When you don't have a job, you make up for it with Hobbies. Like when I moved to the Seattle area and was unemployed for three months i became one of the best BF1942 engineers ever.except that triumph's hobby is apparently useful... yours... not so much
When you don't have a job, you make up for it with Hobbies. Like when I moved to the Seattle area and was unemployed for three months i became one of the best BF1942 engineers ever.except that triumph's hobby is apparently useful... yours... not so much
When you don't have a job, you make up for it with Hobbies. Like when I moved to the Seattle area and was unemployed for three months i became one of the best BF1942 engineers ever.except that triumph's hobby is apparently useful... yours... not so much
Yes, buy my job is far more useful than his hobbies.
sick burn.When you don't have a job, you make up for it with Hobbies. Like when I moved to the Seattle area and was unemployed for three months i became one of the best BF1942 engineers ever.except that triumph's hobby is apparently useful... yours... not so much
Yes, buy my job is far more useful than his hobbies.
I killed Derek Smart in Battlefield 1942 at long range with a scopeless no4 rifle!
Derek Smart is underrated.
Was. :-\ Didn't graduate.
Oh, I didn't take it as a dig, I'm just super bummed about my lack of employment. I'm seriously thinking about selling my car and the rest of my shit and moving to New York to work on film post-production.
my grandma loves the braves >:(Oh, I didn't take it as a dig, I'm just super bummed about my lack of employment. I'm seriously thinking about selling my car and the rest of my shit and moving to New York to work on film post-production.
Do it! I will go into the city just to find you and yell at your dirty Braves-loving ass.
Oh, I didn't take it as a dig, I'm just super bummed about my lack of employment. I'm seriously thinking about selling my car and the rest of my shit and moving to New York to work on film post-production.
Do it! I will go into the city just to find you and yell at your dirty Braves-loving ass.
One thing i know about history. Its Doomed to repeat itself!did you get that off of a fortune cookie? :-\
I've got a little bit less than two years left, and then maybe I could get into law school before Malek.God damn it! >:(
One thing i know about history. Its Doomed to repeat itself!did you get that off of a fortune cookie? :-\
One thing i know about history. Its Doomed to repeat itself!
Like Cheebs, I too am a lover of American history, especially as it relates to presidents.
Teddy is my favorite president :heartbeat
Like Cheebs, I too am a lover of American history, especially as it relates to presidents.
Teddy is my favorite president :heartbeat
FDR>Teddy :shh
I "love" JFK due to his presidency being insanely facinating and the fact he is so likeable. But I agree, he didn't do too much. Most of the grand social changes of the 60's were inacted by LBJ even though most people on the street would assume credit to kennedyLike Cheebs, I too am a lover of American history, especially as it relates to presidents.
Teddy is my favorite president :heartbeat
FDR>Teddy :shh
FDR is overrated, just like JKF. It seems like Americans like emotionally manipulative success stories - and what's more emotionally manipulative than the idea that even as a cripple (legless or headless) YOU TOO can become the president of the United States
Like Cheebs, I too am a lover of American history, especially as it relates to presidents.
Teddy is my favorite president :heartbeat
FDR>Teddy :shh
FDR is overrated, just like JKF. It seems like Americans like emotionally manipulative success stories - and what's more emotionally manipulative than the idea that even as a cripple (legless or headless) YOU TOO can become the president of the United States
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lolLike Cheebs, I too am a lover of American history, especially as it relates to presidents.
Teddy is my favorite president :heartbeat
FDR>Teddy :shh
FDR is overrated, just like JKF. It seems like Americans like emotionally manipulative success stories - and what's more emotionally manipulative than the idea that even as a cripple (legless or headless) YOU TOO can become the president of the United States
Dude, you are the fucking king of emotionally manipulative bullshit.
Kennedy aside, how is FDR's story emotionally manipulative? They tried to keep him being confined to a wheelchair out of public view, and unlike Kennedy, the complaint that he didn't do much is completely unwarranted. Like it or not, FDR did a god-damned lot. He'll be remembered for doing a lot more than probably 90%+ of other presidents.
