I hear it's like, the anti-ff11.
Whereas FF11 was party based FF14 is solo-based.
I hear it's like, the anti-ff11.
Whereas FF11 was party based FF14 is solo-based.
Interest slightly rising. If that's true I will probably pick this up just to scrath that console JRPG itch FFXIII couldn't.
I hear it's like, the anti-ff11.
Whereas FF11 was party based FF14 is solo-based.
Interest slightly rising. If that's true I will probably pick this up just to scrath that console JRPG itch FFXIII couldn't.
SquareEnix is this generation's Acclaim. As Bob Saget once put it, "there's shit everywhere!"
I hear it's like, the anti-ff11.
Whereas FF11 was party based FF14 is solo-based.
Interest slightly rising. If that's true I will probably pick this up just to scrath that console JRPG itch FFXIII couldn't.
SquareEnix is this generation's Acclaim. As Bob Saget once put it, "there's shit everywhere!"
Wizards & Warriors > Square Enix
I believe SE is the worst dev this gen.
Enjoy your PS3 exclusive. Good thinkg Microsoft has such good quality control and would never have this rubbish on their machine.
Enjoy your PS3 exclusive. Good thinkg Microsoft has such good quality control and would never have this rubbish on their machine.
Enjoy your PS3 exclusive. Good thinkg Microsoft has such good quality control and would never have this rubbish on their machine.
PC version.
If this was made by Chinese, they are getting much better!
After the initial (admittedly pretty drunk) confusion, I'm digging on the game. A lot of it is FFXI nostalgia total (OMG HI REZ GOOBUE), but there are a lot of things I like. The graphics are pretty great, I like the levequest idea so far, and I don't think I'll have the time to hit any xp penalties. I haven't run into any shady translation either, although now I'll be on the lookout! Seems pretty close to FFXI...most things are probably named by mashing random keys on the keyboard. There is also a Shantoto-like taru clone that gives you a linkpearl and wants you to call her with any info comparing manhoods. I digress.
All in all, it made me question why the hell can't SE make a mainline offline FF with a back to the basics old-school interesting world?!
And... from the sounds of it it is better than this turd. Your point
I'll be buying this soon. I loved XI.
What the hell is square doing to this franchise?
I think so. And each quest has a 48 hour cooldown which means you can only do it once every two days.
Oh look, Manabyte is trolling an MMO. What a surprise.
36 hour cooldown is better than some quests in FFXI which had SEVEN DAY cooldown.
The reason these have a cooldown is because they are a good way for casuals to level - if the hardcore zombies who play MMOs all day could do these without cooldowns, they wouldn't bother levelling elsewhere.
wow, that is AMAZINGLY bad
lots of items and abilities that have been in katakana since the NES days got sudden and impossible-to-read kanji titles. what the HELL.
wow, that is AMAZINGLY bad
lots of items and abilities that have been in katakana since the NES days got sudden and impossible-to-read kanji titles. what the HELL.
That's not even the worst part. They're wrong Kanji. They are gibberish words. That screenshot was taken by a commenter from Japan on my site for proof it was made in China while fighting off some kid in Italy who thinks the Chinese thing was a 4chan prank.
I bet Blizzard employees gather around a monitor and laugh at how shitty FFXIV is. Cataclysm wins already and it's not even out yet
> implying Blizzard is aware FFXIV was released
Gamespot gave Final Fantasy XIV a 4/10. :lol
Has Square made a good game this gen?
Has Square made a good game this gen?They're publishing a bunch of games I'm interested in too like Dungeon Siege 3 and Deus Ex 3.
Has Square made a good game this gen?They're publishing a bunch of games I'm interested in too like Dungeon Siege 3 and Deus Ex 3.
Just Cause 2 :rock
The World Ends with You was good.
did anyone read that thread on GAF about gamespot giving it a 4.0?! hilarious damage control
did anyone read that thread on GAF about gamespot giving it a 4.0?! hilarious damage control
Say the game were released a year from now, full of content and polished as fuck with all the bad design decisions out and good ones in. People would see this totally differently. That's likely what the game will look like a year from now. Does it still make sense to call this a bad game?
QuoteSay the game were released a year from now, full of content and polished as fuck with all the bad design decisions out and good ones in. People would see this totally differently. That's likely what the game will look like a year from now. Does it still make sense to call this a bad game?
Amazing
QuoteSay the game were released a year from now, full of content and polished as fuck with all the bad design decisions out and good ones in. People would see this totally differently. That's likely what the game will look like a year from now. Does it still make sense to call this a bad game?
