Hey, you know what was a pretty good 3D flick, Drive Angry. Looking at its box office returns, hardly anybody went to see it, but I rather liked it.
I also really liked how the action scenes were for the most part, legible and clearly shot. The same could have been said of the latest Resident Evil, which also had surprisingly well done and not-shitty shaky cam action. And now there's word of
Tsui Hark's latest kung fu opus starring Jet Li which appears to be fantastic.The problem with doing action in 3D is doing it in a way that takes advantage of the depth of field while also being kind to the viewers' eyes. Hark has allowed for this by - twice during the promo - shooting action sequences in confined spaces with the camera rooted in one spot. Rather than constantly shifting and trying to find a focal point, this allows you to simply enjoy the action as it unfolds and moves within the scene - both from side to side and front to back. It's an elegant approach and its looks absolutely amazing. Because this is shot in 3D rather than post converted there is no planing of the different layers, instead the moves in and out of the screen are perfectly smooth and clear. Really impressive.
Simply put, you can't do a Bourne-styled action scene in 3D without it becoming an even more indistinct mess. The trend towards damn near every upcoming tentpole action flick being in 3D might mean filmmakers might actually start framing and shooting action scenes with an eye towards visual clarity rather then a muddled frenzy.
I've not been on board the 3D bandwagon, but if there's a side effect of more frequent visual coherency in any sort of action film then I suppose it could be a necessary evil. Oh, and its also great news that Tsui Hark is now apparently back from his too long trip to Suckville.
What do you guys think?
-----Thesis Statement-----Shaky cam sucks, 3D can't do shaky, 3D forces less dynamic camera moves = better action filmmaking.