Author Topic: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.  (Read 940 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« on: December 11, 2007, 11:34:30 PM »
Not sure how common this knowledge was.  I only saw a few people mention the terrible quality on Amazon, and similarly folks on message boards weren't particularly vocal about it.

Anyway, the Blu Ray transfer is shit.  After putting the movie in, I swapped several times between 720p and 1080i, wondering if something wonky was going on with the resolution.  It basically looked like a low resolution video file blown up too much for its own good.  Plenty of artifacing, particularly in the less dark scenes, and the black levels were flat broken.  I could have gotten the blacks half-decent, but I would have had to change too many pic settings on my TV, and frankly the movie isn't worth that.

It basically looks like a not-great quality DVD upscaled.  It's not like, eye raping bad.  Just wallet raping bad.

Causes?

1) 28DL was one of the first movies shot basically all on digital video.  This was a bragging point in its day, but, well, there's a price that comes with being an early adopter of a hot new thang.

2) Goes along with 1.  Danny Boyle likes to use filters, and do trick shots through translucent textures, like colored glass and see through shower curtain material.  This exasperates the compression and artifacing issues.  This is particularly evident during the opening scenes where Rage is released, and in the final scenes of the mansion.  Basically when the editing gets all music videoy TO THA EXTREME.

3)  This movie is just from 2002, so it is entirely possible that the studio deemed that it was too new to get a new transfer, so they used the original DVD transfer.  The more I think about it, the more this is likely, but due to the amount of artifacing, and black issues, 1 and 2 have to play parts as well.

In short, DO NOT BUY.  This is either a difficult movie to transfer, or it was a quickie cash in.
serge

drohne

  • Senior Member
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2007, 01:30:19 AM »
the movie was shot in standard definition digital video, so i have no idea why they released a bd version in the first place

Mondain

  • no bias
  • Senior Member
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2007, 02:30:51 AM »
*removes film from ziplist*

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2007, 03:05:22 AM »
the movie was shot in standard definition digital video, so i have no idea why they released a bd version in the first place

Why would they shoot it in all digital if they were going to shoot it SD?  Were they like, not forward thinking at all?  Did this movie just have absolutely no budget?
serge

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2007, 09:00:19 AM »
yeah i didnt like the movie first time i saw it - id say im pretty well protected from considering a blu ray of it


hyp

  • Casual Gamer™
  • Senior Member
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2007, 02:08:43 PM »
good thing i rented it!

the movie was shot in standard definition digital video, so i have no idea why they released a bd version in the first place

Why would they shoot it in all digital if they were going to shoot it SD?  Were they like, not forward thinking at all?  Did this movie just have absolutely no budget?

from what i've heard and read, it was an "artistic" choice.  something in the lines of blair witch project.  even so, much of the footage is heavily filtered with tons of post processing added to it.  they should've just shot on film -- fuck it, 16mm would've been better than video.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2007, 02:12:06 PM by hyp »
pyh

jiji

  • Member
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2007, 02:51:57 PM »
Why would they shoot it in all digital if they were going to shoot it SD?  Were they like, not forward thinking at all?  Did this movie just have absolutely no budget?

OTL

FlameOfCallandor

  • The Walking Dead
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2007, 03:37:12 PM »
Actually I think only part of 28 days later was show Digital video.

Inland empire was HD.

jiji

  • Member
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2007, 05:20:12 PM »
Inland empire was HD.

The camera it was shot on (Sony PD150) only does 480i.

http://dvinfo.net/conf/archive/index.php/t-3001.html
OTL

Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2007, 09:03:01 PM »
Good to know.  I'm in love with HD media and I'm slowly building up a Blu-ray library, but with this and other botched transfers it's wiser to wait for impressions of new releases these day.  Especially since these formats are still very young.

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2007, 09:05:35 PM »
Inland empire was HD.

The camera it was shot on (Sony PD150) only does 480i.

http://dvinfo.net/conf/archive/index.php/t-3001.html

I'd think that Lynch knows what he is doing.  He is an HD whore, and has been for some time.

I mean, I trust him; I have no explanation I can offer myself.
serge

DJ_Tet

  • Senior Member
Re: DO NOT BUY 28 DAYS LATER ON BLU RAY: WORST. TRANSFER. EVER.
« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2007, 09:41:39 PM »
Good to know.  I'm in love with HD media and I'm slowly building up a Blu-ray library, but with this and other botched transfers it's wiser to wait for impressions of new releases these day.  Especially since these formats are still very young.

Yeah, sites like hi-def digest are indisposable, as all transfers are not equal.  I won't pay that kind of money for a subpar transfer, I can be patient on these movies.
TIT