Amazing
During beta I was saying the game was shit and people were screaming FUD.
Now the reviews are vindication!
FF has officially jumped the shark
Agito and Versus better be awesome. That is, if FF14 doesn't turn out to be the next FF:TSW and bankrupt the company.
They shouldn't even have had their MMO Final Fantasies part of there mainline series rather than simply calling them Final Fantasy Online.
MMOs are garbage. who cares if they get low score. Squeenix is doing great. FF14 isnt gonna kill the company... rofl
MMOs are garbage. who cares if they get low score. Squeenix is doing great. FF14 isnt gonna kill the company... rofl
Demi's right, even "good" MMOs suck. Might as well just play Two Worlds II or something instead.
I don't put stock into game reviews.
However, this is about brand name recognition, standards and quality.
A Final Fantasy game getting two 4/10's in a row is the equivalent of a new Super Mario game getting 4/10 and not from some troll magazine like Edge either, but from two major gaming outlets. It's just something I cannot believe.
It is not an overreaction to say that S-E has put out two rushed products within the same year with the Final Fantasy name on them. As a result quality is lesser, standards are shattered, the Final Fantasy name is now effectively not attached to quality. As a fan of the series, that's all I want. Not for new entries to "dethrone my personal favorite" or whatever bullshit. What I just described in the above paragraph is text book case jumping the shark. They are now only going through the motions.
Hell, SE is trying to get the bad reviews pulled citing some BS 30-day embargo that is impossible to enforce. They want to trick people into paying for at least one month, but the game is out and they're scrambling to get sites to pull the bad reviews until next month. Sorry SE, bug you can't censor people once your shit is on store shelves.
Hell, SE is trying to get the bad reviews pulled citing some BS 30-day embargo that is impossible to enforce. They want to trick people into paying for at least one month, but the game is out and they're scrambling to get sites to pull the bad reviews until next month. Sorry SE, bug you can't censor people once your shit is on store shelves.
Damn, really? But only GS and GT have posted reviews so far, is SE going after them?
I don't put stock into game reviews.
However, this is about brand name recognition, standards and quality.
A Final Fantasy game getting two 4/10's in a row is the equivalent of a new Super Mario game getting 4/10 and not from some troll magazine like Edge either, but from two major gaming outlets. It's just something I cannot believe.
It is not an overreaction to say that S-E has put out two rushed products within the same year with the Final Fantasy name on them. As a result quality is lesser, standards are shattered, the Final Fantasy name is now effectively not attached to quality. As a fan of the series, that's all I want. Not for new entries to "dethrone my personal favorite" or whatever bullshit. What I just described in the above paragraph is text book case jumping the shark. They are now only going through the motions.
I think the next mainline FF should be a complete reboot of the franchise
I hope no one pulls them. SE deserves the shame. GT puts it perfectly: the game was created in a vacuum. It's like they had no fucking idea what was going on, even in eastern mmos, and didn't give a shit.
QuoteI think the next mainline FF should be a complete reboot of the franchise
what does this even mean? they reboot with every new numbered game anyway.
I hope no one pulls them. SE deserves the shame. GT puts it perfectly: the game was created in a vacuum. It's like they had no fucking idea what was going on, even in eastern mmos, and didn't give a shit.
IGN and Gamespot may. SE is threatening no review copies of other games unless the reviews are pulled.
I hope no one pulls them. SE deserves the shame. GT puts it perfectly: the game was created in a vacuum. It's like they had no fucking idea what was going on, even in eastern mmos, and didn't give a shit.
IGN and Gamespot may. SE is threatening no review copies of other games unless the reviews are pulled.
For one, it shouldn't be titled Final Fantasy 15.
QuoteFor one, it shouldn't be titled Final Fantasy 15.
So a spinoff then?
However, this is about brand name recognition, standards and quality.
No, a complete reboot.
QuoteNo, a complete reboot.
Apart from the title (I'm guessing you think they should just call it "Final Fantasy"?), how will it be different from all the other numbered games which are also complete reboots?
so they should turn final fantasy into a gritty FPS or one of those western rpg where you decide who you get to screw and have important moral questions like "do i murder everyone or do i donate all my money to the church?"QuoteHowever, this is about brand name recognition, standards and quality.
standards and quality have been thrown out of the window well before FF14,that doesn't make the brand less strong because there will still be a lot of people who will buy the game no matter what,just look at all the people going for agito even tough they know almost nothing about it
you are part of the problem himuro :-\
QuoteNo, a complete reboot.
