THE BORE

General => Video Game Bored => Topic started by: Sho Nuff on April 23, 2013, 06:50:50 PM

Title: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Sho Nuff on April 23, 2013, 06:50:50 PM: (http://i.minus.com/ibizClegPKsnuj.gif)

Look! It's got mind melds and shit

And no reviews

The question is, is that Captain Kock or Commander Spirk?
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Steve Contra on April 23, 2013, 06:57:07 PM: Weirdest boner right now
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Flannel Boy on April 23, 2013, 06:57:16 PM: Do you need to ask? Captain Kock.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: StealthFan on April 23, 2013, 07:00:44 PM: Wasn't this shit supposed to release around the release of the first one? :pachah
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 23, 2013, 07:05:35 PM: Quote from: StealthFan on April 23, 2013, 07:00:44 PM
Wasn't this shit supposed to release around the release of the first one? :pachah

No it was supposed to be released with the shitty second movie last year. Then the shitty second movie was delayed until this summer so it sat on the shelf while they claimed they kept developing it.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 26, 2013, 10:57:13 AM: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5At3wDRn4RU
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Joe Molotov on April 26, 2013, 12:10:27 PM: This game makes my kock spirk.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Momo on April 26, 2013, 12:26:26 PM: :bow
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 26, 2013, 01:49:50 PM: GAF caught one of the fake reviewers...the game's producer:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=55613668&postcount=48
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on April 26, 2013, 02:06:27 PM: I think he was just saying the game works for him. I doubt he was trying to deceive anyone when he obviously knows his steam handle is his actual name. Gamers are so desperate for drama.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 26, 2013, 02:09:50 PM: (http://i.imgur.com/b9OlCGP.png)
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: bork on April 26, 2013, 02:14:11 PM: (http://picardfacepalm.com/picard-facepalm-hotlink.jpg)

Quote
(http://i.minus.com/ibizClegPKsnuj.gif)

spoiler (click to show/hide)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lu3juyHesB1r24lq9o1_400.gif)
[close]
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Joe Molotov on April 26, 2013, 02:15:46 PM: Quote from: BobFromPikeCreek on April 26, 2013, 02:06:27 PM
I think he was just saying the game works for him. I doubt he was trying to deceive anyone when he obviously knows his steam handle is his actual name. Gamers are so desperate for drama.

It's funny because in a thread where not a single person can get the game to work right, the developer jumps in and is just like "Game works fine for me." Thanks, pal. :lol
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on April 26, 2013, 02:17:25 PM: I guess I'm just really desensitized to the idea of shit head game devs.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 26, 2013, 03:53:57 PM: I don't like Star Trek in general, but imagine an X-COM Star Trek :omg
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on April 26, 2013, 04:22:27 PM: Quote from: Phoenix Dark on April 26, 2013, 03:53:57 PM
I don't like Star Trek in general, but imagine an X-COM Star Trek :omg

why, you could call it Star Command (http://www.starcommandgame.com/home.html) and release it on iOS

or something

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmGivVlOZq0
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on April 26, 2013, 04:32:30 PM: https://vine.co/v/bPLjdaKdZg5
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on April 26, 2013, 04:33:44 PM: (http://i.imgur.com/vVmbrJT.jpg)
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Steve Contra on April 26, 2013, 04:36:19 PM: Now I want to play the game
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 26, 2013, 04:39:45 PM: Quote from: Howard Alan Treesong on April 26, 2013, 04:22:27 PM
Quote from: Phoenix Dark on April 26, 2013, 03:53:57 PM
I don't like Star Trek in general, but imagine an X-COM Star Trek :omg

why, you could call it Star Command (http://www.starcommandgame.com/home.html) and release it on iOS

or something

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmGivVlOZq0
omg :lawd
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Sho Nuff on April 26, 2013, 05:06:23 PM: Quote from: Howard Alan Treesong on April 26, 2013, 04:33:44 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/vVmbrJT.jpg)

