Author Topic: Battlefield 1943 - out in June, $15 (Read 4439 times)

Quote from: Crushed on February 05, 2009, 12:06:11 PM
can i still shoot down people who steal my fucking corsair

no! and stop putting explosives on the planes!

okay, fine.

(rams carrier into island or enemy carrier)

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #15 on:** February 05, 2009, 12:24:10 PM »

if this takes off i expect we'll be seeing Battlefield 1944: Europe this winter, or next year

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #16 on:** February 05, 2009, 12:38:09 PM »

just watched the trailer

fistfulofmetal · « **Reply #17 on:** February 05, 2009, 01:02:41 PM »

i would rather have BF3.

cool breeze · « **Reply #18 on:** February 05, 2009, 01:05:09 PM »

Quote from: Eel O'Brian on February 05, 2009, 12:24:10 PM

if this takes off i expect we'll be seeing Battlefield 1944: Europe this winter, or next year

hope so

I rocked in Berlin

Quote from: Green Man on February 05, 2009, 12:29:24 PM

Oh so it's going to be a small release like BF: Heroes and not a retail game. That sounds pretty interesting and hopefully will get a steam release.

no

BF Heroes is a free browser based game that is more simple to pick up and play.

BF 1943 is a downloadable game based on BF1942. You pay for it.

cool breeze · « **Reply #19 on:** February 06, 2009, 01:22:58 PM »

http://kotaku.com/5148080/battlefield-1943-pacific-preview-a-much-needed-upgrade

Quote

The destructible environments were a breath of fresh air for me.

Quote

The game is scheduled for release this summer with an expected price point between $15 to $20. The download size of the game will be around 350MB

Quote

Unlike previous Battlefield games, Pacific only has three unit classes: Infantry, Riflemen, and Scout. Gone are the Medics and Heavy weapons classes.

Quote

Also, players have auto-health and unlimited ammo.

$:-\$

fistfulofmetal · « **Reply #20 on:** February 06, 2009, 01:36:03 PM »

welp
so much for that

Eric P · « **Reply #21 on:** February 06, 2009, 01:57:47 PM »

Quote

Also, players have auto-health and unlimited ammo.

i am blaming this on console players

Grecco · « **Reply #22 on:** February 06, 2009, 02:13:23 PM »

When i played BF Modern Combat and BFBC nobody played medic. So not a shock

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #23 on:** February 06, 2009, 02:28:54 PM »

i don't like unlimited ammo, but i'm fine with auto healing

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #24 on:** February 06, 2009, 02:31:17 PM »

Yes!

I remember when Mike Works and I used to suicide jeep bomb enemies on the Pacific maps. And do rally races across the entire island while people were fighting - they'd get so pissed.

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #25 on:** February 06, 2009, 02:59:24 PM »

so many games have ripped off the battlefield style of play

Eric P · « **Reply #26 on:** February 06, 2009, 03:06:38 PM »

Quote from: Eel O'Brian on February 06, 2009, 02:28:54 PM

i don't like unlimited ammo, but i'm fine with auto healing

medic is my favorite class

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #27 on:** February 06, 2009, 03:08:32 PM »

Medic is such a girly class.

C4

cool breeze · « **Reply #28 on:** February 06, 2009, 03:08:38 PM »

Quote from: Eel O'Brian on February 06, 2009, 02:59:24 PM

so many games have ripped off the battlefield style of play

Warhawk is the only big one to come to mind on consoles. On PC there is Crysis, Quake Wars, and some others.

well, I guess the idea of capturing bases and all that. but I don't know if 1942 started that.

Quote from: Eric P on February 06, 2009, 03:06:38 PM

Quote from: Eel O'Brian on February 06, 2009, 02:28:54 PM
i don't like unlimited ammo, but i'm fine with auto healing

medic is my favorite class

same here

I'm gonna miss throwing medpacks mid battle, then blowing away zips with my thompson.

fistfulofmetal · « **Reply #29 on:** February 06, 2009, 06:59:50 PM »

Quote from: a slime appears on February 06, 2009, 04:40:11 PM

Not the true sequel to BF1942 that I was hoping for but I'm ok with this.

wtf is with people seemingly forgetting BF2 exists? I see people shitting on it on Gaf and now here.

Fragamemnon · « **Reply #30 on:** February 06, 2009, 07:02:01 PM »

if people want a modern setting class based shooter they can play BF2, one of its popular realism mods, or go play ArmA

$15-$20 for some dumb but fun WW2 online FPS gaming in the same vein as BF1942 (also dumb but fun). Sounds pretty good.

demi · « **Reply #31 on:** February 06, 2009, 07:06:00 PM »

BF2 isnt on 360, nobody cares. Will buy this. Can't wait to play some Battlefield again. Wow... just, wow. Hype is so high right now.

rubber feathers · « **Reply #32 on:** February 06, 2009, 07:59:53 PM »

Quote from: Grecco on February 06, 2009, 02:13:23 PM

When i played BF Modern Combat and BFBC nobody played medic. So not a shock

Modern Combat had health boxes (or whatever they're called) at most flag points, though. A fair amount of people played medics too, if only because of less reloading and the ability to heal yourself. This was the 360 version, though, I'm not sure how that differs compared to the last-gen versions.