Apart from the title (I'm guessing you think they should just call it "Final Fantasy"?), how will it be different from all the other numbered games which are also complete reboots?
I'm not sure you understand the concept of a reboot.
I'm talking about Square Enix throwing out everything that Final Fantasy is currently known for; archaic gameplay mechanics, horrific pacing, canned animations, mediocre camerawork, cheesy dialogue, generic tween-inspired storyline, horrendous /non-existent online, metrosexual and brow-raising character designs, the list goes on and on and on. I'm talking about Square Enix redoing Final Fantasy and thus completely redefining the franchise.
Let me know if you still have difficulty comprehending the concept of a reboot.
Final Fantasy 15 should be on 3ds.
Less budget to work with, less bloat due to size restraints, smaller development time, less emphasis on GRAPHICS and OMG EMOTIONS and more on gameplay.
FF doesn't need a reboot; it needs a change in priorities.
QuoteNo, a complete reboot.
Apart from the title (I'm guessing you think they should just call it "Final Fantasy"?), how will it be different from all the other numbered games which are also complete reboots?
I'm not sure you understand the concept of a reboot.
I'm talking about Square Enix throwing out everything that Final Fantasy is currently known for; archaic gameplay mechanics, horrific pacing, canned animations, mediocre camerawork, cheesy dialogue, generic tween-inspired storyline, horrendous /non-existent online, metrosexual and brow-raising character designs, the list goes on and on and on. I'm talking about Square Enix redoing Final Fantasy and thus completely redefining the franchise.
Let me know if you still have difficulty comprehending the concept of a reboot.
AIght. Agree with this. But it doesn't need a "reboot" per se.
So dont? I'll go buy my copy though. See ya
When was the last time a Final Fantasy game was interesting, compelling, well-written and fun to play? Like 15 years ago. Final Fantasy 6 was the end of it.
I'll never get the FF7 fanboys- What the fuck is that game even about?
But Versus 13 doesn't fix the long development cycles and all that.
When was the last time a Final Fantasy game was interesting, compelling, well-written and fun to play? Like 15 years ago. Final Fantasy 6 was the end of it.
I'll never get the FF7 fanboys- What the fuck is that game even about?
I'm talking about Square Enix throwing out everything that Final Fantasy is currently known for; archaic gameplay mechanics, horrific pacing, canned animations, mediocre camerawork, cheesy dialogue, generic tween-inspired storyline, horrendous /non-existent online, metrosexual and brow-raising character designs, the list goes on and on and on. I'm talking about Square Enix redoing Final Fantasy and thus completely redefining the franchise.
QuoteI'm talking about Square Enix throwing out everything that Final Fantasy is currently known for; archaic gameplay mechanics, horrific pacing, canned animations, mediocre camerawork, cheesy dialogue, generic tween-inspired storyline, horrendous /non-existent online, metrosexual and brow-raising character designs, the list goes on and on and on. I'm talking about Square Enix redoing Final Fantasy and thus completely redefining the franchise.
yes, that's brilliant, all they have to do is decide to THIS time have good pacing, dialogue and camerawork, along with everything else, and it'll happen! because I'm sure the initial project plans of the games you don't like all included "bad pacing, dialogue and camerawork" on their lists of intended features before development began!
I've always wanted to make a game too, but I've always gotten stuck because I could never decide whether it should be cool or lame. Could someone help me out?
:bow
Has TripleA been annhilated more times than Glen? Anybody keeping count? It's gotta be close.
I'm just wondering if 13 and 14 have done irreparable damage to the franchise. It strikes me that if you tried to reboot it as just "FINAL FANTASY" then people would get it confused with the spinoffs :-\
Through the focus group we conducted (mentioned in the "wrong" section), we found that, contrary to expectations, the game was received very well by Western players. Also, both Japanese and Western players place emphasis on the story and battles, meaning that the style we focused on with Final Fantasy XIII was accepted after all.
Speaking of FF13
:rofl
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=23790179&postcount=1
:roflQuoteThrough the focus group we conducted (mentioned in the "wrong" section), we found that, contrary to expectations, the game was received very well by Western players. Also, both Japanese and Western players place emphasis on the story and battles, meaning that the style we focused on with Final Fantasy XIII was accepted after all.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
When was the last time a Final Fantasy game was interesting, compelling, well-written and fun to play? Like 15 years ago. Final Fantasy 6 was the end of it.