You're such a fucking idiot, PD.
FDR is easily the most important President of the last century.I'd say its pretty damn safe to say he is the most important president since Lincoln.
FDR is overrated, just like JKF. It seems like Americans like emotionally manipulative success stories - and what's more emotionally manipulative than the idea that even as a cripple (legless or headless) YOU TOO can become the president of the United States
As a nutso Libertarian, I don't even like FDR, but to claim that the only reason people like him is:QuoteFDR is overrated, just like JKF. It seems like Americans like emotionally manipulative success stories - and what's more emotionally manipulative than the idea that even as a cripple (legless or headless) YOU TOO can become the president of the United States
is abso-fucking-lutely Unforgiven trolling ridiculous.
And I love how you are slinging emotionally manipulative around like an insult, when in previous discussions concerning your movie tastes, you couldn't understand how the label could be seen as an insult. You cry to Forrest Gump and To Kill a Mockingbird, yet you are saying EMOTIONALLY MANIPULATIVE is a BAD THING in this case (even though FDR's story is shockingly not emotionally manipulative)
Cheebs back me up. I've stated many times that I respect FDR. He is indeed the most important president of the last century. That being said, I think he's overrated. I think he's reached a level of mythological proportions to the point that people are unwilling to call things like they are. He was a step back in terms of civil rights. He presided over one of the largest violations of the constitution (internment). While some would put far more emphasis on his actions at Yalta, I won't go that far; he was rather sick at the time.
FDR was a very smart politician who did what was best for himself throughout his career. In many ways this is what defined his presidency and made it a direct opposition to Teddy's.
Cheebs back me up. I've stated many times that I respect FDR. He is indeed the most important president of the last century. That being said, I think he's overrated. I think he's reached a level of mythological proportions to the point that people are unwilling to call things like they are. He was a step back in terms of civil rights. He presided over one of the largest violations of the constitution (internment). While some would put far more emphasis on his actions at Yalta, I won't go that far; he was rather sick at the time.
FDR was a very smart politician who did what was best for himself throughout his career. In many ways this is what defined his presidency and made it a direct opposition to Teddy's.
FDR ensured that minorities got fair jobs in the various programs he created in the 30s. The internment camps were wrong, yes, but it's not like it was done because they thought pacific islanders were less than other people. Saying "He was a step back in terms of civil rights" is absolutely wrong.
You still haven't qualified how he is overrated, either. Like I said, I don't particularly like a lot of his policy, and I think he set some nasty precedents leading to the welfare state of today, but it is 100% inarguable that his presidency had an absolutely enormous influence on America, even up until today. How do you overrate that, exactly? We're still feeling the consequences of things he did.
Cheebs back me up. I've stated many times that I respect FDR. He is indeed the most important president of the last century. That being said, I think he's overrated. I think he's reached a level of mythological proportions to the point that people are unwilling to call things like they are. He was a step back in terms of civil rights. He presided over one of the largest violations of the constitution (internment). While some would put far more emphasis on his actions at Yalta, I won't go that far; he was rather sick at the time.
FDR was a very smart politician who did what was best for himself throughout his career. In many ways this is what defined his presidency and made it a direct opposition to Teddy's.
FDR ensured that minorities got fair jobs in the various programs he created in the 30s. The internment camps were wrong, yes, but it's not like it was done because they thought pacific islanders were less than other people. Saying "He was a step back in terms of civil rights" is absolutely wrong.
You still haven't qualified how he is overrated, either. Like I said, I don't particularly like a lot of his policy, and I think he set some nasty precedents leading to the welfare state of today, but it is 100% inarguable that his presidency had an absolutely enormous influence on America, even up until today. How do you overrate that, exactly? We're still feeling the consequences of things he did.
Actually many of his programs hurt minorities - albiet in more of a disparate impact way. Sharecroppers especially were effected by some of his legislation.
