Author Topic: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY  (Read 6037 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #60 on: October 02, 2009, 07:28:55 PM »
yep
püp

MyNameIsMethodis

  • QUIT
  • Ebola Carrier
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #61 on: October 02, 2009, 07:32:08 PM »
You forgot Hysteria
USA

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #62 on: October 02, 2009, 07:36:39 PM »
That's a bad example.  Linkin Park is pattern-based down to a formula, which is a problem with their reliance on a gimmick.  Muse has just been recreating Paranoid Android for the last decade, but they're not formulaic in how they go about doing it (lyrics aside).  To their credit, lately they've been switching it up a bit, which is nice even if the results haven't been any good.
obo

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #63 on: October 02, 2009, 07:52:14 PM »
I wish I could be bothered to argue for Muse, but their new album killed any chance for that.
AMC

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #64 on: October 02, 2009, 07:55:27 PM »
That's a bad example.  Linkin Park is pattern-based down to a formula, which is a problem with their reliance on a gimmick.  Muse has just been recreating Paranoid Android for the last decade, but they're not formulaic in how they go about doing it (lyrics aside).  To their credit, lately they've been switching it up a bit, which is nice even if the results haven't been any good.

The only Muse song with a structure remotely similar to Paranoid Android is Citizen Erased, and the chord palettes are nothing alike.

That's not what I was getting at.
obo

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #65 on: October 02, 2009, 08:02:32 PM »
I agree, but I also don't give a shit about Pitchfork. And it's not like this is a surprise. They don't exact give glowing reviews to Muse albums.
AMC

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #66 on: October 03, 2009, 02:39:33 AM »
Still waiting for one example of great Muse songwriting. Perhaps I was being too outrageous with the LK comparison. But even their best songs still sound like run of the mill hard rock songs
010

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #67 on: October 03, 2009, 03:57:15 AM »
I saw them on the same tour, GS. So awesome. I went with 6 other people to MSG, and they all loved it too -- even the couple of people who had never really listened to them before.
AMC

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #68 on: October 03, 2009, 04:10:21 AM »
I remember that version of Sunburn. I was only really disappointed about no Citizen Erased. :(
AMC

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #69 on: October 03, 2009, 09:52:18 AM »
get a room, you two
pcp

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #70 on: October 03, 2009, 12:50:24 PM »
The new Muse record sounds a lot like Queen. A lot. To the point where there's no reason to listen to it when you can just listen to an actual Queen record. :drake
Hi

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #71 on: October 03, 2009, 02:12:15 PM »
Still waiting for one example of great Muse songwriting. Perhaps I was being too outrageous with the LK comparison. But even their best songs still sound like run of the mill hard rock songs

What do you consider good songwriting? If you're talking about lyrics and poetic, Bob Dylan stuff with a strong message, then no, they aren't good songwriters. But they're brilliant instrumentally on OoS. And I'm not talking about boring Malmsteen-esque shredding; what I'm saying that the stuff they play on their instruments sounds really fucking good (to me). The riffs are intricate and hard-rocking, and they sound original. The different sections of the songs all work really well together. The melodies are good.

But you know, I could just be biased since I saw them live in 2007 and they completely blew me away.

A band that has nice songwriting without having particularly complex instrumental work is Nirvana. Cobain wasn't nearly as good of a guitarist as Cantrell, Cornell, Thayil, etc but he wrote better songs.

Jack White is a good song writer imo
010

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #72 on: October 03, 2009, 02:46:03 PM »
:bow Jack White :bow2
püp

Re: Pitchfork top 200 albums of the 2000s thread of IMPACT>QUALITY
« Reply #73 on: October 03, 2009, 03:27:34 PM »
Pains of being Pure at Heart :-*
The XX  :-*
Bat for Lashes :-*

That's my pitchfork friendly list for the year

The XX album is fantastic.

Yet again, Cohen rocks.
野球