Halo 3 should have had a Ghost Recon style first-person view

[cool breeze]

The original Killzone was just broken from a control and technical standpoint.  I think it is borderline unplayable.  I actually wasn't excited for Killzone 2 until after playing the PSP game and seeing that these guys actually are capable of making a good game.

And the scarab battles of Halo 3 were great.  I think the high point of Halo 3 was that one battle against two of them when you were on that VTOL.  The Gears 2 video, and any game that really does this, just piss me off really.  In that Gears 2 video, what you could actually do seemed really limited.  It looked like there were maybe a handful of enemies you could fight at a time, then there was this entire poorly convinced illusion that you were fighting in this grand battle.  At one point you see Marcus pointing over the edge and shooting at the mindless background drones who had no purpose or interactivity other than hiding the pretty bad looking canyons in that scene.  The brumacks were cool, but again that entire sequence wasn't impressive at all to me.  I really hope that things like that don't appear in Gears 2 that often.

[duckman2000]

who gives a fuck about gun models

I do, obviously. Or rather, I'd like them to be real good, or stay the hell out of view.

[JustinP]

  to call me out exclusively is just unfair and trollish. 

not at all.

you are just pitiful. 

[cool breeze]

who gives a fuck about gun models, killzone 2, and to a lesser extent halo 3.  arguing petty differences in mediocre games should stay on gaf.

I think it matters for 2 reasons:

1) It takes up like 30% of the screen throughout the entire game.

2) It kills people.  No one wants a low res fisher price looking POS to kill enemies with. 

[JustinP]

lol. i think if you are going to get your pants in a twist over this, you have come to the wrong board.

meh, i'll just stick you on ignore until someone rectifies this horrific account verification error.

i was just calling out the childish, trolling bullshit you and others spew.  now you back out because your shitty trolling failed hard. 

i don't really care if i'm banned here.  many of you here troll for trolling's sake--it's amusing at times, but it's sad all of the time. 

[Tabasco]

dfyb and andrews crapping on halo.  it's just like gaf, only with less members.   :nuhuh

[Narag]

You homos. I read the first page then skipped to the last page and I'd wager nothing of value was lost.

who gives a fuck about gun models

I do, obviously. Or rather, I'd like them to be real good, or stay the hell out of view.

I liked them but mostly the UNSC stuff. The covenant stuff was a bit ehhh. I also would like a tatical shooter in the halo universe. We can't all be Spartans. :'(

[duckman2000]

dfyb and andrews crapping on halo.  it's just like gaf, only with less members.   :nuhuh

Complete with the weak, empty shitty shit responses from characters such as yourself then, huh? Besides, I have damned near never "crapped" on Halo, only select comically weak components of the game. You know, like gun models, shit looking characters, and a fun pulp story that was with Halo 2 suddenly drummed up far too much and given far too much of the spotlight. It should say something about the excellence of its combat sets that I still enjoy the games quite a bit.

[duckman2000]

i don't really care if i'm banned here.  many of you here troll for trolling's sake--it's amusing at times, but it's sad all of the time. 

I don't know you, but I can tell you right now that if trolling for trolling's sake is going to bother you, you might not enjoy this place very much.

[Grecco]

Shit bin this thread

[WrikaWrek]

This thread needs to be nuked. Just like i did it in World in Conflict

[Smooth Groove]

Should have done what I've been suggesting for a long time: Shit bin Gaffots who applied less than 6 months ago. 

[duckman2000]

Should have done what I've been suggesting for a long time: Shit bin Gaffots who applied less than 6 months ago. 

Not enough Haze talk for you? Gun models, dorks. Talk about them.

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

[WrikaWrek]

MGS4 has some pretty sweet gun models.

[duckman2000]

Maybe they improved, but I seem to recall that the guns looked pretty shitty in first person view. Not in terms of actual modeling or accuracy, but the level of detail and texture quality was sort of shit.

But then that'd be alright anyway as it's not actually a first person game.

[WrikaWrek]

Well, i only ever noticed the guns in the cut scenes and in the viewer where you customize them. So unless they use a lower quality version in game, i think they are pretty good.

[JustinP]

MGS4 has some pretty sweet gun models.

sfag total?

[WrikaWrek]

MGS4 has some pretty sweet gun models.

sfag total?

Suck my nuts

[laesperanzapaz]

God damn I hate gaf fanboys who migrate here.  Ban all stupid junior members, i say.

[Smooth Groove]

It's weird but I usually notice what the guns do rather than what the guns look like.  Like Fear for example, what the nail gun did to the enemies made more impact than what the gun looked like.  

[duckman2000]

It's weird but I usually notice what the guns do rather than what the guns look like.  Like Fear for example, what the nail gun did to the enemies made more impact than what the gun looked like. 

Sure, but a bad looking gun can still mess with things quite a bit, at least for me. And in most of the cases, the ugliness seems to stem from failed attempts at added (superfluous) detail. Do it right, or go for a minimalist presentation damn it.

[JustinP]

God damn I hate gaf fanboys who migrate here.  Ban all stupid junior members, i say.

most of the long-time members i see here are fanboys anyway

[AdmiralViscen]

what the fuck is this

[bork]

Guys, please report shitty threads to me next time.  Can't read everything all the time!