Author Topic: Olbermann sez: "Beginning of the end of America" and also we all LOL at PD! (Read 17999 times)

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #120 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:27:34 PM »

FART FART FART SPINNING AWAY FROM MY ORIGINAL ARGUMENT WHICH WAS WRONG LET ME PUT EMOTICONS HERE

AND HERE

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #121 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:28:39 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 04:27:34 PM

FART FART FART SPINNING AWAY FROM MY ORIGINAL ARGUMENT WHICH WAS WRONG LET ME PUT EMOTICONS HERE

AND HERE

Show me one place where Olbermann beats O'Reilly in a demo. What a waste of time

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #122 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:31:35 PM »

I already did! It's not the only time! I never said he beat O'Reilly in any demo, I said he's ranked ahead of O'Reilly in some demos. And he has!

I'm not going to argue technicalities as you try and spin this away from your only true argument - that being that Olbermann is low rated (whose repeat btw, is the #1 ranked show in that demo). You lose again.

Wait, let me translate that for you in your native tongue:

FART FART FART SPIN FARTY-FART-FART

am i rite?

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #123 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:35:24 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 04:31:35 PM

I already did! It's not the only time! I never said he beat O'Reilly in any demo, I said he's ranked ahead of O'Reilly in some demos. And he has!

I'm not going to argue technicalities as you try and spin this away from your only true argument - that being that Olbermann is low rated (whose repeat btw, is the #1 ranked show in that demo). You lose again.

Wait, let me translate that for you in your native tongue:

FART FART FART SPIN FARTY-FART-FART

am i rite?

Where?

Quote

The broadcast topped CNN's Paula Zahn Now in the demo and total viewers last week, and the trend continued on Monday. But more importantly to MSNBC, Countdown averaged 333,000 viewers in the 25-54 demo -- just 65,000 fewer than Bill O'Reilly's 389,000 demo delivery. MSNBC actually beat FNC in the demo between 8:15 and 8:30pm, according to a tipster.

Quote

Countdown averaged 164,000 total viewers in the quarter, up 41% from Q1 2005. Zahn averaged 158,000 demo viewers (down 33 percent), according to MSNBC. Bill O'Reilly averaged 450,000 in the demo (down 24 percent).

?

And don't pull the 8:15-8:30 shit out your ass. You know that's not relevent to this; O'Reilly had more viewers and ranked ahead

I can't wait for the new quarter numbers to come out

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #124 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:35:32 PM »

This is the part where he comes back with:

GOD UR SO WRONG I SHOWED U IN UR LINKS LOL WHAT A WASTE OF TIME

Quote from: PhoenixDark

I can't wait for the new quarter numbers to come out.

Me too. So I can post this:

"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."

And just post

1,000 times in a row.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #125 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:37:10 PM »

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/default.asp

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #126 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:40:10 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 04:37:10 PM

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/default.asp

Hey, look, Olbermann consistently is ranked ahead of CNN and HLN throughout the month!

I love it when you post links that prove you're wrong.

"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."

TVC15 · « **Reply #127 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:42:25 PM »

Man, watching Willco take down PD is like watching a nun molest a baby.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #128 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:43:49 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 04:40:10 PM

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 04:37:10 PM
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/default.asp

Hey, look, Olbermann consistently is ranked ahead of CNN and HLN throughout the month!

I love it when you post links that prove you're wrong.

"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."

I already receded there. My problem is with your inability to admit you're wrong. Olbermann is behind O'Reilly every single day according to those numbers.

I never challenged anything about CNN. But since you mention it, Dobbs/King/Blitzer beat him on most days according to those numbers.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #129 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:44:10 PM »

Quote from: TVC 15 on October 19, 2006, 04:42:25 PM

Man, watching WIllco take down PD is like watching a nun molest a baby.

Please. The numbers speak for themselves

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #130 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:45:38 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 04:44:10 PM

Please. The numbers speak for themselves

"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."
"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."
"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."
"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."

TVC15 · « **Reply #131 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:48:24 PM »

PD got SONNED, son.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #132 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:48:36 PM »

I think its safe to say if PD has his own show, it may have poor ratings.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #133 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:49:54 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 04:45:38 PM

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 04:44:10 PM
Please. The numbers speak for themselves

"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."
"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."
"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."
"Olbermann may have poor ratings..."

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 04:45:38 PM

I said he's ranked ahead of O'Reilly in some demos
I said he's ranked ahead of O'Reilly in some demos
I said he's ranked ahead of O'Reilly in some demos
I said he's ranked ahead of O'Reilly in some demos

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #134 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:49:56 PM »

What will PhoenixDark post next, as he attempts strategically change his position from the only argument he made which was Olbermann's so-called "poor" ratings to attacking the technicalities of one point of my entire rebuttal (which he has now deemed correct!)?

