Guess what? I THINK IT WORKS SO TAKE THAT.
Robots did fight each on screen, so by the definition, it did work!
I still think Nolan's TEH GRITTAY approach doesn't work at all for the Joker. He does look more like The Hobo.
I still think Nolan's TEH GRITTAY approach doesn't work at all for the Joker. He does look more like The Hobo.
Whereas something like this:
(http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/images/joker-harley-costumes.jpg)
would fit any better? No, just no man. Everything about Nolan's vision is based on realism, and this is pretty much as close to "real" as they're going to get. It looks fine.
When did the Joker stop being a fun character? He was only ever interesting as the classic foil to Batman. If both of them are SUPER PISSED and DARK and OUT FOR REVENGE where does that leave you? A shitty crime story?
When the franchise was handed to Chris Nolan the idea of a "super villian" type of character was gone from the start.
Yeah, I enjoyed the realism in that fight in the Tibetan mountains (or wherever), and I especially enjoyed the realism of that fight on the monorail train on the 10-story framework running through the middle of the city. So realistic, at times I thought I could detect the faint smell of vinyl wafting off Batman's extremely realistic costume. The most realistic part was when he realistically glided with his practical and realistic cape, which was grounded in realism the way it hardened all up into a glider at the touch of a button. And the realistic car climbing up realistic buildings and realistically jumping across rooftops. It was so fucking realistic from start to finish I began to believe in Batman like a kid believes in Santa, and wanted to write him a letter thanking him for saving Gotham
I never saw the two terrible Batman movies. Are they good to watch for the fiasco factor?Sure, in "Batman and Robin" alone you get batman with nipples, batman on ice and Arnold's bad acting. It's almost the perfect shitty summer blockbuster.
I never saw the two terrible Batman movies. Are they good to watch for the fiasco factor?
I never saw the two terrible Batman movies. Are they good to watch for the fiasco factor?
Forever>>>>>B&Rduh?
Bruce Wayne: I'm going after Mr. Freeze and Poison Ivy, "alone".
Dick Grayson: Alone?
Bruce Wayne: That's right, Dick. I want them so much, I can taste it.
Dick Grayson: What? Nobody can face them but the big, bad bat?
Bruce Wayne: It's Poison Ivy too. She has us fighting over her.
Dick Grayson: Yeah right. You're just saying that so I can't kiss her, is that it.
Bruce Wayne: Listen dick, it's a poisonous kiss.
Dick Grayson: A poisonous kiss? You don’t understand. She understands how I feel.
Bruce Wayne: She has clouded your mind and you're not thinking straight.
Dick Grayson: I "am" thinking straight. For the first time in a long time. I want a Robin signal in the sky, I'm sick of being in your shadow.
Forever>>>>>B&Rduh?
Such a waste of Heath Ledger. I mean, why even give him the job if you are going to make him look like that?Ledger is starring in the next Gilliam flick. ( :-* or :-\ you never know with modern gilliam)
Such a waste of Heath Ledger. I mean, why even give him the job if you are going to make him look like that?Ledger is starring in the next Gilliam flick. ( :-* or :-\ you never know with modern gilliam)
And from the writer of Brazil
Tom Stoppard did a uncredited rewrite on the third star wars prequel. :-\And from the writer of Brazil
Written by Charles McKeon and Terry Gilliam. They write most of Gilliam's movies, including Brazil. However, Tom Stoppard has a writing credit on Brazil, but not on this.
Tom Stoppard did a uncredited rewrite on the third star wars prequel. :-\And from the writer of Brazil
Written by Charles McKeon and Terry Gilliam. They write most of Gilliam's movies, including Brazil. However, Tom Stoppard has a writing credit on Brazil, but not on this.
the old burton one actually scared the shit out of you.Yes I agree this is a lot scarier:
They should have picked another villain. The joker in live-action just looks stupid
TVC has been able to build a somewhat credible argument for his relative dislike for Nolan's Batman in contrast to the glowing opinion most have for it, but every time this debate occurs with am nintenho, it devolves into an incoherent mess.
Trolling Nolan's Batman is too much fun. The fans are just too serious for it not to be, and them forgetting you're talking about BATMAN makes it even better. Great movie though!
Trolling Nolan's Batman is too much fun. The fans are just too serious for it not to be, and them forgetting you're talking about BATMAN makes it even better. Great movie though!
Like I keep saying. Chris Nolan gets so much love on the internet because his fans are blockbuster fegs who never been exposed to a non-blockbuster or comedy movie outside of Nolan's work. He is a "serious" director for those who never watched a drama and since thats all they know they ride his dick like there is no tomorrow.
I love Nolan flicks and think he is a great director but the internet obsession is insane. There are people in that gaf topic who seem to honestly believe that Bale is deserving of an oscar for playing Batman.
You liked the Prestige, right?I am pretty sure TVC called it one of his favorites last year, may be confusing him with someone else though.
The exposition at the end smacks of studio interference.
Eh, Nolan isnt a artsy rebel. All his favorite movies are studio stuff (2001, Blade Runner, & On Her Majesty's' Secret Service)
I was going to say that from what Nolan did with Batman Begins, I figured that he wasn't a Batman fan outside of the movies and the comicsI heard him say he liked the animated series before.