I heard that it's basically Jew Violence Porn. It sounds awesome, gonna check it out on Tuesday probably.
i'm not gonna see it, looks like QT's worst movie.
Every trailer and clip I've seen has totally turned me off. It looks...horrible. Especially when I consider we get BJ Novak instead of Sly Stone
Quentin Tarantino’s “Inglourious Basterds” is a big, bold, audacious war movie that will annoy some, startle others and demonstrate once again that he’s the real thing, a director of quixotic delights.
Inglourious Basterds star Brad Pitt offered Tarantino hash to smoke out of a Coke can during filming.:bow Pitt :bow2
The Pulp Fiction director revealed on the Howard Stern radio show that Pitt offered him the substance while on location in Europe.
"He had this big brick of hash, he was gonna give me some for the night," the 46-year-old director said.
"So he takes this brick of hash and whips out a knife like Jesse James and cuts this big sliver.
"The thing that was really funny was I said do you have a pipe to go with this? And he just handed me a Coke can.
Read about how Madsen got cut from this :-\
Read about how Madsen got cut from this :-\
link?
He was beyond shitty in Sin City
CH: Are you still attached to Inglorious Bastards?
MM: Well, that's a big mystery right now. You'd have to ask Quentin. I know Tim Roth and I were attached to it for two or three years. He told me what my character's name was, and we talked a lot about it. But seeing he has this deal with The Weinstein Company and now they seem to be going to the studios, I'm not really sure. I'm hopeful there'll be a role in there for me somewhere.
Quote from: twerdi'm not gonna see it, looks like QT's worst movie.
That's Reservoir Dogs. Followed by Kill Bill.
... Sucks for you, Maurice. Apparently, it rocks! :rock
I wonder why both Ebert and him aren't listed on Rottentomatoes? (by choice?)
I heard that it's basically Jew Violence Porn. It sounds awesome, gonna check it out on Tuesday probably.
I'm sorry, Evil Dead is absolute garbage. It's an interesting concept, but the production values are truly terrible even for cheap horror movies, and the "acting" is atrocious. There is no way you can defend that on an objective level.:lol
Jew Violence Porn? Hardly at all. Anyone that goes into this wanting violence porn of any ethnicity is going to be sorely bored and disappointed.
:drudge WARNING! WARNING :drudge
85-90% of this film is conversation. Tense conversation, meaningful conversation......not Tarantinoesque pop culture banter. These conversations are in French or German. Yes you must read subtitles for most of the film.
Forget District 9. Forget Stark Trek. Forget Harry Potter, if you haven't already. Inglorious Basterds is THE move of the summer. It's got some truly intense drama, drama that doesn't merely rely on over-the-top violence to get the viewer interested. It's a slow movie, but rarely does it feel boring, which is a major accomplishment in an era where it seems like audiences have trouble paying attention if there isn't an explosion or robot peeing on someone every ten seconds. It's also got humor, that Tarantino brand of humor that gets you to laugh at people being ripped apart by machine guns, because, hey, they totally deserve it. It's suspensful, it's funny, it's tragic. It's got Nazi killin' and, at the end of the day, isn't that what matters most?
Go see this movie, as soon as possible.
Forget District 9. Forget Stark Trek. Forget Harry Potter, if you haven't already. Inglorious Basterds is THE move of the summer. It's got some truly intense drama, drama that doesn't merely rely on over-the-top violence to get the viewer interested. It's a slow movie, but rarely does it feel boring, which is a major accomplishment in an era where it seems like audiences have trouble paying attention if there isn't an explosion or robot peeing on someone every ten seconds. It's also got humor, that Tarantino brand of humor that gets you to laugh at people being ripped apart by machine guns, because, hey, they totally deserve it. It's suspensful, it's funny, it's tragic. It's got Nazi killin' and, at the end of the day, isn't that what matters most?
Go see this movie, as soon as possible.
Forget District 9. Forget Stark Trek. Forget Harry Potter, if you haven't already. Inglorious Basterds is THE move of the summer. It's got some truly intense drama, drama that doesn't merely rely on over-the-top violence to get the viewer interested. It's a slow movie, but rarely does it feel boring, which is a major accomplishment in an era where it seems like audiences have trouble paying attention if there isn't an explosion or robot peeing on someone every ten seconds. It's also got humor, that Tarantino brand of humor that gets you to laugh at people being ripped apart by machine guns, because, hey, they totally deserve it. It's suspensful, it's funny, it's tragic. It's got Nazi killin' and, at the end of the day, isn't that what matters most?
Go see this movie, as soon as possible.
Is my favourite poster on EB now.
Best movie I've seen all year so far and will probably be film of the year at the end since Scorsese's Shutter Island looks kinda generic from the trailer.
Hopefully Japan's love affair with QT means this will open before next year. Any of you Japanboritos know fer sure?
