Author Topic: Should Nintendo dissolve sell their first parties and franchises or not?  (Read 1118 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Damian79

  • Senior Member
I dunno, i think they should, their business model is too archaic.

*Sony sells their Vita that is a generation ahead at the same battery life as the 3ds at the same price.  What a fuck up.

*They are seriously disadvantaging their developers with their shit consoles.

*They could easily make their money back with low cost consoles with their first party software but they dont, they simply refuse to.

*I really doubt that nintendo would even try to go cloud gaming, so they will be in continuos decline.


They should sell while they are worth something.

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
püp

Damian79

  • Senior Member
What does hat pic mean?

Does it mean "this is in question?" or "You are joking right?"?

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
©@©™

archie4208

  • Senior Member
(Image removed from quote.)

The lower left part of that GIF made me think there was a speck of dirt on my monitor and I tried to wipe it off.  :(

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
They can take their franchises with them for all I care.
Drunk

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Nintendo has more than enough money on-hand to weather this generation and the coming generation even if they drop to third place and actually start losing money. They'd eventually have to turn things around, but a massive drop-off in sales and profits might be incentive enough to do make a stab at that.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Err...I mean, Nintendo sucks!
[close]
dog

Yes, let's have Nintendo do-away with those lucrative and burdensome legacy IPs, and then place the company's fate at the tender mercy of third party developers whom, historically, have done such a wonderful job in the past of supporting Nintendo's consoles with such a steady influx of equally polished and entertaining titles. Your brain, sir, is a goldmine of sound and potentially groundbreaking business ideas.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2011, 01:41:18 AM by Nintendosbooger »

Double post.

Damian79

  • Senior Member
Yes, let's have Nintendo do-away with those lucrative and burdensome legacy IPs, and then place the company's fate at the tender mercy of third party developers whom, historically, have done such a wonderful job in the past of supporting Nintendo's consoles with such a steady influx of equally polished and entertaining titles. Your brain, sir, is a goldmine of sound and potentially groundbreaking business ideas.

Who are you talking to?  I was talking about Nintendo going out of the business.

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Hi


recursivelyenumerable

  • you might think that; I couldn't possibly comment
  • Senior Member
FOR OR AGAINST
QED

naff

  • someday you feed on a tree frog
  • Senior Member
If they left the hardware game but kept their IPs I'd be cool with that. Like Sega. It's kinda annoying having to get a piece of hardware just to play one devs games. Don't really care too much either way though.
◕‿◕

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
:poop thread
🍆🍆