If you look at the comments to that article you get this, which lends credence to what I've said:
"I went to middle school with Andre. He was completely into the D & D gaming thing back in '73-4-5. He was teased and bullied regularly by the athletes and other kids of the "in" crowd for various reasons. Certainly none of that would ever justify these actions, but it kind of makes you wonder."
Knowing his knowledge of the dark arts, I have prepared a sequence of events:
After eating crispers at Chili's, a Monster Ghost (see: Dungeons and Dragons 1st edition Fiend Folio) shows up and frightens Andre and the Child. Since the crispers have loosened their bowels and the kid does not have as many levels and experience points as Andre, he poops his pants. Andre then tries to get the monster ghost on video, but by the time he turns on the video camera, the monster ghost has already escaped. Disappointed that his opportunity to capture and prove the existence of monster ghosts, Andre sadly molests the child.
Knowing that Andre played Dungeons and Dragons 30some years ago, this is the only sequence of events that makes logical sense to me, and I don't know about you, but I think molesting a child after seeing a monster ghost is perfectly understandable. I bet nobody would give a fuck about prosecuting you if you smoked a joint or stole some mp3s after seeing a monster ghost.