Hopefully Japan's love affair with QT means this will open before next year. Any of you Japanboritos know fer sure?
IMDB says October 3.
It wasn't a great movie but I wouldn't have minded paying a few bucks less for it at a matinee price.
The whole movie felt like a comic book movie though trying to mesh some hyper violent fantasies with actual racial persecution and that of course can't work that well. The movie failed though at anything involving german propoganda and racial cleansing, those sections felt so half-assed/unrealistic that I couldn't care about any of the characters that died, which was most of the main characters.
I liked the landa guy, but I think the movie would have been better if it only focused on the bastards doing their deeds. It really, really, really needed to flesh out the characters in the movie more which it just couldn't do with the skipping through chapter arcs and everything (the fucking british guy was in two consecutive scenes). It is possible that maybe Tarantino is trying to criticize the stereotypes of the good and bad guys of WW2 sort of movies but the fact that the german culture of the time is also a major target of criticism of this movie makes me doubt that.
I don't really know what the point of this movie was but the basic concept feels flawed.
So, I'm seeing a lot of descriptions as "Jew Violence Porn". Does this mean there is massive amounts of nudity, or massive amounts of Jew violence? This determines whether or not I will be seeing this movie.
[sigh]
Looks like I may not be seeing this after all. Because, you know, titties make the movie for me. >:( Lame!
I told you guys to see it. I'm awesome. :smug
I told you guys to see it. I'm awesome. :smug
You are all over the place.Not really. It looks like the movie took some generic political messages from WW2 and fucked them up with some over-Tarantinoed, stereotypical characters. In all the characters of this movie, you only get two different views on the war and on Germans, so it fucks up the human weakness angle completely. That's why I think it was like a comic book movie, it has characters you wouldn't see in real life. I went into this movie expecting to see a bunch of guerilla jews doing scary shit for 3 hours and honestly, it just made me roll my eyes for 2.5 hours.
You are all over the place.Not really. It looks like the movie took some generic political messages from WW2 and fucked them up with some over-Tarantinoed, stereotypical characters. In all the characters of this movie, you only get two different views on the war and on Germans, so it fucks up the human weakness angle completely. That's why I think it was like a comic book movie, it has characters you wouldn't see in real life. I went into this movie expecting to see a bunch of guerilla jews doing scary shit for 3 hours and honestly, it just made me roll my eyes for 2.5 hours.
It was definitely a fun movie but the concept itself just wasn't that great.
Tarantino has repeatedly stressed that despite its being a war film, Inglourious Basterds is his "spaghetti western but with World War II iconography". In addition to spaghetti westerns, the film also pays homage to the World War II "macaroni combat" sub-genre (itself heavily influenced by spaghetti-westerns), as well as French New Wave cinema.
I did get disturbed by all the people laughing at the excessive shock violence. It creeps me out.
I did get disturbed by all the people laughing at the excessive shock violence. It creeps me out.
Welcome to the desensitization of the last 20 years of popular culture?
The scene where Pitt carves a swastika in the guy's head at the very end is fucking gruesome, and nobody laughed at that.
The scene where Pitt carves a swastika in the guy's head at the very end is fucking gruesome, and nobody laughed at that.
The pretext leading up to
"Bawn jor no"
made it so hilarious. :rofl
Otherwise an alright movie. Is the actor you guys are admiring the one who played Lans? It was almost too perfect how he was like a third person omniscient force of nature.spoiler (click to show/hide)I can't imagine how he could remember the girl only seeing her while she ran, but he ordered her a milk, not even letting her decide. Maybe its supposed to be ambiguous. He may also have done that and let her live in the first place because he enjoys teasing his victims[close]
Claude Reigns would have been perfect in this movie.
Yes, it does. Still hate Kill Bill though!
The only character the I liked was the drunk guy who got the autograph. As far as "jew violence porn" goes, no one could feel good about the violence in this movie. It was too realistic and too many innocent people died.
Chapter 5: REVENGE OF THE GIANT FACE :lol
Not one act of violence in this movie looked realistic? The blood effects looked real, it dripped out like normal blood and nothing like Kill Bill's geysers. Even the scalping, choking, and beating scenes all looked realistic. The worst part of it was the sound of it all though.The only character the I liked was the drunk guy who got the autograph. As far as "jew violence porn" goes, no one could feel good about the violence in this movie. It was too realistic and too many innocent people died.:rofl :rofl :rofl
What's a movie thread without am nintenho embarrassing himself
^I think they did leave their dynamite under their theater seats. Possibly, that was the distraction they would need to get out after shooting hitler?Not one act of violence in this movie looked realistic? The blood effects looked real, it dripped out like normal blood and nothing like Kill Bill's geysers. Even the scalping, choking, and beating scenes all looked realistic. The worst part of it was the sound of it all though.The only character the I liked was the drunk guy who got the autograph. As far as "jew violence porn" goes, no one could feel good about the violence in this movie. It was too realistic and too many innocent people died.:rofl :rofl :rofl
It doesn't really matter how much audiences are desensitized to movie violence. In a movie trying to portray fucking who knows what political messages and that's already getting the audience's attention with the tense conversation scenes, Tarantino made a stupid, conscious decision to make the violence look as realistic as possible.
