Speaking purely as an observer: My faith in you, the people of america, couldn't be lower. So I still think you fuck this up somehow
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Word broke last month that Mel Gibson had Vikings on his mind, and was planning a Norse-themed project that would star Leonardo DiCaprio. Now, at an Edge of Darkness press conference, Gibbo has let slip a few more details. From anyone else, they'd sound mental. But from the director of The Passion of the Christ (spoken languages Aramaic, Latin and Hebrew) and Apocalypto (Yucatec Mayan), they're really no surprise at all."I think it's going to be in the English that would have been spoken back then, and Old Norse," says Gibson. "Whatever the 9th century had to offer. I'm going to give you real."Gibson says that the "big, wacky, epic" Vikings idea is one of the first he ever had, when he was a sixteen year old dreaming of being a filmmaker. He didn't reveal anything about the potential plot (or what he was doing recently scouting locations in Vera Cruz), but he's perfectly clear about the approach he's taking. "I want a viking to scare you," he explains. "I want to see somebody who I have never seen before speaking low, guttural German and scaring the living shit out of me. What would that have been like?"We can't wait to find out. William Monahan (The Departed) is writing the script, and variety reported before Christmas that shooting is pencilled in for the autumn of this year.And note "somebody I've never seen before". Unknowns for the Vikings then, putting Leo in the Old English camp. Looks like he's got some linguistics homework beckoning. Hwæt!
This has probably been done before. Besides, it just drives in that bullshit stereotype that vikings were simple barbarians. They actually made pretty imressive societies and economies.Realistically, this is probably going to just be as historically accurate as Braveheart.
When the fuck is somebody going to make my Chinggis Khaan epic? No Mongol was factually inaccurate that Jamuka guy was pretty badass.
But I really can't see audiences accepting that in the same universe as Iron Man and the Hulk, there exists the spirit of this Norse god that possesses some guy. It passes out of the realm of "slightly nerdy but still pretty mainstream" into "total nerdfest." But hey, I could be wrong.
You really think Thor is going to fly with mainstream audiences the same way Iron Man, Spiderman and The Hulk did?
Quote from: Green Shinobi on January 19, 2010, 02:23:45 AMYou really think Thor is going to fly with mainstream audiences the same way Iron Man, Spiderman and The Hulk did? The movie is in really, really, good hands. Probably the best director they have had for any comic movie yet.
Who gives a flying fuck about accuracy in an action movie epic?I want to see people get their shit ruined with an axe, villages pillaged and decimated, and titties.
Sounds very, very good but DiCaprio as a savage Viking?Gibson please.
This movie will definitely end with the Vikings being at least introduced to Christianity.
Have you guys seen this?QuoteFor years, One-Eye, a mute warrior of supernatural strenght, has been held prisoner by the chieftain Barde. Aided by a boy, Are, he kills his captor and together they escape, beginning a journey into the heart of darkness. On their flight, One-Eye and Are board a Viking vessel but the ship is soon engulfed by an endless fog that first disintegrates as they sight an unknown land. As the new land reveals its secrets and the Vikings meet a ghastly fate, One-Eye discovers his true self. [youtube=560,345][/youtube]
For years, One-Eye, a mute warrior of supernatural strenght, has been held prisoner by the chieftain Barde. Aided by a boy, Are, he kills his captor and together they escape, beginning a journey into the heart of darkness. On their flight, One-Eye and Are board a Viking vessel but the ship is soon engulfed by an endless fog that first disintegrates as they sight an unknown land. As the new land reveals its secrets and the Vikings meet a ghastly fate, One-Eye discovers his true self.
I found Apocalypto insulting. What did you like about it?
Quote from: The Business on January 19, 2010, 10:10:10 PMI found Apocalypto insulting. What did you like about it? What didn't you like about it?
Who gives a flying fuck about accuracy in an action movie epic?
Quote from: T EXP on January 19, 2010, 07:31:14 AMWho gives a flying fuck about accuracy in an action movie epic?It just looks bad on him when he promises to give you the most realistic, uncensored look at life back then and then makes something like Braveheart. I haven't seen Passion of the Christ but I'd bet it also had a tiny bit of exaggeration. Just possibly.I wouldn't be surprised if we end up seeing nothing but a bunch of raping/pillaging vikings in their ceremonial horned helmets while shouting in some scary dialect that is only understandable with cheesy subtitles. That would all be awesome if Mel wasn't promising something totally different.
"I want a viking to scare you," he explains. "I want to see somebody who I have never seen before speaking low, guttural German and scaring the living shit out of me. What would that have been like?"
DiCaprio won't scare anybody
What was so wrong with apocalypto? that shit was awesome.
Malek Credo: Fuck chicks, get plaid