Author Topic: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)  (Read 1838 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« on: April 09, 2012, 01:42:24 PM »
Facebook just bought it for ONE BILLION DOLLARS
« Last Edit: April 09, 2012, 01:50:43 PM by CajoleJuice »
AMC

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: Instagram > The New York Times
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2012, 01:44:01 PM »
Money laundering yo

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2012, 01:52:23 PM »
I've never used instagram, but I always see people using old, weathered filters from instagram. Can someone explain what it is?
IYKYK

Huff

  • stronger ties you have, more power you gain
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2012, 01:53:08 PM »
it lets you post pictures. revolutionary, really
dur

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2012, 01:53:47 PM »
I've never used instagram, but I always see people using old, weathered filters from instagram. Can someone explain what it is?
Meet Instagram

It’s a fast, beautiful and fun way to share your photos with friends and family.

Snap a picture, choose a filter to transform its look and feel, then post to Instagram. Share to Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr too – it's as easy as pie. It's photo sharing, reinvented.

Oh yeah, did we mention it’s free?

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2012, 01:54:52 PM »
Not bad.
IYKYK

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2012, 01:55:04 PM »
I've never used instagram, but I always see people using old, weathered filters from instagram. Can someone explain what it is?

Simple way to disguise the inherent ugliness of camera phones.  The downside is it makes you look like a twat.
obo

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2012, 01:55:48 PM »
I've seen people use the filters for fucking twitter screen caps. TWITTER SCREEN CAPS.
IYKYK

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2012, 01:56:38 PM »
I should have bought stock after Borys' post  :'(

guess I'll buy stock in Sony instead
010

MyNameIsMethodis

  • QUIT
  • Ebola Carrier
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2012, 02:01:04 PM »
Instagram has some awesome focus effects though that make it worth using ify ou're lookign for depth of field on the go.



like that
USA

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2012, 02:05:13 PM »
Using novelty filters... great.

How about people learn to make photos instead.

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2012, 02:09:07 PM »
Using novelty filters... great.

How about people learn to make photos instead.
people (including me most of the time) rather just use their shitty camera phones
AMC

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #12 on: April 09, 2012, 02:09:38 PM »
instaSHAM ha ha ha
o_0

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2012, 02:10:40 PM »
Instagram has some awesome focus effects though that make it worth using ify ou're lookign for depth of field on the go.

(Image removed from quote.)

like that

Nope.
___

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #14 on: April 09, 2012, 02:19:25 PM »
Using novelty filters... great.

How about people learn to make photos instead.
people (including me most of the time) rather just use their shitty camera phones

You can make great pics with your phone camera. Ask BluTsunami to post some...

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2012, 02:22:05 PM »
Look you don't need a shitty filter to make a phone picture look ok, these are totally unedited.






CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2012, 02:23:41 PM »
so join instagram and use "no filter"
AMC

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #17 on: April 09, 2012, 02:25:04 PM »
Half the people I know on facebook use it for every shot they post.  Not a big surprise the makers made bank.  That thing took off like crazy.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #18 on: April 09, 2012, 02:44:11 PM »
Instgram cock pics :drool
©@©™

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #19 on: April 09, 2012, 03:10:37 PM »
From Instagram HQ:

dog

pilonv1

  • I love you just the way I am
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2012, 07:56:31 PM »
Looking forward to them trying to monetize it
itm

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2012, 08:25:10 PM »
Look you don't need a shitty filter to make a phone picture look ok, these are totally unedited.

(Image removed from quote.)

Oh yeah? Well take a look at what my shitty 3GS can do with a couple of clicks:



Lager annihilated.

Icon Borys.
Unzip

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #22 on: April 09, 2012, 08:38:51 PM »
Just get a DSLR you hipster plebes.

whiteACID

  • RAWR
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #23 on: April 09, 2012, 08:45:36 PM »
A DSLR is a pain in the ass to carry around with you. Camera phones are great for those unexpected moments, when you want to take a great shot. Instagram just makes it look nicer.
You guys will hate on anything
boo

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #24 on: April 09, 2012, 09:39:37 PM »
I'm guilty of applying filters to my photos at times but mainly for cameraphone pics here and there. As Cajole stated its good for masking shitty optics and sensors. But with that said applying filters to everything can look a little goofy. I personally like to be more selective about it.