I'll never get the FF7 fanboys- What the fuck is that game even about?
FF7 was essentially the first 'epic' console game.
FF is still selling millions, yes, but these sells keep decreasing and decreasing
Why does it matter? I'm a Final Fantasy fan who just wants a great game.
When was the last time a Final Fantasy game was interesting, compelling, well-written and fun to play? Like 15 years ago. Final Fantasy 6 was the end of it.
I'll never get the FF7 fanboys- What the fuck is that game even about?
FF7 was essentially the first 'epic' console game.
Wrong. FF6 was the first epic console game. When playing this game I had no idea that the production value would be this good for a snes game.
Did you ever play FFVII or did you just watch SCEA's CG filled ads on Youtube?
Everyone's getting hung up on the word "epic", I think.
FF7 was one of the first heavily cinematic games that a lot of people played. Loads of prerendered backgrounds of massive locales, lots of CG cutscenes, massive 3D bosses, and all that. For those who came over directly from the SNES and Genesis, there really wasn't anything quite like it.
Did you ever play FFVII or did you just watch SCEA's CG filled ads on Youtube?
I did, even though I personally think OoT is a zillion times 'epic-errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr'.
When was the last time a Final Fantasy game was interesting, compelling, well-written and fun to play? Like 15 years ago. Final Fantasy 6 was the end of it.
I'll never get the FF7 fanboys- What the fuck is that game even about?
FF7 was essentially the first 'epic' console game.
Wrong. FF6 was the first epic console game. When playing this game I had no idea that the production value would be this good for a snes game.
Wrong. FF6 was simply a great game.
You're out of your fucking mind if you actually believe FF6 was a more 'epic' console game than FF7. Everything about FF7 was 'epic'.
can we all agree that FF8 sucks? :smug
can we all agree that FF8 sucks? :smug
sure, but only if we make it FF9
FF10-2 owns
FF10-2 owns
fuckin truth
just say ff2 and we can all (except bebpo wtf) agree
FF10-2 owns
fuckin truth
just say ff2 and we can all (except bebpo wtf) agree
FF10-2 owns
fuckin truth
just say ff2 and we can all (except bebpo wtf) agree
ff13
haven't played it
besides himuro like every final fantasy i don't like which must means that FF13 is a masterpiece :smug
When was the last time a Final Fantasy game was interesting, compelling, well-written and fun to play? Like 15 years ago. Final Fantasy 6 was the end of it.
I'll never get the FF7 fanboys- What the fuck is that game even about?
FF7 was essentially the first 'epic' console game.
Wrong. FF6 was the first epic console game. When playing this game I had no idea that the production value would be this good for a snes game.
Wrong. FF6 was simply a great game.
You're out of your fucking mind if you actually believe FF6 was a more 'epic' console game than FF7. Everything about FF7 was 'epic'.
At the risk of getting into a NERD WAR, FF6 is way more 'epic', traditionally, than FF7.
FF7 has OMGZOR CGI sequences and a HERO WITH SPIKY HAIR AND A HUGE SWORD and TITS MCGEE THE SEXY LADY and BLACK MAN and A TALKING RENAGADE WOLF and lots of Michael Bay-ish "exciting" shit, "epic" in the parlance of Hollywood.
But FF6 is the classic epic. The story of redemption and heart break, of giving in to our wrong instincts etc etc. It's also longer and features a more drastic story.
Looks like FF12's layout. Horrible game.
When was the last time a Final Fantasy game was interesting, compelling, well-written and fun to play? Like 15 years ago. Final Fantasy 6 was the end of it.
I'll never get the FF7 fanboys- What the fuck is that game even about?
FF7 was essentially the first 'epic' console game.
Wrong. FF6 was the first epic console game. When playing this game I had no idea that the production value would be this good for a snes game.
Wrong. FF6 was simply a great game.
You're out of your fucking mind if you actually believe FF6 was a more 'epic' console game than FF7. Everything about FF7 was 'epic'.
At the risk of getting into a NERD WAR, FF6 is way more 'epic', traditionally, than FF7.
FF7 has OMGZOR CGI sequences and a HERO WITH SPIKY HAIR AND A HUGE SWORD and TITS MCGEE THE SEXY LADY and BLACK MAN and A TALKING RENAGADE WOLF and lots of Michael Bay-ish "exciting" shit, "epic" in the parlance of Hollywood.
But FF6 is the classic epic. The story of redemption and heart break, of giving in to our wrong instincts etc etc. It's also longer and features a more drastic story.
