At least I have good taste in men. >:(
There's only 3 episodes left, by then you will have run out of stuff to WHINE about.
u should msg me and we can talk spced
Do you think Simon is hot bleached?
TOO BAD NICK IS HOTTER
WOOF
WOOF
WOOF
Nick is kind of like a bear, isn't he? All he needs is to let his beard grow.
I only recently became aware of what the term "bear" meant thanks to Demi, and I realized - my uncle is one.
He yells only when he's in a position that most people would be shot in or kicked out of a place for, most people would.
Cheerleader's dad knows because somebody tells him the words "claire cheerleader texas" or he connects the dots in Isaac's paintings.
Micah didn't realize that she had a split personality which made her a murderer.
Heroes are known based on the blood donations that they gave which the Human Genome Project does use and he looks for who it would be passed onto based on certain characteristics.
No, he yells all the time. He will yell at the end of a sentence whenever he gets excited. Like he does every 10 seconds. He is an anime stereotype and that is shockingly offensive.He yells to have fun. He's a comic freak from a strict japanese father, it's really just to make fun of his idea of a hero.
Again, he knew nothing that would give him any indication that she would die at the homecoming game. The only painting that indicated that she would die precisely at the homecoming game is the one Nathan destroyed, and which only Nathan, Peter, and that, uh, other chick had seen.Maybe he makes Isaac do heroine just to see the future. It seemed like he knew at the time that his daughter had some sort of powers.
If that's the case, then what did he tell his father that made him go so apeshit that he'd openly use his power?That she split bodies open? They don't know that it's another personality doing it.
There's also a huge inconsistency with fatalism in regards to time travel and seeing the future. It seems the universe is fatalistic because Hiro cannot save charlie. . .she dies anyway, but Peter and the Glasses dude have no problem changing the future when it comes to the cheerleader. You can't have it both ways. The future is either changeable or fatalistic.They don't save Charlie because she has a brain anuerysm and there's no point saving her (it's really not that useful of a power for sylar anyways and they have no way of killing him).
There's also a huge inconsistency with fatalism in regards to time travel and seeing the future. It seems the universe is fatalistic because Hiro cannot save charlie. . .she dies anyway, but Peter and the Glasses dude have no problem changing the future when it comes to the cheerleader. You can't have it both ways. The future is either changeable or fatalistic.The future that Hiro experiences cannot be changed, but the future that gets painted can. Hiro actually travels through time, whereas the painter merely has premonitions. I'm not sure why that is so much of a stretch.
There's also a huge inconsistency with fatalism in regards to time travel and seeing the future. It seems the universe is fatalistic because Hiro cannot save charlie. . .she dies anyway, but Peter and the Glasses dude have no problem changing the future when it comes to the cheerleader. You can't have it both ways. The future is either changeable or fatalistic.The future that Hiro experiences cannot be changed, but the future that gets painted can. Hiro actually travels through time, whereas the painter merely has premonitions. I'm not sure why that is so much of a stretch.
Sounds like you are looking to dislike the show though. If you applied this level of scrutiny to Dr. Who I imagine it'd fall apart even faster. Not to say that the writing is great or anything though.
I criticize Doctor Who all the damned time. Especially the past few episodes.I didn't say that you were not critical of Doctor Who, just that it wasn't the same sort of criticism. Your Who complaints just have to do with characters, themes and the direction of certain plotlines, but it rarely seems to be put through this sort of scrutiny (where you look directly at the show's logic and plot holes). I haven't kept up with watching the new Who though so I haven't been reading threads about it either.
I criticize Doctor Who all the damned time. Especially the past few episodes.Not to say that you don't criticize Dr. Who for just having doubt themes and concepts, but it rarely seems to be put through this sort of scrutiny (where you look directly at the show's logic and plot holes). I haven't kept up with watching the new Who though so I haven't been reading threads about it either.
it is Doctor Who as well so gives a fuck about consistency.
Sounds like you are looking to dislike the show though.
Maybe you're not watching the same show that everyone else is?
Well dude, I know that the masses are often asses.... but it seems like there's quite a few television watchers that would disagree.
I do think you're going over the damn thing with a fine tooth comb, looking for something to bitch about. Maybe to get the people who genuinely like the series to rethink themselves? I think that's kinda shitty, personally.
And what's wrong with asking people to put a little thought into what they are watching? If people did that, and voted with television ratings, maybe 24 wouldn't have turned into the piece of shit it has in its more recent seasons. People shouldn't be settling for the lowest common denominator just because it manages to be coherent despite all of its problems.
Do Niki/Jessica, DL, and Micah ever have anything to do with the main plot? Because I hate them all.
And how did Hiro know his sword was in NYC, based off a drawing from Isaac? Is there an online db of swords that will tell you where every sword in the world can be located?
