Author Topic: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood  (Read 1084 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Eel O'Brian

  • Southern Permasexual
  • Senior Member
Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« on: July 28, 2009, 12:34:11 AM »
this game has the worst cover system of any game i have ever played, the shooting is awful, and within the first fifteen minutes i had to go through a bunch of corridors (trenches) as well as two (TWO!) of those fuckawful fps scenarios where you're stuck behind a mounted weapon mowing down enemies in a conga line

the enemies also spam dynamite at you like enemies in a COD game throw grenades

the graphics are nice, and the bullet time quick draw thing is okay, but the rest of it has a poo-like consistency

bad game, about on par with that history channel civil war game from a couple of years ago

don't believe the reviews, save your dollars or your rental slot

going to bed early would have been a more productive use of my time
sup

Bildi

  • AKA Bildo
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2009, 02:01:01 AM »
Did you play the first and if so how did it compare?

I was hoping this would be OK as I liked the first aside from some glaring flaws (like frustrating platforming).

Cravis

  • Member
Re: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2009, 12:32:43 PM »
Did you play the first and if so how did it compare?

I was hoping this would be OK as I liked the first aside from some glaring flaws (like frustrating platforming).
I liked the first too. From what I've played of Bound in Blood (up to the third mission) I find it a lot more enjoyable. The only disappointment is that I haven't run into any of the larger areas. Everything is confined and when on horseback you're on a strict path. It's still really good. Thankfully there's been no platforming parts. God I hated those. They actually made me quit the game and never finish it.

Fragamemnon

  • Excel 2008 GOTY
  • Icon
Re: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2009, 12:45:39 PM »
Do what I do whenever I want an fun singleplayer FPS fix and just replay call of duty 2 again, Eel. Cheaper too!
hex

Eel O'Brian

  • Southern Permasexual
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2009, 03:28:04 PM »
i didn't buy it, it was a gamefly rental

i can see where some folks might dig it, but it just did not click for me at all

but you are right, COD2 is always a fun replay

bildi, i honestly can't remember whether i played the first COJ or not :lol

if i did, i guess i didn't get very far
sup

dark1x

  • Member
Re: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2009, 06:39:00 PM »
The first part of the game DOES suck as it's basically CoD-lite (and I hate CoD).

I thought it picked up a whole lot after that, however.

I didn't pay for it, however, so it makes it easier to handle.  ;)

Bildi

  • AKA Bildo
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2009, 07:04:40 PM »
I liked the first too. From what I've played of Bound in Blood (up to the third mission) I find it a lot more enjoyable. The only disappointment is that I haven't run into any of the larger areas. Everything is confined and when on horseback you're on a strict path. It's still really good. Thankfully there's been no platforming parts. God I hated those. They actually made me quit the game and never finish it.

I ground through a few of those platforming parts where I would die again and again.  They're the reason I put it down as well.  I might pick this up cheap sometime.

bildi, i honestly can't remember whether i played the first COJ or not :lol

if i did, i guess i didn't get very far

:lol  Clearly made a great impression if you did.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2009, 12:05:50 PM »
Played the demo of the first one, have rarely been that bored or disappointed in a game.

I like GUN, loved Red Dead Revolver. I'll buy RDR2 (not R2D2) when it comes out. Not this.

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« Reply #8 on: August 02, 2009, 09:48:23 PM »
The first game was great, outside of the platforming.  The best aspect of it was really the story though.  The shooting gets a little repetitive and the sneaking was pretty much trial and error.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« Reply #9 on: August 03, 2009, 02:57:07 AM »
The first game was great, outside of the platforming.  The best aspect of it was really the story though.  The shooting gets a little repetitive and the sneaking was pretty much trial and error.

There's a word for a kind of media which is like a game but the gameplay could be dropped, and the piece can just get along on story alone: movie.

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
« Reply #10 on: August 03, 2009, 05:36:28 AM »
The parts where you're just roaming around the countryside are where all the bad gameplay sort of aggregated.  Linear tunnels/trails with occasional pockets of enemies that you come up on every now and then.

The game comes together when you're going on a shooting spree through the cities.  Spreading some gospel and stealing from hookers while unloading your revolvers.  Awesome.