Author Topic: i just got several messages from reasonably cute women in my inbox ... (Read 2515 times)

recursivelyenumerable · « **on:** May 04, 2009, 04:29:15 PM »

and I'm NOT HAPPY

because what's NOT in my inbox is a reply from Dmitry Streblechenko solving my Redemption issues :'(

Eric P · « **Reply #1 on:** May 04, 2009, 04:30:11 PM »

oh your tragic life

Diunx · « **Reply #2 on:** May 04, 2009, 04:32:55 PM »

Thats our recursive!

Ganhyun · « **Reply #3 on:** May 04, 2009, 04:34:31 PM »

you should ask one of the women out.

recursivelyenumerable · « **Reply #4 on:** May 04, 2009, 04:39:06 PM »

for me there is no "out", for I have been sentenced to eternal torment within the four walls of my office, courtesy of Outlook and its infernal MAPI protocols

Human Snorenado · « **Reply #5 on:** May 04, 2009, 04:40:06 PM »

Well in that case the least you can do is send cock pics.

recursivelyenumerable · « **Reply #6 on:** May 04, 2009, 06:15:24 PM »

dmitryyyyyyy

why have you forsaken me :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

Loki · « **Reply #7 on:** May 04, 2009, 06:25:38 PM »

Recursively, I just realized that you look kinda like the guy who plays Scarecrow in the new Batman movies.

recursivelyenumerable · « **Reply #8 on:** May 04, 2009, 06:30:43 PM »

Nah, I make a point of keeping my standards quite low when it comes other people's looks. Postel's Law and all.

Eric P · « **Reply #9 on:** May 04, 2009, 06:33:39 PM »

ah yes, that the stamps you have will inevitably be worthless by the time you actually need to use them to mail something

i think it was Postel's law which lead to the creation of the USPS's Forever stamps

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #10 on:** May 04, 2009, 06:40:10 PM »

recursivelyenumerable, I want to fight you.

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #11 on:** May 04, 2009, 06:45:29 PM »

Quote from: Kosma on May 04, 2009, 06:42:35 PM

Quote from: Malek on May 04, 2009, 06:40:10 PM
recursivelyenumerable, I want to fight you.

bare chested. Cloudwalking, Cyanista and Jinfash can join.

No girls

sorry jin

Cyanista · « **Reply #12 on:** May 04, 2009, 07:54:19 PM »

LOL. It is not ok to look like Cillian Murphy, quasi-dreamy though he is.

recursivelyenumerable · « **Reply #13 on:** May 04, 2009, 08:08:19 PM »

I have no idea how to interpret that post, but I approve of the woman with the hat

... er, wait a minute now ...

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #14 on:** May 04, 2009, 08:10:15 PM »

Cyanista · « **Reply #15 on:** May 04, 2009, 08:15:58 PM »

He's a prettier woman than I am.

Madrun Badrun · « **Reply #16 on:** May 04, 2009, 09:36:25 PM »

Brehvolution · « **Reply #17 on:** May 04, 2009, 11:48:22 PM »

If I had recursive's hair I would be hitting on everything female. It's your ace in the hole.

The Sceneman · « **Reply #18 on:** May 05, 2009, 02:37:31 AM »

have you ever needed pussy so bad you'd be willing to pork the fattest, ugliest babe available?

thats me

Eric P · « **Reply #19 on:** May 05, 2009, 09:51:03 AM »

you're not that fat and ugly

pilonv1 · « **Reply #20 on:** May 05, 2009, 10:21:31 AM »

pics pls

recursivelyenumerable · « **Reply #21 on:** May 05, 2009, 02:36:18 PM »

DMITRY RESPONDED AND IS GOING TO SEND ME A BETA OF THE NEXT VERSION WHICH SHOULD SOLVE MY PROBLEMS!!!

Bildi · « **Reply #22 on:** May 06, 2009, 07:41:20 PM »

Quote from: Zero Hero on May 04, 2009, 11:48:22 PM

If I had recursive's hair I would be hitting on everything female. It's your ace in the hole.

The blue eyes too. He's the Total Package.

Quote from: Scenester on May 05, 2009, 02:37:31 AM

have you ever needed pussy so bad you'd be willing to pork the fattest, ugliest babe available?

thats me

Scenester on his death bed and still getting his end in.

But I just can't do that at all. Multi-year stints without any is the result. $:-\$

DJ_Tet · « **Reply #23 on:** May 07, 2009, 12:15:33 PM »

Damn, I knew Cillian would make a hot woman. He's got cheekbones that go on for days

Saint Cornelius · « **Reply #24 on:** May 07, 2009, 12:18:49 PM »

Seriously I had already rubbed one out entirely when I realized it was a trap.

Cyanista · « **Reply #25 on:** May 07, 2009, 03:28:47 PM »

That was one of the weirdest movies I've ever seen, no doubt. They bill it as a comedy. I would call it a disturbing ride on a gay rollercoaster.

