This is like the AUMF of financial intervention.
I do trust Paulson and Bernanke more than I trust Bush but yikes.
That's not saying much man, I trust my 10 year old autistic nephew more than Bush but JESUS FUCKING CHRIST I wouldn't trust myself with that much power and responsibility.
Well, yeah.
I remember when they were trying to fill the Treasury spot and were having a hard time, because everyone knew how that department had lost its say in the policymaking process. When Paulson signed on some of the egghead liberal economist types I read said "He's better than he deserves, but I wonder if he's going to be able to fight the turf battles and make an impact with just two years left."
I'm more sympathetic to this than the AUMF, because the guy in charge isn't a proven idiot and liar and because the situation probably does warrant the authority to make snap decisions in response to a crisis (as opposed to Saddam, who wasn't going anywhere).
That said, giving him a carte blanche seems nuts. They couldn't think of any rules or institutional checks to follow? Really?
I need to get some talking points on this. Where's Max Sawicky when you need him?