Author Topic: I can see why people dont like Goblet of Fire (spoilers if youre slower than me) (Read 4534 times)

MrAngryFace · « **on:** July 30, 2007, 10:52:18 AM »

I've never seen such a schizo school in a movie ever. HAY POTTAR U R OUR FREND! OH NOES U CHEATED MAYBE?!! DONT KNOW BUT ASSUME SO! U STINK POTTAR! RONS I H8 U! HARRY I H8 U! OH IT DRAGON! GO POTTAR WE LUB U! OH SHITS LETS HOIST U ON OUR SHOULDURZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OH SHITZ RONS LEZ BE FRENDZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RON U WANNA DANCE WITH SOMEBODY! CUZ I REALLY WANNA DANCE WID SOMEBODY! LOL STFU HERMOINE I WOULD RATHER MOPE AND GROW ZITS HAHA HARRY U DATE H8s U TOOOO! HAHHAHA! OH SHITZ!!!!!!!

Why the FUCK would Harry wanna train their asses in 5? Whats worse is without the contrast of his crappy home life hogwarts looks like a big ol bullshit of teenage tomfoolery.

Solo · « **Reply #1 on:** July 30, 2007, 11:19:41 AM »

Its probably the best book, but the worst movie (although I havent seen OotP yet). You know a movie stinks when I would put not 1, but 2 Chris Columbus movies above it!

Movies:

PoA>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CoS>PS>GOF

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #2 on:** July 30, 2007, 11:29:07 AM »

I enjoyed the first two movies well enough, at least things were consistant in those movies.

FlameOfCallandor · « **Reply #3 on:** July 30, 2007, 11:30:28 AM »

The third book and third film were my favorite.

Himu · « **Reply #4 on:** July 30, 2007, 12:23:41 PM »

First film was my favorite movie, book 6 is my favorite book

I liked how magical the first movie was. that sense of discovery and stuff. it got me to read the books.

goblet's movie isn't that good, but the book is my 2nd favorite Potter book. they crammed a bunch of stuff into the movie.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #5 on:** July 30, 2007, 12:35:10 PM »

Most of the dance stuff coulda been cut I thought

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #6 on:** July 30, 2007, 12:44:50 PM »

the dance wasn't even that significant in the book. its inclusion and emphasis was just mike newell being his usual edgy brit romcom gay-ass self

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #7 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:05:20 PM »

The movie is pretty fun for fans. It starts off well, but then is ruined by two horrible scenes

-PORTKEY SPIN ATTACK WHEEEEEE
-"A man Harry? But, WHO?"

Once they get to Hogwarts things get much better. Rita Skeeter is pretty annoying in the book but she's damn awesome in the movie. And a MILF

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #8 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:08:30 PM »

yeah the 'I SAW A MAN' shit was lol.

Fragamemnon · « **Reply #9 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:12:17 PM »

I like the movies because I have a crazy thing for owls. Don't ask, I think it's a birdwatcher thing becuase my wife is even worse.

That being said, I wasn't too fond of Goblet of Fire. Prisoner of Ass Cabin is easily the best of the movie adaptations.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #10 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:20:51 PM »

Mad Eye and Rita Skeeter make the second half of the movie very entertaining imo. And Cedric

:'(

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #11 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:34:46 PM »

I remember not liking liking GOF when compared to the third book; I'm not saying it's bad, but I just had problems with it. It just didn't click with me; to date it's the only Potter book I haven't read at least twice. I'll have to read it again soon.

But the fifth was so much better than the previous books that it didn't matter to me.

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #12 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:36:07 PM »

i'm about halfway through the last book, and it is pretty fuckin' messy and awful. internal consistency is NOT rowling's strong suit. i think 5 and 6 were the only ones i actually enjoyed on some level; the rest were just kinda there.

Himu · « **Reply #13 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:37:23 PM »

I thought Goblet was great because it had the most adventure, that was until book 7, but still. I liked seeing Harry tackle all of those obstacles and shit. It gave the book a different change of pace over the normal school -> quidditch -> detective shit stuff that book 1-3 had. Finding out how Harry could top all of the obstacles was half the fun.

Himu · « **Reply #14 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:38:02 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on July 30, 2007, 01:34:46 PM

But the fifth was so much better than the previous books that it didn't matter to me.

hahaha

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #15 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:39:00 PM »

Quote from: Professor Prole on July 30, 2007, 01:36:07 PM

i'm about halfway through the last book, and it is pretty fuckin' messy and awful. internal consistency is NOT rowling's strong suit. i think 5 and 6 were the only ones i actually enjoyed on some level; the rest were just kinda there.

Awful? Wow ok Drinky

Himu · « **Reply #16 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:41:53 PM »

the first half is pretty meh. it's not the best hp book at all. the second half is awesome but the other books consistently stay interesting the entire book.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #17 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:43:55 PM »

well then you look at the events and aside from the dragon...I mean the contests were kinda basic considering what wizards n witches are supposedly capable of. It just seems like Harry pulls a whole lotta wins out of his ass.