I want to get this game for the sole purpose of taking ridiculous screenshots
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Rufus on April 26, 2013, 08:39:48 PM: So what's happening there? Do they turn into a gun in an FPS game when they've got the Tricorder out?
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 26, 2013, 09:00:23 PM: So what's worse, this or Colonial Marines?
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Sho Nuff on April 26, 2013, 09:13:08 PM: The twitter account for the producer is hilarious, he just does not get it
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 26, 2013, 09:23:04 PM: :lol he retweeted the version mismatch tweet thinking it was a compliment.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Raban on April 26, 2013, 09:26:55 PM: Quote from: Howard Alan Treesong on April 26, 2013, 04:22:27 PM
Quote from: Phoenix Dark on April 26, 2013, 03:53:57 PM
I don't like Star Trek in general, but imagine an X-COM Star Trek :omg

why, you could call it Star Command (http://www.starcommandgame.com/home.html) and release it on iOS

or something

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmGivVlOZq0

This game is taking for-fucking-ever to come out.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 26, 2013, 09:28:09 PM: So the producer deleted his LinkedIn profile, but kept his Twitter going.

You're doing it wrong.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 26, 2013, 09:46:37 PM: Oh, so that's why he deleted his LinkedIn profile. People discovered he never worked on a single game before this one. :rofl

Google still has it cached:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:qcfcupOt6mkJ:www.linkedin.com/pub/kenneth-lindenbaum/7/828/310+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Sho Nuff on April 26, 2013, 09:52:10 PM: Oh! He's an LA movie guy. Yeah, this will not end well.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on April 26, 2013, 10:55:52 PM: :lol No wonder he's being so brash. He has no familiarity with the power of nerd wrath.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Lucretius on April 26, 2013, 11:40:58 PM: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l_YN-yRCVY
The reason buggy games exist.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 27, 2013, 02:42:25 AM: Quote from: Sho Nuff on April 26, 2013, 09:52:10 PM
Oh! He's an LA movie guy. Yeah, this will not end well.

On Twitter he's saying the cached page is lies :lol
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: chronovore on April 27, 2013, 11:38:11 AM: Someone needs to grab a fire extinguisher and put that guy out.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 27, 2013, 12:14:24 PM: (http://abload.de/img/asddas1l3jm9.gif)
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: StealthFan on April 27, 2013, 12:43:05 PM: Jesus Christ Manabyte. Nothing worse than a Star Wars fanatic.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 27, 2013, 01:00:33 PM: What are you talking about? I was up late last night playing Star Trek Online with my fleet. I play STO but think TOR is dog shit.

This game is shit.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 27, 2013, 01:27:18 PM: (http://i.imgur.com/wJdbGd6.jpg)
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 27, 2013, 03:03:40 PM: OMG the game requires a nearly 4gb mandatory install on PS3.
Title: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Shaka Khan on April 27, 2013, 03:05:21 PM: Quote from: ManaByte on April 27, 2013, 03:03:40 PM
OMG the game requires a nearly 4gb mandatory install on PS3.

HOLY SHIT
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Joe Molotov on April 27, 2013, 03:40:18 PM: HOLY FUCK
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: demi on April 27, 2013, 03:43:13 PM: Game seems like it wouldnt be that bad if it wasn't so buggy.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: ManaByte on April 27, 2013, 03:57:39 PM: The giant Kirk/Spock thing with the Tricorder only works on Kirk/Spock because there's no collision on either one. Since there is collision on the other characters they don't turn giant.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: StealthFan on April 27, 2013, 04:03:54 PM: Quote from: ManaByte on April 27, 2013, 03:03:40 PM
OMG the game requires a nearly 4gb mandatory install on PS3.
OMG WTF FAIL TOTAL TOP LEL
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 27, 2013, 04:51:51 PM: Quote from: ManaByte on April 27, 2013, 03:03:40 PM
OMG the game requires a nearly 4gb mandatory install on PS3.

no way :lol
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: demi on April 27, 2013, 04:53:18 PM: Is 4GB a big deal? I've played plenty of PS3 games that put 4GB data on the drive.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: Shaka Khan on April 27, 2013, 05:56:58 PM: Of course not, at least not at this day and age. I was just humouring Mana because of how much I respect him.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: StealthFan on April 27, 2013, 06:26:46 PM: I'm pretty sure we were all mocking him.
Title: Re: STAR TREK the game looks sick
Post by: chronovore on April 28, 2013, 12:06:33 AM: Quote from: Howard Alan Treesong on April 26, 2013, 04:33:44 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/vVmbrJT.jpg)

Khan thinks two-dimensionally, but Kirk also appears to be having trouble with three dimensions.