I'm way more sensitive to the processing when I shoot photos that I may actually end up printing which usually comes from a DSLR though. If the camera and lens is good enough for print I generally like to retain the feel of the scene instead of imposing filters on it.

I think the community aspect of instagram is way more interesting than the filters though. Sites like Flickr are not tailored for mobile uploading, viewing, and commenting at all.
:9

Skidmark

  • Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #25 on: April 09, 2012, 10:05:14 PM »
There is a girl on my facebook who uses those instagram effects especially the soft focus and the fake depth of field, I can't wait till the next time I see her to tell her in person how much she sucks.

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #26 on: April 09, 2012, 10:46:59 PM »
I think the community aspect of instagram is way more interesting than the filters though. Sites like Flickr are not tailored for mobile uploading, viewing, and commenting at all.

This is very true. I was surprised the other day by how much my family was into the social aspect of it. They appreciated how easy it was to use a dedicated photo app without the clutter of FB and real-timeness of Twitter. Not to mention how it fools them into thinking they're pros. 70% of their photo posting and commenting activities takes place inside the app.
Unzip

Flannel Boy

  • classic millennial sex pickle
  • Icon
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #27 on: April 09, 2012, 11:44:58 PM »
Flickr has Imogen. Imogen doesn't need cheap filters.

Flickr wins.

MyNameIsMethodis

  • QUIT
  • Ebola Carrier
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #28 on: April 09, 2012, 11:45:33 PM »


filters work ok in some situations  :-\
USA

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #29 on: April 09, 2012, 11:55:18 PM »
The borders are fukken ghey, though. Everyone should remove them.
Unzip

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #30 on: April 10, 2012, 03:40:45 AM »
Shaka werent you replacing ghey with fab?

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #31 on: April 10, 2012, 04:10:30 AM »
You're thinking of "fag". Ghey is still pretty much ghey.
Unzip

T-Short

  • hooker strangler
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #32 on: April 10, 2012, 04:19:09 AM »
Hey, some of the borders are a-ok.
地平線

T-Short

  • hooker strangler
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #33 on: April 10, 2012, 06:10:33 AM »
I quite like this border, it's the only one I use though. Do you hate, Shaka?  :-*

地平線

Reb

  • Hon. Mr. Tired
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #34 on: April 10, 2012, 06:13:50 AM »
Fruitiest border ever.
brb

T-Short

  • hooker strangler
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #35 on: April 10, 2012, 06:15:50 AM »
 :elephant
地平線

T-Short

  • hooker strangler
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #36 on: April 10, 2012, 07:23:26 AM »
Using novelty filters... great.

How about people learn to make photos instead.

Hehe. Well. Using instagram can be a way to learn how to make photos. The filters aren't really relevant, a good photo is still a photo even if it's taken with an iPhone/point&shoot/DSLR or whatever. The good thing about instagram is of course the "insta" part of it, that you can snap a pic and share it really easily. Of course the "capturing a moment" and "right place at the right time" aspects are only part of what makes good photography, but if you have a good eye it shouldn't matter what the medium or equipment is. Of course you get mongos spamming fucking post-it notes with motivational quotes on them, but it's not hard to build a good feed by looking through your friends' likes and following people with a good eye.
地平線

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #37 on: April 10, 2012, 02:28:38 PM »
I quite like this border, it's the only one I use though. Do you hate, Shaka?  :-*

Ok, perfectly square and plain borders get a pass. I haven't sampled most of them, but I dislike the curved corners, and hate – just hate – the ones with fake time stamps. So overused and tacky.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2012, 02:30:15 PM by Shaka Khan »
Unzip

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: Instagram > The New York Times (Borys was right)
« Reply #38 on: April 10, 2012, 02:42:18 PM »
Thing about borders (the good non overly flourishing ones) is that its a great way to separate the photograph from the UI so you appreciate it even more. Like looking through a window. I should try using them more often for my landscapes. I also really like Hyoushi's, the style and the off white.
:9