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #18 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:44:07 PM »

remember, i don't give a shit about the hokey lore or whatever -- i'm just following the damn plot to its conclusion. i could see fanbois getting all excited over 7 for its, er, encyclopedic qualities -- OMG MORE ABOUT WIZARD WORLD YAY -- but for me, it's more eye-rolling and PLEASE GET TO THE FUCKING POINT. i swear, the protagonists get more unlikable with each book.

maf, if you thought ron and hermione were twats in 4, 7 makes them almost unbearable. do ANY of the main three have any real distinguishing characteristics beyond the most basic dimensions? i can't even tell if harry is developing, because he's a fucking personality-free cipher (with the occasional tantrum)!

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #19 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:47:48 PM »

Quote from: Himuro on July 30, 2007, 01:41:53 PM

the first half is pretty meh. it's not the best hp book at all. the second half is awesome but the other books consistently stay interesting the entire book.

You went in pretty jaded imo. Like I said, the beginning of the book is awesome. The first chapter is better than most of the previous Potter chapters. Mix that with the Dursley scene and the escort adventure and you've got an awesome first 4 chapters. Once they get to the Burrow and gear up for the wedding things get boring, but that's quickly remedied by Kingsly

spoiler (click to show/hide)

"The Minister has fallen. Scrimeour is dead. They are coming"

[close]

TVC15 · « **Reply #20 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:50:16 PM »

So does anyone get laid in the 7th book or what?

Does anyone feel the warmth between anyone else's legs?

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #21 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:52:12 PM »

given the epilogue, i'd assume that hermione rides ron's gingerstick thrice at minimum, and harry pounds ginny's pussy twice. no idea if harry and ron ever cross wands.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #22 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:54:49 PM »

The tantrums in the movies are so bizzare cause whatever lead up to them isnt actually in the movie so you just see people flipping from HATE TO LOVE HATE TO LOVE for 2 hours. At least the 5th movie kinda grounded shit in reality again now that V is back they have someone to universally hate. Even then tho at the beginning of the 5th movie people are all F U HARRY WE LUB CEDRIC! At least the 5th movie showed the students apologizing for being twats instead of just changing between a scene.

TVC15 · « **Reply #23 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:55:03 PM »

Quote from: Professor Prole on July 30, 2007, 01:52:12 PM

given the epilogue, i'd assume that hermione rides ron's gingerstick thrice at minimum, and harry pounds ginny's pussy twice. no idea if harry and ron ever cross wands.

How did these kids go through highschool without even the faintest bit of sexuality? The wizarding world just got a whole lot less interesting.

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #24 on:** July 30, 2007, 01:59:04 PM »

seriously. i expected jelly bracelets, wand-to-genital contact, and hermione preparing a peanut butter and pita surprise for crookshanks in BOOK 1. i expected book 6 to up the ante to e-fueled orgies, anthro furry antics, penis enlargement spells, succubus summoning, and neville getting touched by snape in the quidditch locker room. fuck rowling's sanitized high school hijinks.

come the fuck ON, jk, you KNOW at least one kid tried to shove a wand up his asshole and yell "expelliarmus" EACH YEAR. there's no way that NEVER happened, and you know your readers want to hear about it.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #25 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:01:27 PM »

Cuaron "tempted" to direct Deathly Hallows

Quote

In a new interview with Rotten Tomatoes, Prisoner of Azkaban director Alfonso Cuaron says that he would be "very tempted" to direct Deathly Hallows:

"I feel a little bit like I have to try to do the films that are not going to exist without me. On the same token, I would be really tempted because it was really beautiful. I just started reading the last book and something I respect is the care the producers have put in the film franchise. It would have been so easy after the success of the series just to take the cynical approach of knowing that no matter what people are going to see those movies. Actually they've been taking a lot of care from beginning to end, so yeah I would be really tempted."

http://mugglenet.com/

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #26 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:04:48 PM »

TVC/Drinky: I think it has more to do with the age of the kids.

TVC15 · « **Reply #27 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:06:43 PM »

Quote from: MrAngryFace on July 30, 2007, 02:04:48 PM

TVC/Drinky: I think it has more to do with the age of the kids.

They are 17-18 in the last book. That's a solid 2-3 years of teenage uberhornydom totally unmentioned.

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #28 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:07:13 PM »

it's not like the audience isn't ready for it! i bet half the kids reading the book RIGHT NOW are methed out of their gourds, snorting it powdered out of used condoms while simultaneously browsing shemaleyum.com! KIDS THESE DAYS!

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #29 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:08:12 PM »

that's not a good shemale site

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #30 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:08:41 PM »

oh, evilbore

TVC15 · « **Reply #31 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:10:05 PM »

PD, why don't you just get some breast implants and get Junpei to suck you off? You'd both get what you want that way.