Probably more

and maybe a

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #135 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:50:36 PM »

I was right about the

, but wrong about the

... we can't all be winners - like PhoenixDark!

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #136 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:51:34 PM »

Please. The numbers speak for themselves.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #137 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:52:37 PM »

Please. The numbers speak for themselves.
Please. The numbers speak for themselves.
Please. The numbers speak for themselves.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #138 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:54:29 PM »

Please. Olbermann may have poor ratings.. the numbers speak for themselves.

Olbermann please, the numbers may have poor ratings for themselves.

For themselves, the numbers speak, "OLBERMANN MAY HAVE POOR RATINGS..."

TVC15 · « **Reply #139 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:54:38 PM »

Quote from: MrAngryFace on October 19, 2006, 04:51:34 PM

Please. The numbers speak for themselves.

Fart. The flatulence farts for itself.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #140 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:59:07 PM »

Seriously, what the shit?

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #141 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:01:24 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 04:49:56 PM

What will PhoenixDark post next, as he attempts strategically change his position from the only argument he made which was Olbermann's so-called "poor" ratings to attacking the technicalities of one point of my entire rebuttal (which he has now deemed correct!)?

Probably more and maybe a

That's not true. You claimed Olbermann ranked ahead of O'Reilly in certain demos, and I challenged you. Ever since then it's been a circus show of you dancing around, changing the issue. I ceded that Olbermann's ratings were not "poor" an entire page ago, yet you continue parading around like you've won something.

You have yet to show Olbermann leading or ranking ahead of O'Reilly in anything. I've posted many links which further prove Olbermann continues to get buried by O'Reilly on a daily basis.
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/default.asp

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #142 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:03:49 PM »

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #143 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:04:32 PM »

brawndolicious · « **Reply #144 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:04:45 PM »

Did anybody make the O'Reilly-is-only-watched-by-people-that-think-he's-a-fucking-idiot argument?

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #145 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:05:55 PM »

No one thinks Oreilly is smart. I swear there were some early years where he made sense, then he just went batshit insane during some episode lol.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #146 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:07:08 PM »

Yeah, I used to enjoy O'Reilly's program a long time ago, but since then, he has become a cariacature.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #147 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:08:00 PM »

its like he's trying to fling himself off the cliffs of absurdity.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #148 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:08:30 PM »

Quote from: MrAngryFace on October 19, 2006, 05:05:55 PM

No one thinks Oreilly is smart. I swear there were some early years where he made sense, then he just went batshit insane during some episode lol.

O'Reilly went insane once he got popular lol. He wasn't bad on Inside Edition, but when he started doing real news he sucked; especially during the Clinton scandal. That's when he got popular of course...but at the expense of factual reporting.

The way he treats his guests teters on rudeness to downright hilarity. "SHUT UP!"

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #149 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:09:12 PM »

He was on his own show for a few seasons.

But lets not change the subject of the thread: PD has dumb opinions on politics! Take it away, Willco!

brawndolicious · « **Reply #150 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:09:22 PM »

I think O'Reilly was always an idiot, now he's just open about it and expects approval for it.

edit: This is what gets you fucking rich.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #151 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:13:16 PM »

FART FART FART

Cheebs · « **Reply #152 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:15:36 PM »

This discussion looks like it is straight out of Meet The Press.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #153 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:16:52 PM »

FUCK U, U PARTISAN HACK

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #154 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:20:35 PM »

Quote from: Cheebs on October 19, 2006, 05:15:36 PM

This discussion looks like it is straight out of Meet The Press.

Well in this case, common sense prevailed

Cheebs · « **Reply #155 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:31:32 PM »

Chris Matthews is more important than O'Rielly and he has less than half his ratings.

APF · « **Reply #156 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:39:59 PM »

Fuck you you fucking fucks!!

FUUUUUCCCKK!!!

YOOUUUUUUUU!!

Uh so I didn't read this thread, what's it about?

Cheebs · « **Reply #157 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:51:48 PM »

Quote from: APF on October 19, 2006, 05:39:59 PM

Uh so I didn't read this thread, what's it about?

Starbuck

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #158 on:** October 19, 2006, 05:52:49 PM »

STAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRBUCCCCKKKKK!

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #159 on:** October 19, 2006, 06:01:23 PM »

STARBUCK

Cheebs · « **Reply #160 on:** October 19, 2006, 07:03:12 PM »

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #161 on:** October 19, 2006, 07:06:26 PM »

[quoteDeleted by user

Cheebs · « **Reply #162 on:** October 19, 2006, 07:07:57 PM »

You lose this political discussion on politics.

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment · « **Reply #163 on:** October 19, 2006, 07:49:21 PM »

Oh man, PD just got OWNED, son!!!! What what what!!!!!

:elf :elf :elf

News:

Author Topic: Olbermann sez: "Beginning of the end of America" and also we all LOL at PD! (Read 17999 times)