border, it's not just unrealistic, it's pretentious. Huge difference. I don't want to hear about your favorite indie rock band and I don't want to hear your social commentary on why today's youth is so apathetic. As Maurice said, more teenagers and college coeds are worried about getting laid and playing Call of Duty, not discussing their iPod playlist that resembles "Best Of Pitchfork".
And comparing someone to Joss Whedon or Kevin Williamson isn't really something to celebrate about. Both wrote, arguably, one good thing and have been trying to milk the formula for decades.
Sam Raimi didn't have to play it safe, his production company pretty much financed the whole film. He actually chose the PG-13 rating simply because there wasn't enough added "oomph" (reportedly the difference in the footage is seconds) to justify limiting the financial return. Ghost House has enough of a war chest that if he wanted to make a hard R-rated film, he could.
The marketplace still loves red band content - almost all of the bigger returns in the genre have been R-rated. An R-rated slasher flick is nothing new or exciting in current industry; I think I've seen maybe two or three R-rated horror films in theaters this year alone.
This looks like The Faculty meets Mean Girls.