Author Topic: The Walking Dead  (Read 14375 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
The Walking Dead
« on: October 31, 2010, 10:06:12 PM »
First episode's on right now, AMC's not skimping on the violence apparently.
dog

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2010, 10:28:08 PM »
Saw it like a week ago :pirate
Drunk

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2010, 10:31:32 PM »
Saw it like a week ago :pirate

Nobody cares about you and your piracy.

Show's awesome so far, by the way.
dog

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2010, 10:33:21 PM »
excited to watch rerun after East Bound and Down

sleep and being rested for classes tomorrow :piss2

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2010, 11:00:03 PM »
Can't believe I'm getting all misty-eyed over a show about zombies.  :'(
dog

Tauntaun

  • I'm cute, you should be too.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2010, 11:07:07 PM »
YES!  I am so excited for this series.  :rock
:)

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2010, 11:18:41 PM »
I just picked up the Omnibus of the comic to this before I sit and watch the pilot. What a ridiculously involved book. I can't believe a book about zombies can tug at my emotions so strongly, not to mention this is the second book about zombies to do so, the first being World War Z.

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2010, 11:20:55 PM »
fuckin time warner cable sucks. my AMC and USA both frequently cut out and sometimes simply dont come in - today being the latter.  >:(
nat

MyNameIsMethodis

  • QUIT
  • Ebola Carrier
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2010, 11:44:22 PM »
It was alright, nothing spectacular. Book doesn't really pick up for a while anyways.


BIG SPOILERS
spoiler (click to show/hide)
when shane dies it gets better
[close]
USA

MyNameIsMethodis

  • QUIT
  • Ebola Carrier
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2010, 11:44:34 PM »
By the way, those are BIG SERIES SPOILERS
USA

Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2010, 12:06:27 AM »
Hmm, not a bad episode. Going to wait to see how the characters develop before I pick out which of them to hate/love/not care about.

I don't like the developing love triangle conflict. Why did they have to inject it here? Another thing I would have preferred are the running zombies as opposed to the lumbering ones, but I suppose it costs more to hire fit zombies.

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2010, 12:08:57 AM »
Hmm, not a bad episode. Going to wait to see how the characters develop before I pick out which of them to hate/love/not care about.

I don't like the developing love triangle conflict. Why did they have to inject it here? Another thing I would have preferred are the running zombies as opposed to the lumbering ones, but I suppose it costs more to hire fit zombies.


They don't run in the comic.

Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2010, 12:20:47 AM »
Hmm, not a bad episode. Going to wait to see how the characters develop before I pick out which of them to hate/love/not care about.

I don't like the developing love triangle conflict. Why did they have to inject it here? Another thing I would have preferred are the running zombies as opposed to the lumbering ones, but I suppose it costs more to hire fit zombies.


They don't run in the comic.

Oh, I wasn't aware that it was based on a comic book series. Well, since I'm a big proponent of honest book-to-movie translations, I'll let it go.

Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #13 on: November 01, 2010, 12:38:20 AM »
Great pilot.

I love the fact that even though you can outrun them, these slow creatures manage to overwhelm you with their numbers. That's scary.

Giving them the ability to run ruins that.
野球

Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2010, 12:42:02 AM »
Second the motion on lumbering zombies.  Fuckers will sneak right up on your ass.  Besides, they're not entirely slow and have that Romero-esque bloodcraze speed when the shit hits the fan.

Pilot was awesome though.  Perfect way to end Halloween.
haa

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #15 on: November 01, 2010, 01:02:35 AM »
first episode was really great

and agreed on the slow zombies.  When they run, you lose those great scenes when the person questions whether they use the last bullet for their own head as these slow monsters stumble towards them.

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #16 on: November 01, 2010, 01:56:10 AM »
Hmm, not a bad episode. Going to wait to see how the characters develop before I pick out which of them to hate/love/not care about.

I don't like the developing love triangle conflict. Why did they have to inject it here? Another thing I would have preferred are the running zombies as opposed to the lumbering ones, but I suppose it costs more to hire fit zombies.


