Author Topic: Tiny MAG screen (Read 6321 times)

duckman2000 · « **on:** July 22, 2008, 03:29:12 PM »

I love the concept, but it was disappointing that the demo was just that, an admittedly very stylish target demonstration of a general look and feel. But hey, now there's a screen! Sort of:

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/07/22/first-look-at-mag/

I really hope they pull this off, because it'd be pretty wicked.

JustinP · « **Reply #1 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:31:44 PM »

"bubububu player models have to look like PS2 graphics to support 256 players!!!!"

Draft · « **Reply #2 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:33:09 PM »

ho-hum, another shooter for the FPS3. Don't they have any new ideas?

duckman2000 · « **Reply #3 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:33:54 PM »

Well, it occurs to me that the target demo clip was quite flat, with good lighting and a reasonable amount of geometry. If that's the style they are going for, clean over cluttered, I could see it looking quite good.

Quote from: Draft on July 22, 2008, 03:33:09 PM

ho-hum, another shooter for the FPS3. Don't they have any new ideas?

Cruise-control post of the day, eh? The irony is palpable.

Rman · « **Reply #4 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:35:48 PM »

Quote from: Draft on July 22, 2008, 03:33:09 PM

ho-hum, another shooter for the FPS3. Don't they have any new ideas?

You're right Sony is really taking this FPS thing to another level. Where's the adventurous Sony of old? I guess all their quirky stuff is being shifted to PSN.

AdmiralViscen · « **Reply #5 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:36:36 PM »

They will only tighten up further after LBP bombs

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

Smooth Groove · « **Reply #6 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:36:50 PM »

What's so impressive about this pic? Weren't you the one that kept shitting on COD4's graphics?

Even at 1920x1200, which is like 20 times bigger than that pic, COD4 looks better than that.

Crushed · « **Reply #7 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:38:01 PM »

Quote from: duckman2000 on July 22, 2008, 03:33:54 PM

Cruise-control post of the day, eh? The irony is palpable.

u mad?

Smooth Groove · « **Reply #8 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:39:21 PM »

I wish I have Duckman's sony glasses so that every PS3 game will look like it had Hollywood artistic direction.

Draft · « **Reply #9 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:40:08 PM »

Quote from: Crushed on July 22, 2008, 03:38:01 PM

Quote from: duckman2000 on July 22, 2008, 03:33:54 PM
Cruise-control post of the day, eh? The irony is palpable.
u mad?

Doubtful. Certainly every post in this thread is an extra penny in his pocket.

y2kev · « **Reply #10 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:41:05 PM »

i fucking hate military fps

stop making fps sony
stop it

none of your japanophile fans WANT THIS SHIT

WE WANT ANIMU GAMES WITH ROMANCE SUBPLOTS AND AN ANIMAL CHARACTER THAT SPEAKS

GTAHHGHAGAH

BlueTsunami · « **Reply #11 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:41:17 PM »

Those parachutes look generic

Draft · « **Reply #12 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:42:16 PM »

Quote from: BlueTsunami on July 22, 2008, 03:41:17 PM

Those parachutes look generic

But, to be fair, they are much less generic looking than the anime they are based on.

Jansen · « **Reply #13 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:42:33 PM »

must look like dogshit at 1280x720. otherwise, why the small pic?

AdmiralViscen · « **Reply #14 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:44:37 PM »

Quote from: y2kev on July 22, 2008, 03:41:05 PM

i fucking hate military fps

stop making fps sony
stop it

none of your japanophile fans WANT THIS SHIT

WE WANT ANIMU GAMES WITH ROMANCE SUBPLOTS AND AN ANIMAL CHARACTER THAT SPEAKS

GTAHHGHAGAH

Scott Rohde: We have a long-term strategy that we follow. I know you hate to continue to hear me say it, but we're always looking at opportunities. Do we have an RPG in the works right now? No.

ananus · « **Reply #15 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:45:06 PM »

let sony work on shooters, they can't even get that right after so many tries. their animu games would probably end up being worse than home and lair.

MCD · « **Reply #16 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:46:09 PM »

you guys are brutal.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #17 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:46:18 PM »

Quote from: Smooth Groove on July 22, 2008, 03:39:21 PM

I wish I have Duckman's sony glasses so that every PS3 game will look like it had Hollywood artistic direction.

Uh, what have I said about the graphics of this game? I'm glad I don't have whatever fucking glasses you're wearing, because it pretty clearly distorts shit quite a bit.

This is a fucking GAFbag, it really is.

