since foc can't come into any political thread without disingenuously and grossly contorting the views proffered therein to fit his 13-year-old's binary view of the world -- filtered as it is through the dogma and cant of ayn rand's coda for the socially disenfranchised, "objectivism" (also known as "the best argument for relativism going") -- i am going to create this thread in which we can hopefully contain all the lulz and allow the adults to actually talk politics free of the ignorance that comes with the Children Left Behind (thanks, texas state board of education).
in this thread, foc is free to assert any ludicrous strawman argument or false dichotomy he likes about
a) socialists
b) muslims
c) academics
d) the founding fathers and/or the constitution of the usa
e) political epistemology in general (a thankless undertaking were there ever one)
f) usurpation of American sovereignty by the UN
g) usurpation of American sovereignty by Mexicans and that giant highway
h) meritocracies
i) taxes
j) The Ultimate Warrior
and we will heap ignominy on him in the form of serious lulz.
foc, if you post in this thread, i will respond, which is what you want -- an outlet for your reactionary anti-democrat sentiments, you barely literate contrarian, you! other lolbertarians are also welcome to participate. for the rest of you, please read mike huben's hilarious anti-libertarian faq @
http://world.std.com/~mhuben/libindex.html, and consider how much energy i could have saved referring to its amusingly convenient responses instead of penning specific text representing my own views! why think for yourself when you can recant prefab arguments based on deliberately simplified scenarios just as the ayn rand dogma set do!
edit: mandark add!