They don't run in the comic.

Oh, I wasn't aware that it was based on a comic book series. Well, since I'm a big proponent of honest book-to-movie translations, I'll let it go.

Here's a collection of twitter feed items about the rules regarding Zombies (stolen from GAF)...

Quote
Zombie Rule #1: Ability to run is based on the amount of time a zombie has been undead, and how much decay has set in.

Zombie Rule #2: Zombies decay but at a much slower rate than humans, and it’s still possible to differentiate between young and old zombies.

Zombie Rule #3: Zombies are like lions: if they’ve eaten, you can walk by them without fear, but a pack of hungry zombies will attack you.

Zombie Rule #4: The quickest speed of any zombie is a shambling run. see Night of the Living Dead. NO sprinters exist.

Zombie Rule #5: Zombies are not dexterous. They cannot pick up or use any items more complex than a rock or a stick.

Zombie Rule #6: Zombies have poor eyesight but they do have a strong sense of smell.

Zombie Rule #7: Zombies cannot speak but can communicate by pack mentality. The herd tends to move together if they sight food.

Zombie Rule #8: There is no overt recognition of people or places, there is a sense of familiarity that can dictate where a zombie moves.

Zombie Rule #9: There’s no known cause of the zombie mutation, but it’s suspected to be a virus or infection.
:9

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #17 on: November 01, 2010, 04:18:00 AM »
Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.

tehjaybo

  • Kentucky-Bore's Last Hope
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #18 on: November 01, 2010, 07:27:36 AM »
Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.

I think pretty much the exact opposite of this.  I liked it a lot, thought it followed the first issue of the graphic novel well.  But the sfx were cheesy.  Kinda to be expected.  I still give it two thumbs up.
HURR

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #19 on: November 01, 2010, 08:35:16 AM »
I just picked up the Omnibus of the comic to this before I sit and watch the pilot. What a ridiculously involved book. I can't believe a book about zombies can tug at my emotions so strongly, not to mention this is the second book about zombies to do so, the first being World War Z.
Because zombie movies are really about human relations, more than anything else. It's always about who we become after the shit has hit the fan, and what people are really like when society isn't forcing them into a certain shape. The comic is incredibly moving, because Kirkman gets that.


Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.
You should probably give it an episode or four before judging. Morgan's not a dickhead, he's a guy who is defending his son, trying to figure out what's next. I thought the change in tone is well-explained by him questioning the source of Rick's injury. I think the pilot did a fantastic job of navigating some tricky stuff.

I'll be happy if they can find a way to make Rick's wife more tolerable. In the comic, she's a borderline shrew.

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #20 on: November 01, 2010, 09:50:59 AM »
I really hope they changes they make are more than "lets add some melodramatic backstory to this character" this show will be pretty boring if you know who lives and dies and how.
Drunk

Bloodwake

  • Legend in his own mind
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #21 on: November 01, 2010, 12:19:51 PM »
Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.

tl;dr - ITS NOT THE GRAPHIC NOVEL TELEVISION AND MOVIES SUCK I HATE CREATIVE LIBERTIES AAARGH
HLR

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #22 on: November 01, 2010, 01:29:46 PM »
ugh is that spoiler is true I hope they don't drag that triangle shit for too long.
Drunk

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #23 on: November 01, 2010, 01:43:32 PM »
Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.

tl;dr - ITS NOT THE GRAPHIC NOVEL TELEVISION AND MOVIES SUCK I HATE CREATIVE LIBERTIES AAARGH

Pretty much. My personality isn't cut out for television dramas. I should probably stop giving them chances. Movies are great, don't get me wrong, it's impossible to take a graphic novel and cram it into a 2 hour film without something going wrong, but when you have a television show and a graphic novel, I don't see why things would get lost in translation.

I'm pretty sure I just can't watch television, ever.