Now put everything about FF6 next to FF7, throw away the 'classic' take of the word 'epic', and use the modern take of the word 'epic'. The conclusion is obvious.
For Oblivion Read this
http://brokentoys.org/2010/09/24/final-fantasy-xiv-triumph-of-the-horsebirds/
For Oblivion Read this
http://brokentoys.org/2010/09/24/final-fantasy-xiv-triumph-of-the-horsebirds/
When was the last time a Final Fantasy game was interesting, compelling, well-written and fun to play? Like 15 years ago. Final Fantasy 6 was the end of it.
I'll never get the FF7 fanboys- What the fuck is that game even about?
FF7 was essentially the first 'epic' console game.
Wrong. FF6 was the first epic console game. When playing this game I had no idea that the production value would be this good for a snes game.
Wrong. FF6 was simply a great game.
You're out of your fucking mind if you actually believe FF6 was a more 'epic' console game than FF7. Everything about FF7 was 'epic'.
At the risk of getting into a NERD WAR, FF6 is way more 'epic', traditionally, than FF7.
FF7 has OMGZOR CGI sequences and a HERO WITH SPIKY HAIR AND A HUGE SWORD and TITS MCGEE THE SEXY LADY and BLACK MAN and A TALKING RENAGADE WOLF and lots of Michael Bay-ish "exciting" shit, "epic" in the parlance of Hollywood.
But FF6 is the classic epic. The story of redemption and heart break, of giving in to our wrong instincts etc etc. It's also longer and features a more drastic story.
Now put everything about FF6 next to FF7, throw away the 'classic' take of the word 'epic', and use the modern take of the word 'epic'. The conclusion is obvious.
(http://imgur.com/QHwM7.gif)
Square extends the 30 day trial :rofl
http://lodestone.finalfantasyxiv.com/pl/news/detail?newsId=ce357898b8968d9c0b3327ff9a706ba97b218fec
:rofl
Not that anyone would curse a friend by trying this piece of shit, but if you give them a buddy key they need to buy the game to install it. There's no client download available from Square. People with a buddy key must have the retail disc to install the game.
So hard to believe SE dropped the ball bigtime, they had years to prepare. What went wrong? When will we find out?
:rofl
Not that anyone would curse a friend by trying this piece of shit, but if you give them a buddy key they need to buy the game to install it. There's no client download available from Square. People with a buddy key must have the retail disc to install the game.
Oh, it gets better.
No one who buys the game new can play because it can't download the launch patch. SE uses a horrible BT client for the patches and as no one is seeding the launch day patch...new players are SOL.
So hard to believe SE dropped the ball bigtime, they had years to prepare. What went wrong? When will we find out?
So hard to believe SE dropped the ball bigtime, they had years to prepare. What went wrong? When will we find out?
Things started to go wrong when Yasumi Matsuno left the FF series halfway through FFXII.
Eurogamer: Is the PS3 version still on course for release in March 2011?
Hiromichi Tanaka: Our priority is to bring satisfaction to Windows players, so we're working hard on that. But as soon as we feel that's done, we will focus on the PS3 version.
That being said, the Windows version is working on PS3 at the moment. We're focusing on optimisation and adjusting the balance as well as fixing all the bugs. We would like to bring it to PS3 players as soon as possible.
PC Gamer: I understand when it’s elements of a landscape, like a tree or rock. But these seem to be whole areas, to an extent that you don’t see in something like WoW.
Hiromichi Tanaka: One of the explanations for that is the size of the parts of the data that we use. Back in the days of FFXI and even WoW, the memory of each part was much less than what we have to use now. These days, because of the graphics, the same size of the parts costs more memory size. If the PC itself has that same size of the- has got larger in the same manner, then we can increase the map in the same way. But the same size of the data is now like ten times more memory size, so that’s really costing the game data size.
PC Gamer: If WoW could do it then, why isn’t it doable now?
Hiromichi Tanaka: One of the reasons why is because of the quality of the graphics – it’s different from WoW. What we’re trying to do in each part is costing more memory. Basically that’s the difference. WoW was designed a few years ago, before FFXI. FFXIV is designed with the latest graphical technology; that’s why it costs that much of memory data.
:rofl
Not that anyone would curse a friend by trying this piece of shit, but if you give them a buddy key they need to buy the game to install it. There's no client download available from Square. People with a buddy key must have the retail disc to install the game.
In order to make the game look better, we had to make it look worse.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2010-11-15-square-enix-on-final-fantasy-xivs-future-interview?page=2QuoteEurogamer: Is the PS3 version still on course for release in March 2011?