And that's another thing that annoys me about him. Like LBJ, FDR was very effective as a presidential whip so to speak - he was able to convince congressmen to go along with his legislation, even if they weren't exactly in support of it. Yet he never attempted to use his bully pulpit power or influence to achieve anything related to civil rights. Elenaor basically begged him to sign the anti lynching bill (he didn't). This is about character. LBJ (yes, in total he's not the greatest example of "character") pushed civil rights despite his southern roots, and was able to convince enough of his southern buddies to actually pass the thing. FDR could have done this, but instead decided it would hurt him politically. Which of course is puzzling because of the emmense support he had throughout his presidency
Roosevelt explained his reluctance to support anti-lynching legislation in a conversation with Walter White of the NAACP. "I did not choose the tools with which I must work. Had I been permitted to choose then I would have selected quite different ones. But I've got to get legislation passed by Congress to save America. The Southerners by reason of the seniority rule in Congress are chairmen or occupy strategic places on most of the Senate and House committees. If I come out for the anti-lynching bill now, they will block every bill I ask Congress to pass to keep America from collapsing. I just can't take that risk."
Cheebs back me up. I've stated many times that I respect FDR. He is indeed the most important president of the last century. That being said, I think he's overrated. I think he's reached a level of mythological proportions to the point that people are unwilling to call things like they are. He was a step back in terms of civil rights. He presided over one of the largest violations of the constitution (internment). While some would put far more emphasis on his actions at Yalta, I won't go that far; he was rather sick at the time.
FDR was a very smart politician who did what was best for himself throughout his career. In many ways this is what defined his presidency and made it a direct opposition to Teddy's.
FDR ensured that minorities got fair jobs in the various programs he created in the 30s. The internment camps were wrong, yes, but it's not like it was done because they thought pacific islanders were less than other people. Saying "He was a step back in terms of civil rights" is absolutely wrong.
You still haven't qualified how he is overrated, either. Like I said, I don't particularly like a lot of his policy, and I think he set some nasty precedents leading to the welfare state of today, but it is 100% inarguable that his presidency had an absolutely enormous influence on America, even up until today. How do you overrate that, exactly? We're still feeling the consequences of things he did.
Actually many of his programs hurt minorities - albiet in more of a disparate impact way. Sharecroppers especially were effected by some of his legislation.
And that's another thing that annoys me about him. Like LBJ, FDR was very effective as a presidential whip so to speak - he was able to convince congressmen to go along with his legislation, even if they weren't exactly in support of it. Yet he never attempted to use his bully pulpit power or influence to achieve anything related to civil rights. Elenaor basically begged him to sign the anti lynching bill (he didn't). This is about character. LBJ (yes, in total he's not the greatest example of "character") pushed civil rights despite his southern roots, and was able to convince enough of his southern buddies to actually pass the thing. FDR could have done this, but instead decided it would hurt him politically. Which of course is puzzling because of the emmense support he had throughout his presidency
Aherm, PD:QuoteRoosevelt explained his reluctance to support anti-lynching legislation in a conversation with Walter White of the NAACP. "I did not choose the tools with which I must work. Had I been permitted to choose then I would have selected quite different ones. But I've got to get legislation passed by Congress to save America. The Southerners by reason of the seniority rule in Congress are chairmen or occupy strategic places on most of the Senate and House committees. If I come out for the anti-lynching bill now, they will block every bill I ask Congress to pass to keep America from collapsing. I just can't take that risk."
Attacking his stances on civil rights isn't easy because it's a complicated subject. It is, however, absolute hyperbole to say he was a step back in civil rights. He wasn't a Republican, after all.
But I've got to get legislation passed by Congress to save America.
Attacking his stances on civil rights isn't easy because it's a complicated subject. It is, however, absolute hyperbole to say he was a step back in civil rights. He wasn't a Republican, after all.
Yes, that quote totally sounds passive and uncaring. When you have already painted someone as a racist and are reading text, you tend to have that effect.
And don't forget Teddy abandoned his political party, so I think it's kind of disingenuous to paint him as a typical Republican.
Yes, that quote totally sounds passive and uncaring. When you have already painted someone as a racist and are reading text, you tend to have that effect.
