Author Topic: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS  (Read 3923 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tauntaun

  • I'm cute, you should be too.
  • Senior Member
Re: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS
« Reply #60 on: November 03, 2009, 01:12:27 PM »
He's just typing passionately. :-*

my nmotto ew.

Please tell me this is an on purpose typo.  :lol
:)

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS
« Reply #61 on: November 05, 2009, 12:56:01 AM »
How can any muslim be mad about this movie?
It's pretty clear by now that they're not showing hsi actual face.

But I'm seriously wondering how the hell this movie is going to please both shias and sunnis when it comes to the whole successor issue.  Or they could just avoid that and a bunch of infidels are going to think that mohammad didn't think ahead or something.  It's going to be so much fun to watch what happens.

Oh and if you want some historical perspective willco....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Commandments

It's pretty black and white in the second commandment and in the bible that it is at the least highly discouraged to make physical representations of holy figures.  Maybe the catholic church bent that rule like a pretzel just to convert over some pagans who were on the fence?

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member

Oblivion

  • Senior Member
Re: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS
« Reply #63 on: November 05, 2009, 04:25:35 AM »
Meh, I'm more interested in the sequel, Muhammed 2: The Shiite Hits the Fan.

Yeti

  • Hail Hydra
  • Senior Member
Re: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS
« Reply #64 on: November 05, 2009, 10:49:41 AM »


This is how they should get around depicting him.
WDW

FlameOfCallandor

  • The Walking Dead
Re: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS
« Reply #65 on: November 05, 2009, 10:54:35 AM »
 :lol :lol

That would be awesome.

Tauntaun

  • I'm cute, you should be too.
  • Senior Member
Re: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS
« Reply #66 on: November 05, 2009, 11:00:44 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)

This is how they should get around depicting him.

:lol
:)

FlameOfCallandor

  • The Walking Dead
Re: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS
« Reply #67 on: November 05, 2009, 12:44:22 PM »
I thought this was relevant.
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/11/04/daily-gut-where-are-roland-emmerichs-balls/
Quote
So Roland Emmerich’s new movie is called “2012,” but it should be titled “Dude, Where’s my Balls.”
In the flick, the director enlists every CGI trick in the book to destroy various religious icons– including the Sistine Chapel, St. Peter’s Basilica and the Christ the Redeemer statue. And for those of you who worship at the altar of Obama, the White House gets nailed as well.
But there was one thing missing among the carnage: an Islamic target.

According to Sci Fi Wire, by way of Cinematical.com, this was no accident. In an interview, the  director said he hoped to destroy the Kaaba, an Islamic holy site, but his fellow screenwriter Harald Kloser persuaded him not to.
Here’s what the hack had to say about crushing the Kaaba:
“Well, I wanted to do that… but my co-writer Harald said I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie. And he was right. … We have to all … in the Western world … think about this. You can actually … let … Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have … a fatwa, and that sounds a little bit like what the state of this world is. So it’s just something which I kind of didn’t [think] was [an] important element anyway in the film, so I kind of left it out.”

And so, he echoes what I said nearly two years ago on this show: Hollywood screws with Christians because Christians don’t behead people. But tweak Islam, and you could end up like director Theo van Gogh – dead on a street with a flag impaled on your chest. Roland picks the safe target because he’d rather live, and by “live,” I mean “beat our brains to death with yet more effects-laden dreck.” As my guinea pig, Captain Whiskers might say, “All hail the dependable cowardice of our film industry!”
He might say that, if he could talk.

Anyway, the difference between good and evil is pretty clear. Good people might annoy you about having prayer in schools; evil people throw acid in girls’ faces if they wish to go to school. Trashing the former, while ignoring the latter – proves that Roland has the gonads of a shrimp.
(Note: I haven’t actually seen gonads on a shrimp, but I imagine they’re really small.)
And if you disagree with me, then you’re probably a racist.

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS
« Reply #68 on: November 05, 2009, 01:24:21 PM »
I think the Muslims have the right idea there. Maybe if we all put a fatwa on Roland Emmerich's head, he'll stop making shitty movies.
PSP

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS
« Reply #69 on: November 05, 2009, 01:30:47 PM »
I think the Muslims have the right idea there. Maybe if we all put a fatwa on Roland Emmerich's head, he'll stop making shitty movies.

I can support this.
dog

Tieno

  • Iconz
  • Senior Member
Re: MUHAMMAD biopic not going to feature MUHAMMAD LAWL MUSLIMS
« Reply #70 on: November 05, 2009, 01:47:54 PM »
Fucking crazy, I do love your islam teachings Jinfash. Always learn something new.
i