Obama National Co-Chair involved:
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/ConductUnbecoming/Story?id=6431739&page=1
The weird thing is that Fitz said the tapes clear Obama from wrong doing. So why are they backtracking so much? Look at what Obama said yesterday:
I had no contact with the governor or his office and so we were not, I was not aware of what was happening.
Why would he correct himself mid-sentence?
My guess is that they knew what Blago was doing and don't want to be connected with not turning him in.
They are cleared of any LEGAL wrong doing. There is nothing illegal with talking to the guy about things not related to his crimes. But the media can still make a big deal about it and he doesn't want that.
Obviously Obama has no legal issues and stayed clear of Blago's problems, everyone in Ill. knew the guy was corrupt so he obviously didn't want to be tainted by him so he wouldn't play ball with his political games (which is why the governor calls Obama a mother fucker amongst other nice names). But he doesn't want ANY connections to him, even perfectly legal ones due to the media's love of stories like this.
All the nonsense on shows like Hannity on Fox where they are calling obama corrupt and all this nonsense is pure bullshit. Is Obama backtracking on meeting with the guy? Sure, he wants nothing to do with him. But it isn't for legal problems or corruption. It is purely for media reasonings. Which it's why its so useless to keep talking about Obama.
No one else who talked with Blago on legal terms is getting attention from the right-wing media. Guess what Palin attended the governers meeting with blago a few weeks ago. OMG. DID SHE TALK TO HIM?!?!?!? And what if she said she didn't but may have said hello? CORRRRUPPPPTIOOOOON! That makes just as much sense as dwelling on Obama.
Obama had nothing to do with Blago's crimes. Obama says so, the wire-tapped tapes say so, and so does the Fed investigators. Obama shouldn't be a topic, drop it sd. You are waaay above this hannity/rush nonsense.