MyNameIsMethodis

  • QUIT
  • Ebola Carrier
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #24 on: November 01, 2010, 01:44:30 PM »
Green Man you shoudl prob label those are HUGE SERIES SPOILERS so people don't click those unless they've read the comics
USA

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #25 on: November 01, 2010, 01:51:12 PM »
Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.

tl;dr - ITS NOT THE GRAPHIC NOVEL TELEVISION AND MOVIES SUCK I HATE CREATIVE LIBERTIES AAARGH

Pretty much. My personality isn't cut out for television dramas. I should probably stop giving them chances. Movies are great, don't get me wrong, it's impossible to take a graphic novel and cram it into a 2 hour film without something going wrong, but when you have a television show and a graphic novel, I don't see why things would get lost in translation.

I'm pretty sure I just can't watch television, ever.

Comics have an entirely different flow than movie and TV series, even books.
dog

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #26 on: November 01, 2010, 02:05:24 PM »
From what little I know about plot exposition and writing a story, the pilot explained everything in a much more convoluted, drawn-out fashion compared to how quickly the comic book got the same points across, and with so much more simplicity. Like I said, I just don't get television show construction. I've never liked a live-action television drama, except maybe the first three seasons of House.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #27 on: November 01, 2010, 02:17:20 PM »
The only part I felt that about was the conversation near the beginning between Shane and Andrew, which went on too long. Other than that, I thought it worked fine, but I don't have the comic book for reference.
dog

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #28 on: November 01, 2010, 02:38:39 PM »
I got the comics for Secret Santa last year and loved them, but found that once it gets to the
spoiler (click to show/hide)
prison
[close]
its gets a little wild and loses a bit of the focus as a study on the human condition. It becomes and action drama essentially.

I didn't feel that way until
spoiler (click to show/hide)
The Governor storms the prison on a fucking tank
[close]
when I flipped to that page I literally put the book down and facepalmed.

Just fyi, GIGANTIC plot spoilers in that tag, do not open.

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #29 on: November 01, 2010, 04:00:56 PM »
spoiler (click to show/hide)
I even found Michonne a little too much. The woman was a lawyer and now she's some sort of ninja? That's a huge amount of suspension of disbelief required.
[close]

Her character kind of makes sense though, since
spoiler (click to show/hide)
the author felt it necessary to put the cast into really impossible situations, like the rape and imprisonment, so might as well have an impossible character to fight those dangers away. She is too much. WAY too much. I really didn't like where the book went once they got to Woodbury.
[close]
Shit just got stupider and stupider and like you said, it became more of an action drama. It reminds me a lot of A History Of Violence. The book, obviously.

drew

  • sy
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #30 on: November 01, 2010, 04:43:57 PM »
which came first with the waking up from a coma angle - 28 days later or the walking dead comic and or book?

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #31 on: November 01, 2010, 04:53:33 PM »
which came first with the waking up from a coma angle - 28 days later or the walking dead comic and or book?

28 Days Later

The comic book author says he started writing the comic before that, though.  ::)
AMC

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #32 on: November 01, 2010, 07:07:56 PM »
It's not like it's some genius plot device, it's a pretty obvious one to slowly bring the reader/viewer into the world.

I guess they could've made him into a Korean who stayed in an internet cafe for a month straight and didn't notice the zombie apocalpyse around - but even then he would've wondered why everyone was afk.
___

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #33 on: November 01, 2010, 07:17:37 PM »
:lol

Please. Make that movie.

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #34 on: November 01, 2010, 09:11:41 PM »


tl;dr - ITS NOT THE GRAPHIC NOVEL TELEVISION AND MOVIES SUCK I HATE CREATIVE LIBERTIES AAARGH

my mind was crafting this reply almost to the letter as I was reading his post. i even added the "AAARRGH" at the end in my mind  :lol


the pilot -
loved it. it knew when to stick close to the pages and when to take some liberties. really awesome stuff.

I really do hope the first season is the only one that sticks close to the novel. it would be boring watching this show when you know pretty much where the plot is going to go.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
going up to where Carl kills Shane is a good point to divert itself from the pages and go it's own route. tbh the prison storyline would be kind of boring on screen
[close]
nat

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #35 on: November 01, 2010, 09:16:24 PM »
I really must have a TV-unfriendly brain. You guys are applauding this thing and I couldn't stand it when I was watching it. It has nothing to do with comic book loyalty, I think Scott Pilgrim was better than the books, off the top of my head I can't think of more examples.