And how did Hiro know his sword was in NYC, based off a drawing from Isaac? Is there an online db of swords that will tell you where every sword in the world can be located?
Well it's a famous sword. Plus, it's a tv series. When you watch sci fi movies do you go batshit when they're able to hack into alien technology?
It is also ludicous to sayQuoteSounds like you are looking to dislike the show though.
Which is complete bullshit. I paid for the series on iTunes. Do you think I'd spend 40 bucks on something I had already determined I wouldn't like? Talk to Patel, he will confirm that I liked the first 3 establishing episodes, and that although I was noticing problems, I wasn't writing off the show yet.
It is also ludicous to sayQuoteSounds like you are looking to dislike the show though.
Which is complete bullshit. I paid for the series on iTunes. Do you think I'd spend 40 bucks on something I had already determined I wouldn't like? Talk to Patel, he will confirm that I liked the first 3 establishing episodes, and that although I was noticing problems, I wasn't writing off the show yet.
It's my experience that when people are nitpicking logistical plotholes of a film or television series, they're mostly just looking for something to criticize for the sake of justifying their own distaste or riling other people up. You're also demanding answers to questions that could be explained later on, which seems like kind of an unfair onus to put on the writing staff . That plus the troll-y thread title lead me to a perhaps unfair conclusion.
For the record though, I told you you wouldn't like Heroes much :P You said you liked characters and writing, and the series really doesn't excel with either of those.
Are you reading the comics, btw? They apparently explain a good deal more of what goes on.
No. I only buy collected TPBs.They are all free online as PDFs, from the show website. I doubt that there will be a TPB, but it'd be cool if there was since the art is much better than what you'd expect from a free promotional comic.
No. I only buy collected TPBs.They are all free online as PDFs, from the show website. I doubt that there will be a TPB, but it'd be cool if there was since the art is much better than what you'd expect from a free promotional comic.
Not that it'll make you like the show much more, but people in the GAF threads that were complaining about missing stuff (eg: where does Wifi girl go?) have had those questions answered in the comics. I've only read the recent run that covers Wifi girl and the time that the Malcom McDowell guy spent in Vietnam, but it made me want to read more...
Well, the comics are written by the show's writers and producers. It's not like some crap Dr. Who novel that got farmed out to a B-list hack sci-fi writer to make a quick buck. If the showrunners want them to be considered canon, I don't see why they shouldn't be.
It's just a thing. . .if it's not in the main medium, it's not canon. This isn't just a Heroes thing.
It's just a thing. . .if it's not in the main medium, it's not canon. This isn't just a Heroes thing.
Is this your personal take, or just a geek-law that I never picked up on? It was my assumption that canon can be whatever the creator designates......or does it only become canon when the "main medium" adopts the continuity of the supplemental works?
Does creator-involvement have any bearing on canon at all, then? Like, what about all the Dune and Middle Earth stuff that isn't by Herbert or Tolkein? Maybe we should consider Lucas1999 a different person than Lucas1977.
I'm sure you'll be more forgiving, now.
If you're still talking shit by the time you get to "Company Man", we're going to have words.
I have no doubt they will find a way to tie them into the store, but at this point, it's not because they logically fit into it, but because the writers just have to find a reason to tie all the stories together.
They really do have a big, BIG thing to do with the story.I have no doubt they will find a way to tie them into the store, but at this point, it's not because they logically fit into it, but because the writers just have to find a reason to tie all the stories together.
Come on, dude - now you can see into the writers' thought process? You really are hating for the sake of H8ing.
My prediction is that Linderman calls in a favor from DL that involves protecting either his paintings or the sword. I am guessing Linderman is the big bad.
My prediction is that Linderman calls in a favor from DL that involves protecting either his paintings or the sword. I am guessing Linderman is the big bad.
No. And also?spoiler (click to show/hide):lol duder you're SO off.[close]
I've made copies of all the 1st season's episodes and unlike you, *I* think the time the show got REALLY rad is when Claire woke up in the morgue.
She wakes up in the morgue after the doctor leaves to answer the phone or whatever. She puts on a white coat and. . .walks out? Morgues have armed guards in hospitals.
She wakes up in the morgue after the doctor leaves to answer the phone or whatever. She puts on a white coat and. . .walks out? Morgues have armed guards in hospitals.
For the record, I used to work at Scripps Clinic in Torrey Pines, CA (in case you want to Google it), working as an errand boy, basically, wheeling old people and the immobile to and fro the hospital. Sometimes that involved walking gurneys with dead folk into the morgue. There was a little keypad on the door to the morgue, and that was it, my man - no cameras or anything else that I saw, even.
But I know, anecdotal evidence FTL. IMO Claire could've totally busted out of there while the tech was taking a fat shit or diddling herself in the ladies' room. Nobody gives a shit once you're dead, dude.