Author Topic: Quick question re: Lasik  (Read 751 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Quick question re: Lasik
« on: July 08, 2008, 12:01:02 AM »
I was wondering today if I could just get Lasik surgery in one eye, so I could legitimately wear a monocle.  Would this be an ordeal, like those furries having to seek out seedy cosmetic surgeons to make them look like cats and shit.  I just want to be able to wear a monocle so I can say like "My word!" and I promise to hold a tea cup and or a cane at all times.
serge

Crushed

  • i am terrified by skellybones
  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2008, 12:04:08 AM »


Just do it on only one eye.
wtc

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2008, 12:16:32 AM »
ive had glasses since i was 10, kinda cant imagine not having them
o_0

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2008, 12:18:29 AM »
Lasik was the best investment of my life.  Why not just get the standard lasik done on each eye and wear a non-prescription monocle? 

I strive for honesty in all things.  I would be ashamed to wear a clear glass monocle.
serge

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2008, 12:26:04 AM »
What if you wore two monocles? I can only imagine how awesome that would be.
©@©™

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2008, 12:38:32 AM »
I also want his facial hair:



My goal with this plan is to buy a BMW and cruise around an indian reservation while wearing my monocle and saying "my word!" and seeing how long it takes the indians to murder me.
serge

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2008, 01:47:39 AM »
Surely no-one wore monocles because they were only short-sighted in one eye? Wasn't it just because they were too filthy poor to afford spectacles?  ???

I think TVC can certainly apply this logic and feel good about his monocle-wearing. Unless of course he would now see it as a brand of filthy-poordom, which would probably defeat his stated purpose.

vjj

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2008, 01:49:52 AM »
You would also need to dress for a monacle; you cant just slap one on with your t-shirt
o_0

Crushed

  • i am terrified by skellybones
  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #8 on: July 08, 2008, 01:52:53 AM »
Surely no-one wore monocles because they were only short-sighted in one eye? Wasn't it just because they were too filthy poor to afford spectacles?  ???

People didn't get custom prescription glasses and contact lenses in those days, dude.
wtc

Bildi

  • AKA Bildo
  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2008, 02:00:31 AM »
You would also need to dress for a monacle; you cant just slap one on with your t-shirt

The thought of such fashion faux pas brings gray hairs to my head.

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2008, 02:27:22 AM »
Surely no-one wore monocles because they were only short-sighted in one eye? Wasn't it just because they were too filthy poor to afford spectacles?  ???

When I first started wearing glasses, when I was a wee, drunken 10 year old, only one of my eyes was bad, and the other lens in my glasses was just plain glass.  Well, plastic, or whatever sort of polycarbon thing they put in em.  I'd imagine that's how it is for others as well.

serge

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2008, 02:53:16 AM »
Surely no-one wore monocles because they were only short-sighted in one eye? Wasn't it just because they were too filthy poor to afford spectacles?  ???

People didn't get custom prescription glasses and contact lenses in those days, dude.

...and? I'm just suggesting that one lens is cheaper and simpler to make than two, so monocles probably came before spectacles. I have no idea. Please don't assume any part of this conversation is intended to be a serious discussion of the history of opthalmy.
vjj

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2008, 07:44:22 AM »
why not just read the excellent magazine Monocle in public?

http://www.monocle.com/
Tonya

DJ_Tet

  • Senior Member
Re: Quick question re: Lasik
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2008, 08:00:16 AM »
When I was a child I used to dream of two things...


wearing braces and wearing a monocle.



Braces were absolute hell, 10+ years, but well worth the effort.  I had forgotten about my love of monocles, though.  One of my eyes is significantly worse than the other, so I will anxiously follow this thread.  On another aside, I might actually be able to afford lasik on ONE of my eyes, so there's that.

 :tophat


The question remains, how exactly does a monocle fit, and how comfortable are they?  At one time they served a purpose besides fashion I'd imagine, what's the story behind the monocle?

Eyepatches and monocles are just things you never see anymore, it's too bad.
TIT