I really don't give a fuck dude, my first post was poking fun at you.
But you're doing EXACTLY what you're criticizing.
-Forum poster uses highest priced PS3 to make point - you act like everyone buys 360 wifi and full priced XBL
-I say 360 has the better lineup (which honestly should be a stone cold fact, it simply has more games on it) - You accuse me of saying PS3 has nothing on it
-You insist that the PS3 has the stronger lineup, yet obviously you are not implying anything negative at all about 360!
-You beat around the bush ripping on the entirety of Sony's 40GB strategy - but don't let it be said that the 40GB itself is a problem!
No, I'm not doing exactly what I criticized. I never acted like everyone buys the 360 wifi adapter and you know it. Go back and read what I said. I clearly stated some people would buy it. Which is true! Therefore for those people it's a bad value proposition, because if they bought a PS3 that would never be necessary.
Xbox Live is pretty much mandatory for most people buying a 360. Ok, so maybe you find a sale on a one year subscription. Big deal. It only costs $40 a year now. The point is that adds up over time, and eventually means several hundred dollars over the life of the console. That's certainly worth mentioning when one is discussing the differences between a PS3 and 360, is it not?
Second, MORE GAMES DOESN'T MEAN BETTER ANYTHING. More just means better to you? Come on. I'm a very picky game buyer. I only buy the cream of the crop that interests me. I wouldn't give a shit if they released 100 games a month for any platform, I'd still only buy 10-15 games a year. More does not equal better.
Third, I NEVER ONCE suggested the PS3 had the better lineup. Where the eff did that come from?
Lastly, I only said their handling of skus was a joke this gen, so you want to assume I was talking about the 40gb? Good for you. I have problems with many of their decisions, and the 40gb is only lacking PS2 BC IMO. Other than that I never said a bad word about it.