Author Topic: 200k a year isn't rich!  (Read 6675 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: 200k a year isn't rich!
« Reply #60 on: June 11, 2008, 07:23:18 PM »
abrader, can we be best friends?  :)

I thought we already were - ?!?!?!?!!?!?!?



Oblivion

  • Senior Member
Re: 200k a year isn't rich!
« Reply #61 on: June 11, 2008, 09:15:44 PM »
I can sorta understand how that might not be so much if you're in New York or Beverly Hills, but fuck, I'd happily take that shit in a heartbeat! :punch

IDK man, I'm in NY and if I was making 200k a year I'd feel filthy rich. 

Oh, I agree. I mean, as long as you're not living on Park Avenue or some shit.

Quote
Wealthy means more than a salary--it also means possession of property, an absence of debt, etc.  My ex-GF made literally twice as much as me, but due to unfortunate circumstances had a lot of debt she was paying off; this meant that in practical terms, I was more "wealthy"--I had more money I could spend, more I could invest, etc.  Still, it was weird having to loan her money every once in a while when she overextended her bank account.

Well, I would definitely think you were richer in spirit, at least. :)

APF

  • Senior Member
Re: 200k a year isn't rich!
« Reply #62 on: June 11, 2008, 09:41:34 PM »
Man you know how much happier I would be right now if I really did spend all my money on coke and prostitutes?

Ron Paul take me away!!
***