Author Topic: Call of Duty 5: World at War debut trailer (Read 1905 times)

CHOW CHOW · « **on:** June 21, 2008, 10:46:13 AM »

Glorious HD: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35412.html

SD:
[gt]35413[/gt]

crap, no gametrailers embed? SD link: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35413.html

holy fucking shit, that was awesome!!!!!

Tieno · « **Reply #1 on:** June 21, 2008, 10:54:15 AM »

I like the trailer, it's good.

Check the marketplace trailer, it's 2x as big as the gametrailers one because that one is compressed to dogshit.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #2 on:** June 21, 2008, 10:59:17 AM »

Looks good, graphically. But I really don't know if I can go back to the weapons of that era after enjoying the SMGs, ARs and sweeter explosive devices of modern times.

CHOW CHOW · « **Reply #3 on:** June 21, 2008, 11:10:02 AM »

Watch the trailer again and take special notice of the animations... they look much improved

Mupepe · « **Reply #4 on:** June 21, 2008, 11:20:51 AM »

looks better in motion than I thought it would.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #5 on:** June 21, 2008, 11:35:46 AM »

There have been a lot of knee-jerk negative reactions to this simply because it's not from IW, but yeah, it looks real good. Whatever shortcomings it has, it shares with COD4, so it's all good.

CHOW CHOW · « **Reply #6 on:** June 21, 2008, 11:40:05 AM »

Agreed, the "bobobo it's Treyarch so it's gonna suck!!!" stuff is getting old. This looks absolutely fantastic. It's using an updated version of the COD4 engine and also COD4's multi-player system, perks 'n all, so I seriously doubt it's gonna disappoint.

MCD · « **Reply #7 on:** June 21, 2008, 11:45:06 AM »

it's also got coop.

only thing i don't like is the setting.

Beezy · « **Reply #8 on:** June 21, 2008, 12:07:49 PM »

A new COD game isn't necessary right now. COD4 is still the most played game on Live.

CHOW CHOW · « **Reply #9 on:** June 21, 2008, 12:46:59 PM »

Quote from: Beezy on June 21, 2008, 12:07:49 PM

A new COD game isn't necessary right now. COD4 is still the most played game on Live.

this will be out in the fall... probably like november, that's like 5-6 months

Slo · « **Reply #10 on:** June 21, 2008, 12:47:18 PM »

Wow, the atmosphere looks great.

Beezy · « **Reply #11 on:** June 21, 2008, 12:55:05 PM »

Quote from: CHOW CHOW on June 21, 2008, 12:46:59 PM

Quote from: Beezy on June 21, 2008, 12:07:49 PM
A new COD game isn't necessary right now. COD4 is still the most played game on Live.
this will be out in the fall... probably like november, that's like 5-6 months

Exactly. That's only a year after COD4 came out.

MCD · « **Reply #12 on:** June 21, 2008, 01:00:38 PM »

http://www.gamersyde.com/news_6677.html

marketplace quality.

CHOW CHOW · « **Reply #13 on:** June 21, 2008, 01:06:08 PM »

Quote from: Beezy on June 21, 2008, 12:55:05 PM

Quote from: CHOW CHOW on June 21, 2008, 12:46:59 PM
Quote from: Beezy on June 21, 2008, 12:07:49 PM
A new COD game isn't necessary right now. COD4 is still the most played game on Live.
this will be out in the fall... probably like november, that's like 5-6 months
Exactly. That's only a year after COD4 came out.

I dunno.. a year's a long time with videogames. I'm cool with a new COD every year as long as the quality holds up. It certainly looks that way with COD5... trailer's insane

Vizzys · « **Reply #14 on:** June 21, 2008, 01:07:21 PM »

hope we can call in napalm airstrikes online

Slo · « **Reply #15 on:** June 21, 2008, 01:43:15 PM »

Quote from: Viz on June 21, 2008, 01:07:21 PM

hope we can call in napalm airstrikes online

I think that was Vietnam.

Vizzys · « **Reply #16 on:** June 21, 2008, 01:49:22 PM »

nvm...

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #17 on:** June 21, 2008, 02:36:31 PM »

game boner

Pharmacy · « **Reply #18 on:** June 21, 2008, 02:41:19 PM »

Sweet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tabasco · « **Reply #19 on:** June 22, 2008, 05:29:16 AM »

I sort of liked CoD3, even if it was the game that killed my launch 360. That trailer looked good. My complaint about the CoD games are that I just don't think the drop in IQ is worth 60 fps. For me, Resistance proved that if you LOCK a game a 30 fps, that's smooth enough. Bump up the textures and resolution for the consoles. If running at 60fps is that important, buy it on PC.

pilonv1 · « **Reply #20 on:** June 22, 2008, 05:51:22 AM »

Co-op would be the only reason I'd look at this.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #21 on:** June 22, 2008, 05:51:43 AM »

In a game with as much action as CoD, 60 fps makes a gigantic difference. The only not-so-good parts of CoD's graphics are the textures though.

Darunia · « **Reply #22 on:** June 22, 2008, 06:22:16 AM »

I still love how they dropped the numbering for this one

chronovore · « **Reply #23 on:** June 23, 2008, 03:32:24 AM »

That actually makes some sense; taking the brand off into subtitle-land to broaden it.

GSG Flash · « **Reply #24 on:** June 23, 2008, 08:47:48 AM »

The trailer was good, but still, WW2 = fail, the series was supposed to move forwards after CoD4, not backwards.

Quote from: ParticleReality on June 22, 2008, 07:40:12 AM

Quote from: Darunia on June 22, 2008, 06:22:16 AM
I still love how they dropped the numbering for this one

IW wants the number 5 on their true sequel. Don't be too shocked if World at War doesn't become the title for a series of WW2 games.

Hopefully IW makes a CoD with laser guns, aliens and dinosaurs. That would be awesome

That's good, CoD3 was a mistake that should've never happened. The numbering should stick with the IW developed CoD games.

News:

Author Topic: Call of Duty 5: World at War debut trailer (Read 1905 times)