Author Topic: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing  (Read 1071 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« on: March 06, 2008, 04:50:47 PM »
this article made me want to "quit" my job.

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=34682

Doing More With Less


By Franklin Schneider
Posted: March 5, 2008

When the federal economic stimulus package hit the news in January, my latest run on unemployment was just going dry, and the mere prospect of getting another job was enough to make my testicles retract into my body. When reports surfaced that a three- or six-month (!!) unemployment extension was going to be part of the package, it seemed like government was finally doing something for the little guy, instead of just the fat cats and whiny Christians. I spent the next two weeks Google News-ing “unemployment extension economic stimulus” every 10 minutes.

When the package including the extension failed by one vote, I was so fucking pissed at the United States government that if an al-Qaeda recruiter had pitched me at that moment, I’d be in the Afghanistan desert as we speak, screaming Arabic at the top of my lungs while bayoneting an Uncle Sam mannequin.

I’ve been on unemployment three times in the past six years. Each time was better than the last, and each time I stayed on until the last cent was exhausted. I didn’t even try to get a job; it was a paid vacation. This is somewhat unusual from what I can tell. There’s a deep vein of antipathy in this country toward collecting checks from the government, especially in precincts that tend to skew rightward. Politicians imply that it’s un-American for an individual to milk the government, all while jacking up corporate welfare for their campaign contributors. And your uncle who cheered at the end of Easy Rider? He insists that if he had to obliterate 40 years of his life punching a clock, why should you goddamn hippies have it any better?

This brand of puritanism has gained traction among the gullible masses, including those I count as friends. Around the same time I got fired from a start-up in Herndon—the second of my three stints—a wave of layoffs claimed several in my circle. Most of them stayed on unemployment for only a few scant weeks before getting another shit job they immediately began bitching about. When I asked why, they muttered various reasons like “not wanting to be on welfare” or “wanting to work for a living.” One even fretted about “what her parents would think.”

Given a choice between getting a check every week for doing nothing and getting a check every week for flushing 40 hours of the prime of their lives down the toilet, they chose the latter. I mean, what kind of self-hating, masochistic Protestant bullshit is that?

Not only do I feel no guilt whatsoever about sucking from the state’s teat, I feel that I’m absolutely entitled to it. First of all, the employer that fired me pays for half of my unemployment, and fuck them.

Second of all, it’s really my money in the first place. See, your employer never pays you what you’re worth—there’s a surplus, some of which goes toward overhead and various other business costs, and the rest of which is kept as profit. (This is what Marx was referring to when he talked about “exploitation of the workers.”) A tiny fraction of this surplus—which, again, has been skimmed off of my labor—is put into a government-mandated account to go toward unemployment checks for fired workers. So yeah, it’s my money. Give it back. And since most people’s lives are so devoid of meaning that they’d rather go directly into another shitty job than be forced to confront the sheer emptiness of their existence, most of that money never even gets distributed.

The other half of my unemployment is paid for by taxes. I pay taxes, but I don’t have kids who go to public school, I don’t have a car that depreciates the roads, Social Security (which I’m paying into) is going to be belly up long before I retire, so my taxes are basically being taken from me and given to other people anyway. And I hate to be “that guy,” but we’re flushing half a billion dollars a day in Iraq, and you’re begrudging me a few hundred a week?

The most oft-heard complaint about unemployment is that it’s not enough to live on. Generally it’s about half of what you made on the job, capped at around $400 a week. (Before my payments ran out in January, I was getting $270 a week.) I guess if you have kids to support or a lot of debt to pay down, $400 a week is probably not a livable income. So I hope buying shoes on credit and not pulling out was worth being chained to a desk for the rest of your life.

For those of us who haven’t irreversibly fucked up our lives, $400 a week is doable. While you’ll have to cut back, you’ll find out that pretty much all the shit you spent your disposable income on—eating out, drinks, purchases from the “As Seen on TV!” product line—is no longer so important once you escape the 9-to-5 gulag.

At most full-time jobs I’ve had, my first thought upon the close of the workday was to get to the nearest bar and drink until the previous eight hours had been permanently obliterated from my memory. Hence, happy hour. This can run up quite a bar tab, especially after several months of building up a tolerance (not to mention the hard miles on your liver). I also ate out every single day, often two or three times, both because I had no time to cook and also because after sitting in a windowless room for eight hours and then in traffic for two more, I was so understimulated that I needed sensation, any sensation. Heroin would have been ideal, but most of the time I settled for Taco Bell. Same with intermittent shopping sprees. When you’re miserable, you buy things. It’s the American Way; whatever your problem, there’s a product that can solve it. Have a bad day? Buy some jeans! Just realize that your best years are a distant memory? Buy a big car! This is why a lot of people who make six figures still live check to check—perhaps this 50-inch plasma screen/Louis Vuitton bag/waterfront condo will make my soul hurt less?

