Author Topic: Medal of Honor: Warfighter  (Read 10545 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pilonv1

  • I love you just the way I am
  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #60 on: October 25, 2012, 12:45:38 AM »
Game is getting roasted in reviews and its mostly deserved but what I think is really going on is reviewers sort of taking a stand (or getting on their soap boxes) on a genre they don't really like anymore.

I mean the reality is at this point 80% of the review in a military fps should be directed towards the mp side because that's why people buy these games. It's sort of silly to spend 90% of a review on a game like this on the campaign and very little on the mp which is not how the real world plays these games anymore. Reviewers don't represent the fps mp gaming public in that regard.

Even if the campaign sucks, that's not why people buy these games .

I wonder why they even bother with single player now in these games.
itm

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #61 on: October 25, 2012, 01:02:11 AM »
Game is getting roasted in reviews and its mostly deserved but what I think is really going on is reviewers sort of taking a stand (or getting on their soap boxes) on a genre they don't really like anymore.

I mean the reality is at this point 80% of the review in a military fps should be directed towards the mp side because that's why people buy these games. It's sort of silly to spend 90% of a review on a game like this on the campaign and very little on the mp which is not how the real world plays these games anymore. Reviewers don't represent the fps mp gaming public in that regard.

Even if the campaign sucks, that's not why people buy these games .

I wonder why they even bother with single player now in these games.

I think there is a more casual portion of the audience that does play and enjoy these sorts of campaigns. I think there is also a perceived value thing where some segment of the markets feels like they are getting more value for money with a true single player and multi-player component. And I think for some people its more fun to learn the mechanics of the game through a story interactive viewpoint rather than just bot matches mp style.

But yeah, ultimately I think a lot of companies are being shortsighted by not making truly mp only focused games.  Almost certainly Warfighter would have been reviewed better as a mp only title although they would have to drop the price to do that.

It feels sluggish, hip fire is not viable at all, the classes that run around with grenade launchers are fucking ridiculous (especially since the mp maps are mostly in confined spaces) interface isnt intuitive at all. Buddy spawn system sucks, although they dont let you spawn on your buddy when they are in "danger" you often find yourself being spawn fragged, ass long intervals between levels, shooting that doesnt feel satisfying, run button has a weird uneditable toggle like function, doesnt seem like playing tactically will get you far in this game.

Some other stuff too, but yeah hate this.

The major thing that is bugging me is how the mouse movement feels. Its weird. It's like there is some mouse smoothing going on or something. No matter how much I adjust the DPI of my mouse, it feels very hard to snap from target to target unlike Battlefield. I can't tell if its just in my mind and the recoil is what is actually throwing me off or what.

pilonv1

  • I love you just the way I am
  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #62 on: October 25, 2012, 01:04:20 AM »
Game is getting roasted in reviews and its mostly deserved but what I think is really going on is reviewers sort of taking a stand (or getting on their soap boxes) on a genre they don't really like anymore.

I mean the reality is at this point 80% of the review in a military fps should be directed towards the mp side because that's why people buy these games. It's sort of silly to spend 90% of a review on a game like this on the campaign and very little on the mp which is not how the real world plays these games anymore. Reviewers don't represent the fps mp gaming public in that regard.

Even if the campaign sucks, that's not why people buy these games .

I wonder why they even bother with single player now in these games.

I think there is a more casual portion of the audience that does play and enjoy these sorts of campaigns. I think there is also a perceived value thing where some segment of the markets feels like they are getting more value for money with a true single player and multi-player component. And I think for some people its more fun to learn the mechanics of the game through a story interactive viewpoint rather than just bot matches mp style.

But yeah, ultimately I think a lot of companies are being shortsighted by not making truly mp only focused games.

I just think it's wasted resources, they could probably save some money.

Quote
Almost certainly Warfighter would have been reviewed better as a mp only title although they would have to drop the price to do that.

This is probably more of the case, no one has the balls to charge full price for a console multiplayer only FPS title.
itm

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #63 on: October 25, 2012, 01:04:30 AM »
No you are right, mouse moving is shit, that and the animations are what makes it feel sluggish to me.

drew

  • sy
  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #64 on: October 25, 2012, 01:14:58 AM »
there is what must be just short of an hour of car chase segments in this fucking campaign.  at least the second one is a little bit more fun, although it's at least ten minutes longer, too.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2012, 03:39:31 AM by drew »

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #65 on: October 26, 2012, 06:20:23 PM »
To be fair I haven't run into any real bad glitches but




 :lol









Sho Nuff

  • o/~ TOUCH ME AND I'LL BREAK YOUR FACE o/~
  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #66 on: October 26, 2012, 07:57:38 PM »
Loving these movies

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #67 on: October 27, 2012, 09:58:36 AM »
I love all the butthurt in the gb quicklook comments. WHY IS PATRICK SO DOWN ON THIS GAME HE HAS A BAD ATTITUDE SO DOES BRAD AT LEAST RYAN KINDA LIKES IT BLAH BLAH.

SOMETIMES A BAD GAME IS BAD!
o_0

SantaC

  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #68 on: October 27, 2012, 02:44:37 PM »
I guess Frostbite 2 really isn't an engine EA can have all their teams using.

BF3 SP had major issues. NFS: The Run game me trouble too. They probably should have stuck to Unreal Engine 3.

Frostbite 2 is developed for PC and does not scale as well on this generation of consoles. BF3 looks fantastic on a buffed PC.

FatalT

  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #69 on: October 27, 2012, 06:20:04 PM »
This game sucks. I rented it yesterday and returned it yesterday.

Rahxephon91

  • Senior Member
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter
« Reply #70 on: May 16, 2013, 12:36:34 AM »
Why is this game so ugly on consoles? Battlefield 3 looks pretty damn good in sp and runs fin in mp. Not this game though. I feel like it probably looks worse than the last one, but I don't remember the one well enough for a mind comparison.

Yeah, I've been playing this. It's.......well a CoD wanabe fps. It's not terrible per say.