Quote from: McDragon on July 22, 2008, 03:46:09 PM

you guys are brutal.

Well, morons at least.

AdmiralViscen · « **Reply #18 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:47:12 PM »

I was just having fun I'm sorry babe

I am bicurious about this game

cool breeze · « **Reply #19 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:48:11 PM »

Quote from: Smooth Groove on July 22, 2008, 03:36:50 PM

What's so impressive about this pic? Weren't you the one that kept shitting on COD4's graphics?

Even at 1920x1200, which is like 20 times bigger than that pic, COD4 looks better than that.

The entire point is that people were claiming (I don't know if it was on this forum or not) that it would like like a PS2, or even PS1, game due to the 256 (or something) player count in the game. It looks good judging from that small pic, but considering its a small picture and not a video, I can't judge too much.

Quote from: y2kev on July 22, 2008, 03:41:05 PM

i fucking hate military fps

stop making fps sony
stop it

none of your japanophile fans WANT THIS SHIT

WE WANT ANIMU GAMES WITH ROMANCE SUBPLOTS AND AN ANIMAL CHARACTER THAT SPEAKS

GTAHHGHAGAH

Speak for yourself. The idea of MAG has me excited because I want someone to pull it off right.

Crushed · « **Reply #20 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:49:37 PM »

now it's impressive

duckman2000 · « **Reply #21 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:50:13 PM »

Quote from: swaggaz on July 22, 2008, 03:48:11 PM

Speak for yourself. The idea of MAG has me excited because I want someone to pull it off right.

I find it hard to believe that any FPS fan, or at least a fan of larger scale combat games, would honestly want anything other than for them to pull this off. The general cynicism here tends to take a turn for the absolutely idiotic once the GAFminded fuckpit gets pounding, which is a shame.

y2kev · « **Reply #22 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:50:21 PM »

yes, well, don't worry. zipper rocks with technology. they should pull this off with flying colors.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #23 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:51:10 PM »

Quote from: y2kev on July 22, 2008, 03:50:21 PM

yes, well, don't worry. zipper rocks with technology. they should pull this off with flying colors.

Well, that's the problem. Still, nothing wrong in hoping that they will. Guerrilla has certainly shown improvement under the first party wing, so who knows, maybe Zipper will follow suit.

cool breeze · « **Reply #24 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:56:39 PM »

wait, this is an FPS? why? no third person SOCOM option?

Quote from: Borys on July 22, 2008, 03:53:53 PM

Can we all agree that:

1) we can make SHIT out of this tiny-ass screen?
2) 99% of games look GREAT on tiny-ass screens?

I think you can at least tell that the modeling isn't a blocky mess. That is all I got from it. Textures and other effects are unknown.

And shrink down a picture of Dead Rising for the Wii. Do it.

Smooth Groove · « **Reply #25 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:57:08 PM »

Who the fuck here said anything about wanting the game to fail?

There's just nothing particularly "very stylish" about what's been shown.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #26 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:58:04 PM »

Quote from: Smooth Groove on July 22, 2008, 03:57:08 PM

Who the fuck here said anything about wanting the game to fail?

There's just nothing particularly "stylish" about what's been shown.

The demonstration was quite stylish. If you can't recognize that, then you simply don't know style. Which, really, fails to surprise me.

Quote from: swaggaz on July 22, 2008, 03:56:39 PM

wait, this is an FPS? why? no third person SOCOM option?

I have no idea, I'm just using the term loosely.

Vizzys · « **Reply #27 on:** July 22, 2008, 03:58:46 PM »

Quote from: Crushed on July 22, 2008, 03:49:37 PM

(Image removed from quote.)

now it's impressive

still not enough blur

duckman2000 · « **Reply #28 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:00:03 PM »

Quote from: Borys on July 22, 2008, 03:53:53 PM

Can we all agree that:

1) we can make SHIT out of this tiny-ass screen?
2) 99% of games look GREAT on tiny-ass screens?

3) Don't post anything (PS3) game related on EB or the dumbest of the dumbshits will bitch like the bitches they are.

Smooth Groove · « **Reply #29 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:00:50 PM »

Wtf do you know about style? You liked Uncharted's character models.

And I was talking about the pic. I didn't bother watching the videos.

Only PS3 gamers spent all their time watching videos of unreleased games instead of playing games.

Brehvolution · « **Reply #30 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:02:00 PM »

It's a shame, this would be sweet with the 360's party system.