DJ_Tet · « **Reply #26 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:02:05 PM »

woah, some man-hands going on in that last pic

Saint Cornelius · « **Reply #27 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:14:20 PM »

No worse than Brooke Shields. -headbutt from Kiefer-

T234 · « **Reply #28 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:30:52 PM »

Quote from: recursivelyenumerable on May 04, 2009, 04:29:15 PM

and I'm NOT HAPPY

because what's NOT in my inbox is a reply from Dmitry Streblechenko solving my Redemption issues :'(

WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM

IF I LOOKED LIKE YOU I WOULDN'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH CHICKS AT ALL, AS IT STANDS I AM A MISERABLE PRICK WHO WISHES TO DIE

I LOOK LIKE AN OGRE WHEN I HAVE HAIR, AND A RUSSIAN POLITICIAN WITHOUT MONEY OR POWER WHEN I DON'T

MAKES IT REAL HARD TO PICK UP CHICKS

SO YOU HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF ACNE SCARS, SO WHAT

AT LEAST TALK TO THESE CHICKS YOU GODDAMNED SON OF A BITCH

Tauntaun · « **Reply #29 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:31:40 PM »

Ugh, T234 stop posting in ultra mega caps plz.

T234 · « **Reply #30 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:34:00 PM »

Sorry boo

Ganhyun · « **Reply #31 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:37:51 PM »

wow, glad you got that off your chest

T234 · « **Reply #32 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:40:40 PM »

Sometimes, you just gotta give 'em real talk.

Ganhyun · « **Reply #33 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:42:29 PM »

Quote from: T234 on May 07, 2009, 04:40:40 PM

Sometimes, you just gotta give 'em real talk.

truth

recursivelyenumerable · « **Reply #34 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:50:58 PM »

lulz. i'm a bit too busy with work and other stuff to pick up chix atm. maybe once my apartment is all pimped out with IKEA swag.

Saint Cornelius · « **Reply #35 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:06:27 PM »

Don't you watch Breaking Bad? All you need are some lawn chairs, a mattress, a wall-mounted flatscreen (with satellite) and a bong and you're straight!

recursivelyenumerable · « **Reply #36 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:09:24 PM »

right now I just have matress on the floor.

Saint Cornelius · « **Reply #37 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:11:32 PM »

1/4th of the way there my man!

T234 · « **Reply #38 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:12:09 PM »

Saint Cornelius · « **Reply #39 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:13:35 PM »

jesus I have no idea what is going on in Magic nowadays

Ganhyun · « **Reply #40 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:15:20 PM »

Quote from: Saint Cornelius on May 07, 2009, 05:13:35 PM

jesus I have no idea what is going on in Magic nowadays

LEgend rule: There can only be one of a legend card on the board. IF someone plays a copy of a legend later on, it replaces the first legend I believe. This card basically lets you have multiple copies out.

Saint Cornelius · « **Reply #41 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:19:52 PM »

Ah, I see. Thanks Ganhyun

tehjaybo · « **Reply #42 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:22:32 PM »

No, the second one that comes into play triggers both being removed from play and placed into the discard pile. They aren't "destroyed", so indestructable doesn't apply, they just go bye-bye.

Ganhyun · « **Reply #43 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:25:39 PM »

Quote from: Saint Cornelius on May 07, 2009, 05:19:52 PM

Ah, I see. Thanks Ganhyun

no biggie. Its a fairly recent rule addition they added due to people playing decks stacked with certain legend cards.

tehjaybo · « **Reply #44 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:43:58 PM »

Quote from: Ganhyun on May 07, 2009, 05:25:39 PM

Quote from: Saint Cornelius on May 07, 2009, 05:19:52 PM
Ah, I see. Thanks Ganhyun

no biggie. Its a fairly recent rule addition they added due to people playing decks stacked with certain legend cards.

That depends on how long you've been playing. The Legend rule has been around since 2005 it looks like.

Ganhyun · « **Reply #45 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:51:50 PM »

Quote from: tehjaybo on May 07, 2009, 05:43:58 PM

Quote from: Ganhyun on May 07, 2009, 05:25:39 PM
Quote from: Saint Cornelius on May 07, 2009, 05:19:52 PM
Ah, I see. Thanks Ganhyun

no biggie. Its a fairly recent rule addition they added due to people playing decks stacked with certain legend cards.

That depends on how long you've been playing. The Legend rule has been around since 2005 it looks like.

thus for me, fairly recent

Maybe notsomuch for others.

Diunx · « **Reply #46 on:** May 07, 2009, 06:23:20 PM »

GO TO YOUR MAGIC THREAD NERDS!!!!!!!

Bildi · « **Reply #47 on:** May 07, 2009, 10:57:34 PM »

Just when you think a thread can't get any more lame.

Ganhyun · « **Reply #48 on:** May 08, 2009, 10:43:53 AM »

Quote from: Bildi on May 07, 2009, 10:57:34 PM

Just when you think a thread can't get any more lame.

News:

Author Topic: i just got several messages from reasonably cute women in my inbox ... (Read 2515 times)