Yes, he should have made it more like Kill Bill. It still wouldn't have been that great but it would have been much better I think.
Deserved his own movie!
Yeah, those were both unexpected. I was more bummed that he killed:spoiler (click to show/hide)HUGO STIGLITZ[close]
Deserved his own movie!
spoiler (click to show/hide)-Loved shoshannas head thingie at the movie premiere, somehow I thought it showed us the mystique of covering up a woman (ala muslims)[close]
First time I saw a packed cinema giving applause after a real movie in my life I think (not talking nerd jerk off Star Wars, Lotro). Real mature people giving applause. I was impressed.
Holy shit, movie rockedBecause I think it was decent but not great? I just didn't like the French cinema stuff.
Also I'm not one to dogpile other users or cram people into some stereotype, but am nintenho is wrong about everything
you basterd.
i'm not gonna see it, looks like QT's worst movie.
you basterd.
i'm not gonna see it, looks like QT's worst movie.
i'm sorry, evilbore, i take back everything. please forgive me :'(
been thinking about it since I saw it, and the movie was pretty great. I've been stuck between deciding if Eli Roth is truly terrible or it's just his shtick. Christoph Waltz was awesome, though.
I can't be the only one who squirms at the final scene, am I?
I can't be the only one who squirms at the final scene, am I?
That was brutal. :-X
I can't be the only one who squirms at the final scene, am I?
That was brutal. :-X
"You'll be shot for this!"
"Naw, I'll just be chewed out"
AMURIKKKA
:american :american :american
Oh hell, why not:
1. Jackie Brown
2. Inglourious Basterds
3. Pulp Fiction
4. Reservoir Dogs
5. Death Proof
6. Kill Bill
Another thing- while Jackie Brown is good and shit, I don't really think it's THAT MUCH better than Reservoir Dogs, and obviously I didn't rate it higher than DP. I mean, it's good but not THAT good. I don't get the infatuation with it, other than of course Bridget Fonda playing a slut and all.
13. The shit he wrote for Natural Born KillersWRT Natural Born Killers, Tarantino said that the final movie was so different than his script that he didn't want to be in the credits.
Hey, I thought you really liked DP when it came out! Neener neener!
1. Pulp Fiction
2. Reservoir Dogs
3. Kill Bill (p.1&2 together)
4. Death Proof
5. Inglorious Bastards
I still haven't see Jackie Brown so I can't rank it. Death Proof is low only because I went into it expecting a totally different movie and Inglorious Bastards is dumb fun (to me) but that's it really.
I am pretty sure the all Nazi soldiers did stuff besides murder Jews all the time.
...IG is about nazi propaganda?What?
I dont think even if I could explain it you would understand how deep this goes, ww2, nazis, everything. The only comparison that I can think of is racism against blacks in the US.:sarcastic jerkoff emote
And this (IG) all just show the banality and humanity of it all, the nazis sitting in the pub playing pub games like regular folk. It may be a comedy but its starting to trivialize all the pain which is somehow nice and scary at the same time.
Finally saw this last night. A solid 8/10, but Tarantino is still too much in love with his own writing, continuing the problem that started in Death Proof.
Best part was the guys pretending to be Italian. :lol :lol
I think that he means that his movies are more about the characters than the stories, sometimes it makes it a better movie and sometimes it does not.
5) True Romance (counting this as his. It would have been #2 a few years ago, but I can't abide the racism
5) True Romance (counting this as his. It would have been #2 a few years ago, but I can't abide the racism
Are you talking about the sequence with Dennis Hopper confronting Christopher Walken, or some other part? That sequence is the only racist dialogue I can remember offhand, and it's clearly not promoting racism as a positive thing.
The main Nazi character, Hans "The Jew Hunter" Landa was fantastic. Did that guy get an Oscar?
No offense chronovore but I think that's a croak of shit. THey couldn't have done it any other way?... you know what kind of movie you were watching, right? It's not classy and it's not trying to be.
To be honest I did rewind the scene and watch it again :-[
Like I said. French Poodle.:D Glad I can provide some happiness.
Also, this avatar:(http://i37.tinypic.com/2j0jqdx.gif)
damnnnna
Yeah but atleast IMHO it feels like they threw it in just to say "lol we have a sex scene". It's out of place, breaks the tension in that scene, and stupid. You could tell just by looking at her that she was pretty much a new german, I didn't need to see some fuckold movie director dogg her to get the point across.
