenwald.

edit:
Quote
Worth noting the Guardian is very much part of the UK TERF brigade. It routinely publishes articles attacking trans women specifically. So much so that the American branch of the guardian wrote a public letter attacking the main UK paper for its transphobia.

On anything to do with trans issues I would be extremely, *extremely* sceptical to say the least.
Quote from: Kyuuji
Meanwhile the sports scientist quoted by the TERF rag you cited is out there retweeting Maya Forstater:

This all going beyond the fact that the current rise in transphobia and moral panic has been directly tied to right-wing efforts and radicalisation
THANK 👏 YOU 👏
« Last Edit: Today at 06:42:12 PM by benjipwns »

Spieler1

  • Senior Member
Also why doesn't Samus have the physique of Conan or He-Man??? :cat

https://www.resetera.com/threads/metroid-dread-announced-for-nintendo-switch-coming-october-8th-2021-gameplay-at-threadmarks.442639/page-118

Why are they even so eager to turn Samus into a meathead when the whole point of the suit she's wearing is that you wouldn't need to be super buff?

It's like casting The Rock as Iron Man

Wait, this series already had a non-sexualized woman protagonist for 30 years?  :steel WELLL but why isn't Samus a transgender person in a wheelchair?!? Check mate, nazis. :ego

I don't think a single other forum turned their official Metroid 5 thread into a woke contest. They literally can't live without slacktivism.
« Last Edit: Today at 07:55:40 PM by Spieler1 »

Averon

  • Senior Member
As the industry conforms more and more to their wishes on how to present female characters, they need to dig further and further towards the bottom of the barrel to keep that same outrage energy up. Notice how the thread now mainly bitches about Japaneses weeb games, which they had to scale back bitching about because they were sounding hilariously racist to Asians; obscure games that sell less than 250,000 copies in the West, if it is even brought over to be localized; and mainstream games where women dare show a little bit of skin (A woman showing bare thighs?!? Fucking patriarchy/male gaze!). Their problem is that all of the low hanging fruit is gone in the West, but they want to still be just as outraged as they were 6-7 years ago. In trying to justify that outrage, they sound and act more and more puritanical and authoritarian in the process, as well as aiming at more and more niche targets like Japanese weeb games or niche mobile games.
« Last Edit: Today at 09:03:05 PM by Averon »

Nintex

  • Boy's Club President
  • Senior Member
 :aloy  :brazilcry :dolezal :kinison :reeeee :social :social2 :gamergate :shaking :yikes :bobby

ResetEra has been an inviting bonfire at the crossroads of the gaming industry. Our goal is to provide a modern platform where enthusiasts and industry professionals alike will want to talk about all kinds of video games
🤴

Potato

  • Kipfler
  • Senior Member
Also why doesn't Samus have the physique of Conan or He-Man??? :cat

https://www.resetera.com/threads/metroid-dread-announced-for-nintendo-switch-coming-october-8th-2021-gameplay-at-threadmarks.442639/page-118
Can't be a strong woman™ if you don't have the musculature of a male body builder...
Spud

Don Rumata

  • Hard To Be A Mod
  • Senior Member
Imagine a gender-neutral, weight-class-neutral MMA of the future.

2.30m man against a 1.60m woman weighing as much as his leg. DING! DING! DING! fight!
 :lawd
oink

BIONIC

  • Live Laugh Love. Wanderlust. The Office. Pizza. Dog mom. #Blessed
  • Senior Member
https://www.resetera.com/threads/former-nxivm-member-sarah-edmondson-says-she-believes-allison-mack-regrets-her-role-in-sex-cult.451462/#post-68718046

Quote from: Rex Dart: Eskimo Spy, post: 68718046, member: 27507
When attractive consenting white people treat each other like shit in a private club for rich white people, it’s a cult?

As someone raised in an actual cult that abused minors, destroyed the fabric of my family and generations of finances, I gotta say “nah”.

These are over privileged assholes desperately trying to reframe their shitty adult decisions. They wanted to pay a steep social price to be part of an exclusive club, and that’s exactly what they did. Until it sucked.

LOL cult. Like Kali brainwashed you. Get fucked.

:hmm
Wine

Hap Shaughnessy

  • Junior Member
Unless you're Inuit, you shouldn't have a username with "Eskimo" in it.
QOFM

Straight Edge

  • Boots & Braces
  • Senior Member
Imagine a gender-neutral, weight-class-neutral MMA of the future.

2.30m man against a 1.60m woman weighing as much as his leg. DING! DING! DING! fight!
 :lawd

As the Andy Kaufman of my time, I will get in the ring and fight any transman.
Oi Oi

Lonewulfeus

  • Former Unofficial Ambassador to ResetEra
  • Senior Member
I love that the rebuttal is entirely conjecture that we’re to take as absolute fact.

Quote
Most measures of physical strength minimize, muscle mass decreases, bone density decreases, and they become fairly comparable to women in their musculature. After as much time as has passed in her case, if tested, she would probably end up in the same muscle mass category as her biologically born female counterpart.

Most, fairly, and would probably doing a ton of heavy lifting here.  Do we know for a fact that this is the case?  If not why don’t we?  Seems simple enough to study and could put this whole issue to bed.

Though even in this rebuttal they admit that there could be some lingering physical benefit to having gone through puberty as a male or else most would be all.

Potato

  • Kipfler
  • Senior Member
Imagine a gender-neutral, weight-class-neutral MMA of the future.

2.30m man against a 1.60m woman weighing as much as his leg. DING! DING! DING! fight!
 :lawd
We don't need to wait. Just put Morrigan in the Octagon with NepNep and see what happens.
Spud



benjipwns

  • Senior Member
Quote
It's been over a fucking month.

After several prominent YouTubers called him out over this.
:badass

Rahxephon91

  • Senior Member
I mean...

Quiet is a crappy character.

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Imagine a gender-neutral, weight-class-neutral MMA of the future.

2.30m man against a 1.60m woman weighing as much as his leg. DING! DING! DING! fight!
 :lawd
We don't need to wait. Just put Morrigan in the Octagon with NepNep and see what happens.

 :doge

Hap Shaughnessy

  • Junior Member
QOFM