I'm far from a comic-book nerd, but whatever. The characters just seemed like any other television drama character transplanted into a zombie apocalypse. There was nothing likable for me. Oh well.

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #36 on: November 01, 2010, 09:23:41 PM »
i think you're giving waaaayy to much credit to the characterization in the book. early on none of the characters where anything more then by the numbers. just like any medium it's over time where they start to develop. did you really like any of the characters when you first read the very first issue of TWD? you may have grown to like Rick or grown to hate him over time but after the very first issue? I doubt it.
nat

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #37 on: November 01, 2010, 09:47:03 PM »
I'm not saying the characterization is fantastic in the comic, far from it, but they're established pretty clearly early on. From the first chapter I already knew what kind of character Rick was, and the way they handeled Morgan in the book was simple and straightforward. I agree, characters should be developed over time, but right in the first 10 minutes of the pilot it's clear Shane is a douche and the writers tried REALLY hard to drive this point home. It was insulting how blunt the exposition was, where in the comic at least there's subtlety and build-up.

Something I love in the book was that the opening scene started right away with action, ended abruptly and threw you into the middle of the situation just as Rick had been. In the show we have a zombie child picking up a stuffed animal, a drawn out, pointless conversation, and a boring, tensionless shootout filled with completely superfluous characters. The exact same information the pilot took 20 minutes to reveal could've been transmitted within a minute, but instead we get endless scenes where absolutely nothing happens.

I'm not trying to sound superior here, but most televisons shows don't impress me because the writing is marketed to the lowest common denominator. Nothing is ever illustrated with any grace or tact, it's all just tied into a bundle and shoved down your throat.

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #38 on: November 01, 2010, 10:14:05 PM »
Do you honestly think anybody who doesn't like zombies will become fans of this show? Pass that joint, brotha.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #39 on: November 01, 2010, 10:18:37 PM »
my wife doesn't like zombie movies but she liked the pilot.  a zombie show has way more potential than a zombie movie because it gives more of a chance of attachment as opposed to movies where it's hard to see past the horror factor.

anyways, i really liked it.  i have the novels but never got around to reading them.  but i don't get how shane is a douche in the show.  he seemed okay to me.  not really good or bad.  *shrug*

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #40 on: November 01, 2010, 10:21:07 PM »
Mupepe you used to be my bro on entertainment, now we're always at odds :fbm

MyNameIsMethodis

  • QUIT
  • Ebola Carrier
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #41 on: November 01, 2010, 10:22:59 PM »
my mom watched this and now I can't watch ita nymore  :fbm
USA

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #42 on: November 01, 2010, 10:25:42 PM »
She won't let you watch it because of the violence?
Drunk

MyNameIsMethodis

  • QUIT
  • Ebola Carrier
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #43 on: November 01, 2010, 10:26:25 PM »
no I can't watch something that my mom finds cool it's not hip
USA

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #44 on: November 01, 2010, 10:28:28 PM »
Mupepe you used to be my bro on entertainment, now we're always at odds :fbm
sorry boo boo.  maybe because i never read the novels.  but i really liked it :fbm

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #45 on: November 01, 2010, 10:37:39 PM »
startselect didn't like the pilot because it took more than one minute to set up the world, introduce the characters, and explain the zombies.
dog

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #46 on: November 01, 2010, 10:38:17 PM »
Don't like zombies?! Why were you a RE freak in middle school?!
IYKYK

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #47 on: November 01, 2010, 10:42:23 PM »
Holy Shit, some whiney bitches here.

If a shot by shot recreation of the graphic novels with them as storyboard is the only thing that will satisfy you, then grab your copies and a flashlight and reread them under the covers.

Let some adults talk about what this show is accomplishing, and maybe some adult discussion about how the contrasts to the original work are necessary and either add or detract to the original story - or maybe just how the changes were necessiated by the medium.