It's three seconds long! And, as chronovore pointed out, it's about as incisive as three seconds of film can be. Whose joke character are you, anyway?Three seconds too long and doens't fit at all in the movie. Why do I need to be shown that she's a traitor? And to do that by getting dogged? It's stupid.
Why? Because I have a opinion on what I feel is a useless sex scene? I love the movie otherwise, just, did they really have to show it? Didn't shusannah's face alone dictate that she thought that was happening anyways? I know it's sacriligieous but that type of writing is Dexter level. It's sloppy filmmaking and screenwriting.
Movie comes out tommorow, I really wish the special edition would come out here.
I think if it was just one thrust, or even a kiss, it would've been alot more effective. Why not a kiss? or a hug?
I just feel it's entirely out of place, useless, and could be done without. That's all.
I don't even remember a sex scene ???
So I don't even know what the fuck he's talking about
It was pretty hot, and i have no qualms admitting I spent an hour looking for it online.
I just feel it's entirely out of place, useless, and could be done without. That's all.Which is why you rewound it several times and have wasted time looking for it on the internet. Dude, you have issues.
That's okay, i'd fall asleep too in your company.
Anyways, what was with the totally unneccesary sex scene at the streudel shop or w/e? Was that really neccesary? Couldn't you just tell regardless that she's a german? :/
I wish you the viewer could edit movies.
No offense chronovore but I think that's a croak of shit. THey couldn't have done it any other way?
Yeah but atleast IMHO it feels like they threw it in just to say "lol we have a sex scene". It's out of place, breaks the tension in that scene, and stupid. You could tell just by looking at her that she was pretty much a new german, I didn't need to see some fuckold movie director dogg her to get the point across.
germandirector dogging germandirector translator
To be honest I did rewind the scene and watch it again :-[
It's three seconds long! And, as chronovore pointed out, it's about as incisive as three seconds of film can be. Whose joke character are you, anyway?Three seconds too long and doens't fit at all in the movie. Why do I need to be shown that she's a traitor? And to do that by getting dogged? It's stupid.
it went on a little too long though and was unneccesary.
Why? Because I have a opinion on what I feel is a useless sex scene? I love the movie otherwise, just, did they really have to show it? Didn't shusannah's face alone dictate that she thought that was happening anyways? I know it's sacriligieous but that type of writing is Dexter level. It's sloppy filmmaking and screenwriting.
Movie comes out tommorow, I really wish the special edition would come out here.
I think if it was just one thrust, or even a kiss, it would've been alot more effective. Why not a kiss? or a hug?
I just feel it's entirely out of place, useless, and could be done without. That's all.
It was pretty hot, and i have no qualms admitting I spent an hour looking for it online.
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST. This was all posted today.That's okay, i'd fall asleep too in your company.
Anyways, what was with the totally unneccesary sex scene at the streudel shop or w/e? Was that really neccesary? Couldn't you just tell regardless that she's a german? :/
I wish you the viewer could edit movies.No offense chronovore but I think that's a croak of shit. THey couldn't have done it any other way?Yeah but atleast IMHO it feels like they threw it in just to say "lol we have a sex scene". It's out of place, breaks the tension in that scene, and stupid. You could tell just by looking at her that she was pretty much a new german, I didn't need to see some fuckold movie director dogg her to get the point across.germandirector dogging germandirector translatorTo be honest I did rewind the scene and watch it again :-[It's three seconds long! And, as chronovore pointed out, it's about as incisive as three seconds of film can be. Whose joke character are you, anyway?Three seconds too long and doens't fit at all in the movie. Why do I need to be shown that she's a traitor? And to do that by getting dogged? It's stupid.it went on a little too long though and was unneccesary.Why? Because I have a opinion on what I feel is a useless sex scene? I love the movie otherwise, just, did they really have to show it? Didn't shusannah's face alone dictate that she thought that was happening anyways? I know it's sacriligieous but that type of writing is Dexter level. It's sloppy filmmaking and screenwriting.
Movie comes out tommorow, I really wish the special edition would come out here.I think if it was just one thrust, or even a kiss, it would've been alot more effective. Why not a kiss? or a hug?I just feel it's entirely out of place, useless, and could be done without. That's all.It was pretty hot, and i have no qualms admitting I spent an hour looking for it online.
Methodis got a shame swell, so now he's trying to bash the movie.Gotta get summa that Christian side-huggin (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_Oj0-splZw)'!
I don't even remember a sex scene ???
So I don't even know what the fuck he's talking about
That scene was awesome fucking.Fixed.
Like I said. French Poodle.
Also, this avatar:(http://i37.tinypic.com/2j0jqdx.gif)
damnnnna
you can be like this nukka and rub a nukka dikk off