360 isn't anywhere near the PS2.
The PS2 had dat quality and in a nice quantity too. Every genre was represented well. It was a rare moment where every relevant third party produced their flagship wares on it. It was the only time we'd probably ever experience a one console generation along with the NES. The Xbox had some decent titles but they were mostly FPS. Frat gamers saved the Xbox from total irrelevancy. The GC is pretty lol, Nintendo was at their worst here, thinking that in a time where nobody gave a fuck about them that it was ok to start tinkering with their flagship franchises by saddling them with unnecessary and cumbersome gimmicks.
Being the last major j-game system is not a big deal at all. Most western games suck, aping D&D fantasy or sci-fi bullshit, neither of which tickle my pickle. Although I do want to get around to finally playing Fallout 3. It seems like one of the rare moments where a western RPG isn't a total fanwank. I still like my j-games and wish developers didn't want to just dump a bunch of SNES or first or second year era PS One shit on the DS instead. I doubt Blue Dragon or Lost Odyssey did that terrible and if they want more sales, they could just release it on both PS3 and 360. Oh wellz.
360 does have a much better online system than the PS2. The achievements and xbox live community is probably responsible for the high software:hardware ratio. It is a great system that keeps gamers from putting the 360 in the closet like the Wii and keeps them wanting to play the latest and greatest. It is also obvious that people are willing to pay money for Live, something dumbfuck Sfags assumed would be a fatal flaw for Live. Then again Sfags thought that Killzone 2 was going to sell gangbusters but a couple months later, it was getting outsold by low budget fitness games lol.
If people suggest the PS3 is better than the PS2, they're a mongoloid. If you think the Wii is better than the PS2, it is time to become an hero.
