Cooley is the running joke of law school discussion forums -- although if the passive-aggressive nature of the posters there is an indication of my future colleagues' temperaments, maybe law isn't such an attractive field after all.
Anyway, I'm not planning to take the LSAT till June. I prefer to wait one application cycle between undergrad and law school for many reasons (most importantly, the June LSAT gives me a month of study uninterrupted by midterms or finals).
yeah, it's definitely a joke of a school right now, but I bet in 10 years (or less) it'll be more respectable. They offer some seriously competitive scholarships, like the one I mentioned earlier, so I'm sure they're landing some excellent students who just don't want to pay out the ass for school. John Marshall in Chicago was the same way. It still has ridiculously low requirements, but a good rep among judges and lawyers in the city. It was ranked like 3rd or 4th in a U.S. News in a category I can't remember right now...might have been legal writing. IIT-Kent was also like 3rd or 4th tier about 15 years ago, but now it's first tier.
Not to defend Cooley, what matters is how a school is when you're applying and not how good it might be when you're done, but a lot of people just lack perspective when it comes to law schools...of course, there are the few who can talk shit because they actually will land 173+ and have 3.8+ gpas

From my brief scans, it seemed like there were a lot of people on those law school forums who thought that anything but top 10 of tier 1 is shit. and if they're anything like some of my friends and other people I know at school who are taking the LSAT/applying to law school, they're trying to psyche people out and aren't really that confident/smart. It's really lame, but law school entrance is very competitive. I don't even talk with people about the LSAT other than "yeah, it's a pain in the ass" etc.