But yeah, Bad Company had almost no one playing medic though. And with no health boxes, if you were at 15% health you could easily stay at that point of black-and-whiteness for minutes. Dice really screwed the pooch with BC. Hopefully they fix everything in BC2, but I doubt it.

It'd be a shame if BC was responsible for, say, the auto-health and no medic class decisions, but the game seems to be slimmed down in order to be noob-friendly or something.

fistfulofmetal · « **Reply #33 on:** February 06, 2009, 10:15:32 PM »

that doesn't make sense. they didn't switch anything up. they took what made 1942 good and improved on every aspect.

Better designed maps, better classes, structured gameplay that makes working as a team easy and seamless. the commander, all that stuff.

but it still basically played the same as 1942. Dudes on different teams trying to take command of control points on a map.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #34 on:** February 06, 2009, 10:19:20 PM »

Quote from: Eel O'Brian on February 06, 2009, 02:59:24 PM

so many games have ripped off the battlefield style of play

yeah, they need do something unique and make it polished for me to get into another multiplayer fps.

fistfulofmetal · « **Reply #35 on:** February 06, 2009, 10:21:54 PM »

Quote from: a slime appears on February 06, 2009, 10:18:22 PM

I wish my copy came with the "fistfulofmetal" mod so I could agree with you.

do you don't agree with my points? How exactly are they flawed?

Does that mean you would like BF to return to '64 people running around randomly on a giant map' gameplay?

cool breeze · « **Reply #36 on:** February 07, 2009, 12:35:42 AM »

http://pc.ign.com/dor/objects/14320736/battlefield-1943/videos/bf_1943pacific_comm_nycc09.html

good footage of it. It's more or less a Bad Company mod, not so much Battlefield 1942 action.

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #37 on:** February 07, 2009, 06:26:22 AM »

i've already read in several places that dice have said if this does well they'll add more and more stuff to it (i'm taking that to mean the european maps)

i like the air raid bunker idea, that's pretty cool

drift on the jeeps, ha, you know they put that in because of all the racing people used to do

parachutes

dlc goty

cool breeze · « **Reply #38 on:** February 07, 2009, 10:36:16 AM »

yeah, I like the bomber idea, but if people are as good as flying in this as they were in 1942, I'd imagine they'd get shot down quickly.

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #39 on:** April 23, 2009, 01:59:29 PM »

http://kotaku.com/5224390/battlefield-1943-drops-in-june

360 & PS3, pc version in september

buy niccas buy

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #40 on:** April 23, 2009, 02:11:21 PM »

yeah dude it would be so much better with red dot sights and flash grenades huh

BEGONE

I may do something with this on the borecast

ManaByte · « **Reply #41 on:** April 23, 2009, 02:21:20 PM »

$10. This is better.

Eric P · « **Reply #42 on:** April 23, 2009, 02:43:08 PM »

Quote from: Eel O'Brian on April 23, 2009, 01:59:29 PM

http://kotaku.com/5224390/battlefield-1943-drops-in-june

360 & PS3, pc version in september

buy niccas buy

pc version in september makes me worry

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #43 on:** April 23, 2009, 04:17:34 PM »

Quote from: ManaByte on April 23, 2009, 02:21:20 PM

(Image removed from quote.)

$10. This is better.

1942 borked on Vista, only people left playing are so good they would insta-rape anyone trying to play

Quote from: Eric P on April 23, 2009, 02:43:08 PM

Quote from: Eel O'Brian on April 23, 2009, 01:59:29 PM
http://kotaku.com/5224390/battlefield-1943-drops-in-june

360 & PS3, pc version in september

buy niccas buy

pc version in september makes me worry

according to what i've read they're being cagey, but hinting at more players and refined pc controls

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #44 on:** April 23, 2009, 05:42:12 PM »

new wake island trailer

http://www.viddler.com/explore/Joystiq/videos/799/

brawndolicious · « **Reply #45 on:** April 23, 2009, 07:37:14 PM »

Console players used the support classes in BF: BC so I don't get why they removed them. There's no need to have teamwork anymore so it might not feel like a BF game. I will have to wait and see.

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #46 on:** April 24, 2009, 11:03:56 PM »

Quote from: Eric P on April 23, 2009, 02:43:08 PM

Quote from: Eel O'Brian on April 23, 2009, 01:59:29 PM
http://kotaku.com/5224390/battlefield-1943-drops-in-june

360 & PS3, pc version in september

buy niccas buy

pc version in september makes me worry

From an email I got today:

Q: Why are we releasing the PC version of Battlefield 1943 in September?

A: The PC is built around the core game and that development process takes a bit longer. We want to ensure a true PC experience and that includes additional features support and gameplay that are not utilized for the console. – Gordon Van Dyke, BF1943 Producer

News:

Author Topic: Battlefield 1943 - out in June, $15 (Read 4439 times)