TVC15 · « **Reply #32 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:12:21 PM »

Quote from: Billy Rygar on July 30, 2007, 02:11:20 PM

Quote from: TVC 15 on July 30, 2007, 02:06:43 PM
Quote from: MrAngryFace on July 30, 2007, 02:04:48 PM
TVC/Drinky: I think it has more to do with the age of the kids.

They are 17-18 in the last book. That's a solid 2-3 years of teenage uberhornydom totally unmentioned.
I think he meant the fanbase.

So the fanbase is cool with all the death in the last 3 books, but any display of sexuality is strictly not allowed?

Cyanista · « **Reply #33 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:15:58 PM »

The fanbase of people who started reading these books when they were 10 is now 20.

Guess what? They aren't getting laid, either.

TVC15 · « **Reply #34 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:16:11 PM »

Quote from: Billy Rygar on July 30, 2007, 02:14:29 PM

Well, yeah. American parents and all that.

America is not the only market for the books, the books do not take place in America, and the author is not American.

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #35 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:17:41 PM »

srsly, though, i think she was aiming for the roald dahl asexual vibe.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #36 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:17:55 PM »

Quote from: TVC 15 on July 30, 2007, 02:12:21 PM

Quote from: Billy Rygar on July 30, 2007, 02:11:20 PM
Quote from: TVC 15 on July 30, 2007, 02:06:43 PM
Quote from: MrAngryFace on July 30, 2007, 02:04:48 PM
TVC/Drinky: I think it has more to do with the age of the kids.

They are 17-18 in the last book. That's a solid 2-3 years of teenage uberhornydom totally unmentioned.
I think he meant the fanbase.

So the fanbase is cool with all the death in the last 3 books, but any display of sexuality is strictly not allowed?

I'm pretty sure Harry plugged Cho in HBP, and Ron almost plugged Lavender Brown (he took her in that classroom he thought was empty...). But at the same time, there's no need for visual sex scenes in these books. I don't think anyone honestly wants to see that. Seems like needless controversy.

And no, Junpei is underage. Plus if I was doing a cheeseburger I'd be the pitcher

TVC15 · « **Reply #37 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:19:29 PM »

The books are coming of age stories. You can't have a multi-thousand page coming of age story without some explicit boners.

And you could still be the pitcher even if you are the one with tits.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #38 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:21:26 PM »

maybe they can do books about the gang when theyre 18 to satisfy some of your weird desires

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #39 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:22:53 PM »

"...yes...yes...that saucy hermione granger certainly wants it like that, doesn't she...yeessss..."

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #40 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:23:18 PM »

Quote from: TVC 15 on July 30, 2007, 02:19:29 PM

The books are coming of age stories. You can't have a multi-thousand page coming of age story without some explicit boners.

And you could still be the pitcher even if you are the one with tits.

It's unnecessary though. The sexual tension is there without actual sex, and there's kissing/groping applenty. I know this is the whatever goes crowd, but it's not hard to see why books featuring underage sex would be met with controversy, and not just in America. The books are read predominantly by kids as it is (I'm not saying it's a kid's series though). If there was sex I'm sure you'd be complaining even more about fanfiction similarities :p

True, but I don't want the tits. cheeseburger sex is probably just a fantasy I have but will never indulge in (most likely). Don't want to deal with the smell

TVC15 · « **Reply #41 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:23:46 PM »

Quote from: MrAngryFace on July 30, 2007, 02:21:26 PM

maybe they can do books about the gang when theyre 18 to satisfy some of your weird desires

HARRY POTTER AND THE MILK-STAINED SHEETS!

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #42 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:24:35 PM »

man, grr martin's jaunty little cap just COMPLETES that picture

TVC15 · « **Reply #43 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:27:22 PM »

It is pretty much the most unflattering picture of all time. And I am counting mugshots.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #44 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:28:31 PM »

it's like he was looking for a golf course and walked into a gay porn convention

Himu · « **Reply #45 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:39:05 PM »

Quote from: Professor Prole on July 30, 2007, 01:59:04 PM

seriously. i expected jelly bracelets, wand-to-genital contact, and hermione preparing a peanut butter and pita surprise for crookshanks in BOOK 1. i expected book 6 to up the ante to e-fueled orgies, anthro furry antics, penis enlargement spells, succubus summoning, and neville getting touched by snape in the quidditch locker room. fuck rowling's sanitized high school hijinks.

come the fuck ON, jk, you KNOW at least one kid tried to shove a wand up his asshole and yell "expelliarmus" EACH YEAR. there's no way that NEVER happened, and you know your readers want to hear about it.

Cyanista · « **Reply #46 on:** July 30, 2007, 02:40:08 PM »

Quote from: TVC 15 on July 30, 2007, 02:27:22 PM

It is pretty much the most unflattering picture of all time. And I am counting mugshots.

Garden gnomes look the same in EVERY picture, what are you talking about?

News:

Author Topic: I can see why people dont like Goblet of Fire (spoilers if youre slower than me) (Read 4534 times)