Hiromichi Tanaka: Our priority is to bring satisfaction to Windows players, so we're working hard on that. But as soon as we feel that's done, we will focus on the PS3 version. (wave)
That being said, the Windows version is working on PS3 at the moment. We're focusing on optimisation and adjusting the balance as well as fixing all the bugs. We would like to bring it to PS3 players as soon as possible.
So PS3 version is delayed indefinitely then? :teehee
http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/11/15/interview-final-fantasy-xiv-developers-apologise-to-unhappy-players/QuotePC Gamer: I understand when it’s elements of a landscape, like a tree or rock. But these seem to be whole areas, to an extent that you don’t see in something like WoW.
Hiromichi Tanaka: One of the explanations for that is the size of the parts of the data that we use. Back in the days of FFXI and even WoW, the memory of each part was much less than what we have to use now. These days, because of the graphics, the same size of the parts costs more memory size. If the PC itself has that same size of the- has got larger in the same manner, then we can increase the map in the same way. But the same size of the data is now like ten times more memory size, so that’s really costing the game data size. (wave)
PC Gamer: If WoW could do it then, why isn’t it doable now?
Hiromichi Tanaka: One of the reasons why is because of the quality of the graphics – it’s different from WoW. What we’re trying to do in each part is costing more memory. Basically that’s the difference. WoW was designed a few years ago, before FFXI. FFXIV is designed with the latest graphical technology; that’s why it costs that much of memory data. (wave)
:lol
Square's doing it wrong, they should shorten the free trial period so people have less time to find out how crappy it is before they have to re-up.:lol :lol
"Sorry, but your 2 hour trial is over, we're automatically charging your card for a minimum one-year subscription, kupo!" (http://i301.photobucket.com/albums/nn50/thedoctor945/Emotions/mooglehappy.png)
I'd imagine it's been patched so much that it's now 50% as good as everything else
I've only heard good things about the game as of late. $8 sounds like a steal if you time it right to get a couple of days of 2.0
Im in the ps3 and pc beta, client patching ps3 side seems a but fucking distinguished mentally-challenged
Best Final Fantasy since XII, massive improvement over the original. If only we'd get worlds/style like this again in an offline FF. Will try and post some pics later, as I am pretty sure that's allowed now.
just got to the first instanced fight
fun. probably not subbing on any regular basis, but I could see myself hopping in every once in a while. I just don't want to get to the point where I have to party up cause I don't wanna do that
So it's not worth even trying and just wait until the next phase?
Are there Tarutaru
Do they talky-walky like thissy-wissy
God fucking damn I hate Tarutaru
So why is this suddenly good all of a sudden?I imagine it's not but people will foolishly pay attention again cause it's called Final Fantasy.
Really curious how this thing runs on the PS3
But not curious enough to install it myself
So why is this suddenly good all of a sudden?
Are there Tarutaru
God fucking damn I hate Tarutaru
A Realm Stillborn
ah, how i've missed being subjected to people's final fantasy online vacation slides
ah, how i've missed being subjected to people's final fantasy online vacation slides
I am guessing the tales of terrible server problems are exaggerated?
Id like to play this but uhm, does the 25 euro fee include 1 month?
I just bought it :-*
you all bitch about mmos
and then play the janky mmo
i swear to gawd
you all bitch about mmos
and then play the janky mmo
i swear to gawd
:umad
Can I still get a free month if I have a shrinkwrapped boxed version of 1.0?Yes, I've received it myself.
Well, this is stupid. First I have to install a version from July 2010 before I can download the current version.
Edit: Nope. The update only told me that the version is no longer playable. "Please uninstall."
Edit 2: They need to update their help pages or just add a big Download Client button.
I think they are adding servers today.
Im kind of bored of the game already, just got to level 13.
The story quests are nice, graphics are nice, music is good, but most of the quests are just boring. Aside from the story quests and ff setting there isnt much to set this aside from the million other mmos.
I do appreciate the decent control scheme for my pad.
Almost makes me want to stand in the dunes and grind like in ffxi.
So SE doesn't have to pay attention to the MMO market because their homebase doesn't?
I don't know but I'm thinking of diving into this. Someone talk me out of it!
So I guess I'm the only one actually playing it still.
The game is awesome. I've been enjoying most of the story mode, but the it's the dungeons and bosses that have been extremely fun. It really feels like a main FF games at times.
I'm really enjoying this game.
Dont do it, go play something else