Otherwise, all I see is your soggy vagina is dripping on my shoe.
___

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #48 on: November 01, 2010, 10:49:01 PM »
Is it worth watching the show if u never read the book (as far as the pilot is concerned). This sounds worth sitting down to after a hard day's work.

I hate reading btw. So boring.
fat

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #49 on: November 01, 2010, 10:58:31 PM »
Watch Fringe instead.
Drunk

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #50 on: November 01, 2010, 11:08:21 PM »
Isnt that the LOST clone? No thanks... want to watch something else.
fat

Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #51 on: November 01, 2010, 11:10:25 PM »
Is it worth watching the show if u never read the book (as far as the pilot is concerned). This sounds worth sitting down to after a hard day's work.

I hate reading btw. So boring.

I've never read the comic, and I really enjoyed it. Give it a shot.
野球

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #52 on: November 01, 2010, 11:11:15 PM »
Is it worth watching the show if u never read the book (as far as the pilot is concerned). This sounds worth sitting down to after a hard day's work.

I hate reading btw. So boring.

watch this

leper malek

ban startselect
___

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #53 on: November 01, 2010, 11:12:32 PM »
Aight I'll snag it sometime this week. Is it a weekly airing? Guess I could google that
fat

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #54 on: November 01, 2010, 11:19:54 PM »
Isnt that the LOST clone? No thanks... want to watch something else.

Fringe is nothing like lost, for example lost is shit and Fringe is not there are many more differences but that is pretty much the main one.
Drunk

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #55 on: November 01, 2010, 11:21:10 PM »
That's not what I heard but, you are wrong about lots of things... dont let me ruin your streak

: *
fat

Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #56 on: November 01, 2010, 11:30:56 PM »
Aight I'll snag it sometime this week. Is it a weekly airing? Guess I could google that

Yep. Sundays at 10pm on AMC.
野球

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #57 on: November 01, 2010, 11:46:20 PM »
Holy Shit, some whiney bitches here.

If a shot by shot recreation of the graphic novels with them as storyboard is the only thing that will satisfy you, then grab your copies and a flashlight and reread them under the covers.

Let some adults talk about what this show is accomplishing, and maybe some adult discussion about how the contrasts to the original work are necessary and either add or detract to the original story - or maybe just how the changes were necessiated by the medium.

Otherwise, all I see is your soggy vagina is dripping on my shoe.

Sounds like you're the soggy vagina. I never said I want a shot by shot recreation, I'm not a comic nerd, and I don't give a fuck about staying faithful to a comic book I just fucking read not one day ago.

What I did say is that, for a television drama it's uninteresting pap + zombies, that TV shows' habit of appealing to a mass audience by sacrificing good writing is impossible for me to overcome, and that the introduction of themes and characters within the show, based on that pilot, isn't compelling.

You and too many others throw "adults" around like some badge you're proud of when in most cases the lot of you act more childish than the US government. Talk to me like a goddamn man and tell me why I'm wrong other than having a different opinion than you.

And if you're just trolling, then:
Quote
Let some adults talk about what this show is accomplishing, and maybe some adult discussion about how the contrasts to the original work are necessary and either add or detract to the original story - or maybe just how the changes were necessiated by the medium.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2010, 11:48:45 PM by startselect »

Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #58 on: November 02, 2010, 12:08:31 AM »
The only character I like at this point is the dude w/ son. He showed some real emotion there when he struggled to keep the cross-hairs on his wife. I'm looking forward to seeing him develop.

The cop is obviously the central character, but he isn't anything special.

Everyone in that camp with the cop's wife, including his former partner and the wife herself, sucks. That partner is an asshole. How can you not agree to put warning signs outside of Atlanta, knowing that any other survivor out there would probably unknowingly head that way? Awful leadership on his part, and an asshole move.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2010, 12:11:38 AM by Nintendosbooger »

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Walking Dead
« Reply #59 on: November 02, 2010, 12:41:59 AM »
Don't like zombies?! Why were you a RE freak in middle school?!
huh? i love zombies. never said i didn't