And don't forget Teddy abandoned his political party, so I think it's kind of disingenuous to paint him as a typical Republican.
There's more to the story than him simply leaving the party though. In many ways it was started by Taft's back stabbing of Roosevelt - or at least that's how Roosevelt saw it.
Teddy was a Republican through and through, the problem is that today Republican means something very different
Yes, that quote totally sounds passive and uncaring. When you have already painted someone as a racist and are reading text, you tend to have that effect.
And don't forget Teddy abandoned his political party, so I think it's kind of disingenuous to paint him as a typical Republican.
There's more to the story than him simply leaving the party though. In many ways it was started by Taft's back stabbing of Roosevelt - or at least that's how Roosevelt saw it.
Teddy was a Republican through and through, the problem is that today Republican means something very different
Teddy was progressive and he really didn't fit into one party or another. He liked unions but he also liked making shit illegal.
Teddy's party has absolutely nothing in common with the party today. It is useless and pure nonsense to attach party labels that far back.Yes, that quote totally sounds passive and uncaring. When you have already painted someone as a racist and are reading text, you tend to have that effect.
And don't forget Teddy abandoned his political party, so I think it's kind of disingenuous to paint him as a typical Republican.
There's more to the story than him simply leaving the party though. In many ways it was started by Taft's back stabbing of Roosevelt - or at least that's how Roosevelt saw it.
Teddy was a Republican through and through, the problem is that today Republican means something very different
Teddy was progressive and he really didn't fit into one party or another. He liked unions but he also liked making shit illegal.
He was a progressive Republican. Is that so hard to admit?
Yes, that quote totally sounds passive and uncaring. When you have already painted someone as a racist and are reading text, you tend to have that effect.
And don't forget Teddy abandoned his political party, so I think it's kind of disingenuous to paint him as a typical Republican.
There's more to the story than him simply leaving the party though. In many ways it was started by Taft's back stabbing of Roosevelt - or at least that's how Roosevelt saw it.
Teddy was a Republican through and through, the problem is that today Republican means something very different
Teddy was progressive and he really didn't fit into one party or another. He liked unions but he also liked making shit illegal.
He was a progressive Republican. Is that so hard to admit?
He realized business was very important for the economic development of the country, but at the same time he refused to sit back and let businesses do whatever they wanted
Teddy's party has absolutely nothing in common with the party today. It is useless and pure nonsense to attach party labels that far back.Yes, that quote totally sounds passive and uncaring. When you have already painted someone as a racist and are reading text, you tend to have that effect.
And don't forget Teddy abandoned his political party, so I think it's kind of disingenuous to paint him as a typical Republican.
There's more to the story than him simply leaving the party though. In many ways it was started by Taft's back stabbing of Roosevelt - or at least that's how Roosevelt saw it.
Teddy was a Republican through and through, the problem is that today Republican means something very different
Teddy was progressive and he really didn't fit into one party or another. He liked unions but he also liked making shit illegal.
He was a progressive Republican. Is that so hard to admit?
As I said. Thomas Jefferson one of the founders of the Dem' party but masturbated to states rights.Teddy's party has absolutely nothing in common with the party today. It is useless and pure nonsense to attach party labels that far back.Yes, that quote totally sounds passive and uncaring. When you have already painted someone as a racist and are reading text, you tend to have that effect.
And don't forget Teddy abandoned his political party, so I think it's kind of disingenuous to paint him as a typical Republican.
There's more to the story than him simply leaving the party though. In many ways it was started by Taft's back stabbing of Roosevelt - or at least that's how Roosevelt saw it.
Teddy was a Republican through and through, the problem is that today Republican means something very different
Teddy was progressive and he really didn't fit into one party or another. He liked unions but he also liked making shit illegal.
He was a progressive Republican. Is that so hard to admit?
And this is what I don't think TVC understands, unless he's being sarcastic. 70 years ago the Democrats were nothing like they are today, and no one could honestly call them the party of "social/civil rights". Just ask Senator Bryd
You know what PD doesn't understand? FDR's presidency. HE'S OVERRATED!!!!!!