AdmiralViscen · « **Reply #31 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:03:28 PM »

Quote from: duckman2000 on July 22, 2008, 04:00:03 PM

Quote from: Borys on July 22, 2008, 03:53:53 PM
Can we all agree that:

1) we can make SHIT out of this tiny-ass screen?
2) 99% of games look GREAT on tiny-ass screens?

3) Don't post anything (PS3) game related on EB or the dumbest of the dumbshits will bitch like the bitches they are.

LBP, Warhawk, Motorstorm 2 do just fine.

JustinP · « **Reply #32 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:03:57 PM »

Quote from: Borys on July 22, 2008, 03:53:53 PM

Can we all agree that:

1) we can make SHIT out of this tiny-ass screen?
2) 99% of games look GREAT on tiny-ass screens?

you can tell it looks better than xbox1 games. nobody is saying it will be the best looking game ever. when you consider the scale of the game, the game certainly doesn't look bad, at least based on the screen (which is all we have right now).

there's a certain level of detail shown in the character models. don't act stupid like you can't see it.

Jansen · « **Reply #33 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:04:10 PM »

AMAZING

duckman2000 · « **Reply #34 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:04:15 PM »

Quote from: Smooth Groove on July 22, 2008, 04:00:50 PM

And I was talking about the pic. I didn't bother watching the videos.

So you bitch at me for calling the demonstration stylish, which you know it wasn't because you've seen the picture... but not the demonstration? Either you're one very dumb sod, or your act is fucking good.

Quote from: Borys on July 22, 2008, 04:02:34 PM

It was all CG man. Stylish CG means nothing in the end.

Actually, it means that the demonstration was stylish.

BlueTsunami · « **Reply #35 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:06:01 PM »

Even newer screen

Smooth Groove · « **Reply #36 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:06:19 PM »

Duckman's criticism of EB is laughable. No one bitches more about tiny flaws in a game than him. Unless, of course, it's a PS3 game.

Quote from: duckman2000 on July 22, 2008, 04:04:15 PM

Quote from: Smooth Groove on July 22, 2008, 04:00:50 PM
And I was talking about the pic. I didn't bother watching the videos.

So you bitch at me for calling the demonstration stylish, which you know it wasn't because you've seen the picture... but not the demonstration? Either you're one very dumb sod, or your act is fucking good.

Quote from: Borys on July 22, 2008, 04:02:34 PM
It was all CG man. Stylish CG means nothing in the end.

Actually, it means that the demonstration was stylish.

I was just talking about the pic itself. Like Borys said, who gives a shit about CG?

And you call yourself a PC gamer? SMH

JustinP · « **Reply #37 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:06:57 PM »

Quote from: Wicked Laharl on July 22, 2008, 04:04:10 PM

AMAZING

Crushed · « **Reply #38 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:07:16 PM »

Obviously being rendered at 281p and upscaled to manage all those players.

cool breeze · « **Reply #39 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:09:35 PM »

Quote from: AdmiralViscen on July 22, 2008, 04:03:28 PM

LBP, Warhawk, Motorstorm 2 do just fine.

As does Infamous and Fat Princess.

I do think at times people are a bit harsh, but them the breaks.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #40 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:10:20 PM »

Quote from: Smooth Groove on July 22, 2008, 04:06:19 PM

I was just talking about the pic itself. Like Borys said, who gives a shit about CG?

And you call yourself a PC gamer? SMH

Then why in the hell are you even referencing my comments? I know nothing about this game other than that there was a very stylish target demonstration, and now there is a tiny screen which I've never judged one way or the other because it's simply too tiny. I hope it will look and play awesome, but I have no idea if it will. There's not enough to go by to even make a preliminary call on the quality.

Again, your distorted view of reality must be a fucked up one to live with.

y2kev · « **Reply #41 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:14:36 PM »

why do you think bungie's show was cancelled

mojotardio

duckman2000 · « **Reply #42 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:15:54 PM »

Quote from: mojovonio on July 22, 2008, 04:13:48 PM

"Stylish!"

-Duckman

Is the demonstration going to be in the actual game? Then it is at least in part stylish.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #43 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:18:02 PM »

I know you're joking, but is Wollan actually claiming that? He's not a insider, unless you count obscure PS forums.

Crushed · « **Reply #44 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:18:20 PM »

Just like how nib95's sources told him that The Getaway PS3 looks better than GT5P!

