Oops, he did it again.
Poor Gayken!
The lonely homo is still looking for love in the all the wrong places.
He's not trying too hard to stay in the closet!
A horny Clay has returned to trolling the Internet for hot gay sex, and PerezHilton.com has all the details.
The Gayken logged on to gay hook-up site Manhunt this past Thursday, attempting to find some "company."
In what appears to be a form letter, he emailed one (and probably many more) hot local North Carolina dude.
Here's how it all went down!
Clay emails the dude.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070125-213113.jpg)
Clay then assures the horny homo that it's really him, after sending some airbrushed "glamour" shots of himself.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070125-213130.jpg)
Clay then invites his potential hookup to cam.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070127-125622.jpg)
Here is their IM chat. Pay special notice to the whole "finger" exchange, which verifies Clay's identity.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070125-212648.jpg)
The piece de resistance!!!
Our beloved Gayken is looking rough.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070125-211113.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070125-211210.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070125-211225.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070125-211211.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070125-211213.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070125-211215.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/iidxnick/new-20070125-211219.jpg)
P.S. Happychap2??? Skippermageeblue???
These are the LAMEST screen names ever.
Come on Clay!!!
We suggest NCgangbangbottom or Firecrotchpig!
Those fucking gossip sights piss me off god dammit
Why does anyone give a fuck? Clay Aiken may make annoying music, but who gives a fuck about his personal life.
If this was someone worthwhile perhaps I'd be more interested
Clay Aiken's heterosexuality is about as believable as Phoenix Dark's!
Why does anyone give a fuck? Clay Aiken may make annoying music, but who gives a fuck about his personal life.
If this was someone worthwhile perhaps I'd be more interested
The only reason Perez was adamant about his outing is because Gayken has denied it the entire time. The fact of the matter is, if you're in the media spotlight, you're private life WILL be exposed, so you better be a good boy/girl. Gayken has been denying this for years now, and here is solid proof of his hypocrisy. It's humerous and now he has nothing to do but confirm it.
Why does anyone give a fuck? Clay Aiken may make annoying music, but who gives a fuck about his personal life.
If this was someone worthwhile perhaps I'd be more interested
The only reason Perez was adamant about his outing is because Gayken has denied it the entire time. The fact of the matter is, if you're in the media spotlight, you're private life WILL be exposed, so you better be a good boy/girl. Gayken has been denying this for years now, and here is solid proof of his hypocrisy. It's humerous and now he has nothing to do but confirm it.
How do we know he was gay? Are you saying because he fell into stereotypes in terms of the way he talks and looks!
How do we know he was gay? Are you saying because he fell into stereotypes in terms of the way he talks and looks!
It's not that we "know", it's just very obvious. When you 100% lie to the media, and you are CLEARLY not of the heterosexual brethren, people are going to hound you to tell the truth. Just like how women in the media are criticized for their weight. Don't like it? Don't be a celebrity.
Also: I have word from a very reliable source (trust me on this one, I have connections) that Wentworth Miller is in fact Bi. I used to hate when Perez would post shit on him about his gayness, but I have a friend who is best friends with Wentworth, and he confirmed it to me. :pimp
How do we know he was gay? Are you saying because he fell into stereotypes in terms of the way he talks and looks!
PD, there's nothing wrong with stereotypes as long as you know when to not apply them. It's an intuitive thing, you just have to know when to stop using your stereotypes. Clay. . .is gay. Beyond the pale. If he is not gay, then god himself is the one that fucked the kid in the ass.
PD, there's nothing wrong with stereotypes as long as you know when to not apply them. It's an intuitive thing, you just have to know when to stop using your stereotypes. Clay. . .is gay. Beyond the pale. If he is not gay, then god himself is the one that fucked the kid in the ass.
What other "straight" men do you think are most likely gays? :-\
when did the belief that one is "born gay" become "contemporary"?
i'm assuming you take that as the prevailing verdict on the origins of homosexuality?