You know what PD doesn't understand? FDR's presidency. HE'S OVERRATED!!!!!!
He is. People should give him credit for keeping the country together, winning the war, and putting us on the road to economic recovery (although no, the New Deal did not end the Great Depression).
You know what PD doesn't understand? FDR's presidency. HE'S OVERRATED!!!!!!
He is. People should give him credit for keeping the country together, winning the war, and putting us on the road to economic recovery (although no, the New Deal did not end the Great Depression).
Yes, ANYONE could've done that, right?
I'm sorry that civil rights took a back seat to the depression and world war 2, PD. I don't know if you ever learned about those. You see, the civilized world was kind of on the brink of total collapse.
You know what PD doesn't understand? FDR's presidency. HE'S OVERRATED!!!!!!
He is. People should give him credit for keeping the country together, winning the war, and putting us on the road to economic recovery (although no, the New Deal did not end the Great Depression).
Yes, ANYONE could've done that, right?
I'm sorry that civil rights took a back seat to the depression and world war 2, PD. I don't know if you ever learned about those. You see, the civilized world was kind of on the brink of total collapse.
I don't mean to make it sound like anyone could do this. Jimmy Carter certainly couldn't
But in terms of my least favorite presidents everyone likes, FDR is #1, followed by JKF
What are your thoughts on JKF?Just Kidding Fucker?
What are your thoughts on JKF?As president rather over-rated. But that should not take away from the fact he avoided WWIII with sheer brilliance, most presidents would have gone to war(yet he helped kind of start the crisis so it is somewhat negated).
What are your thoughts on JKF?Just Kidding Fucker?
Goddammit, how did a thread dedicated to my intelligence get shat up by PD? Oh yeah, it's what he does. Ugh. :duhNo thread stays on topic... unless the topic is about PD, since almost every thread centers around him.
It'd be nice to get my BA in History and be done with it, but seeing as how that's not very useful, I unfortunately have to go all the way (or at least with a Master's) to be a college instructor. :-\
But hey, I like teaching, and history was always an interesting subject, so I don't mind too much. The other reason is that I've heard most game designers are had degrees in history, which sorta makes sense since it would be useful to know some shit that you could tie in with the games you're working on. Yeah, yeah, the odds of getting such a job are pretty rare, but that's why I have a backup plan.
Everyone shutup and listen... we already, as a nation, voted, and elected Ronald Reagan the greatest American of all time.
The end.spoiler (click to show/hide)lol[close]
He created AIDS, hated blacks, and set 911 into motion!
hay guys, what's going on in here?
but I'm willing to bet that if you were a black sharecropper (and many were at that time) in 1935 you certainly weren't happy with FDR.This may your almost unheard of lack of love for FDR. He did a lot for the "white community" and kept them very happy. Basically everyone here is white, but still as you said most cried.
Triumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Triumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Triumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Triumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Dude, I could totally be making in the mid to upper 30s if I didn't fucking hate retail. Not that it's a good field or anything, but that's certainly decent money for someone who has no debt or car payment.
Triumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Dude, I could totally be making in the mid to upper 30s if I didn't fucking hate retail. Not that it's a good field or anything, but that's certainly decent money for someone who has no debt or car payment.
Wow, upper 30s, eh? I take it back then.
I sense a lot of sarcasm in this post :rofl :rofl :roflTriumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Dude, I could totally be making in the mid to upper 30s if I didn't fucking hate retail. Not that it's a good field or anything, but that's certainly decent money for someone who has no debt or car payment.
Wow, upper 30s, eh? I take it back then.
I sense a lot of sarcasm in this post :rofl :rofl :roflTriumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Dude, I could totally be making in the mid to upper 30s if I didn't fucking hate retail. Not that it's a good field or anything, but that's certainly decent money for someone who has no debt or car payment.
Wow, upper 30s, eh? I take it back then.