JustinP · « **Reply #45 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:26:28 PM »

Quote from: Borys on July 22, 2008, 04:24:41 PM

http://www.evilbore.com/forum/index.php?topic=23003

"yeah, totally man! we were shitting all over these games because that's what we do and they don't even agree with us! WTF IS WITH THAT?!"

y2kev · « **Reply #46 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:28:40 PM »

i'll leave if you want

duckman2000 · « **Reply #47 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:28:41 PM »

Quote from: swaggaz on July 22, 2008, 04:09:35 PM

Quote from: AdmiralViscen on July 22, 2008, 04:03:28 PM
LBP, Warhawk, Motorstorm 2 do just fine.

As does Infamous and Fat Princess.

I do think at times people are a bit harsh, but them the breaks.

So then what is the problem here? What exactly is it about a post containing one small image and a link to a blog post that sets the critters off?

Me, I'm mostly pissed about being accused of praising this complete unknown beyond saying that the demonstration was stylish.

cool breeze · « **Reply #48 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:36:14 PM »

I don't know. They could genuinely not be interested in the game. I mean, I think the non-crazies aren't giving Too Human a pass simply because it is a 360 game.

I do think that the actual CG video was stylish, but not this picture. It wasn't stylish in really the style of the game, it was more of how the video itself was directed. Like, it was cool how they paced it so you have the first assault going into the base with snipers in the hills and rocket troops and all that jazz. Just as the video is ending you see a whole new wave of players parachuting in to get to battle. That stuff was cool.

The actual picture is nothing special outside of knowing it isn't a blocky Wii-like mess despite having that many players. I am still rooting for this game based on the concept and the hope they can pull it off.

Mupepe · « **Reply #49 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:36:36 PM »

wow. this thread devolved into shit really fucking quickly.

i can't wait for MAG

drohne · « **Reply #50 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:38:59 PM »

hey, at least there is a screen -- when somebody shows a prerendered teaser, you wonder if they've got anything resembling a game

now let's see a tiny screen of gow3

duckman2000 · « **Reply #51 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:41:51 PM »

Quote from: swaggaz on July 22, 2008, 04:36:14 PM

I don't know. They could genuinely not be interested in the game.

Well, I'm not really buying the reasoning that people are this negative towards the game due to a lack of interest in what the game aims to bring to the table.

Quote from: swaggaz on July 22, 2008, 04:36:14 PM

I do think that the actual CG video was stylish, but not this picture. It wasn't stylish in really the style of the game, it was more of how the video itself was directed. Like, it was cool how they paced it so you have the first assault going into the base with snipers in the hills and rocket troops and all that jazz. Just as the video is ending you see a whole new wave of players parachuting in to get to battle. That stuff was cool.

Precisely. I was actually surprised at the quality, and assumed that some other studio had put it together for them. Which may be what happened, but if that's the experience they are going for, then I hope they pull it off.

drohne · « **Reply #52 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:47:20 PM »

honestly with the title 'massive action game,' i was hoping for something...cool and actiony rather than the usual clancy routine

clancy

they should just call it 'meh' for 'marginally entertaining hackwork'

cool breeze · « **Reply #53 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:48:11 PM »

Quote from: mojovonio on July 22, 2008, 04:37:28 PM

me neither.

me and you vs 256 assholes

LETS DO IT MUPEPE!

That is like 128 assholes per cock! It is impossible.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #54 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:49:47 PM »

Quote from: drohne on July 22, 2008, 04:47:20 PM

honestly with the title 'massive action game,' i was hoping for something...cool and actiony rather than the usual clancy routine

clancy

they should just call it 'meh' for 'marginally entertaining hackwork'

Weren't the SOCOM games a good deal more action orientated than your common Clancy game though? I have very limited experience with SOCOM, but as a Ghost Recon player, I seem to remember feeling that they were too, er, action-y.

drohne · « **Reply #55 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:51:05 PM »

i haven't played socom. it's just that games with 'real world' military themes bore me silly

duckman2000 · « **Reply #56 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:52:51 PM »

Quote from: drohne on July 22, 2008, 04:51:05 PM

i haven't played socom. it's just that games with 'real world' military themes bore me silly

Don't they (Sony dudes, not Zipper) have something else brewing, for those with less interest in military action? Some MMO.

cool breeze · « **Reply #57 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:55:41 PM »

The Agency?

I think that actually looks quite good. It is on PC and PS3, so I will probably pick it up on PC if I do get it. It is all about spies vs mercenaries doing missions in their own ways and can be played alone or as an MMO.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #58 on:** July 22, 2008, 04:56:50 PM »

Yeah, that's the one. I only caught a short demo from E3, but then I'm more into military themed games so hey.

News:

Author Topic: Tiny MAG screen (Read 6321 times)