It doesn't seem like solid evidence. It could all be staged. A fake AIM conversation set up just to create a news item on perezhilton.com. Who knows. Didn't they take compromising pictures of John Travelota as 'proof' of his gayness a couples monthas back?
when did the belief that one is "born gay" become "contemporary"?
i'm assuming you take that as the prevailing verdict on the origins of homosexuality?
It doesn't seem like solid evidence. It could all be staged. A fake AIM conversation set up just to create a news item on perezhilton.com. Who knows. Didn't they take compromising pictures of John Travelota as 'proof' of his gayness a couples monthas back?
Claymate confirmed total.
when did the belief that one is "born gay" become "contemporary"?It is the contemporary stance that homosexuality* is a product of nature because most of the evidence in support of this position has been gathered during the last decade and a half. What have we learned?
i'm assuming you take that as the prevailing verdict on the origins of homosexuality?
If being gay was nature over nurture wouldn't thousands of years of natural selection removed the people who were not procreating?
If being gay was nature over nurture wouldn't thousands of years of natural selection removed the people who were not procreating?
Since when could gay people not procreate? That makes no sense. Are you saying that all homosexuals never have heterosexual relationships?
If being gay was nature over nurture wouldn't thousands of years of natural selection removed the people who were not procreating?
Since when could gay people not procreate? That makes no sense. Are you saying that all homosexuals never have heterosexual relationships?
Are you saying that Gay people procreate and then turn gay? That itself throws the nature argument out the window.
If being gay was nature over nurture wouldn't thousands of years of natural selection removed the people who were not procreating?
Are you saying that Gay people procreate and then turn gay? That itself throws the nature argument out the window.
No, I'm saying many gay men have had children, simply because society or family or what have you has forced them into that situation.
Your theory makes no sense, because gay men are capable of procreation.
FoC, you are pretty distinguished mentally-challenged.
But as TVC already said, who said it has to do with genetics?
But as TVC already said, who said it has to do with genetics?
If its not genetics then what else does nature consist of? I guess you could chalk it up to a chemical imbalance, which might be true considering everything in our body is a chemical reaction of some sort.
I wonder what will happen to his career now. He wasn't really that successful to begin with, you know?He'll probably start sucking dick for
But as TVC already said, who said it has to do with genetics?
If its not genetics then what else does nature consist of? I guess you could chalk it up to a chemical imbalance, which might be true considering everything in our body is a chemical reaction of some sort.
You forget the mental aspect of things
But as TVC already said, who said it has to do with genetics?
If its not genetics then what else does nature consist of? I guess you could chalk it up to a chemical imbalance, which might be true considering everything in our body is a chemical reaction of some sort.
No. The possibility that the vast majority of homosapiens are indeed born heterosexual but there is the possibility that some differentiate from this due to a slight mental alternation that's develeped as the body forms in the womb
No. The possibility that the vast majority of homosapiens are indeed born heterosexual but there is the possibility that some differentiate from this due to a slight mental alternation that's develeped as the body forms in the womb
So then it would be a chemical imbalance?
No. The possibility that the vast majority of homosapiens are indeed born heterosexual but there is the possibility that some differentiate from this due to a slight mental alternation that's develeped as the body forms in the womb
So then it would be a chemical imbalance?
Possibly, but again not necessarily. It could be from any of a wide variety of conception or pregnancy factors.
No. The possibility that the vast majority of homosapiens are indeed born heterosexual but there is the possibility that some differentiate from this due to a slight mental alternation that's develeped as the body forms in the womb
So then it would be a chemical imbalance?
Possibly, but again not necessarily. It could be from any of a wide variety of conception or pregnancy factors.
Wouldnt any of those be chemical reactions?
No. The possibility that the vast majority of homosapiens are indeed born heterosexual but there is the possibility that some differentiate from this due to a slight mental alternation that's develeped as the body forms in the womb
So then it would be a chemical imbalance?
Possibly, but again not necessarily. It could be from any of a wide variety of conception or pregnancy factors.