I sense a lot of sarcasm in this post :rofl :rofl :roflTriumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Dude, I could totally be making in the mid to upper 30s if I didn't fucking hate retail. Not that it's a good field or anything, but that's certainly decent money for someone who has no debt or car payment.
Wow, upper 30s, eh? I take it back then.
But that's the low spectrum of things. I know friends that make that much as just assistant manager-type positions. Managers in various retail outlets can make a crapton.A regional manager at Mcdonalds in a major metro area can make 90k a year. that's my dream :drool
But that's the low spectrum of things. I know friends that make that much as just assistant manager-type positions. Managers in various retail outlets can make a crapton.A regional manager at Mcdonalds in a major metro area can make 90k a year. that's my dream :drool
I told Julia to quit school and stay crackin' at McDonalds.
I sense a lot of sarcasm in this post :rofl :rofl :roflTriumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Dude, I could totally be making in the mid to upper 30s if I didn't fucking hate retail. Not that it's a good field or anything, but that's certainly decent money for someone who has no debt or car payment.
Wow, upper 30s, eh? I take it back then.
:-*
It'd be nice to get my BA in History and be done with it, but seeing as how that's not very useful, I unfortunately have to go all the way (or at least with a Master's) to be a college instructor. :-\
But hey, I like teaching, and history was always an interesting subject, so I don't mind too much. The other reason is that I've heard most game designers are had degrees in history, which sorta makes sense since it would be useful to know some shit that you could tie in with the games you're working on. Yeah, yeah, the odds of getting such a job is pretty rare, but that's why I have a backup plan.
You aren't gonna be a game designer off the bat. Good luck with that.
I sense a lot of sarcasm in this post :rofl :rofl :roflTriumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Dude, I could totally be making in the mid to upper 30s if I didn't fucking hate retail. Not that it's a good field or anything, but that's certainly decent money for someone who has no debt or car payment.
Wow, upper 30s, eh? I take it back then.
:-*
Dick. I was pointing out that one can make a semi-decent wage without having a degree. I still plan on getting one.
And don't denigrate retail- sure it sucks, but with America moving towards a service oriented economy, retail will just keep getting bigger. At least until the water and gas riots start!
\I sense a lot of sarcasm in this post :rofl :rofl :roflTriumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Dude, I could totally be making in the mid to upper 30s if I didn't fucking hate retail. Not that it's a good field or anything, but that's certainly decent money for someone who has no debt or car payment.
Wow, upper 30s, eh? I take it back then.
:-*
Dick. I was pointing out that one can make a semi-decent wage without having a degree. I still plan on getting one.
And don't denigrate retail- sure it sucks, but with America moving towards a service oriented economy, retail will just keep getting bigger. At least until the water and gas riots start!
\I sense a lot of sarcasm in this post :rofl :rofl :roflTriumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Dude, I could totally be making in the mid to upper 30s if I didn't fucking hate retail. Not that it's a good field or anything, but that's certainly decent money for someone who has no debt or car payment.
Wow, upper 30s, eh? I take it back then.
:-*
Dick. I was pointing out that one can make a semi-decent wage without having a degree. I still plan on getting one.
And don't denigrate retail- sure it sucks, but with America moving towards a service oriented economy, retail will just keep getting bigger. At least until the water and gas riots start!
Yes, Triumph, you are at the mercy of the invisible hand of the market. WORSHIP IT! WORSHIP THE ALL-KNOWING MARKET!
I sense a lot of sarcasm in this post :rofl :rofl :roflTriumph, I'm actually quite surprised you didn't finish college. I always assumed you did man. Goes to show that college (or school in general) means jack shit when pin pointing one's intelligence. I mean look at PD.
Yeah, but his case certainly isn't encouraging for one's prospects for employment-related success without a college degree :P
Dude, I could totally be making in the mid to upper 30s if I didn't fucking hate retail. Not that it's a good field or anything, but that's certainly decent money for someone who has no debt or car payment.
Wow, upper 30s, eh? I take it back then.
:-*
Dick. I was pointing out that one can make a semi-decent wage without having a degree. I still plan on getting one.