But once you’re off the hamster wheel, you find you no longer need to overcompensate. You don’t need consumable solutions because your essential problem—your life sucked—is solved.

more wishful thinking at link

*sigh*
Tonya

Barry Egan

  • The neurotic is nailed to the cross of his fiction.
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2008, 05:38:11 PM »
I approve this message, although I think a balance can be struck by working free-lance and getting a little bit more dough than you would leeching off the government to put in to savings.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2008, 05:40:12 PM by Chipopo »

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2008, 05:47:51 PM »
i know i need a different track in life

this shit is killing me
Tonya

Barry Egan

  • The neurotic is nailed to the cross of his fiction.
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2008, 05:54:54 PM »
Specialize in making deceptive advertorials for big corporations.  It'll suck your soul dry if you think about what you're doing, but it pays well and you get to work from home.  And it utilizes 'creativity'(!) in the basest sense of the word.

T234

  • Canadian Legal Expert and Hillballer
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2008, 06:10:07 PM »
If I made $400 dollars a week, I would be celebrating.
UK

Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2008, 06:10:45 PM »
I really agree.  I don't care how much you love your job.  Heck I like my job.  Devoting most of your waking hours to working is wack.  Why did we choose this?

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2008, 08:12:43 PM »
protestant work ethic. it's batshit.

that said, i like my job and i like working -- i like the sense of purpose and i like the change of venue. on the other hand, giving more than 40-50 hours/week of my life to ANYTHING/ANYONE is fuckin' bullshit.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2008, 08:56:15 PM by Professor Prole »
duc

Ichirou

  • Merry Christmas
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2008, 08:16:38 PM »
I like working too.  I don't like feeling like a worthless layabout.  I'd probably work even if I was independently wealthy.

That said, corporations are out to screw you, so I'd never work for them.  Public servants FTW.
PS4

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2008, 08:27:29 PM »
Public servants FTW.

then you fuck people completely by accident!
Tonya

Fresh Prince

  • a one-eyed cat peepin' in a seafood store
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2008, 08:30:41 PM »
I can't bear to think of working 5 days a week again. 1 year of that soul crushing work was horrible. Now I'll be working another 40 years with perhaps 5-10 years being 'enjoyable' at best  :(
888

Ichirou

  • Merry Christmas
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2008, 08:32:00 PM »
Find a job you like, that's the way to get through life!
PS4

bagofeyes

  • blow me - I deserve it
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2008, 08:35:58 PM »
I fucking hate working for other people. If I was my own boss, doing something I liked, I would gladly work 40 hours a week. I can't do that at the moment though. This year I'm going to try and just live on part-time work. I still have another year on my VISA and I'll be paying pretty cheap rent (sharing with a friend). Working about 3 days and having 4 days off appeals. I don't spend much money anyway.

Fresh Prince

  • a one-eyed cat peepin' in a seafood store
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2008, 08:37:38 PM »
Find a job you like, that's the way to get through life!
I don't think the work itself isn't necessarily the problem but the people\bureaucracy that surrounds it. Well it was at least for me.
 
Edit: bagofeyes has got it right.
888

Ichirou

  • Merry Christmas
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #13 on: March 06, 2008, 08:39:44 PM »
Find a job you like, that's the way to get through life!
I don't think the work itself isn't necessarily the problem but the people\bureaucracy that surrounds it. Well it was at least for me.
 
Edit: bagofeyes has got it right.

Yeah, this is true...even if the job is something you love, if the work environment sucks, it ruins everything. :/
PS4

bagofeyes

  • blow me - I deserve it
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #14 on: March 06, 2008, 08:41:13 PM »
The work ethic in Japan is even more batshit insane too. I applaud the salarymen that jump in front of trains.

Ichirou

  • Merry Christmas
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2008, 08:45:49 PM »
I end up working late a lot even though I technically get out of work at 4:15 PM.  I hate working at home so I usually end up in front of the computer at work till I'm done writing lesson plans or handouts or whatever.
PS4

bagofeyes

  • blow me - I deserve it
  • Senior Member
Re: Doing More With Less: In defense of creative loafing
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2008, 08:48:58 PM »
I'll stay back if I want to get something done, but I won't stay back just because of the office peer pressure. It's just so bizarre; I see them sitting around at 6 o'clock with nothing to do, but they won't leave till at least a couple of hours later.