Yeah, apart from Christian Nutt, I can't think of any western mag reviewers who actually are into the JP RPGs at all. It really sucks seeing such amazing games get shitty scores. I remember BKO got something like 6.0's and 4.5's... that just gets a big "what the fuck" from me, seeing as it was one of the best games from last gen. Plenty of awesome RPGs have gotten totally shafted - Dragon Quarter, Etrian Odyssey, Blue Dragon, Tales of the Abyss, the aforemented BKO. I guess western reviewers prefer action-oriented combat, dialogue trees, create-a-character, and an illusion of nonlinearity, to more sophisticated turn-based combat and a more linear, focused quest.
Honestly, for all the talk of JP RPGs not progressing at all (which is bullshit since I can name at least 10 different last-gen RPGs with completely different mechanics, and not to mention the action and strategy offshoots of the genre), the Western RPGs have actually *devolved* in recent times... my understanding is that games like Planescape Torment, BG2, Fallout, Ultima 6-7 are more involved and higher quality than stuff like Jade Empire, Mass Effect, Oblivion, etc.
The main complaints I have with the JP RPG genre (this occurs in 90% of the genre) are:
-Strategy guides/FAQs are necessary to find a lot of secrets/subquests
-Towns have like 3 buildings in them